BLMH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

HealthWarehouse.com, Inc. has a net margin of -63.85% compared to Blum Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of -0.86%. Blum Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat HealthWarehouse.com, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Blum Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand HealthWarehouse.com, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 601.41%. Given that HealthWarehouse.com, Inc. has higher upside potential than Blum Holdings, Inc., analysts believe HealthWarehouse.com, Inc. is more attractive than Blum Holdings, Inc..

Blum Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.903, which suggesting that the stock is 90.32% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison HealthWarehouse.com, Inc. has a beta of 0.262, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.772%.

Blum Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. HealthWarehouse.com, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Blum Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. HealthWarehouse.com, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Blum Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $4.8M, which are smaller than HealthWarehouse.com, Inc. quarterly revenues of $8.4M. Blum Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$3.1M is lower than HealthWarehouse.com, Inc.'s net income of -$72K. Notably, Blum Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 1.18x while HealthWarehouse.com, Inc.'s PE ratio is 40.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Blum Holdings, Inc. is 0.67x versus 0.14x for HealthWarehouse.com, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

LadyBug Resource Group, Inc. has a net margin of -63.85% compared to Blum Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of --. Blum Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat LadyBug Resource Group, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Blum Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand LadyBug Resource Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Blum Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than LadyBug Resource Group, Inc., analysts believe Blum Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than LadyBug Resource Group, Inc..

Blum Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.903, which suggesting that the stock is 90.32% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LadyBug Resource Group, Inc. has a beta of -12.060, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1306.03%.

Blum Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. LadyBug Resource Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Blum Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. LadyBug Resource Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Blum Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $4.8M, which are larger than LadyBug Resource Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Blum Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$3.1M is higher than LadyBug Resource Group, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, Blum Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 1.18x while LadyBug Resource Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Blum Holdings, Inc. is 0.67x versus 0.16x for LadyBug Resource Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Polomar Health Services, Inc. has a net margin of -63.85% compared to Blum Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of -10480.65%. Blum Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Polomar Health Services, Inc.'s return on equity of -28.79%.

Blum Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Polomar Health Services, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Blum Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Polomar Health Services, Inc., analysts believe Blum Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Polomar Health Services, Inc..

Blum Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.903, which suggesting that the stock is 90.32% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Polomar Health Services, Inc. has a beta of -0.120, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 111.973%.

Blum Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Polomar Health Services, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Blum Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Polomar Health Services, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Blum Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $4.8M, which are larger than Polomar Health Services, Inc. quarterly revenues of $6.2K. Blum Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$3.1M is lower than Polomar Health Services, Inc.'s net income of -$649.8K. Notably, Blum Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 1.18x while Polomar Health Services, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Blum Holdings, Inc. is 0.67x versus 59.83x for Polomar Health Services, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.