Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?
Digital signature software business DocuSign (NASDAQ:DOCU) has been struggling over…
Buy
72
ALMMF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$1.47
Seasonality move
:
13.38%
Day range:
$1.44 - $1.47
52-week range:
$0.50 - $1.75
Dividend yield:
3.23%
P/E ratio:
17.36x
P/S ratio:
0.76x
P/B ratio:
2.45x
Volume:
5.9K
Avg. volume:
11.8K
1-year change:
164.6%
Market cap:
$25.2B
Revenue:
$32.9B
EPS (TTM):
$0.08
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ALMMF
Aluminum Corp. of China Ltd.
|
$8.1B | -- | -2.04% | -- | -- |
|
BON
Bon Natural Life Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CNEY
CN Energy Group, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ITP
IT Tech Packaging, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
RETO
ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SEED
Origin Agritech Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ALMMF
Aluminum Corp. of China Ltd.
|
$1.47 | -- | $25.2B | 17.36x | $0.02 | 3.23% | 0.76x |
|
BON
Bon Natural Life Ltd.
|
$1.61 | -- | $6M | 0.33x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.16x |
|
CNEY
CN Energy Group, Inc.
|
$0.53 | -- | $1.7M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.06x |
|
ITP
IT Tech Packaging, Inc.
|
$0.24 | -- | $4M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.03x |
|
RETO
ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc.
|
$2.13 | -- | $5.5M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.26x |
|
SEED
Origin Agritech Ltd.
|
$1.18 | -- | $9M | 4.43x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.62x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ALMMF
Aluminum Corp. of China Ltd.
|
48.15% | 2.208 | 42.25% | 0.94x |
|
BON
Bon Natural Life Ltd.
|
14.59% | 4.611 | 97.42% | 0.76x |
|
CNEY
CN Energy Group, Inc.
|
5.91% | 1.265 | 191.75% | 2.16x |
|
ITP
IT Tech Packaging, Inc.
|
6.28% | -4.025 | 207.9% | 0.60x |
|
RETO
ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc.
|
39.92% | 0.634 | 76.14% | 0.14x |
|
SEED
Origin Agritech Ltd.
|
-226.02% | 1.400 | 30.76% | 0.12x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ALMMF
Aluminum Corp. of China Ltd.
|
$1.5B | $1.1B | 11.5% | 18.54% | 12.86% | $1.3B |
|
BON
Bon Natural Life Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 5.99% | 6.8% | -- | -- |
|
CNEY
CN Energy Group, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -3.93% | -4.2% | -- | -- |
|
ITP
IT Tech Packaging, Inc.
|
$2M | -$996.3K | -6.61% | -7.04% | -3.89% | $1.5M |
|
RETO
ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -32.57% | -85.96% | -- | -- |
|
SEED
Origin Agritech Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Aluminum Corp. of China Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns ALMMF or BON?
Bon Natural Life Ltd. has a net margin of 10.31% compared to Aluminum Corp. of China Ltd.'s net margin of --. Aluminum Corp. of China Ltd.'s return on equity of 18.54% beat Bon Natural Life Ltd.'s return on equity of 6.8%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ALMMFAluminum Corp. of China Ltd.18.37% -- $26.9B BONBon Natural Life Ltd.-- -- $43.6M -
What do Analysts Say About ALMMF or BON?
Aluminum Corp. of China Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Bon Natural Life Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 155179.5%. Given that Bon Natural Life Ltd. has higher upside potential than Aluminum Corp. of China Ltd., analysts believe Bon Natural Life Ltd. is more attractive than Aluminum Corp. of China Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ALMMFAluminum Corp. of China Ltd.0 0 0 BONBon Natural Life Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is ALMMF or BON More Risky?
Aluminum Corp. of China Ltd. has a beta of 0.820, which suggesting that the stock is 18.021% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bon Natural Life Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ALMMF or BON?
Aluminum Corp. of China Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.23%. Bon Natural Life Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Aluminum Corp. of China Ltd. pays 28.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Bon Natural Life Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Aluminum Corp. of China Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ALMMF or BON?
Aluminum Corp. of China Ltd. quarterly revenues are $8.4B, which are larger than Bon Natural Life Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Aluminum Corp. of China Ltd.'s net income of $866.3M is higher than Bon Natural Life Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Aluminum Corp. of China Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.36x while Bon Natural Life Ltd.'s PE ratio is 0.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aluminum Corp. of China Ltd. is 0.76x versus 0.16x for Bon Natural Life Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ALMMFAluminum Corp. of China Ltd.0.76x 17.36x $8.4B $866.3M BONBon Natural Life Ltd.0.16x 0.33x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ALMMF or CNEY?
CN Energy Group, Inc. has a net margin of 10.31% compared to Aluminum Corp. of China Ltd.'s net margin of --. Aluminum Corp. of China Ltd.'s return on equity of 18.54% beat CN Energy Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -4.2%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ALMMFAluminum Corp. of China Ltd.18.37% -- $26.9B CNEYCN Energy Group, Inc.-- -- $109.3M -
What do Analysts Say About ALMMF or CNEY?
Aluminum Corp. of China Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CN Energy Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 169519.47%. Given that CN Energy Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Aluminum Corp. of China Ltd., analysts believe CN Energy Group, Inc. is more attractive than Aluminum Corp. of China Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ALMMFAluminum Corp. of China Ltd.0 0 0 CNEYCN Energy Group, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is ALMMF or CNEY More Risky?
Aluminum Corp. of China Ltd. has a beta of 0.820, which suggesting that the stock is 18.021% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CN Energy Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ALMMF or CNEY?
Aluminum Corp. of China Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.23%. CN Energy Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Aluminum Corp. of China Ltd. pays 28.6% of its earnings as a dividend. CN Energy Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Aluminum Corp. of China Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ALMMF or CNEY?
Aluminum Corp. of China Ltd. quarterly revenues are $8.4B, which are larger than CN Energy Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Aluminum Corp. of China Ltd.'s net income of $866.3M is higher than CN Energy Group, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, Aluminum Corp. of China Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.36x while CN Energy Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aluminum Corp. of China Ltd. is 0.76x versus 0.06x for CN Energy Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ALMMFAluminum Corp. of China Ltd.0.76x 17.36x $8.4B $866.3M CNEYCN Energy Group, Inc.0.06x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ALMMF or ITP?
IT Tech Packaging, Inc. has a net margin of 10.31% compared to Aluminum Corp. of China Ltd.'s net margin of -5.66%. Aluminum Corp. of China Ltd.'s return on equity of 18.54% beat IT Tech Packaging, Inc.'s return on equity of -7.04%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ALMMFAluminum Corp. of China Ltd.18.37% -- $26.9B ITPIT Tech Packaging, Inc.7.9% -$0.11 $162.2M -
What do Analysts Say About ALMMF or ITP?
Aluminum Corp. of China Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand IT Tech Packaging, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Aluminum Corp. of China Ltd. has higher upside potential than IT Tech Packaging, Inc., analysts believe Aluminum Corp. of China Ltd. is more attractive than IT Tech Packaging, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ALMMFAluminum Corp. of China Ltd.0 0 0 ITPIT Tech Packaging, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is ALMMF or ITP More Risky?
Aluminum Corp. of China Ltd. has a beta of 0.820, which suggesting that the stock is 18.021% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison IT Tech Packaging, Inc. has a beta of -0.575, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 157.534%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ALMMF or ITP?
Aluminum Corp. of China Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.23%. IT Tech Packaging, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Aluminum Corp. of China Ltd. pays 28.6% of its earnings as a dividend. IT Tech Packaging, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Aluminum Corp. of China Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ALMMF or ITP?
Aluminum Corp. of China Ltd. quarterly revenues are $8.4B, which are larger than IT Tech Packaging, Inc. quarterly revenues of $25.6M. Aluminum Corp. of China Ltd.'s net income of $866.3M is higher than IT Tech Packaging, Inc.'s net income of -$1.4M. Notably, Aluminum Corp. of China Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.36x while IT Tech Packaging, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aluminum Corp. of China Ltd. is 0.76x versus 0.03x for IT Tech Packaging, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ALMMFAluminum Corp. of China Ltd.0.76x 17.36x $8.4B $866.3M ITPIT Tech Packaging, Inc.0.03x -- $25.6M -$1.4M
-
Which has Higher Returns ALMMF or RETO?
ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. has a net margin of 10.31% compared to Aluminum Corp. of China Ltd.'s net margin of --. Aluminum Corp. of China Ltd.'s return on equity of 18.54% beat ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc.'s return on equity of -85.96%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ALMMFAluminum Corp. of China Ltd.18.37% -- $26.9B RETOReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc.-- -- $22.6M -
What do Analysts Say About ALMMF or RETO?
Aluminum Corp. of China Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Aluminum Corp. of China Ltd. has higher upside potential than ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc., analysts believe Aluminum Corp. of China Ltd. is more attractive than ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ALMMFAluminum Corp. of China Ltd.0 0 0 RETOReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is ALMMF or RETO More Risky?
Aluminum Corp. of China Ltd. has a beta of 0.820, which suggesting that the stock is 18.021% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. has a beta of 1.523, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.329%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ALMMF or RETO?
Aluminum Corp. of China Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.23%. ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Aluminum Corp. of China Ltd. pays 28.6% of its earnings as a dividend. ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Aluminum Corp. of China Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ALMMF or RETO?
Aluminum Corp. of China Ltd. quarterly revenues are $8.4B, which are larger than ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Aluminum Corp. of China Ltd.'s net income of $866.3M is higher than ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, Aluminum Corp. of China Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.36x while ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aluminum Corp. of China Ltd. is 0.76x versus 0.26x for ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ALMMFAluminum Corp. of China Ltd.0.76x 17.36x $8.4B $866.3M RETOReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc.0.26x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ALMMF or SEED?
Origin Agritech Ltd. has a net margin of 10.31% compared to Aluminum Corp. of China Ltd.'s net margin of --. Aluminum Corp. of China Ltd.'s return on equity of 18.54% beat Origin Agritech Ltd.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ALMMFAluminum Corp. of China Ltd.18.37% -- $26.9B SEEDOrigin Agritech Ltd.-- -- -$5.7M -
What do Analysts Say About ALMMF or SEED?
Aluminum Corp. of China Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Origin Agritech Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Aluminum Corp. of China Ltd. has higher upside potential than Origin Agritech Ltd., analysts believe Aluminum Corp. of China Ltd. is more attractive than Origin Agritech Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ALMMFAluminum Corp. of China Ltd.0 0 0 SEEDOrigin Agritech Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is ALMMF or SEED More Risky?
Aluminum Corp. of China Ltd. has a beta of 0.820, which suggesting that the stock is 18.021% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Origin Agritech Ltd. has a beta of 1.807, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 80.662%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ALMMF or SEED?
Aluminum Corp. of China Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.23%. Origin Agritech Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Aluminum Corp. of China Ltd. pays 28.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Origin Agritech Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Aluminum Corp. of China Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ALMMF or SEED?
Aluminum Corp. of China Ltd. quarterly revenues are $8.4B, which are larger than Origin Agritech Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Aluminum Corp. of China Ltd.'s net income of $866.3M is higher than Origin Agritech Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Aluminum Corp. of China Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.36x while Origin Agritech Ltd.'s PE ratio is 4.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aluminum Corp. of China Ltd. is 0.76x versus 0.62x for Origin Agritech Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ALMMFAluminum Corp. of China Ltd.0.76x 17.36x $8.4B $866.3M SEEDOrigin Agritech Ltd.0.62x 4.43x -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?
Cybersecurity major SentinelOne (NYSE:S) has struggled over several years, delivering…
Is Broadcom Stock on Sale?
Chip and software maker Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) has been among the…
Stock Ideas
Buy
59
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 65x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
72
GLTO alert for Dec 27
Galecto, Inc. [GLTO] is up 16.92% over the past day.
Sell
20
SMX alert for Dec 27
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 15.76% over the past day.
Sell
11
CDNAF alert for Dec 27
Canadian Tire Corp. Ltd. [CDNAF] is down 10% over the past day.
