Financhill
Buy
68

BFSAF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$30.65
Seasonality move :
0%
Day range:
$30.65 - $30.65
52-week range:
$25.35 - $34.53
Dividend yield:
2.39%
P/E ratio:
12.82x
P/S ratio:
0.91x
P/B ratio:
1.28x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
--
1-year change:
10.47%
Market cap:
$1.2B
Revenue:
$1.3B
EPS (TTM):
$2.39

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
BFSAF
Befesa SA
-- -- -- -- --
CLH
Clean Harbors, Inc.
$1.6B $2.39 2.23% 2.79% $250.12
PGTK
Pacific Green Technologies, Inc.
-- -- -- -- --
QWTR
Quest Water Global, Inc.
-- -- -- -- --
RAKR
Rainmaker Worldwide
-- -- -- -- --
WM
Waste Management, Inc.
$6.5B $2.01 8.45% 31.45% $246.63
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
BFSAF
Befesa SA
$30.65 -- $1.2B 12.82x $0.73 2.39% 0.91x
CLH
Clean Harbors, Inc.
$240.19 $250.12 $12.8B 33.32x $0.00 0% 2.17x
PGTK
Pacific Green Technologies, Inc.
$0.0900 -- $5.1M 3.02x $0.00 0% 0.70x
QWTR
Quest Water Global, Inc.
$0.0408 -- $5.4M -- $0.00 0% --
RAKR
Rainmaker Worldwide
-- -- -- -- $0.00 0% --
WM
Waste Management, Inc.
$221.36 $246.63 $89.2B 34.88x $0.83 1.49% 3.61x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
BFSAF
Befesa SA
46.24% 0.553 79.55% 0.76x
CLH
Clean Harbors, Inc.
52.15% 0.935 24.38% 2.04x
PGTK
Pacific Green Technologies, Inc.
-- 876.091 -- --
QWTR
Quest Water Global, Inc.
-- -1.798 -- 0.00x
RAKR
Rainmaker Worldwide
-- 0.000 -- --
WM
Waste Management, Inc.
71.05% 0.108 26.26% 0.65x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
BFSAF
Befesa SA
$140M $48.3M 5.79% 10.76% 14.25% $31.3M
CLH
Clean Harbors, Inc.
$382.6M $193M 6.81% 14.75% 12.46% $206.8M
PGTK
Pacific Green Technologies, Inc.
-- -- -- -- -- --
QWTR
Quest Water Global, Inc.
-- -$198.2K -- -- -- -$244K
RAKR
Rainmaker Worldwide
-- -- -- -- -- --
WM
Waste Management, Inc.
$1.9B $1.2B 8.2% 29.42% 18.87% $816M

Befesa SA vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns BFSAF or CLH?

    Clean Harbors, Inc. has a net margin of 7.55% compared to Befesa SA's net margin of 7.67%. Befesa SA's return on equity of 10.76% beat Clean Harbors, Inc.'s return on equity of 14.75%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    BFSAF
    Befesa SA
    41.26% $0.60 $1.8B
    CLH
    Clean Harbors, Inc.
    24.7% $2.21 $5.8B
  • What do Analysts Say About BFSAF or CLH?

    Befesa SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Clean Harbors, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $250.12 which suggests that it could grow by 4.13%. Given that Clean Harbors, Inc. has higher upside potential than Befesa SA, analysts believe Clean Harbors, Inc. is more attractive than Befesa SA.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    BFSAF
    Befesa SA
    0 0 0
    CLH
    Clean Harbors, Inc.
    7 5 0
  • Is BFSAF or CLH More Risky?

    Befesa SA has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Clean Harbors, Inc. has a beta of 0.955, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.526%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock BFSAF or CLH?

    Befesa SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.73 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.39%. Clean Harbors, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Befesa SA pays 50.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Clean Harbors, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Befesa SA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios BFSAF or CLH?

    Befesa SA quarterly revenues are $339.2M, which are smaller than Clean Harbors, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.5B. Befesa SA's net income of $25.6M is lower than Clean Harbors, Inc.'s net income of $118.8M. Notably, Befesa SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.82x while Clean Harbors, Inc.'s PE ratio is 33.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Befesa SA is 0.91x versus 2.17x for Clean Harbors, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    BFSAF
    Befesa SA
    0.91x 12.82x $339.2M $25.6M
    CLH
    Clean Harbors, Inc.
    2.17x 33.32x $1.5B $118.8M
  • Which has Higher Returns BFSAF or PGTK?

    Pacific Green Technologies, Inc. has a net margin of 7.55% compared to Befesa SA's net margin of --. Befesa SA's return on equity of 10.76% beat Pacific Green Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    BFSAF
    Befesa SA
    41.26% $0.60 $1.8B
    PGTK
    Pacific Green Technologies, Inc.
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About BFSAF or PGTK?

    Befesa SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Pacific Green Technologies, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Befesa SA has higher upside potential than Pacific Green Technologies, Inc., analysts believe Befesa SA is more attractive than Pacific Green Technologies, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    BFSAF
    Befesa SA
    0 0 0
    PGTK
    Pacific Green Technologies, Inc.
    0 0 0
  • Is BFSAF or PGTK More Risky?

    Befesa SA has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pacific Green Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 90.653, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8965.269%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock BFSAF or PGTK?

    Befesa SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.73 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.39%. Pacific Green Technologies, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Befesa SA pays 50.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Pacific Green Technologies, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Befesa SA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios BFSAF or PGTK?

    Befesa SA quarterly revenues are $339.2M, which are larger than Pacific Green Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Befesa SA's net income of $25.6M is higher than Pacific Green Technologies, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, Befesa SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.82x while Pacific Green Technologies, Inc.'s PE ratio is 3.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Befesa SA is 0.91x versus 0.70x for Pacific Green Technologies, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    BFSAF
    Befesa SA
    0.91x 12.82x $339.2M $25.6M
    PGTK
    Pacific Green Technologies, Inc.
    0.70x 3.02x -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns BFSAF or QWTR?

    Quest Water Global, Inc. has a net margin of 7.55% compared to Befesa SA's net margin of --. Befesa SA's return on equity of 10.76% beat Quest Water Global, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    BFSAF
    Befesa SA
    41.26% $0.60 $1.8B
    QWTR
    Quest Water Global, Inc.
    -- -$0.00 -$2.7M
  • What do Analysts Say About BFSAF or QWTR?

    Befesa SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Quest Water Global, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Befesa SA has higher upside potential than Quest Water Global, Inc., analysts believe Befesa SA is more attractive than Quest Water Global, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    BFSAF
    Befesa SA
    0 0 0
    QWTR
    Quest Water Global, Inc.
    0 0 0
  • Is BFSAF or QWTR More Risky?

    Befesa SA has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Quest Water Global, Inc. has a beta of 0.199, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 80.068%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock BFSAF or QWTR?

    Befesa SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.73 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.39%. Quest Water Global, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Befesa SA pays 50.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Quest Water Global, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Befesa SA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios BFSAF or QWTR?

    Befesa SA quarterly revenues are $339.2M, which are larger than Quest Water Global, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Befesa SA's net income of $25.6M is higher than Quest Water Global, Inc.'s net income of -$198.2K. Notably, Befesa SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.82x while Quest Water Global, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Befesa SA is 0.91x versus -- for Quest Water Global, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    BFSAF
    Befesa SA
    0.91x 12.82x $339.2M $25.6M
    QWTR
    Quest Water Global, Inc.
    -- -- -- -$198.2K
  • Which has Higher Returns BFSAF or RAKR?

    Rainmaker Worldwide has a net margin of 7.55% compared to Befesa SA's net margin of --. Befesa SA's return on equity of 10.76% beat Rainmaker Worldwide's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    BFSAF
    Befesa SA
    41.26% $0.60 $1.8B
    RAKR
    Rainmaker Worldwide
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About BFSAF or RAKR?

    Befesa SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Rainmaker Worldwide has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Befesa SA has higher upside potential than Rainmaker Worldwide, analysts believe Befesa SA is more attractive than Rainmaker Worldwide.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    BFSAF
    Befesa SA
    0 0 0
    RAKR
    Rainmaker Worldwide
    0 0 0
  • Is BFSAF or RAKR More Risky?

    Befesa SA has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rainmaker Worldwide has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock BFSAF or RAKR?

    Befesa SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.73 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.39%. Rainmaker Worldwide offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Befesa SA pays 50.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Rainmaker Worldwide pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Befesa SA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios BFSAF or RAKR?

    Befesa SA quarterly revenues are $339.2M, which are larger than Rainmaker Worldwide quarterly revenues of --. Befesa SA's net income of $25.6M is higher than Rainmaker Worldwide's net income of --. Notably, Befesa SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.82x while Rainmaker Worldwide's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Befesa SA is 0.91x versus -- for Rainmaker Worldwide. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    BFSAF
    Befesa SA
    0.91x 12.82x $339.2M $25.6M
    RAKR
    Rainmaker Worldwide
    -- -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns BFSAF or WM?

    Waste Management, Inc. has a net margin of 7.55% compared to Befesa SA's net margin of 9.36%. Befesa SA's return on equity of 10.76% beat Waste Management, Inc.'s return on equity of 29.42%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    BFSAF
    Befesa SA
    41.26% $0.60 $1.8B
    WM
    Waste Management, Inc.
    29.2% $1.49 $32.9B
  • What do Analysts Say About BFSAF or WM?

    Befesa SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Waste Management, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $246.63 which suggests that it could grow by 11.35%. Given that Waste Management, Inc. has higher upside potential than Befesa SA, analysts believe Waste Management, Inc. is more attractive than Befesa SA.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    BFSAF
    Befesa SA
    0 0 0
    WM
    Waste Management, Inc.
    15 7 0
  • Is BFSAF or WM More Risky?

    Befesa SA has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Waste Management, Inc. has a beta of 0.584, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.647%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock BFSAF or WM?

    Befesa SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.73 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.39%. Waste Management, Inc. offers a yield of 1.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Befesa SA pays 50.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Waste Management, Inc. pays out 44.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios BFSAF or WM?

    Befesa SA quarterly revenues are $339.2M, which are smaller than Waste Management, Inc. quarterly revenues of $6.4B. Befesa SA's net income of $25.6M is lower than Waste Management, Inc.'s net income of $603M. Notably, Befesa SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.82x while Waste Management, Inc.'s PE ratio is 34.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Befesa SA is 0.91x versus 3.61x for Waste Management, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    BFSAF
    Befesa SA
    0.91x 12.82x $339.2M $25.6M
    WM
    Waste Management, Inc.
    3.61x 34.88x $6.4B $603M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?
Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?

Digital signature software business DocuSign (NASDAQ:DOCU) has been struggling over…

Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?
Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?

Cybersecurity major SentinelOne (NYSE:S) has struggled over several years, delivering…

Is Broadcom Stock on Sale?
Is Broadcom Stock on Sale?

Chip and software maker Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) has been among the…

Stock Ideas

Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x

Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x

Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x

Alerts

Buy
80
TVTX alert for Dec 26

Travere Therapeutics, Inc. [TVTX] is down 0.37% over the past day.

Buy
64
ZCSH alert for Dec 26

Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) [ZCSH] is down 1.79% over the past day.

Buy
66
ASTS alert for Dec 26

AST Spacemobile, Inc. [ASTS] is down 6.05% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock