Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Sell Broadcom Stock?
In Q3, legendary macro investor Stan Druckenmiller sold his entire…
Sell
32
CBUMY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$30.01
Seasonality move
:
5.33%
Day range:
$30.01 - $30.01
52-week range:
$21.44 - $49.50
Dividend yield:
3.61%
P/E ratio:
6.22x
P/S ratio:
0.19x
P/B ratio:
0.25x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
42
1-year change:
28.8%
Market cap:
$4.6B
Revenue:
$25.3B
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CBUMY
China National Building Material Co., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BON
Bon Natural Life Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CNEY
CN Energy Group, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ITP
IT Tech Packaging, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
RETO
ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SEED
Origin Agritech Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CBUMY
China National Building Material Co., Ltd.
|
$30.01 | -- | $4.6B | 6.22x | $1.08 | 3.61% | 0.19x |
|
BON
Bon Natural Life Ltd.
|
$1.50 | -- | $5.6M | 0.33x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.15x |
|
CNEY
CN Energy Group, Inc.
|
$0.56 | -- | $1.7M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.06x |
|
ITP
IT Tech Packaging, Inc.
|
$0.23 | -- | $3.9M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.03x |
|
RETO
ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc.
|
$1.97 | -- | $5.1M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.24x |
|
SEED
Origin Agritech Ltd.
|
$1.18 | -- | $9M | 4.43x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.62x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CBUMY
China National Building Material Co., Ltd.
|
59.06% | -0.239 | -- | 0.63x |
|
BON
Bon Natural Life Ltd.
|
14.59% | 4.611 | 97.42% | 0.76x |
|
CNEY
CN Energy Group, Inc.
|
5.91% | 1.265 | 191.75% | 2.16x |
|
ITP
IT Tech Packaging, Inc.
|
6.28% | -4.025 | 207.9% | 0.60x |
|
RETO
ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc.
|
39.92% | 0.634 | 76.14% | 0.14x |
|
SEED
Origin Agritech Ltd.
|
-226.02% | 1.400 | 30.76% | 0.12x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CBUMY
China National Building Material Co., Ltd.
|
$952.1M | $185.9M | 0.76% | 1.51% | 4.46% | -- |
|
BON
Bon Natural Life Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 5.99% | 6.8% | -- | -- |
|
CNEY
CN Energy Group, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -3.93% | -4.2% | -- | -- |
|
ITP
IT Tech Packaging, Inc.
|
$2M | -$996.3K | -6.61% | -7.04% | -3.89% | $1.5M |
|
RETO
ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -32.57% | -85.96% | -- | -- |
|
SEED
Origin Agritech Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
China National Building Material Co., Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CBUMY or BON?
Bon Natural Life Ltd. has a net margin of -1.41% compared to China National Building Material Co., Ltd.'s net margin of --. China National Building Material Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 1.51% beat Bon Natural Life Ltd.'s return on equity of 6.8%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CBUMYChina National Building Material Co., Ltd.18.91% -$0.47 $49.5B BONBon Natural Life Ltd.-- -- $43.6M -
What do Analysts Say About CBUMY or BON?
China National Building Material Co., Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Bon Natural Life Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 166566.67%. Given that Bon Natural Life Ltd. has higher upside potential than China National Building Material Co., Ltd., analysts believe Bon Natural Life Ltd. is more attractive than China National Building Material Co., Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CBUMYChina National Building Material Co., Ltd.0 0 0 BONBon Natural Life Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is CBUMY or BON More Risky?
China National Building Material Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.232, which suggesting that the stock is 76.815% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bon Natural Life Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CBUMY or BON?
China National Building Material Co., Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $1.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.61%. Bon Natural Life Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China National Building Material Co., Ltd. pays 46.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Bon Natural Life Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. China National Building Material Co., Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CBUMY or BON?
China National Building Material Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues are $5B, which are larger than Bon Natural Life Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. China National Building Material Co., Ltd.'s net income of -$71M is higher than Bon Natural Life Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, China National Building Material Co., Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 6.22x while Bon Natural Life Ltd.'s PE ratio is 0.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China National Building Material Co., Ltd. is 0.19x versus 0.15x for Bon Natural Life Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CBUMYChina National Building Material Co., Ltd.0.19x 6.22x $5B -$71M BONBon Natural Life Ltd.0.15x 0.33x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CBUMY or CNEY?
CN Energy Group, Inc. has a net margin of -1.41% compared to China National Building Material Co., Ltd.'s net margin of --. China National Building Material Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 1.51% beat CN Energy Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -4.2%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CBUMYChina National Building Material Co., Ltd.18.91% -$0.47 $49.5B CNEYCN Energy Group, Inc.-- -- $109.3M -
What do Analysts Say About CBUMY or CNEY?
China National Building Material Co., Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CN Energy Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 160585.75%. Given that CN Energy Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than China National Building Material Co., Ltd., analysts believe CN Energy Group, Inc. is more attractive than China National Building Material Co., Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CBUMYChina National Building Material Co., Ltd.0 0 0 CNEYCN Energy Group, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is CBUMY or CNEY More Risky?
China National Building Material Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.232, which suggesting that the stock is 76.815% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CN Energy Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CBUMY or CNEY?
China National Building Material Co., Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $1.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.61%. CN Energy Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China National Building Material Co., Ltd. pays 46.03% of its earnings as a dividend. CN Energy Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. China National Building Material Co., Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CBUMY or CNEY?
China National Building Material Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues are $5B, which are larger than CN Energy Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. China National Building Material Co., Ltd.'s net income of -$71M is higher than CN Energy Group, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, China National Building Material Co., Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 6.22x while CN Energy Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China National Building Material Co., Ltd. is 0.19x versus 0.06x for CN Energy Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CBUMYChina National Building Material Co., Ltd.0.19x 6.22x $5B -$71M CNEYCN Energy Group, Inc.0.06x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CBUMY or ITP?
IT Tech Packaging, Inc. has a net margin of -1.41% compared to China National Building Material Co., Ltd.'s net margin of -5.66%. China National Building Material Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 1.51% beat IT Tech Packaging, Inc.'s return on equity of -7.04%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CBUMYChina National Building Material Co., Ltd.18.91% -$0.47 $49.5B ITPIT Tech Packaging, Inc.7.9% -$0.11 $162.2M -
What do Analysts Say About CBUMY or ITP?
China National Building Material Co., Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand IT Tech Packaging, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China National Building Material Co., Ltd. has higher upside potential than IT Tech Packaging, Inc., analysts believe China National Building Material Co., Ltd. is more attractive than IT Tech Packaging, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CBUMYChina National Building Material Co., Ltd.0 0 0 ITPIT Tech Packaging, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is CBUMY or ITP More Risky?
China National Building Material Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.232, which suggesting that the stock is 76.815% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison IT Tech Packaging, Inc. has a beta of -0.575, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 157.534%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CBUMY or ITP?
China National Building Material Co., Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $1.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.61%. IT Tech Packaging, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China National Building Material Co., Ltd. pays 46.03% of its earnings as a dividend. IT Tech Packaging, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. China National Building Material Co., Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CBUMY or ITP?
China National Building Material Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues are $5B, which are larger than IT Tech Packaging, Inc. quarterly revenues of $25.6M. China National Building Material Co., Ltd.'s net income of -$71M is lower than IT Tech Packaging, Inc.'s net income of -$1.4M. Notably, China National Building Material Co., Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 6.22x while IT Tech Packaging, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China National Building Material Co., Ltd. is 0.19x versus 0.03x for IT Tech Packaging, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CBUMYChina National Building Material Co., Ltd.0.19x 6.22x $5B -$71M ITPIT Tech Packaging, Inc.0.03x -- $25.6M -$1.4M
-
Which has Higher Returns CBUMY or RETO?
ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. has a net margin of -1.41% compared to China National Building Material Co., Ltd.'s net margin of --. China National Building Material Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 1.51% beat ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc.'s return on equity of -85.96%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CBUMYChina National Building Material Co., Ltd.18.91% -$0.47 $49.5B RETOReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc.-- -- $22.6M -
What do Analysts Say About CBUMY or RETO?
China National Building Material Co., Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China National Building Material Co., Ltd. has higher upside potential than ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc., analysts believe China National Building Material Co., Ltd. is more attractive than ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CBUMYChina National Building Material Co., Ltd.0 0 0 RETOReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is CBUMY or RETO More Risky?
China National Building Material Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.232, which suggesting that the stock is 76.815% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. has a beta of 1.523, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.329%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CBUMY or RETO?
China National Building Material Co., Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $1.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.61%. ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China National Building Material Co., Ltd. pays 46.03% of its earnings as a dividend. ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. China National Building Material Co., Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CBUMY or RETO?
China National Building Material Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues are $5B, which are larger than ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. China National Building Material Co., Ltd.'s net income of -$71M is higher than ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, China National Building Material Co., Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 6.22x while ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China National Building Material Co., Ltd. is 0.19x versus 0.24x for ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CBUMYChina National Building Material Co., Ltd.0.19x 6.22x $5B -$71M RETOReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc.0.24x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CBUMY or SEED?
Origin Agritech Ltd. has a net margin of -1.41% compared to China National Building Material Co., Ltd.'s net margin of --. China National Building Material Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 1.51% beat Origin Agritech Ltd.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CBUMYChina National Building Material Co., Ltd.18.91% -$0.47 $49.5B SEEDOrigin Agritech Ltd.-- -- -$5.7M -
What do Analysts Say About CBUMY or SEED?
China National Building Material Co., Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Origin Agritech Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China National Building Material Co., Ltd. has higher upside potential than Origin Agritech Ltd., analysts believe China National Building Material Co., Ltd. is more attractive than Origin Agritech Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CBUMYChina National Building Material Co., Ltd.0 0 0 SEEDOrigin Agritech Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is CBUMY or SEED More Risky?
China National Building Material Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.232, which suggesting that the stock is 76.815% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Origin Agritech Ltd. has a beta of 1.807, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 80.662%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CBUMY or SEED?
China National Building Material Co., Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $1.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.61%. Origin Agritech Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China National Building Material Co., Ltd. pays 46.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Origin Agritech Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. China National Building Material Co., Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CBUMY or SEED?
China National Building Material Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues are $5B, which are larger than Origin Agritech Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. China National Building Material Co., Ltd.'s net income of -$71M is higher than Origin Agritech Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, China National Building Material Co., Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 6.22x while Origin Agritech Ltd.'s PE ratio is 4.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China National Building Material Co., Ltd. is 0.19x versus 0.62x for Origin Agritech Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CBUMYChina National Building Material Co., Ltd.0.19x 6.22x $5B -$71M SEEDOrigin Agritech Ltd.0.62x 4.43x -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Why Is CoreWeave Stock Down So Much?
AI cloud computing business CoreWeave (NASDAQ:CRWV) has been through a…
Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Buy MercadoLibre Stock?
In Q3, billionaire Stan Druckenmiller bought about 4,620 shares of…
Stock Ideas
Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Sell
14
SMX alert for Dec 30
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 40.26% over the past day.
Buy
71
ZCSH alert for Dec 30
Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) [ZCSH] is down 4.56% over the past day.
Buy
69
GDXU alert for Dec 30
MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETN [GDXU] is up 3.19% over the past day.
