How Big Will the SpaceX IPO Be?
Operated up to now as a private business, SpaceX will…
Sell
45
BCAUF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$0.50
Seasonality move
:
2.72%
Day range:
$0.50 - $0.50
52-week range:
$0.30 - $0.56
Dividend yield:
20.31%
P/E ratio:
6.08x
P/S ratio:
16.11x
P/B ratio:
0.65x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
1.2K
1-year change:
26.04%
Market cap:
$2.5B
Revenue:
$152.3M
EPS (TTM):
$0.09
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BCAUF
Brilliance China Automotive Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GELYF
Geely Automobile Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
JELCF
Johnson Electric Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NFGRF
BeijingWest Industries International Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NWFAF
New Focus Auto Tech Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
WCHS
Winchester Holding Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BCAUF
Brilliance China Automotive Holdings Ltd.
|
$0.50 | -- | $2.5B | 6.08x | $0.10 | 20.31% | 16.11x |
|
GELYF
Geely Automobile Holdings Ltd.
|
$2.10 | -- | $21.2B | 9.26x | $0.04 | 2.02% | 0.50x |
|
JELCF
Johnson Electric Holdings Ltd.
|
$3.47 | -- | $3.2B | 12.20x | $0.02 | 2.25% | 0.90x |
|
NFGRF
BeijingWest Industries International Ltd.
|
$0.6863 | -- | $591.3M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 1.38x |
|
NWFAF
New Focus Auto Tech Holdings Ltd.
|
$0.0038 | -- | $65.1M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.85x |
|
WCHS
Winchester Holding Group
|
$6.60 | -- | $700.7M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 427.69x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BCAUF
Brilliance China Automotive Holdings Ltd.
|
2.29% | 0.691 | -- | 6.52x |
|
GELYF
Geely Automobile Holdings Ltd.
|
32.72% | 0.001 | 25.44% | 0.71x |
|
JELCF
Johnson Electric Holdings Ltd.
|
11.88% | -0.980 | -- | 1.92x |
|
NFGRF
BeijingWest Industries International Ltd.
|
-- | 22.596 | -- | -- |
|
NWFAF
New Focus Auto Tech Holdings Ltd.
|
36.51% | 1.314 | -- | 0.22x |
|
WCHS
Winchester Holding Group
|
-- | 1.373 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BCAUF
Brilliance China Automotive Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 8.63% | 8.84% | -- | -- |
|
GELYF
Geely Automobile Holdings Ltd.
|
$2.1B | $472.3M | 14.62% | 17.99% | 3.79% | -- |
|
JELCF
Johnson Electric Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 8.52% | 9.88% | -- | -- |
|
NFGRF
BeijingWest Industries International Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -14.64% | -- | -- | -- |
|
NWFAF
New Focus Auto Tech Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -9.7% | -13.8% | -- | -- |
|
WCHS
Winchester Holding Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Brilliance China Automotive Holdings Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns BCAUF or GELYF?
Geely Automobile Holdings Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Brilliance China Automotive Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of 4.15%. Brilliance China Automotive Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 8.84% beat Geely Automobile Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 17.99%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BCAUFBrilliance China Automotive Holdings Ltd.-- -- $3.8B GELYFGeely Automobile Holdings Ltd.16.59% $0.05 $19.9B -
What do Analysts Say About BCAUF or GELYF?
Brilliance China Automotive Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Geely Automobile Holdings Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Brilliance China Automotive Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Geely Automobile Holdings Ltd., analysts believe Brilliance China Automotive Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Geely Automobile Holdings Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BCAUFBrilliance China Automotive Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 GELYFGeely Automobile Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is BCAUF or GELYF More Risky?
Brilliance China Automotive Holdings Ltd. has a beta of -0.035, which suggesting that the stock is 103.498% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Geely Automobile Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.648, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.233%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BCAUF or GELYF?
Brilliance China Automotive Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 20.31%. Geely Automobile Holdings Ltd. offers a yield of 2.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Brilliance China Automotive Holdings Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Geely Automobile Holdings Ltd. pays out 18.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Geely Automobile Holdings Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BCAUF or GELYF?
Brilliance China Automotive Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Geely Automobile Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues of $12.5B. Brilliance China Automotive Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Geely Automobile Holdings Ltd.'s net income of $517M. Notably, Brilliance China Automotive Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 6.08x while Geely Automobile Holdings Ltd.'s PE ratio is 9.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brilliance China Automotive Holdings Ltd. is 16.11x versus 0.50x for Geely Automobile Holdings Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BCAUFBrilliance China Automotive Holdings Ltd.16.11x 6.08x -- -- GELYFGeely Automobile Holdings Ltd.0.50x 9.26x $12.5B $517M
-
Which has Higher Returns BCAUF or JELCF?
Johnson Electric Holdings Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Brilliance China Automotive Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. Brilliance China Automotive Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 8.84% beat Johnson Electric Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 9.88%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BCAUFBrilliance China Automotive Holdings Ltd.-- -- $3.8B JELCFJohnson Electric Holdings Ltd.-- -- $3.1B -
What do Analysts Say About BCAUF or JELCF?
Brilliance China Automotive Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Johnson Electric Holdings Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Brilliance China Automotive Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Johnson Electric Holdings Ltd., analysts believe Brilliance China Automotive Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Johnson Electric Holdings Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BCAUFBrilliance China Automotive Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 JELCFJohnson Electric Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is BCAUF or JELCF More Risky?
Brilliance China Automotive Holdings Ltd. has a beta of -0.035, which suggesting that the stock is 103.498% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Johnson Electric Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.037, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 96.292%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BCAUF or JELCF?
Brilliance China Automotive Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 20.31%. Johnson Electric Holdings Ltd. offers a yield of 2.25% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. Brilliance China Automotive Holdings Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Johnson Electric Holdings Ltd. pays out 27.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Johnson Electric Holdings Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BCAUF or JELCF?
Brilliance China Automotive Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Johnson Electric Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Brilliance China Automotive Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Johnson Electric Holdings Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Brilliance China Automotive Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 6.08x while Johnson Electric Holdings Ltd.'s PE ratio is 12.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brilliance China Automotive Holdings Ltd. is 16.11x versus 0.90x for Johnson Electric Holdings Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BCAUFBrilliance China Automotive Holdings Ltd.16.11x 6.08x -- -- JELCFJohnson Electric Holdings Ltd.0.90x 12.20x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns BCAUF or NFGRF?
BeijingWest Industries International Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Brilliance China Automotive Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. Brilliance China Automotive Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 8.84% beat BeijingWest Industries International Ltd.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BCAUFBrilliance China Automotive Holdings Ltd.-- -- $3.8B NFGRFBeijingWest Industries International Ltd.-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About BCAUF or NFGRF?
Brilliance China Automotive Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand BeijingWest Industries International Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Brilliance China Automotive Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than BeijingWest Industries International Ltd., analysts believe Brilliance China Automotive Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than BeijingWest Industries International Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BCAUFBrilliance China Automotive Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 NFGRFBeijingWest Industries International Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is BCAUF or NFGRF More Risky?
Brilliance China Automotive Holdings Ltd. has a beta of -0.035, which suggesting that the stock is 103.498% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BeijingWest Industries International Ltd. has a beta of 6.068, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 506.763%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BCAUF or NFGRF?
Brilliance China Automotive Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 20.31%. BeijingWest Industries International Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Brilliance China Automotive Holdings Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. BeijingWest Industries International Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BCAUF or NFGRF?
Brilliance China Automotive Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than BeijingWest Industries International Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Brilliance China Automotive Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than BeijingWest Industries International Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Brilliance China Automotive Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 6.08x while BeijingWest Industries International Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brilliance China Automotive Holdings Ltd. is 16.11x versus 1.38x for BeijingWest Industries International Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BCAUFBrilliance China Automotive Holdings Ltd.16.11x 6.08x -- -- NFGRFBeijingWest Industries International Ltd.1.38x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns BCAUF or NWFAF?
New Focus Auto Tech Holdings Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Brilliance China Automotive Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. Brilliance China Automotive Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 8.84% beat New Focus Auto Tech Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -13.8%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BCAUFBrilliance China Automotive Holdings Ltd.-- -- $3.8B NWFAFNew Focus Auto Tech Holdings Ltd.-- -- $145M -
What do Analysts Say About BCAUF or NWFAF?
Brilliance China Automotive Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand New Focus Auto Tech Holdings Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Brilliance China Automotive Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than New Focus Auto Tech Holdings Ltd., analysts believe Brilliance China Automotive Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than New Focus Auto Tech Holdings Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BCAUFBrilliance China Automotive Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 NWFAFNew Focus Auto Tech Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is BCAUF or NWFAF More Risky?
Brilliance China Automotive Holdings Ltd. has a beta of -0.035, which suggesting that the stock is 103.498% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison New Focus Auto Tech Holdings Ltd. has a beta of -4.581, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 558.085%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BCAUF or NWFAF?
Brilliance China Automotive Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 20.31%. New Focus Auto Tech Holdings Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Brilliance China Automotive Holdings Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. New Focus Auto Tech Holdings Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BCAUF or NWFAF?
Brilliance China Automotive Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than New Focus Auto Tech Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Brilliance China Automotive Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than New Focus Auto Tech Holdings Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Brilliance China Automotive Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 6.08x while New Focus Auto Tech Holdings Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brilliance China Automotive Holdings Ltd. is 16.11x versus 0.85x for New Focus Auto Tech Holdings Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BCAUFBrilliance China Automotive Holdings Ltd.16.11x 6.08x -- -- NWFAFNew Focus Auto Tech Holdings Ltd.0.85x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns BCAUF or WCHS?
Winchester Holding Group has a net margin of -- compared to Brilliance China Automotive Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. Brilliance China Automotive Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 8.84% beat Winchester Holding Group's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BCAUFBrilliance China Automotive Holdings Ltd.-- -- $3.8B WCHSWinchester Holding Group-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About BCAUF or WCHS?
Brilliance China Automotive Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Winchester Holding Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Brilliance China Automotive Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Winchester Holding Group, analysts believe Brilliance China Automotive Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Winchester Holding Group.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BCAUFBrilliance China Automotive Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 WCHSWinchester Holding Group0 0 0 -
Is BCAUF or WCHS More Risky?
Brilliance China Automotive Holdings Ltd. has a beta of -0.035, which suggesting that the stock is 103.498% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Winchester Holding Group has a beta of 19.661, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1866.095%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BCAUF or WCHS?
Brilliance China Automotive Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 20.31%. Winchester Holding Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Brilliance China Automotive Holdings Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Winchester Holding Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BCAUF or WCHS?
Brilliance China Automotive Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Winchester Holding Group quarterly revenues of --. Brilliance China Automotive Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Winchester Holding Group's net income of --. Notably, Brilliance China Automotive Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 6.08x while Winchester Holding Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brilliance China Automotive Holdings Ltd. is 16.11x versus 427.69x for Winchester Holding Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BCAUFBrilliance China Automotive Holdings Ltd.16.11x 6.08x -- -- WCHSWinchester Holding Group427.69x -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Where Will ISRG Stock Be in 5 Years?
Intuitive Surgical (NASDAQ:ISRG) is the innovative medical tech business behind…
Is Kratos Stock a Good Investment?
UAV and hypersonic system defense contractor Kratos (NASDAQ:KTOS) has swung…
Stock Ideas
Buy
56
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.5T
P/E Ratio: 63x
Buy
61
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
53
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 30x
Alerts
Sell
40
BILL alert for Feb 7
Bill Holdings, Inc. [BILL] is up 37.11% over the past day.
Buy
75
PRLB alert for Feb 7
Proto Labs, Inc. [PRLB] is up 28.33% over the past day.
Sell
30
MSTR alert for Feb 7
Strategy, Inc. [MSTR] is up 26.08% over the past day.
