BTLCY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Harworth Group Plc has a net margin of -- compared to The British Land Co. Plc's net margin of --. The British Land Co. Plc's return on equity of 6.09% beat Harworth Group Plc's return on equity of 8.75%.

The British Land Co. Plc has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Harworth Group Plc has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that The British Land Co. Plc has higher upside potential than Harworth Group Plc, analysts believe The British Land Co. Plc is more attractive than Harworth Group Plc.

The British Land Co. Plc has a beta of 1.203, which suggesting that the stock is 20.325% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Harworth Group Plc has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

The British Land Co. Plc has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.89%. Harworth Group Plc offers a yield of 1.06% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. The British Land Co. Plc pays 44.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Harworth Group Plc pays out 9.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

The British Land Co. Plc quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Harworth Group Plc quarterly revenues of --. The British Land Co. Plc's net income of -- is lower than Harworth Group Plc's net income of --. Notably, The British Land Co. Plc's price-to-earnings ratio is 0.30x while Harworth Group Plc's PE ratio is 10.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The British Land Co. Plc is 8.49x versus 2.82x for Harworth Group Plc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

IHS Holding Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to The British Land Co. Plc's net margin of 32.39%. The British Land Co. Plc's return on equity of 6.09% beat IHS Holding Ltd.'s return on equity of -10278.22%.

The British Land Co. Plc has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand IHS Holding Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $9.63 which suggests that it could grow by 35.37%. Given that IHS Holding Ltd. has higher upside potential than The British Land Co. Plc, analysts believe IHS Holding Ltd. is more attractive than The British Land Co. Plc.

The British Land Co. Plc has a beta of 1.203, which suggesting that the stock is 20.325% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison IHS Holding Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

The British Land Co. Plc has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.89%. IHS Holding Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. The British Land Co. Plc pays 44.56% of its earnings as a dividend. IHS Holding Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. The British Land Co. Plc's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

The British Land Co. Plc quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than IHS Holding Ltd. quarterly revenues of $455.1M. The British Land Co. Plc's net income of -- is lower than IHS Holding Ltd.'s net income of $147.4M. Notably, The British Land Co. Plc's price-to-earnings ratio is 0.30x while IHS Holding Ltd.'s PE ratio is 5.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The British Land Co. Plc is 8.49x versus 1.35x for IHS Holding Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Murano Global Investments Plc has a net margin of -- compared to The British Land Co. Plc's net margin of -587%. The British Land Co. Plc's return on equity of 6.09% beat Murano Global Investments Plc's return on equity of -10.41%.

The British Land Co. Plc has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Murano Global Investments Plc has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that The British Land Co. Plc has higher upside potential than Murano Global Investments Plc, analysts believe The British Land Co. Plc is more attractive than Murano Global Investments Plc.

The British Land Co. Plc has a beta of 1.203, which suggesting that the stock is 20.325% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Murano Global Investments Plc has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

The British Land Co. Plc has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.89%. Murano Global Investments Plc offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. The British Land Co. Plc pays 44.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Murano Global Investments Plc pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. The British Land Co. Plc's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

The British Land Co. Plc quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Murano Global Investments Plc quarterly revenues of $9.3M. The British Land Co. Plc's net income of -- is lower than Murano Global Investments Plc's net income of -$54.7M. Notably, The British Land Co. Plc's price-to-earnings ratio is 0.30x while Murano Global Investments Plc's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The British Land Co. Plc is 8.49x versus 11.42x for Murano Global Investments Plc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Savills Plc has a net margin of -- compared to The British Land Co. Plc's net margin of --. The British Land Co. Plc's return on equity of 6.09% beat Savills Plc's return on equity of 7.11%.

The British Land Co. Plc has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Savills Plc has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that The British Land Co. Plc has higher upside potential than Savills Plc, analysts believe The British Land Co. Plc is more attractive than Savills Plc.

The British Land Co. Plc has a beta of 1.203, which suggesting that the stock is 20.325% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Savills Plc has a beta of 0.323, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 67.7%.

The British Land Co. Plc has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.89%. Savills Plc offers a yield of 2.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. The British Land Co. Plc pays 44.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Savills Plc pays out 76.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

The British Land Co. Plc quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Savills Plc quarterly revenues of --. The British Land Co. Plc's net income of -- is lower than Savills Plc's net income of --. Notably, The British Land Co. Plc's price-to-earnings ratio is 0.30x while Savills Plc's PE ratio is 24.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The British Land Co. Plc is 8.49x versus 0.54x for Savills Plc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.