CBUMY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Gulf Resources has a net margin of 2.09% compared to China National Building Material's net margin of -155.77%. China National Building Material's return on equity of 1.51% beat Gulf Resources's return on equity of -49.67%.

China National Building Material has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Gulf Resources has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1945.13%. Given that Gulf Resources has higher upside potential than China National Building Material, analysts believe Gulf Resources is more attractive than China National Building Material.

China National Building Material has a beta of 0.541, which suggesting that the stock is 45.894% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gulf Resources has a beta of 0.380, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.975%.

China National Building Material has a quarterly dividend of $1.62 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.25%. Gulf Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China National Building Material pays 66.57% of its earnings as a dividend. Gulf Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. China National Building Material's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

China National Building Material quarterly revenues are $7.1B, which are larger than Gulf Resources quarterly revenues of $2.2M. China National Building Material's net income of $148.5M is higher than Gulf Resources's net income of -$3.5M. Notably, China National Building Material's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.16x while Gulf Resources's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China National Building Material is 0.17x versus 0.59x for Gulf Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

IT Tech Packaging has a net margin of 2.09% compared to China National Building Material's net margin of -7.87%. China National Building Material's return on equity of 1.51% beat IT Tech Packaging's return on equity of -5.89%.

China National Building Material has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand IT Tech Packaging has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China National Building Material has higher upside potential than IT Tech Packaging, analysts believe China National Building Material is more attractive than IT Tech Packaging.

China National Building Material has a beta of 0.541, which suggesting that the stock is 45.894% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison IT Tech Packaging has a beta of -0.914, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 191.376%.

China National Building Material has a quarterly dividend of $1.62 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.25%. IT Tech Packaging offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China National Building Material pays 66.57% of its earnings as a dividend. IT Tech Packaging pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. China National Building Material's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

China National Building Material quarterly revenues are $7.1B, which are larger than IT Tech Packaging quarterly revenues of $25.1M. China National Building Material's net income of $148.5M is higher than IT Tech Packaging's net income of -$2M. Notably, China National Building Material's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.16x while IT Tech Packaging's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China National Building Material is 0.17x versus 0.03x for IT Tech Packaging. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ReTo Eco-Solutions has a net margin of 2.09% compared to China National Building Material's net margin of --. China National Building Material's return on equity of 1.51% beat ReTo Eco-Solutions's return on equity of -85.96%.

China National Building Material has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ReTo Eco-Solutions has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China National Building Material has higher upside potential than ReTo Eco-Solutions, analysts believe China National Building Material is more attractive than ReTo Eco-Solutions.

China National Building Material has a beta of 0.541, which suggesting that the stock is 45.894% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ReTo Eco-Solutions has a beta of 1.362, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.215%.

China National Building Material has a quarterly dividend of $1.62 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.25%. ReTo Eco-Solutions offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China National Building Material pays 66.57% of its earnings as a dividend. ReTo Eco-Solutions pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. China National Building Material's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

China National Building Material quarterly revenues are $7.1B, which are larger than ReTo Eco-Solutions quarterly revenues of --. China National Building Material's net income of $148.5M is higher than ReTo Eco-Solutions's net income of --. Notably, China National Building Material's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.16x while ReTo Eco-Solutions's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China National Building Material is 0.17x versus 0.18x for ReTo Eco-Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Origin Agritech has a net margin of 2.09% compared to China National Building Material's net margin of --. China National Building Material's return on equity of 1.51% beat Origin Agritech's return on equity of --.

China National Building Material has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Origin Agritech has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China National Building Material has higher upside potential than Origin Agritech, analysts believe China National Building Material is more attractive than Origin Agritech.

China National Building Material has a beta of 0.541, which suggesting that the stock is 45.894% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Origin Agritech has a beta of 1.515, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.517%.

China National Building Material has a quarterly dividend of $1.62 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.25%. Origin Agritech offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China National Building Material pays 66.57% of its earnings as a dividend. Origin Agritech pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. China National Building Material's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

China National Building Material quarterly revenues are $7.1B, which are larger than Origin Agritech quarterly revenues of --. China National Building Material's net income of $148.5M is higher than Origin Agritech's net income of --. Notably, China National Building Material's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.16x while Origin Agritech's PE ratio is 4.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China National Building Material is 0.17x versus 0.81x for Origin Agritech. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.