AJINY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Kao has a net margin of 7.92% compared to Ajinomoto's net margin of 6.87%. Ajinomoto's return on equity of 10.58% beat Kao's return on equity of 7.86%.

Ajinomoto has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kao has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Ajinomoto has higher upside potential than Kao, analysts believe Ajinomoto is more attractive than Kao.

Ajinomoto has a beta of 0.314, which suggesting that the stock is 68.57% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kao has a beta of 0.199, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 80.095%.

Ajinomoto has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.22%. Kao offers a yield of 2.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Ajinomoto pays 44.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Kao pays out 65.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ajinomoto quarterly revenues are $2.7B, which are smaller than Kao quarterly revenues of $2.7B. Ajinomoto's net income of $211.2M is higher than Kao's net income of $185.9M. Notably, Ajinomoto's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.81x while Kao's PE ratio is 35.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ajinomoto is 2.07x versus 1.81x for Kao. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Shiseido has a net margin of 7.92% compared to Ajinomoto's net margin of 0.35%. Ajinomoto's return on equity of 10.58% beat Shiseido's return on equity of 0.28%.

Ajinomoto has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Shiseido has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Ajinomoto has higher upside potential than Shiseido, analysts believe Ajinomoto is more attractive than Shiseido.

Ajinomoto has a beta of 0.314, which suggesting that the stock is 68.57% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Shiseido has a beta of 0.318, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 68.242%.

Ajinomoto has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.22%. Shiseido offers a yield of 1.66% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. Ajinomoto pays 44.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Shiseido pays out -221.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Ajinomoto's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ajinomoto quarterly revenues are $2.7B, which are larger than Shiseido quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Ajinomoto's net income of $211.2M is higher than Shiseido's net income of $5M. Notably, Ajinomoto's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.81x while Shiseido's PE ratio is 523.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ajinomoto is 2.07x versus 1.00x for Shiseido. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Toyo Suisan Kaisha has a net margin of 7.92% compared to Ajinomoto's net margin of 13.65%. Ajinomoto's return on equity of 10.58% beat Toyo Suisan Kaisha's return on equity of 13.98%.

Ajinomoto has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Toyo Suisan Kaisha has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Ajinomoto has higher upside potential than Toyo Suisan Kaisha, analysts believe Ajinomoto is more attractive than Toyo Suisan Kaisha.

Ajinomoto has a beta of 0.314, which suggesting that the stock is 68.57% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Toyo Suisan Kaisha has a beta of 0.476, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.373%.

Ajinomoto has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.22%. Toyo Suisan Kaisha offers a yield of 2.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.53 per share. Ajinomoto pays 44.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Toyo Suisan Kaisha pays out 22.01% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ajinomoto quarterly revenues are $2.7B, which are larger than Toyo Suisan Kaisha quarterly revenues of $980.3M. Ajinomoto's net income of $211.2M is higher than Toyo Suisan Kaisha's net income of $133.8M. Notably, Ajinomoto's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.81x while Toyo Suisan Kaisha's PE ratio is 13.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ajinomoto is 2.07x versus 1.67x for Toyo Suisan Kaisha. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Unicharm has a net margin of 7.92% compared to Ajinomoto's net margin of 8.5%. Ajinomoto's return on equity of 10.58% beat Unicharm's return on equity of 10.38%.

Ajinomoto has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Unicharm has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Ajinomoto has higher upside potential than Unicharm, analysts believe Ajinomoto is more attractive than Unicharm.

Ajinomoto has a beta of 0.314, which suggesting that the stock is 68.57% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Unicharm has a beta of 0.298, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.203%.

Ajinomoto has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.22%. Unicharm offers a yield of 1.26% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Ajinomoto pays 44.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Unicharm pays out 30.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ajinomoto quarterly revenues are $2.7B, which are larger than Unicharm quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Ajinomoto's net income of $211.2M is higher than Unicharm's net income of $134.1M. Notably, Ajinomoto's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.81x while Unicharm's PE ratio is 25.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ajinomoto is 2.07x versus 2.34x for Unicharm. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.