CNEY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

IT Tech Packaging, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to CN Energy Group, Inc.'s net margin of -5.66%. CN Energy Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -4.2% beat IT Tech Packaging, Inc.'s return on equity of -7.04%.

CN Energy Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 89009%. On the other hand IT Tech Packaging, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CN Energy Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than IT Tech Packaging, Inc., analysts believe CN Energy Group, Inc. is more attractive than IT Tech Packaging, Inc..

CN Energy Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison IT Tech Packaging, Inc. has a beta of -0.469, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 146.866%.

CN Energy Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. IT Tech Packaging, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CN Energy Group, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. IT Tech Packaging, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CN Energy Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than IT Tech Packaging, Inc. quarterly revenues of $25.6M. CN Energy Group, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than IT Tech Packaging, Inc.'s net income of -$1.4M. Notably, CN Energy Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 0.16x while IT Tech Packaging, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CN Energy Group, Inc. is 0.09x versus 0.03x for IT Tech Packaging, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CL Workshop Group Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to CN Energy Group, Inc.'s net margin of --. CN Energy Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -4.2% beat CL Workshop Group Ltd.'s return on equity of -70.23%.

CN Energy Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 89009%. On the other hand CL Workshop Group Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CN Energy Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than CL Workshop Group Ltd., analysts believe CN Energy Group, Inc. is more attractive than CL Workshop Group Ltd..

CN Energy Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CL Workshop Group Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

CN Energy Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CL Workshop Group Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CN Energy Group, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CL Workshop Group Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CN Energy Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than CL Workshop Group Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. CN Energy Group, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than CL Workshop Group Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, CN Energy Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 0.16x while CL Workshop Group Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CN Energy Group, Inc. is 0.09x versus 1.08x for CL Workshop Group Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to CN Energy Group, Inc.'s net margin of --. CN Energy Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -4.2% beat ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc.'s return on equity of -85.96%.

CN Energy Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 89009%. On the other hand ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CN Energy Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc., analysts believe CN Energy Group, Inc. is more attractive than ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc..

CN Energy Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. has a beta of 1.625, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.477%.

CN Energy Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CN Energy Group, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CN Energy Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. CN Energy Group, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, CN Energy Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 0.16x while ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CN Energy Group, Inc. is 0.09x versus 0.11x for ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Origin Agritech Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to CN Energy Group, Inc.'s net margin of --. CN Energy Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -4.2% beat Origin Agritech Ltd.'s return on equity of --.

CN Energy Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 89009%. On the other hand Origin Agritech Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CN Energy Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Origin Agritech Ltd., analysts believe CN Energy Group, Inc. is more attractive than Origin Agritech Ltd..

CN Energy Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Origin Agritech Ltd. has a beta of 1.773, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 77.269%.

CN Energy Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Origin Agritech Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CN Energy Group, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Origin Agritech Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CN Energy Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Origin Agritech Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. CN Energy Group, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than Origin Agritech Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, CN Energy Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 0.16x while Origin Agritech Ltd.'s PE ratio is 4.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CN Energy Group, Inc. is 0.09x versus 0.65x for Origin Agritech Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.