Is SCHD a Good ETF to Buy?
With around $65.7 billion in net assets, Schwab’s US Dividend…
Buy
68
BABAF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$11.52
Seasonality move
:
-0.22%
Day range:
$11.52 - $11.52
52-week range:
$8.08 - $14.96
Dividend yield:
2.17%
P/E ratio:
18.92x
P/S ratio:
1.70x
P/B ratio:
1.61x
Volume:
650
Avg. volume:
36.8K
1-year change:
26.32%
Market cap:
$219.4B
Revenue:
$131.6B
EPS (TTM):
$0.61
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BABAF
Alibaba Group Holding
|
$38B | -- | 5.86% | -- | -- |
|
MI
NFT
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MLCO
Melco Resorts and Entertainment
|
$1.2B | $0.02 | 7.86% | -100% | $9.15 |
|
NHTC
Natural Health Trends
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
OCG
Oriental Culture Holding
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BABAF
Alibaba Group Holding
|
$11.52 | -- | $219.4B | 18.92x | $0.21 | 2.17% | 1.70x |
|
MI
NFT
|
$3.20 | -- | $13.1M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
MLCO
Melco Resorts and Entertainment
|
$5.61 | $9.15 | $2.4B | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.54x |
|
NHTC
Natural Health Trends
|
$4.70 | -- | $54.1M | 64.34x | $0.20 | 17.02% | 1.25x |
|
OCG
Oriental Culture Holding
|
$1.33 | -- | $24.6M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 5.99x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BABAF
Alibaba Group Holding
|
17.49% | -0.386 | 11.03% | 1.27x |
|
MI
NFT
|
-- | 4.395 | -- | 6.85x |
|
MLCO
Melco Resorts and Entertainment
|
122.07% | 1.768 | 195.07% | 1.06x |
|
NHTC
Natural Health Trends
|
-- | 0.618 | -- | 2.19x |
|
OCG
Oriental Culture Holding
|
-- | 1.259 | -- | 9.66x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BABAF
Alibaba Group Holding
|
$12.9B | $4.9B | 6.68% | 7.78% | 22.15% | $280.2M |
|
MI
NFT
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MLCO
Melco Resorts and Entertainment
|
$432.7M | $144.3M | -2.16% | -- | 11.83% | -- |
|
NHTC
Natural Health Trends
|
$7.9M | -$275K | 1.92% | 1.92% | -2.57% | -$443K |
|
OCG
Oriental Culture Holding
|
-- | -- | -6.99% | -6.99% | -- | -- |
Alibaba Group Holding vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns BABAF or MI?
NFT has a net margin of 18.62% compared to Alibaba Group Holding's net margin of --. Alibaba Group Holding's return on equity of 7.78% beat NFT's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BABAFAlibaba Group Holding39.1% $0.32 $179.7B MINFT-- -- $74.8M -
What do Analysts Say About BABAF or MI?
Alibaba Group Holding has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand NFT has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Alibaba Group Holding has higher upside potential than NFT, analysts believe Alibaba Group Holding is more attractive than NFT.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BABAFAlibaba Group Holding0 0 0 MINFT0 0 0 -
Is BABAF or MI More Risky?
Alibaba Group Holding has a beta of 0.239, which suggesting that the stock is 76.09% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NFT has a beta of 2.906, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 190.588%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BABAF or MI?
Alibaba Group Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.17%. NFT offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Alibaba Group Holding pays 22.43% of its earnings as a dividend. NFT pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Alibaba Group Holding's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BABAF or MI?
Alibaba Group Holding quarterly revenues are $33B, which are larger than NFT quarterly revenues of --. Alibaba Group Holding's net income of $6.1B is higher than NFT's net income of --. Notably, Alibaba Group Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.92x while NFT's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alibaba Group Holding is 1.70x versus -- for NFT. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BABAFAlibaba Group Holding1.70x 18.92x $33B $6.1B MINFT-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns BABAF or MLCO?
Melco Resorts and Entertainment has a net margin of 18.62% compared to Alibaba Group Holding's net margin of 2.32%. Alibaba Group Holding's return on equity of 7.78% beat Melco Resorts and Entertainment's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BABAFAlibaba Group Holding39.1% $0.32 $179.7B MLCOMelco Resorts and Entertainment36.82% $0.06 $6.3B -
What do Analysts Say About BABAF or MLCO?
Alibaba Group Holding has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Melco Resorts and Entertainment has an analysts' consensus of $9.15 which suggests that it could grow by 63.1%. Given that Melco Resorts and Entertainment has higher upside potential than Alibaba Group Holding, analysts believe Melco Resorts and Entertainment is more attractive than Alibaba Group Holding.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BABAFAlibaba Group Holding0 0 0 MLCOMelco Resorts and Entertainment8 4 0 -
Is BABAF or MLCO More Risky?
Alibaba Group Holding has a beta of 0.239, which suggesting that the stock is 76.09% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Melco Resorts and Entertainment has a beta of 1.047, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.707%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BABAF or MLCO?
Alibaba Group Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.17%. Melco Resorts and Entertainment offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Alibaba Group Holding pays 22.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Melco Resorts and Entertainment pays out -0.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Alibaba Group Holding's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BABAF or MLCO?
Alibaba Group Holding quarterly revenues are $33B, which are larger than Melco Resorts and Entertainment quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Alibaba Group Holding's net income of $6.1B is higher than Melco Resorts and Entertainment's net income of $27.3M. Notably, Alibaba Group Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.92x while Melco Resorts and Entertainment's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alibaba Group Holding is 1.70x versus 0.54x for Melco Resorts and Entertainment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BABAFAlibaba Group Holding1.70x 18.92x $33B $6.1B MLCOMelco Resorts and Entertainment0.54x -- $1.2B $27.3M
-
Which has Higher Returns BABAF or NHTC?
Natural Health Trends has a net margin of 18.62% compared to Alibaba Group Holding's net margin of 0.33%. Alibaba Group Holding's return on equity of 7.78% beat Natural Health Trends's return on equity of 1.92%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BABAFAlibaba Group Holding39.1% $0.32 $179.7B NHTCNatural Health Trends74.14% $0.00 $35.3M -
What do Analysts Say About BABAF or NHTC?
Alibaba Group Holding has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Natural Health Trends has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 538.3%. Given that Natural Health Trends has higher upside potential than Alibaba Group Holding, analysts believe Natural Health Trends is more attractive than Alibaba Group Holding.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BABAFAlibaba Group Holding0 0 0 NHTCNatural Health Trends0 0 0 -
Is BABAF or NHTC More Risky?
Alibaba Group Holding has a beta of 0.239, which suggesting that the stock is 76.09% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Natural Health Trends has a beta of 0.943, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.721%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BABAF or NHTC?
Alibaba Group Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.17%. Natural Health Trends offers a yield of 17.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Alibaba Group Holding pays 22.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Natural Health Trends pays out 1622.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Alibaba Group Holding's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Natural Health Trends's is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BABAF or NHTC?
Alibaba Group Holding quarterly revenues are $33B, which are larger than Natural Health Trends quarterly revenues of $10.7M. Alibaba Group Holding's net income of $6.1B is higher than Natural Health Trends's net income of $35K. Notably, Alibaba Group Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.92x while Natural Health Trends's PE ratio is 64.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alibaba Group Holding is 1.70x versus 1.25x for Natural Health Trends. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BABAFAlibaba Group Holding1.70x 18.92x $33B $6.1B NHTCNatural Health Trends1.25x 64.34x $10.7M $35K
-
Which has Higher Returns BABAF or OCG?
Oriental Culture Holding has a net margin of 18.62% compared to Alibaba Group Holding's net margin of --. Alibaba Group Holding's return on equity of 7.78% beat Oriental Culture Holding's return on equity of -6.99%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BABAFAlibaba Group Holding39.1% $0.32 $179.7B OCGOriental Culture Holding-- -- $51.1M -
What do Analysts Say About BABAF or OCG?
Alibaba Group Holding has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Oriental Culture Holding has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Alibaba Group Holding has higher upside potential than Oriental Culture Holding, analysts believe Alibaba Group Holding is more attractive than Oriental Culture Holding.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BABAFAlibaba Group Holding0 0 0 OCGOriental Culture Holding0 0 0 -
Is BABAF or OCG More Risky?
Alibaba Group Holding has a beta of 0.239, which suggesting that the stock is 76.09% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oriental Culture Holding has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BABAF or OCG?
Alibaba Group Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.17%. Oriental Culture Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Alibaba Group Holding pays 22.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Oriental Culture Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Alibaba Group Holding's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BABAF or OCG?
Alibaba Group Holding quarterly revenues are $33B, which are larger than Oriental Culture Holding quarterly revenues of --. Alibaba Group Holding's net income of $6.1B is higher than Oriental Culture Holding's net income of --. Notably, Alibaba Group Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.92x while Oriental Culture Holding's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alibaba Group Holding is 1.70x versus 5.99x for Oriental Culture Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BABAFAlibaba Group Holding1.70x 18.92x $33B $6.1B OCGOriental Culture Holding5.99x -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is NAIL a Good ETF to Buy?
If you’re thinking about buying the NAIL ETF, this article…
3 High Dividend Dow Jones Stocks
Thanks to surging stock prices over the past two years,…
Stock Ideas
Sell
40
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 117x
Sell
43
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.1T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Alerts
Buy
57
NARI alert for Jan 8
Inari Medical [NARI] is up 0.06% over the past day.
Buy
69
UNF alert for Jan 8
UniFirst [UNF] is up 4.09% over the past day.
Sell
31
APOG alert for Jan 8
Apogee Enterprises [APOG] is down 8.7% over the past day.
