Are We Heading Toward a Recession?
Fears of a recession in 2025 grew at the end…
Buy
66
CNEY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$0.19
Seasonality move
:
9.37%
Day range:
$0.18 - $0.22
52-week range:
$0.11 - $1.60
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
0.03x
P/B ratio:
0.02x
Volume:
6.7M
Avg. volume:
21.7M
1-year change:
-75.86%
Market cap:
$2.4M
Revenue:
$51M
EPS (TTM):
-$4.67
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CNEY
CN Energy Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GURE
Gulf Resources
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ITP
IT Tech Packaging
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
RETO
ReTo Eco-Solutions
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SEED
Origin Agritech
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ZKIN
ZK International Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CNEY
CN Energy Group
|
$0.19 | -- | $2.4M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.03x |
|
GURE
Gulf Resources
|
$0.63 | -- | $8.4M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.88x |
|
ITP
IT Tech Packaging
|
$0.44 | -- | $4.4M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.06x |
|
RETO
ReTo Eco-Solutions
|
$3.22 | -- | $6.2M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.18x |
|
SEED
Origin Agritech
|
$1.12 | -- | $8M | 4.43x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.46x |
|
ZKIN
ZK International Group
|
$3.99 | -- | $20.6M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.18x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CNEY
CN Energy Group
|
5.91% | 0.993 | 191.75% | 2.16x |
|
GURE
Gulf Resources
|
-- | -0.272 | -- | 0.65x |
|
ITP
IT Tech Packaging
|
5.62% | -3.652 | 373.86% | 1.01x |
|
RETO
ReTo Eco-Solutions
|
39.92% | 5.815 | 76.14% | 0.14x |
|
SEED
Origin Agritech
|
-- | 3.725 | -- | 0.16x |
|
ZKIN
ZK International Group
|
47.74% | 0.744 | 133.61% | 0.83x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CNEY
CN Energy Group
|
-- | -- | -3.93% | -4.2% | -- | -- |
|
GURE
Gulf Resources
|
-$1.8M | -$2.8M | -49.67% | -49.67% | -204.04% | $518.7K |
|
ITP
IT Tech Packaging
|
$1.9M | -$1.5M | -5.5% | -5.89% | -5.81% | $1.2M |
|
RETO
ReTo Eco-Solutions
|
-- | -- | -32.57% | -85.96% | -- | -- |
|
SEED
Origin Agritech
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ZKIN
ZK International Group
|
-- | -- | -87.77% | -131.08% | -- | -- |
CN Energy Group vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CNEY or GURE?
Gulf Resources has a net margin of -- compared to CN Energy Group's net margin of -155.77%. CN Energy Group's return on equity of -4.2% beat Gulf Resources's return on equity of -49.67%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CNEYCN Energy Group-- -- $109.3M GUREGulf Resources-81.58% -$0.33 $166.5M -
What do Analysts Say About CNEY or GURE?
CN Energy Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 18562.54%. On the other hand Gulf Resources has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 2201.59%. Given that CN Energy Group has higher upside potential than Gulf Resources, analysts believe CN Energy Group is more attractive than Gulf Resources.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CNEYCN Energy Group0 0 0 GUREGulf Resources0 0 0 -
Is CNEY or GURE More Risky?
CN Energy Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gulf Resources has a beta of 0.281, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 71.896%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CNEY or GURE?
CN Energy Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Gulf Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CN Energy Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Gulf Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CNEY or GURE?
CN Energy Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Gulf Resources quarterly revenues of $2.2M. CN Energy Group's net income of -- is lower than Gulf Resources's net income of -$3.5M. Notably, CN Energy Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Gulf Resources's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CN Energy Group is 0.03x versus 0.88x for Gulf Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CNEYCN Energy Group0.03x -- -- -- GUREGulf Resources0.88x -- $2.2M -$3.5M
-
Which has Higher Returns CNEY or ITP?
IT Tech Packaging has a net margin of -- compared to CN Energy Group's net margin of -7.87%. CN Energy Group's return on equity of -4.2% beat IT Tech Packaging's return on equity of -5.89%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CNEYCN Energy Group-- -- $109.3M ITPIT Tech Packaging7.65% -$0.20 $174.1M -
What do Analysts Say About CNEY or ITP?
CN Energy Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 18562.54%. On the other hand IT Tech Packaging has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CN Energy Group has higher upside potential than IT Tech Packaging, analysts believe CN Energy Group is more attractive than IT Tech Packaging.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CNEYCN Energy Group0 0 0 ITPIT Tech Packaging0 0 0 -
Is CNEY or ITP More Risky?
CN Energy Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison IT Tech Packaging has a beta of -0.942, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 194.214%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CNEY or ITP?
CN Energy Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. IT Tech Packaging offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CN Energy Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. IT Tech Packaging pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CNEY or ITP?
CN Energy Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than IT Tech Packaging quarterly revenues of $25.1M. CN Energy Group's net income of -- is lower than IT Tech Packaging's net income of -$2M. Notably, CN Energy Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while IT Tech Packaging's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CN Energy Group is 0.03x versus 0.06x for IT Tech Packaging. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CNEYCN Energy Group0.03x -- -- -- ITPIT Tech Packaging0.06x -- $25.1M -$2M
-
Which has Higher Returns CNEY or RETO?
ReTo Eco-Solutions has a net margin of -- compared to CN Energy Group's net margin of --. CN Energy Group's return on equity of -4.2% beat ReTo Eco-Solutions's return on equity of -85.96%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CNEYCN Energy Group-- -- $109.3M RETOReTo Eco-Solutions-- -- $22.6M -
What do Analysts Say About CNEY or RETO?
CN Energy Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 18562.54%. On the other hand ReTo Eco-Solutions has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CN Energy Group has higher upside potential than ReTo Eco-Solutions, analysts believe CN Energy Group is more attractive than ReTo Eco-Solutions.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CNEYCN Energy Group0 0 0 RETOReTo Eco-Solutions0 0 0 -
Is CNEY or RETO More Risky?
CN Energy Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ReTo Eco-Solutions has a beta of 1.465, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.517%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CNEY or RETO?
CN Energy Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ReTo Eco-Solutions offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CN Energy Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ReTo Eco-Solutions pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CNEY or RETO?
CN Energy Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ReTo Eco-Solutions quarterly revenues of --. CN Energy Group's net income of -- is lower than ReTo Eco-Solutions's net income of --. Notably, CN Energy Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ReTo Eco-Solutions's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CN Energy Group is 0.03x versus 0.18x for ReTo Eco-Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CNEYCN Energy Group0.03x -- -- -- RETOReTo Eco-Solutions0.18x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CNEY or SEED?
Origin Agritech has a net margin of -- compared to CN Energy Group's net margin of --. CN Energy Group's return on equity of -4.2% beat Origin Agritech's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CNEYCN Energy Group-- -- $109.3M SEEDOrigin Agritech-- -- -$10.7M -
What do Analysts Say About CNEY or SEED?
CN Energy Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 18562.54%. On the other hand Origin Agritech has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CN Energy Group has higher upside potential than Origin Agritech, analysts believe CN Energy Group is more attractive than Origin Agritech.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CNEYCN Energy Group0 0 0 SEEDOrigin Agritech0 0 0 -
Is CNEY or SEED More Risky?
CN Energy Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Origin Agritech has a beta of 1.884, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.355%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CNEY or SEED?
CN Energy Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Origin Agritech offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CN Energy Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Origin Agritech pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CNEY or SEED?
CN Energy Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Origin Agritech quarterly revenues of --. CN Energy Group's net income of -- is lower than Origin Agritech's net income of --. Notably, CN Energy Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Origin Agritech's PE ratio is 4.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CN Energy Group is 0.03x versus 0.46x for Origin Agritech. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CNEYCN Energy Group0.03x -- -- -- SEEDOrigin Agritech0.46x 4.43x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CNEY or ZKIN?
ZK International Group has a net margin of -- compared to CN Energy Group's net margin of --. CN Energy Group's return on equity of -4.2% beat ZK International Group's return on equity of -131.08%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CNEYCN Energy Group-- -- $109.3M ZKINZK International Group-- -- $54.5M -
What do Analysts Say About CNEY or ZKIN?
CN Energy Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 18562.54%. On the other hand ZK International Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CN Energy Group has higher upside potential than ZK International Group, analysts believe CN Energy Group is more attractive than ZK International Group.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CNEYCN Energy Group0 0 0 ZKINZK International Group0 0 0 -
Is CNEY or ZKIN More Risky?
CN Energy Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ZK International Group has a beta of 2.055, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 105.461%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CNEY or ZKIN?
CN Energy Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ZK International Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CN Energy Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ZK International Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CNEY or ZKIN?
CN Energy Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ZK International Group quarterly revenues of --. CN Energy Group's net income of -- is lower than ZK International Group's net income of --. Notably, CN Energy Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ZK International Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CN Energy Group is 0.03x versus 0.18x for ZK International Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CNEYCN Energy Group0.03x -- -- -- ZKINZK International Group0.18x -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
3 Recession-Proof ETFs to Invest in Now
The U.S. gross domestic product (GDP) contracted 0.3% during the…
Is Butterfly Network the Best Small-Cap Stock?
Brought to public trading by an SPAC merger in early…
Stock Ideas
Buy
68
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Sell
39
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3T
P/E Ratio: 33x
Buy
61
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.8T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Buy
60
RGC alert for May 10
Regencell Bioscience Holdings [RGC] is up 79.25% over the past day.
Buy
97
NGVC alert for May 10
Natural Grocers by Vitamin Cottage [NGVC] is up 30.26% over the past day.
Sell
38
ONTO alert for May 10
Onto Innovation [ONTO] is down 30.17% over the past day.
