Financhill
Buy
82

CEEIF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$23.1300
Seasonality move :
15.72%
Day range:
$23.1300 - $23.1300
52-week range:
$19.0600 - $24.0800
Dividend yield:
1.11%
P/E ratio:
12.92x
P/S ratio:
1.33x
P/B ratio:
2.99x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
7
1-year change:
21.35%
Market cap:
$266.9M
Revenue:
$182.9M
EPS (TTM):
$1.79

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
CEEIF
Ceres, Inc. (Japan)
-- -- -- -- --
KUBTY
Kubota Corp.
$4.9B -- -1.16% -- $70.94
LAWR
Robot Consulting
-- -- -- -- --
LGPS
LogProstyle
-- -- -- -- --
RYOJ
rYojbaba Co., Ltd.
-- -- -- -- --
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
CEEIF
Ceres, Inc. (Japan)
$23.1300 -- $266.9M 12.92x $0.38 1.11% 1.33x
KUBTY
Kubota Corp.
$72.72 $70.94 $16.5B 14.18x $0.83 0% 0.84x
LAWR
Robot Consulting
-- -- -- -- $0.00 0% --
LGPS
LogProstyle
-- -- -- -- $0.00 0% --
RYOJ
rYojbaba Co., Ltd.
$4.03 -- $45.3M 4,477.78x $0.00 0% 560.45x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
CEEIF
Ceres, Inc. (Japan)
41.98% -1.925 23.81% 0.94x
KUBTY
Kubota Corp.
46.67% 0.469 92.86% 1.09x
LAWR
Robot Consulting
-- 0.000 -- --
LGPS
LogProstyle
-- 0.000 -- --
RYOJ
rYojbaba Co., Ltd.
-- 0.000 -- --
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
CEEIF
Ceres, Inc. (Japan)
$19.9M $3.3M 14.88% 25.93% 7.51% $887.7K
KUBTY
Kubota Corp.
$1.5B $490M 4.29% 7.8% 9.64% $229.6M
LAWR
Robot Consulting
-- -- -- -- -- --
LGPS
LogProstyle
-- -- -- -- -- --
RYOJ
rYojbaba Co., Ltd.
-- -- -- -- -- --

Ceres, Inc. (Japan) vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns CEEIF or KUBTY?

    Kubota Corp. has a net margin of 12.78% compared to Ceres, Inc. (Japan)'s net margin of 6.5%. Ceres, Inc. (Japan)'s return on equity of 25.93% beat Kubota Corp.'s return on equity of 7.8%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CEEIF
    Ceres, Inc. (Japan)
    45.84% $0.49 $158.7M
    KUBTY
    Kubota Corp.
    29.36% $1.48 $32.9B
  • What do Analysts Say About CEEIF or KUBTY?

    Ceres, Inc. (Japan) has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kubota Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $70.94 which suggests that it could fall by -2.44%. Given that Kubota Corp. has higher upside potential than Ceres, Inc. (Japan), analysts believe Kubota Corp. is more attractive than Ceres, Inc. (Japan).

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CEEIF
    Ceres, Inc. (Japan)
    0 0 0
    KUBTY
    Kubota Corp.
    0 1 0
  • Is CEEIF or KUBTY More Risky?

    Ceres, Inc. (Japan) has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kubota Corp. has a beta of 0.934, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.632%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CEEIF or KUBTY?

    Ceres, Inc. (Japan) has a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.11%. Kubota Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Ceres, Inc. (Japan) pays 46.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Kubota Corp. pays out 19.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CEEIF or KUBTY?

    Ceres, Inc. (Japan) quarterly revenues are $43.5M, which are smaller than Kubota Corp. quarterly revenues of $5.1B. Ceres, Inc. (Japan)'s net income of $5.6M is lower than Kubota Corp.'s net income of $330.4M. Notably, Ceres, Inc. (Japan)'s price-to-earnings ratio is 12.92x while Kubota Corp.'s PE ratio is 14.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ceres, Inc. (Japan) is 1.33x versus 0.84x for Kubota Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CEEIF
    Ceres, Inc. (Japan)
    1.33x 12.92x $43.5M $5.6M
    KUBTY
    Kubota Corp.
    0.84x 14.18x $5.1B $330.4M
  • Which has Higher Returns CEEIF or LAWR?

    Robot Consulting has a net margin of 12.78% compared to Ceres, Inc. (Japan)'s net margin of --. Ceres, Inc. (Japan)'s return on equity of 25.93% beat Robot Consulting's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CEEIF
    Ceres, Inc. (Japan)
    45.84% $0.49 $158.7M
    LAWR
    Robot Consulting
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About CEEIF or LAWR?

    Ceres, Inc. (Japan) has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Robot Consulting has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Ceres, Inc. (Japan) has higher upside potential than Robot Consulting, analysts believe Ceres, Inc. (Japan) is more attractive than Robot Consulting.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CEEIF
    Ceres, Inc. (Japan)
    0 0 0
    LAWR
    Robot Consulting
    0 0 0
  • Is CEEIF or LAWR More Risky?

    Ceres, Inc. (Japan) has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Robot Consulting has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CEEIF or LAWR?

    Ceres, Inc. (Japan) has a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.11%. Robot Consulting offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ceres, Inc. (Japan) pays 46.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Robot Consulting pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ceres, Inc. (Japan)'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CEEIF or LAWR?

    Ceres, Inc. (Japan) quarterly revenues are $43.5M, which are larger than Robot Consulting quarterly revenues of --. Ceres, Inc. (Japan)'s net income of $5.6M is higher than Robot Consulting's net income of --. Notably, Ceres, Inc. (Japan)'s price-to-earnings ratio is 12.92x while Robot Consulting's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ceres, Inc. (Japan) is 1.33x versus -- for Robot Consulting. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CEEIF
    Ceres, Inc. (Japan)
    1.33x 12.92x $43.5M $5.6M
    LAWR
    Robot Consulting
    -- -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns CEEIF or LGPS?

    LogProstyle has a net margin of 12.78% compared to Ceres, Inc. (Japan)'s net margin of --. Ceres, Inc. (Japan)'s return on equity of 25.93% beat LogProstyle's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CEEIF
    Ceres, Inc. (Japan)
    45.84% $0.49 $158.7M
    LGPS
    LogProstyle
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About CEEIF or LGPS?

    Ceres, Inc. (Japan) has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand LogProstyle has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Ceres, Inc. (Japan) has higher upside potential than LogProstyle, analysts believe Ceres, Inc. (Japan) is more attractive than LogProstyle.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CEEIF
    Ceres, Inc. (Japan)
    0 0 0
    LGPS
    LogProstyle
    0 0 0
  • Is CEEIF or LGPS More Risky?

    Ceres, Inc. (Japan) has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LogProstyle has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CEEIF or LGPS?

    Ceres, Inc. (Japan) has a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.11%. LogProstyle offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ceres, Inc. (Japan) pays 46.53% of its earnings as a dividend. LogProstyle pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ceres, Inc. (Japan)'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CEEIF or LGPS?

    Ceres, Inc. (Japan) quarterly revenues are $43.5M, which are larger than LogProstyle quarterly revenues of --. Ceres, Inc. (Japan)'s net income of $5.6M is higher than LogProstyle's net income of --. Notably, Ceres, Inc. (Japan)'s price-to-earnings ratio is 12.92x while LogProstyle's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ceres, Inc. (Japan) is 1.33x versus -- for LogProstyle. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CEEIF
    Ceres, Inc. (Japan)
    1.33x 12.92x $43.5M $5.6M
    LGPS
    LogProstyle
    -- -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns CEEIF or RYOJ?

    rYojbaba Co., Ltd. has a net margin of 12.78% compared to Ceres, Inc. (Japan)'s net margin of --. Ceres, Inc. (Japan)'s return on equity of 25.93% beat rYojbaba Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CEEIF
    Ceres, Inc. (Japan)
    45.84% $0.49 $158.7M
    RYOJ
    rYojbaba Co., Ltd.
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About CEEIF or RYOJ?

    Ceres, Inc. (Japan) has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand rYojbaba Co., Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Ceres, Inc. (Japan) has higher upside potential than rYojbaba Co., Ltd., analysts believe Ceres, Inc. (Japan) is more attractive than rYojbaba Co., Ltd..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CEEIF
    Ceres, Inc. (Japan)
    0 0 0
    RYOJ
    rYojbaba Co., Ltd.
    0 0 0
  • Is CEEIF or RYOJ More Risky?

    Ceres, Inc. (Japan) has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison rYojbaba Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CEEIF or RYOJ?

    Ceres, Inc. (Japan) has a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.11%. rYojbaba Co., Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ceres, Inc. (Japan) pays 46.53% of its earnings as a dividend. rYojbaba Co., Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ceres, Inc. (Japan)'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CEEIF or RYOJ?

    Ceres, Inc. (Japan) quarterly revenues are $43.5M, which are larger than rYojbaba Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Ceres, Inc. (Japan)'s net income of $5.6M is higher than rYojbaba Co., Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Ceres, Inc. (Japan)'s price-to-earnings ratio is 12.92x while rYojbaba Co., Ltd.'s PE ratio is 4,477.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ceres, Inc. (Japan) is 1.33x versus 560.45x for rYojbaba Co., Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CEEIF
    Ceres, Inc. (Japan)
    1.33x 12.92x $43.5M $5.6M
    RYOJ
    rYojbaba Co., Ltd.
    560.45x 4,477.78x -- --

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Why Did SoFi Stock Drop?
Why Did SoFi Stock Drop?

Fintech platform SoFi (NASDAQ:SOFI) has stumbled in recent days, selling…

Will Robinhood Win AI Investing?
Will Robinhood Win AI Investing?

Recently, online brokerage Robinhood (NASDAQ:HOOD) has been focused on introducing…

Is Amazon an AI Stock?
Is Amazon an AI Stock?

With the market starting to look skittish on pure-play AI…

Stock Ideas

Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 62x

Buy
56
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x

Buy
81
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x

Alerts

Sell
50
TGL alert for Dec 8

Treasure Global, Inc. [TGL] is up 33.49% over the past day.

Buy
56
SMX alert for Dec 8

SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 42.66% over the past day.

Buy
62
PRAX alert for Dec 8

Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. [PRAX] is up 10.18% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock