Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…
Sell
48
BABAF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$18.06
Seasonality move
:
-9.05%
Day range:
$18.28 - $19.57
52-week range:
$12.02 - $23.99
Dividend yield:
0.67%
P/E ratio:
21.56x
P/S ratio:
2.67x
P/B ratio:
2.58x
Volume:
1.1K
Avg. volume:
15.5K
1-year change:
11.51%
Market cap:
$373.8B
Revenue:
$138B
EPS (TTM):
$0.91
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BABAF
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.
|
$42.1B | -- | 11.15% | -- | -- |
|
CZASF
China Zhengtong Auto Services Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
JD
JD.com, Inc.
|
$51.1B | $0.10 | 7.8% | -49.4% | $40.29 |
|
MPNGY
Meituan
|
$13.4B | -- | 12.56% | -- | -- |
|
ZSHGY
Zhongsheng Group Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BABAF
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.
|
$19.57 | -- | $373.8B | 21.56x | $0.25 | 0.67% | 2.67x |
|
CZASF
China Zhengtong Auto Services Holdings Ltd.
|
$0.01 | -- | $101.2M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.01x |
|
JD
JD.com, Inc.
|
$26.98 | $40.29 | $38.3B | 9.12x | $1.00 | 3.71% | 0.22x |
|
MPNGY
Meituan
|
$20.56 | -- | $62.8B | 33.95x | $0.00 | 0% | 1.24x |
|
ZSHGY
Zhongsheng Group Holdings Ltd.
|
$15.67 | -- | $3.7B | 9.18x | $0.86 | 5.51% | 0.17x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BABAF
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.
|
21.43% | 0.308 | 8.98% | 0.93x |
|
CZASF
China Zhengtong Auto Services Holdings Ltd.
|
101.82% | 0.000 | -- | 0.26x |
|
JD
JD.com, Inc.
|
32.58% | 0.696 | 26.32% | 0.79x |
|
MPNGY
Meituan
|
23.44% | 0.131 | 8.84% | 1.42x |
|
ZSHGY
Zhongsheng Group Holdings Ltd.
|
41.13% | -0.613 | -- | 0.53x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BABAF
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.
|
$13.4B | $728.9M | 9.24% | 11.27% | 2.11% | $1.4B |
|
CZASF
China Zhengtong Auto Services Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -7.6% | -126.9% | -- | -- |
|
JD
JD.com, Inc.
|
$7B | -$169.6M | 8.75% | 11.51% | -0.41% | -$1.1B |
|
MPNGY
Meituan
|
$3.5B | -$2.7B | -0.96% | -1.26% | -20.18% | -$5.1B |
|
ZSHGY
Zhongsheng Group Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 4.71% | 7.94% | -- | -- |
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns BABAF or CZASF?
China Zhengtong Auto Services Holdings Ltd. has a net margin of 8.31% compared to Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.'s net margin of --. Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.'s return on equity of 11.27% beat China Zhengtong Auto Services Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -126.9%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BABAFAlibaba Group Holding Ltd.38.82% $0.15 $195.7B CZASFChina Zhengtong Auto Services Holdings Ltd.-- -- $2.9B -
What do Analysts Say About BABAF or CZASF?
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand China Zhengtong Auto Services Holdings Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. has higher upside potential than China Zhengtong Auto Services Holdings Ltd., analysts believe Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. is more attractive than China Zhengtong Auto Services Holdings Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BABAFAlibaba Group Holding Ltd.0 0 0 CZASFChina Zhengtong Auto Services Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is BABAF or CZASF More Risky?
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. has a beta of 0.409, which suggesting that the stock is 59.076% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Zhengtong Auto Services Holdings Ltd. has a beta of -1.110, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 211.006%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BABAF or CZASF?
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.67%. China Zhengtong Auto Services Holdings Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. pays 13.85% of its earnings as a dividend. China Zhengtong Auto Services Holdings Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BABAF or CZASF?
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. quarterly revenues are $34.6B, which are larger than China Zhengtong Auto Services Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.'s net income of $2.9B is higher than China Zhengtong Auto Services Holdings Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 21.56x while China Zhengtong Auto Services Holdings Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. is 2.67x versus 0.01x for China Zhengtong Auto Services Holdings Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BABAFAlibaba Group Holding Ltd.2.67x 21.56x $34.6B $2.9B CZASFChina Zhengtong Auto Services Holdings Ltd.0.01x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns BABAF or JD?
JD.com, Inc. has a net margin of 8.31% compared to Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.'s net margin of 2.13%. Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.'s return on equity of 11.27% beat JD.com, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.51%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BABAFAlibaba Group Holding Ltd.38.82% $0.15 $195.7B JDJD.com, Inc.16.79% $0.50 $58.5B -
What do Analysts Say About BABAF or JD?
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand JD.com, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $40.29 which suggests that it could grow by 49.34%. Given that JD.com, Inc. has higher upside potential than Alibaba Group Holding Ltd., analysts believe JD.com, Inc. is more attractive than Alibaba Group Holding Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BABAFAlibaba Group Holding Ltd.0 0 0 JDJD.com, Inc.27 3 1 -
Is BABAF or JD More Risky?
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. has a beta of 0.409, which suggesting that the stock is 59.076% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison JD.com, Inc. has a beta of 0.404, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.569%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BABAF or JD?
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.67%. JD.com, Inc. offers a yield of 3.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. pays 13.85% of its earnings as a dividend. JD.com, Inc. pays out 26.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BABAF or JD?
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. quarterly revenues are $34.6B, which are smaller than JD.com, Inc. quarterly revenues of $41.8B. Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.'s net income of $2.9B is higher than JD.com, Inc.'s net income of $891.5M. Notably, Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 21.56x while JD.com, Inc.'s PE ratio is 9.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. is 2.67x versus 0.22x for JD.com, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BABAFAlibaba Group Holding Ltd.2.67x 21.56x $34.6B $2.9B JDJD.com, Inc.0.22x 9.12x $41.8B $891.5M
-
Which has Higher Returns BABAF or MPNGY?
Meituan has a net margin of 8.31% compared to Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.'s net margin of -19.51%. Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.'s return on equity of 11.27% beat Meituan's return on equity of -1.26%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BABAFAlibaba Group Holding Ltd.38.82% $0.15 $195.7B MPNGYMeituan26.37% -$0.85 $30.7B -
What do Analysts Say About BABAF or MPNGY?
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Meituan has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 27.53%. Given that Meituan has higher upside potential than Alibaba Group Holding Ltd., analysts believe Meituan is more attractive than Alibaba Group Holding Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BABAFAlibaba Group Holding Ltd.0 0 0 MPNGYMeituan0 0 0 -
Is BABAF or MPNGY More Risky?
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. has a beta of 0.409, which suggesting that the stock is 59.076% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Meituan has a beta of 0.071, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 92.887%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BABAF or MPNGY?
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.67%. Meituan offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. pays 13.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Meituan pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BABAF or MPNGY?
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. quarterly revenues are $34.6B, which are larger than Meituan quarterly revenues of $13.3B. Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.'s net income of $2.9B is higher than Meituan's net income of -$2.6B. Notably, Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 21.56x while Meituan's PE ratio is 33.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. is 2.67x versus 1.24x for Meituan. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BABAFAlibaba Group Holding Ltd.2.67x 21.56x $34.6B $2.9B MPNGYMeituan1.24x 33.95x $13.3B -$2.6B
-
Which has Higher Returns BABAF or ZSHGY?
Zhongsheng Group Holdings Ltd. has a net margin of 8.31% compared to Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.'s net margin of --. Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.'s return on equity of 11.27% beat Zhongsheng Group Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 7.94%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BABAFAlibaba Group Holding Ltd.38.82% $0.15 $195.7B ZSHGYZhongsheng Group Holdings Ltd.-- -- $10.7B -
What do Analysts Say About BABAF or ZSHGY?
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Zhongsheng Group Holdings Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. has higher upside potential than Zhongsheng Group Holdings Ltd., analysts believe Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. is more attractive than Zhongsheng Group Holdings Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BABAFAlibaba Group Holding Ltd.0 0 0 ZSHGYZhongsheng Group Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is BABAF or ZSHGY More Risky?
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. has a beta of 0.409, which suggesting that the stock is 59.076% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zhongsheng Group Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 1.021, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.054%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BABAF or ZSHGY?
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.67%. Zhongsheng Group Holdings Ltd. offers a yield of 5.51% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.86 per share. Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. pays 13.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Zhongsheng Group Holdings Ltd. pays out 42.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BABAF or ZSHGY?
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. quarterly revenues are $34.6B, which are larger than Zhongsheng Group Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.'s net income of $2.9B is higher than Zhongsheng Group Holdings Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 21.56x while Zhongsheng Group Holdings Ltd.'s PE ratio is 9.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. is 2.67x versus 0.17x for Zhongsheng Group Holdings Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BABAFAlibaba Group Holding Ltd.2.67x 21.56x $34.6B $2.9B ZSHGYZhongsheng Group Holdings Ltd.0.17x 9.18x -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…
Stock Ideas
Sell
50
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.5T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Sell
37
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 28x
Alerts
Buy
59
SEZL alert for Feb 27
Sezzle, Inc. [SEZL] is down 13.96% over the past day.
Buy
83
GCT alert for Feb 27
GigaCloud Technology, Inc. [GCT] is down 10.47% over the past day.
Buy
62
LMAT alert for Feb 27
LeMaitre Vascular, Inc. [LMAT] is down 6.68% over the past day.
