Is Bloom Energy The Best Stock to Buy Now?
Shares of energy startup Bloom Energy (NYSE:BE) have advanced by…
Sell
35
BJWTY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$22.00
Seasonality move
:
0.48%
Day range:
$22.00 - $22.00
52-week range:
$22.00 - $22.00
Dividend yield:
6.7%
P/E ratio:
16.99x
P/S ratio:
0.97x
P/B ratio:
0.65x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
--
1-year change:
--
Market cap:
$3.2B
Revenue:
$3.4B
EPS (TTM):
$1.30
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BJWTY
Beijing Enterprises Water Group Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CGEGF
CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CRPJY
China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HGKGY
Power Assets Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SHUNF
Shunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SMTLF
GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BJWTY
Beijing Enterprises Water Group Ltd.
|
$22.00 | -- | $3.2B | 16.99x | $0.66 | 6.7% | 0.97x |
|
CGEGF
CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.
|
$0.24 | -- | $1B | 4.59x | $0.01 | 5.95% | 0.57x |
|
CRPJY
China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd.
|
$36.15 | -- | $12.5B | 7.39x | $0.68 | 5.54% | 0.91x |
|
HGKGY
Power Assets Holdings Ltd.
|
$6.89 | -- | $14.7B | 18.58x | $0.10 | 5.25% | 140.00x |
|
SHUNF
Shunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd.
|
$0.0021 | -- | $10.7M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.53x |
|
SMTLF
GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.
|
$0.09 | -- | $147.5M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.78x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BJWTY
Beijing Enterprises Water Group Ltd.
|
68.08% | 0.175 | -- | 0.94x |
|
CGEGF
CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.
|
79.58% | 0.187 | -- | 0.65x |
|
CRPJY
China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd.
|
63.41% | 0.208 | -- | 0.52x |
|
HGKGY
Power Assets Holdings Ltd.
|
2.8% | -0.263 | -- | 0.68x |
|
SHUNF
Shunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd.
|
217.69% | -14.998 | -- | 0.47x |
|
SMTLF
GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.
|
16.77% | -0.070 | -- | 2.80x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BJWTY
Beijing Enterprises Water Group Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 1.4% | 3.29% | -- | -- |
|
CGEGF
CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 3.2% | 14.22% | -- | -- |
|
CRPJY
China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 5.05% | 13.16% | -- | -- |
|
HGKGY
Power Assets Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 6.78% | 7% | -- | -- |
|
SHUNF
Shunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -19.25% | -- | -- | -- |
|
SMTLF
GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -7.98% | -8.62% | -- | -- |
Beijing Enterprises Water Group Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns BJWTY or CGEGF?
CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Beijing Enterprises Water Group Ltd.'s net margin of --. Beijing Enterprises Water Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 3.29% beat CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 14.22%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BJWTYBeijing Enterprises Water Group Ltd.-- -- $18B CGEGFCGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.-- -- $8.1B -
What do Analysts Say About BJWTY or CGEGF?
Beijing Enterprises Water Group Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Beijing Enterprises Water Group Ltd. has higher upside potential than CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd., analysts believe Beijing Enterprises Water Group Ltd. is more attractive than CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BJWTYBeijing Enterprises Water Group Ltd.0 0 0 CGEGFCGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is BJWTY or CGEGF More Risky?
Beijing Enterprises Water Group Ltd. has a beta of 0.452, which suggesting that the stock is 54.828% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd. has a beta of -2.348, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 334.77%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BJWTY or CGEGF?
Beijing Enterprises Water Group Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.66 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.7%. CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd. offers a yield of 5.95% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Beijing Enterprises Water Group Ltd. pays 85.76% of its earnings as a dividend. CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd. pays out 24.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BJWTY or CGEGF?
Beijing Enterprises Water Group Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Beijing Enterprises Water Group Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Beijing Enterprises Water Group Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.99x while CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.'s PE ratio is 4.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Beijing Enterprises Water Group Ltd. is 0.97x versus 0.57x for CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BJWTYBeijing Enterprises Water Group Ltd.0.97x 16.99x -- -- CGEGFCGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.0.57x 4.59x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns BJWTY or CRPJY?
China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Beijing Enterprises Water Group Ltd.'s net margin of --. Beijing Enterprises Water Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 3.29% beat China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 13.16%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BJWTYBeijing Enterprises Water Group Ltd.-- -- $18B CRPJYChina Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd.-- -- $40B -
What do Analysts Say About BJWTY or CRPJY?
Beijing Enterprises Water Group Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Beijing Enterprises Water Group Ltd. has higher upside potential than China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd., analysts believe Beijing Enterprises Water Group Ltd. is more attractive than China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BJWTYBeijing Enterprises Water Group Ltd.0 0 0 CRPJYChina Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is BJWTY or CRPJY More Risky?
Beijing Enterprises Water Group Ltd. has a beta of 0.452, which suggesting that the stock is 54.828% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.666, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.36%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BJWTY or CRPJY?
Beijing Enterprises Water Group Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.66 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.7%. China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd. offers a yield of 5.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share. Beijing Enterprises Water Group Ltd. pays 85.76% of its earnings as a dividend. China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd. pays out 36.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BJWTY or CRPJY?
Beijing Enterprises Water Group Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Beijing Enterprises Water Group Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Beijing Enterprises Water Group Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.99x while China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd.'s PE ratio is 7.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Beijing Enterprises Water Group Ltd. is 0.97x versus 0.91x for China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BJWTYBeijing Enterprises Water Group Ltd.0.97x 16.99x -- -- CRPJYChina Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd.0.91x 7.39x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns BJWTY or HGKGY?
Power Assets Holdings Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Beijing Enterprises Water Group Ltd.'s net margin of --. Beijing Enterprises Water Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 3.29% beat Power Assets Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 7%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BJWTYBeijing Enterprises Water Group Ltd.-- -- $18B HGKGYPower Assets Holdings Ltd.-- -- $11.5B -
What do Analysts Say About BJWTY or HGKGY?
Beijing Enterprises Water Group Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Power Assets Holdings Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Beijing Enterprises Water Group Ltd. has higher upside potential than Power Assets Holdings Ltd., analysts believe Beijing Enterprises Water Group Ltd. is more attractive than Power Assets Holdings Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BJWTYBeijing Enterprises Water Group Ltd.0 0 0 HGKGYPower Assets Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is BJWTY or HGKGY More Risky?
Beijing Enterprises Water Group Ltd. has a beta of 0.452, which suggesting that the stock is 54.828% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Power Assets Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.321, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 67.899%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BJWTY or HGKGY?
Beijing Enterprises Water Group Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.66 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.7%. Power Assets Holdings Ltd. offers a yield of 5.25% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Beijing Enterprises Water Group Ltd. pays 85.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Power Assets Holdings Ltd. pays out 86.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BJWTY or HGKGY?
Beijing Enterprises Water Group Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Power Assets Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Beijing Enterprises Water Group Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Power Assets Holdings Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Beijing Enterprises Water Group Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.99x while Power Assets Holdings Ltd.'s PE ratio is 18.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Beijing Enterprises Water Group Ltd. is 0.97x versus 140.00x for Power Assets Holdings Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BJWTYBeijing Enterprises Water Group Ltd.0.97x 16.99x -- -- HGKGYPower Assets Holdings Ltd.140.00x 18.58x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns BJWTY or SHUNF?
Shunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Beijing Enterprises Water Group Ltd.'s net margin of --. Beijing Enterprises Water Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 3.29% beat Shunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BJWTYBeijing Enterprises Water Group Ltd.-- -- $18B SHUNFShunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd.-- -- $214.4M -
What do Analysts Say About BJWTY or SHUNF?
Beijing Enterprises Water Group Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Shunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Beijing Enterprises Water Group Ltd. has higher upside potential than Shunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd., analysts believe Beijing Enterprises Water Group Ltd. is more attractive than Shunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BJWTYBeijing Enterprises Water Group Ltd.0 0 0 SHUNFShunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is BJWTY or SHUNF More Risky?
Beijing Enterprises Water Group Ltd. has a beta of 0.452, which suggesting that the stock is 54.828% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Shunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd. has a beta of 0.051, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 94.877%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BJWTY or SHUNF?
Beijing Enterprises Water Group Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.66 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.7%. Shunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Beijing Enterprises Water Group Ltd. pays 85.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Shunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Beijing Enterprises Water Group Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BJWTY or SHUNF?
Beijing Enterprises Water Group Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Shunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Beijing Enterprises Water Group Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Shunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Beijing Enterprises Water Group Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.99x while Shunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Beijing Enterprises Water Group Ltd. is 0.97x versus 0.53x for Shunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BJWTYBeijing Enterprises Water Group Ltd.0.97x 16.99x -- -- SHUNFShunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd.0.53x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns BJWTY or SMTLF?
GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Beijing Enterprises Water Group Ltd.'s net margin of --. Beijing Enterprises Water Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 3.29% beat GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -8.62%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BJWTYBeijing Enterprises Water Group Ltd.-- -- $18B SMTLFGCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.-- -- $708.1M -
What do Analysts Say About BJWTY or SMTLF?
Beijing Enterprises Water Group Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Beijing Enterprises Water Group Ltd. has higher upside potential than GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd., analysts believe Beijing Enterprises Water Group Ltd. is more attractive than GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BJWTYBeijing Enterprises Water Group Ltd.0 0 0 SMTLFGCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is BJWTY or SMTLF More Risky?
Beijing Enterprises Water Group Ltd. has a beta of 0.452, which suggesting that the stock is 54.828% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.625, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.471%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BJWTY or SMTLF?
Beijing Enterprises Water Group Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.66 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.7%. GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Beijing Enterprises Water Group Ltd. pays 85.76% of its earnings as a dividend. GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Beijing Enterprises Water Group Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BJWTY or SMTLF?
Beijing Enterprises Water Group Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Beijing Enterprises Water Group Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Beijing Enterprises Water Group Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.99x while GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Beijing Enterprises Water Group Ltd. is 0.97x versus 0.78x for GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BJWTYBeijing Enterprises Water Group Ltd.0.97x 16.99x -- -- SMTLFGCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.0.78x -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Berkshire Hathaway Stock Undervalued?
Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE:BRK.A,BRK.B) has undershot the market this year, returning…
Is Oracle Stock Undervalued?
Shares of Oracle (NYSE:ORCL) rocketed higher earlier this year when…
Stock Ideas
Buy
55
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.5T
P/E Ratio: 63x
Buy
53
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Buy
59
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
60
AAOI alert for Dec 23
Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. [AAOI] is up 5.38% over the past day.
Buy
52
ABVX alert for Dec 23
Abivax SA [ABVX] is up 1.37% over the past day.
Buy
69
QBTS alert for Dec 23
D-Wave Quantum, Inc. [QBTS] is down 3.36% over the past day.
