BLMH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

HealthWarehouse.com, Inc. has a net margin of -63.85% compared to Blum Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of -0.86%. Blum Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat HealthWarehouse.com, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Blum Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand HealthWarehouse.com, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 441.67%. Given that HealthWarehouse.com, Inc. has higher upside potential than Blum Holdings, Inc., analysts believe HealthWarehouse.com, Inc. is more attractive than Blum Holdings, Inc..

Blum Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.903, which suggesting that the stock is 90.32% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison HealthWarehouse.com, Inc. has a beta of 0.262, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.772%.

Blum Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. HealthWarehouse.com, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Blum Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. HealthWarehouse.com, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Blum Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $4.8M, which are smaller than HealthWarehouse.com, Inc. quarterly revenues of $8.4M. Blum Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$3.1M is lower than HealthWarehouse.com, Inc.'s net income of -$72K. Notably, Blum Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 1.01x while HealthWarehouse.com, Inc.'s PE ratio is 52.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Blum Holdings, Inc. is 0.57x versus 0.18x for HealthWarehouse.com, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

LadyBug Resource Group, Inc. has a net margin of -63.85% compared to Blum Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of --. Blum Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat LadyBug Resource Group, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Blum Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand LadyBug Resource Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Blum Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than LadyBug Resource Group, Inc., analysts believe Blum Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than LadyBug Resource Group, Inc..

Blum Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.903, which suggesting that the stock is 90.32% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LadyBug Resource Group, Inc. has a beta of -12.060, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1306.03%.

Blum Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. LadyBug Resource Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Blum Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. LadyBug Resource Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Blum Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $4.8M, which are larger than LadyBug Resource Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Blum Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$3.1M is higher than LadyBug Resource Group, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, Blum Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 1.01x while LadyBug Resource Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Blum Holdings, Inc. is 0.57x versus 0.33x for LadyBug Resource Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Synergy CHC has a net margin of -63.85% compared to Blum Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of --. Blum Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Synergy CHC's return on equity of --.

Blum Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Synergy CHC has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Blum Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Synergy CHC, analysts believe Blum Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Synergy CHC.

Blum Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.903, which suggesting that the stock is 90.32% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Synergy CHC has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Blum Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Synergy CHC offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Blum Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Synergy CHC pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Blum Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $4.8M, which are larger than Synergy CHC quarterly revenues of --. Blum Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$3.1M is higher than Synergy CHC's net income of --. Notably, Blum Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 1.01x while Synergy CHC's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Blum Holdings, Inc. is 0.57x versus -- for Synergy CHC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.