ATAZF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

IDEX Biometrics ASA has a net margin of 2.68% compared to Atea ASA's net margin of --. Atea ASA's return on equity of 18.63% beat IDEX Biometrics ASA's return on equity of --.

Atea ASA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand IDEX Biometrics ASA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Atea ASA has higher upside potential than IDEX Biometrics ASA, analysts believe Atea ASA is more attractive than IDEX Biometrics ASA.

Atea ASA has a beta of 0.649, which suggesting that the stock is 35.12% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison IDEX Biometrics ASA has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Atea ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.53%. IDEX Biometrics ASA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Atea ASA pays 101.16% of its earnings as a dividend. IDEX Biometrics ASA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Atea ASA quarterly revenues are $835.2M, which are larger than IDEX Biometrics ASA quarterly revenues of --. Atea ASA's net income of $22.4M is higher than IDEX Biometrics ASA's net income of --. Notably, Atea ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.89x while IDEX Biometrics ASA's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Atea ASA is 0.50x versus -- for IDEX Biometrics ASA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nordic Semiconductor ASA has a net margin of 2.68% compared to Atea ASA's net margin of 0.48%. Atea ASA's return on equity of 18.63% beat Nordic Semiconductor ASA's return on equity of 1.4%.

Atea ASA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nordic Semiconductor ASA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Atea ASA has higher upside potential than Nordic Semiconductor ASA, analysts believe Atea ASA is more attractive than Nordic Semiconductor ASA.

Atea ASA has a beta of 0.649, which suggesting that the stock is 35.12% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nordic Semiconductor ASA has a beta of 1.441, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.082%.

Atea ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.53%. Nordic Semiconductor ASA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Atea ASA pays 101.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Nordic Semiconductor ASA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Atea ASA quarterly revenues are $835.2M, which are larger than Nordic Semiconductor ASA quarterly revenues of $179M. Atea ASA's net income of $22.4M is higher than Nordic Semiconductor ASA's net income of $852K. Notably, Atea ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.89x while Nordic Semiconductor ASA's PE ratio is 320.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Atea ASA is 0.50x versus 4.07x for Nordic Semiconductor ASA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pexip Holding ASA has a net margin of 2.68% compared to Atea ASA's net margin of 9.65%. Atea ASA's return on equity of 18.63% beat Pexip Holding ASA's return on equity of 12.67%.

Atea ASA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Pexip Holding ASA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Atea ASA has higher upside potential than Pexip Holding ASA, analysts believe Atea ASA is more attractive than Pexip Holding ASA.

Atea ASA has a beta of 0.649, which suggesting that the stock is 35.12% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pexip Holding ASA has a beta of 0.929, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.147%.

Atea ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.53%. Pexip Holding ASA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Atea ASA pays 101.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Pexip Holding ASA pays out 172.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Atea ASA quarterly revenues are $835.2M, which are larger than Pexip Holding ASA quarterly revenues of $26.3M. Atea ASA's net income of $22.4M is higher than Pexip Holding ASA's net income of $2.5M. Notably, Atea ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.89x while Pexip Holding ASA's PE ratio is 38.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Atea ASA is 0.50x versus 6.02x for Pexip Holding ASA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

REC Silicon ASA has a net margin of 2.68% compared to Atea ASA's net margin of -111.24%. Atea ASA's return on equity of 18.63% beat REC Silicon ASA's return on equity of -1132.18%.

Atea ASA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand REC Silicon ASA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Atea ASA has higher upside potential than REC Silicon ASA, analysts believe Atea ASA is more attractive than REC Silicon ASA.

Atea ASA has a beta of 0.649, which suggesting that the stock is 35.12% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison REC Silicon ASA has a beta of 0.445, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.461%.

Atea ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.53%. REC Silicon ASA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Atea ASA pays 101.16% of its earnings as a dividend. REC Silicon ASA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Atea ASA quarterly revenues are $835.2M, which are larger than REC Silicon ASA quarterly revenues of $16.9M. Atea ASA's net income of $22.4M is higher than REC Silicon ASA's net income of -$18.8M. Notably, Atea ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.89x while REC Silicon ASA's PE ratio is 16.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Atea ASA is 0.50x versus 0.33x for REC Silicon ASA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.