BABAF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

China Automotive Systems, Inc. has a net margin of 8.31% compared to Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.'s net margin of 6.1%. Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.'s return on equity of 11.27% beat China Automotive Systems, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.53%.

Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand China Automotive Systems, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 67.41%. Given that China Automotive Systems, Inc. has higher upside potential than Alibaba Group Holding Ltd., analysts believe China Automotive Systems, Inc. is more attractive than Alibaba Group Holding Ltd..

Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. has a beta of 0.381, which suggesting that the stock is 61.939% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Automotive Systems, Inc. has a beta of 0.958, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.185%.

Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.67%. China Automotive Systems, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share. Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. pays 13.85% of its earnings as a dividend. China Automotive Systems, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. quarterly revenues are $34.6B, which are larger than China Automotive Systems, Inc. quarterly revenues of $193.2M. Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.'s net income of $2.9B is higher than China Automotive Systems, Inc.'s net income of $11.8M. Notably, Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 21.48x while China Automotive Systems, Inc.'s PE ratio is 4.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. is 2.66x versus 0.19x for China Automotive Systems, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

JD.com, Inc. has a net margin of 8.31% compared to Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.'s net margin of 2.13%. Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.'s return on equity of 11.27% beat JD.com, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.51%.

Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand JD.com, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $42.68 which suggests that it could grow by 47.04%. Given that JD.com, Inc. has higher upside potential than Alibaba Group Holding Ltd., analysts believe JD.com, Inc. is more attractive than Alibaba Group Holding Ltd..

Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. has a beta of 0.381, which suggesting that the stock is 61.939% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison JD.com, Inc. has a beta of 0.399, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.074%.

Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.67%. JD.com, Inc. offers a yield of 3.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. pays 13.85% of its earnings as a dividend. JD.com, Inc. pays out 26.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. quarterly revenues are $34.6B, which are smaller than JD.com, Inc. quarterly revenues of $41.8B. Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.'s net income of $2.9B is higher than JD.com, Inc.'s net income of $891.5M. Notably, Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 21.48x while JD.com, Inc.'s PE ratio is 9.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. is 2.66x versus 0.24x for JD.com, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Meituan has a net margin of 8.31% compared to Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.'s net margin of -19.51%. Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.'s return on equity of 11.27% beat Meituan's return on equity of -1.26%.

Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Meituan has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -1.24%. Given that Meituan has higher upside potential than Alibaba Group Holding Ltd., analysts believe Meituan is more attractive than Alibaba Group Holding Ltd..

Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. has a beta of 0.381, which suggesting that the stock is 61.939% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Meituan has a beta of 0.022, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 97.779%.

Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.67%. Meituan offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. pays 13.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Meituan pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. quarterly revenues are $34.6B, which are larger than Meituan quarterly revenues of $13.3B. Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.'s net income of $2.9B is higher than Meituan's net income of -$2.6B. Notably, Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 21.48x while Meituan's PE ratio is 33.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. is 2.66x versus 1.61x for Meituan. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.