BNCM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Principal Financial Group, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Bounce Mobile Systems, Inc.'s net margin of 6.35%. Bounce Mobile Systems, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Principal Financial Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.92%.

Bounce Mobile Systems, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Principal Financial Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $90.00 which suggests that it could grow by 0.46%. Given that Principal Financial Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Bounce Mobile Systems, Inc., analysts believe Principal Financial Group, Inc. is more attractive than Bounce Mobile Systems, Inc..

Bounce Mobile Systems, Inc. has a beta of 1.190, which suggesting that the stock is 18.964% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Principal Financial Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.893, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.653%.

Bounce Mobile Systems, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Principal Financial Group, Inc. offers a yield of 3.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.79 per share. Bounce Mobile Systems, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Principal Financial Group, Inc. pays out 42.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Principal Financial Group, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Bounce Mobile Systems, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Principal Financial Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3.7B. Bounce Mobile Systems, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than Principal Financial Group, Inc.'s net income of $233.9M. Notably, Bounce Mobile Systems, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Principal Financial Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 13.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bounce Mobile Systems, Inc. is 0.68x versus 1.29x for Principal Financial Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

B. Riley Financial, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Bounce Mobile Systems, Inc.'s net margin of -14.33%. Bounce Mobile Systems, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat B. Riley Financial, Inc.'s return on equity of -37.71%.

Bounce Mobile Systems, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand B. Riley Financial, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 530.25%. Given that B. Riley Financial, Inc. has higher upside potential than Bounce Mobile Systems, Inc., analysts believe B. Riley Financial, Inc. is more attractive than Bounce Mobile Systems, Inc..

Bounce Mobile Systems, Inc. has a beta of 1.190, which suggesting that the stock is 18.964% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison B. Riley Financial, Inc. has a beta of 1.289, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.922%.

Bounce Mobile Systems, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. B. Riley Financial, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Bounce Mobile Systems, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. B. Riley Financial, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Bounce Mobile Systems, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than B. Riley Financial, Inc. quarterly revenues of $343M. Bounce Mobile Systems, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than B. Riley Financial, Inc.'s net income of -$49.2M. Notably, Bounce Mobile Systems, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while B. Riley Financial, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bounce Mobile Systems, Inc. is 0.68x versus 0.17x for B. Riley Financial, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SEI Investments Co. has a net margin of -- compared to Bounce Mobile Systems, Inc.'s net margin of 28.41%. Bounce Mobile Systems, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat SEI Investments Co.'s return on equity of 30.07%.

Bounce Mobile Systems, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SEI Investments Co. has an analysts' consensus of $97.33 which suggests that it could grow by 14.01%. Given that SEI Investments Co. has higher upside potential than Bounce Mobile Systems, Inc., analysts believe SEI Investments Co. is more attractive than Bounce Mobile Systems, Inc..

Bounce Mobile Systems, Inc. has a beta of 1.190, which suggesting that the stock is 18.964% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SEI Investments Co. has a beta of 0.983, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.68%.

Bounce Mobile Systems, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SEI Investments Co. offers a yield of 1.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share. Bounce Mobile Systems, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SEI Investments Co. pays out 21.53% of its earnings as a dividend. SEI Investments Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Bounce Mobile Systems, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than SEI Investments Co. quarterly revenues of $579.3M. Bounce Mobile Systems, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than SEI Investments Co.'s net income of $164.6M. Notably, Bounce Mobile Systems, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SEI Investments Co.'s PE ratio is 15.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bounce Mobile Systems, Inc. is 0.68x versus 4.88x for SEI Investments Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Bounce Mobile Systems, Inc.'s net margin of 35.48%. Bounce Mobile Systems, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 18.22%.

Bounce Mobile Systems, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $107.67 which suggests that it could grow by 2.85%. Given that T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Bounce Mobile Systems, Inc., analysts believe T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. is more attractive than Bounce Mobile Systems, Inc..

Bounce Mobile Systems, Inc. has a beta of 1.190, which suggesting that the stock is 18.964% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.529, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.879%.

Bounce Mobile Systems, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. offers a yield of 4.85% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.27 per share. Bounce Mobile Systems, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. pays out 54.18% of its earnings as a dividend. T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Bounce Mobile Systems, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Bounce Mobile Systems, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.'s net income of $671.8M. Notably, Bounce Mobile Systems, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 11.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bounce Mobile Systems, Inc. is 0.68x versus 3.22x for T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.