Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Sell Broadcom Stock?
In Q3, legendary macro investor Stan Druckenmiller sold his entire…
Sell
15
CNEY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$0.61
Seasonality move
:
-56.32%
Day range:
$0.55 - $0.62
52-week range:
$0.51 - $12.23
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
0.06x
P/B ratio:
0.07x
Volume:
129.3K
Avg. volume:
1.3M
1-year change:
-92.23%
Market cap:
$1.9M
Revenue:
$51M
EPS (TTM):
-$4.67
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CNEY
CN Energy Group, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BON
Bon Natural Life Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ITP
IT Tech Packaging, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NWGL
CL Workshop Group Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
RETO
ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SEED
Origin Agritech Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CNEY
CN Energy Group, Inc.
|
$0.61 | -- | $1.9M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.06x |
|
BON
Bon Natural Life Ltd.
|
$1.59 | -- | $6M | 0.33x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.16x |
|
ITP
IT Tech Packaging, Inc.
|
$0.22 | -- | $3.7M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.03x |
|
NWGL
CL Workshop Group Ltd.
|
$1.42 | -- | $23.5M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 1.32x |
|
RETO
ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc.
|
$1.91 | -- | $4.9M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.23x |
|
SEED
Origin Agritech Ltd.
|
$1.11 | -- | $8.5M | 4.43x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.58x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CNEY
CN Energy Group, Inc.
|
5.91% | 2.227 | 191.75% | 2.16x |
|
BON
Bon Natural Life Ltd.
|
14.59% | 4.611 | 97.42% | 0.76x |
|
ITP
IT Tech Packaging, Inc.
|
6.28% | 0.784 | 207.9% | 0.60x |
|
NWGL
CL Workshop Group Ltd.
|
42.17% | -0.480 | 46.01% | 0.47x |
|
RETO
ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc.
|
39.92% | 1.181 | 76.14% | 0.14x |
|
SEED
Origin Agritech Ltd.
|
-226.02% | 1.124 | 30.76% | 0.12x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CNEY
CN Energy Group, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -3.93% | -4.2% | -- | -- |
|
BON
Bon Natural Life Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 5.99% | 6.8% | -- | -- |
|
ITP
IT Tech Packaging, Inc.
|
$2M | -$996.3K | -6.61% | -7.04% | -3.89% | $1.5M |
|
NWGL
CL Workshop Group Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -31.27% | -70.23% | -- | -- |
|
RETO
ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -32.57% | -85.96% | -- | -- |
|
SEED
Origin Agritech Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
CN Energy Group, Inc. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CNEY or BON?
Bon Natural Life Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to CN Energy Group, Inc.'s net margin of --. CN Energy Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -4.2% beat Bon Natural Life Ltd.'s return on equity of 6.8%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CNEYCN Energy Group, Inc.-- -- $109.3M BONBon Natural Life Ltd.-- -- $43.6M -
What do Analysts Say About CNEY or BON?
CN Energy Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 146958.97%. On the other hand Bon Natural Life Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 157132.7%. Given that Bon Natural Life Ltd. has higher upside potential than CN Energy Group, Inc., analysts believe Bon Natural Life Ltd. is more attractive than CN Energy Group, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CNEYCN Energy Group, Inc.0 0 0 BONBon Natural Life Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is CNEY or BON More Risky?
CN Energy Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bon Natural Life Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CNEY or BON?
CN Energy Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Bon Natural Life Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CN Energy Group, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bon Natural Life Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CNEY or BON?
CN Energy Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Bon Natural Life Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. CN Energy Group, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than Bon Natural Life Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, CN Energy Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Bon Natural Life Ltd.'s PE ratio is 0.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CN Energy Group, Inc. is 0.06x versus 0.16x for Bon Natural Life Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CNEYCN Energy Group, Inc.0.06x -- -- -- BONBon Natural Life Ltd.0.16x 0.33x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CNEY or ITP?
IT Tech Packaging, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to CN Energy Group, Inc.'s net margin of -5.66%. CN Energy Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -4.2% beat IT Tech Packaging, Inc.'s return on equity of -7.04%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CNEYCN Energy Group, Inc.-- -- $109.3M ITPIT Tech Packaging, Inc.7.9% -$0.11 $162.2M -
What do Analysts Say About CNEY or ITP?
CN Energy Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 146958.97%. On the other hand IT Tech Packaging, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CN Energy Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than IT Tech Packaging, Inc., analysts believe CN Energy Group, Inc. is more attractive than IT Tech Packaging, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CNEYCN Energy Group, Inc.0 0 0 ITPIT Tech Packaging, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is CNEY or ITP More Risky?
CN Energy Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison IT Tech Packaging, Inc. has a beta of -0.550, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 155.002%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CNEY or ITP?
CN Energy Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. IT Tech Packaging, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CN Energy Group, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. IT Tech Packaging, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CNEY or ITP?
CN Energy Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than IT Tech Packaging, Inc. quarterly revenues of $25.6M. CN Energy Group, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than IT Tech Packaging, Inc.'s net income of -$1.4M. Notably, CN Energy Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while IT Tech Packaging, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CN Energy Group, Inc. is 0.06x versus 0.03x for IT Tech Packaging, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CNEYCN Energy Group, Inc.0.06x -- -- -- ITPIT Tech Packaging, Inc.0.03x -- $25.6M -$1.4M
-
Which has Higher Returns CNEY or NWGL?
CL Workshop Group Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to CN Energy Group, Inc.'s net margin of --. CN Energy Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -4.2% beat CL Workshop Group Ltd.'s return on equity of -70.23%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CNEYCN Energy Group, Inc.-- -- $109.3M NWGLCL Workshop Group Ltd.-- -- $30.5M -
What do Analysts Say About CNEY or NWGL?
CN Energy Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 146958.97%. On the other hand CL Workshop Group Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CN Energy Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than CL Workshop Group Ltd., analysts believe CN Energy Group, Inc. is more attractive than CL Workshop Group Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CNEYCN Energy Group, Inc.0 0 0 NWGLCL Workshop Group Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is CNEY or NWGL More Risky?
CN Energy Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CL Workshop Group Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CNEY or NWGL?
CN Energy Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CL Workshop Group Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CN Energy Group, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CL Workshop Group Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CNEY or NWGL?
CN Energy Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than CL Workshop Group Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. CN Energy Group, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than CL Workshop Group Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, CN Energy Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CL Workshop Group Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CN Energy Group, Inc. is 0.06x versus 1.32x for CL Workshop Group Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CNEYCN Energy Group, Inc.0.06x -- -- -- NWGLCL Workshop Group Ltd.1.32x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CNEY or RETO?
ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to CN Energy Group, Inc.'s net margin of --. CN Energy Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -4.2% beat ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc.'s return on equity of -85.96%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CNEYCN Energy Group, Inc.-- -- $109.3M RETOReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc.-- -- $22.6M -
What do Analysts Say About CNEY or RETO?
CN Energy Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 146958.97%. On the other hand ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CN Energy Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc., analysts believe CN Energy Group, Inc. is more attractive than ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CNEYCN Energy Group, Inc.0 0 0 RETOReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is CNEY or RETO More Risky?
CN Energy Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. has a beta of 1.547, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.701%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CNEY or RETO?
CN Energy Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CN Energy Group, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CNEY or RETO?
CN Energy Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. CN Energy Group, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, CN Energy Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CN Energy Group, Inc. is 0.06x versus 0.23x for ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CNEYCN Energy Group, Inc.0.06x -- -- -- RETOReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc.0.23x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CNEY or SEED?
Origin Agritech Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to CN Energy Group, Inc.'s net margin of --. CN Energy Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -4.2% beat Origin Agritech Ltd.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CNEYCN Energy Group, Inc.-- -- $109.3M SEEDOrigin Agritech Ltd.-- -- -$5.7M -
What do Analysts Say About CNEY or SEED?
CN Energy Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 146958.97%. On the other hand Origin Agritech Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CN Energy Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Origin Agritech Ltd., analysts believe CN Energy Group, Inc. is more attractive than Origin Agritech Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CNEYCN Energy Group, Inc.0 0 0 SEEDOrigin Agritech Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is CNEY or SEED More Risky?
CN Energy Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Origin Agritech Ltd. has a beta of 1.706, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.628%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CNEY or SEED?
CN Energy Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Origin Agritech Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CN Energy Group, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Origin Agritech Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CNEY or SEED?
CN Energy Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Origin Agritech Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. CN Energy Group, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than Origin Agritech Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, CN Energy Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Origin Agritech Ltd.'s PE ratio is 4.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CN Energy Group, Inc. is 0.06x versus 0.58x for Origin Agritech Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CNEYCN Energy Group, Inc.0.06x -- -- -- SEEDOrigin Agritech Ltd.0.58x 4.43x -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Why Is CoreWeave Stock Down So Much?
AI cloud computing business CoreWeave (NASDAQ:CRWV) has been through a…
Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Buy MercadoLibre Stock?
In Q3, billionaire Stan Druckenmiller bought about 4,620 shares of…
Stock Ideas
Buy
55
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.5T
P/E Ratio: 63x
Buy
53
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Sell
30
CORT alert for Jan 1
Corcept Therapeutics, Inc. [CORT] is down 50.44% over the past day.
Buy
75
AXSM alert for Jan 1
Axsome Therapeutics, Inc. [AXSM] is up 22.82% over the past day.
Buy
81
ZIJMY alert for Jan 1
Zijin Mining Group Co., Ltd. [ZIJMY] is up 1.86% over the past day.
