Financhill
Buy
60

AETUF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$19.00
Seasonality move :
1.56%
Day range:
$18.93 - $19.30
52-week range:
$14.58 - $19.64
Dividend yield:
2.67%
P/E ratio:
12.32x
P/S ratio:
2.76x
P/B ratio:
1.97x
Volume:
85.8K
Avg. volume:
59.5K
1-year change:
24.09%
Market cap:
$11.2B
Revenue:
$4.7B
EPS (TTM):
$1.54

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
AETUF
ARC Resources
$949M $0.27 -17.29% -31.45% --
FECOF
FEC Resources
-- -- -- -- --
GFR
Greenfire Resources
-- $0.29 -- -16.96% --
GTE
Gran Tierra Energy
-- $0.14 -- -30% --
SUNYF
Sunshine Oilsands
-- -- -- -- --
VELXQ
Canadian Overseas Petroleum
-- -- -- -- --
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
AETUF
ARC Resources
$19.00 -- $11.2B 12.32x $0.13 2.67% 2.76x
FECOF
FEC Resources
$0.0016 -- $1.4M 0.20x $0.00 0% --
GFR
Greenfire Resources
$7.19 -- $499.5M 13.80x $0.00 0% 0.89x
GTE
Gran Tierra Energy
$7.48 -- $272.7M 5.24x $0.00 0% 0.38x
SUNYF
Sunshine Oilsands
$0.0602 -- $14.7M -- $0.00 0% 0.49x
VELXQ
Canadian Overseas Petroleum
$0.0003 -- $1.1M -- $0.00 0% 0.01x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
AETUF
ARC Resources
15.71% 0.872 11.42% 0.58x
FECOF
FEC Resources
-- 2.498 -- --
GFR
Greenfire Resources
29.36% 0.728 44.13% 0.49x
GTE
Gran Tierra Energy
63.2% -0.639 376.16% 1.17x
SUNYF
Sunshine Oilsands
85.98% 0.107 1906.76% 0.01x
VELXQ
Canadian Overseas Petroleum
-- 5.218 -- --
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
AETUF
ARC Resources
$441.7M $185.2M 14.33% 16.71% 34.6% $50.4M
FECOF
FEC Resources
-- -$39.9K -- -- -- -$46.3K
GFR
Greenfire Resources
$73.3M $28.6M 3.5% 5.36% 38.37% -$28.5M
GTE
Gran Tierra Energy
$95.8M $39.5M 4.47% 11.15% 25.56% $25.7M
SUNYF
Sunshine Oilsands
-$1.1M -$3.9M -7.31% -43.12% 39.36% -$958.3K
VELXQ
Canadian Overseas Petroleum
-- -- -- -- -- --

ARC Resources vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns AETUF or FECOF?

    FEC Resources has a net margin of 24.59% compared to ARC Resources's net margin of --. ARC Resources's return on equity of 16.71% beat FEC Resources's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    AETUF
    ARC Resources
    45.06% $0.40 $6.8B
    FECOF
    FEC Resources
    -- -$0.00 --
  • What do Analysts Say About AETUF or FECOF?

    ARC Resources has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 31.52%. On the other hand FEC Resources has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ARC Resources has higher upside potential than FEC Resources, analysts believe ARC Resources is more attractive than FEC Resources.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    AETUF
    ARC Resources
    11 0 0
    FECOF
    FEC Resources
    0 0 0
  • Is AETUF or FECOF More Risky?

    ARC Resources has a beta of 1.104, which suggesting that the stock is 10.383% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison FEC Resources has a beta of 0.970, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.041%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock AETUF or FECOF?

    ARC Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.67%. FEC Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ARC Resources pays 24.55% of its earnings as a dividend. FEC Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. ARC Resources's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios AETUF or FECOF?

    ARC Resources quarterly revenues are $980.3M, which are larger than FEC Resources quarterly revenues of --. ARC Resources's net income of $241M is higher than FEC Resources's net income of -$57K. Notably, ARC Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.32x while FEC Resources's PE ratio is 0.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ARC Resources is 2.76x versus -- for FEC Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    AETUF
    ARC Resources
    2.76x 12.32x $980.3M $241M
    FECOF
    FEC Resources
    -- 0.20x -- -$57K
  • Which has Higher Returns AETUF or GFR?

    Greenfire Resources has a net margin of 24.59% compared to ARC Resources's net margin of 30.43%. ARC Resources's return on equity of 16.71% beat Greenfire Resources's return on equity of 5.36%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    AETUF
    ARC Resources
    45.06% $0.40 $6.8B
    GFR
    Greenfire Resources
    51.62% $0.60 $777.9M
  • What do Analysts Say About AETUF or GFR?

    ARC Resources has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 31.52%. On the other hand Greenfire Resources has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ARC Resources has higher upside potential than Greenfire Resources, analysts believe ARC Resources is more attractive than Greenfire Resources.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    AETUF
    ARC Resources
    11 0 0
    GFR
    Greenfire Resources
    1 0 0
  • Is AETUF or GFR More Risky?

    ARC Resources has a beta of 1.104, which suggesting that the stock is 10.383% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Greenfire Resources has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock AETUF or GFR?

    ARC Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.67%. Greenfire Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ARC Resources pays 24.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Greenfire Resources pays out -43.77% of its earnings as a dividend. ARC Resources's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios AETUF or GFR?

    ARC Resources quarterly revenues are $980.3M, which are larger than Greenfire Resources quarterly revenues of $141.9M. ARC Resources's net income of $241M is higher than Greenfire Resources's net income of $43.2M. Notably, ARC Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.32x while Greenfire Resources's PE ratio is 13.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ARC Resources is 2.76x versus 0.89x for Greenfire Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    AETUF
    ARC Resources
    2.76x 12.32x $980.3M $241M
    GFR
    Greenfire Resources
    0.89x 13.80x $141.9M $43.2M
  • Which has Higher Returns AETUF or GTE?

    Gran Tierra Energy has a net margin of 24.59% compared to ARC Resources's net margin of 0.75%. ARC Resources's return on equity of 16.71% beat Gran Tierra Energy's return on equity of 11.15%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    AETUF
    ARC Resources
    45.06% $0.40 $6.8B
    GTE
    Gran Tierra Energy
    63.29% $0.04 $1.1B
  • What do Analysts Say About AETUF or GTE?

    ARC Resources has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 31.52%. On the other hand Gran Tierra Energy has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 7.82%. Given that ARC Resources has higher upside potential than Gran Tierra Energy, analysts believe ARC Resources is more attractive than Gran Tierra Energy.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    AETUF
    ARC Resources
    11 0 0
    GTE
    Gran Tierra Energy
    2 3 0
  • Is AETUF or GTE More Risky?

    ARC Resources has a beta of 1.104, which suggesting that the stock is 10.383% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gran Tierra Energy has a beta of 1.533, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.336%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock AETUF or GTE?

    ARC Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.67%. Gran Tierra Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ARC Resources pays 24.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Gran Tierra Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. ARC Resources's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios AETUF or GTE?

    ARC Resources quarterly revenues are $980.3M, which are larger than Gran Tierra Energy quarterly revenues of $151.4M. ARC Resources's net income of $241M is higher than Gran Tierra Energy's net income of $1.1M. Notably, ARC Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.32x while Gran Tierra Energy's PE ratio is 5.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ARC Resources is 2.76x versus 0.38x for Gran Tierra Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    AETUF
    ARC Resources
    2.76x 12.32x $980.3M $241M
    GTE
    Gran Tierra Energy
    0.38x 5.24x $151.4M $1.1M
  • Which has Higher Returns AETUF or SUNYF?

    Sunshine Oilsands has a net margin of 24.59% compared to ARC Resources's net margin of -9.69%. ARC Resources's return on equity of 16.71% beat Sunshine Oilsands's return on equity of -43.12%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    AETUF
    ARC Resources
    45.06% $0.40 $6.8B
    SUNYF
    Sunshine Oilsands
    -28.82% -$0.00 $308.5M
  • What do Analysts Say About AETUF or SUNYF?

    ARC Resources has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 31.52%. On the other hand Sunshine Oilsands has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ARC Resources has higher upside potential than Sunshine Oilsands, analysts believe ARC Resources is more attractive than Sunshine Oilsands.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    AETUF
    ARC Resources
    11 0 0
    SUNYF
    Sunshine Oilsands
    0 0 0
  • Is AETUF or SUNYF More Risky?

    ARC Resources has a beta of 1.104, which suggesting that the stock is 10.383% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sunshine Oilsands has a beta of -3,524.262, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 352526.223%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock AETUF or SUNYF?

    ARC Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.67%. Sunshine Oilsands offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ARC Resources pays 24.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Sunshine Oilsands pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. ARC Resources's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios AETUF or SUNYF?

    ARC Resources quarterly revenues are $980.3M, which are larger than Sunshine Oilsands quarterly revenues of $3.8M. ARC Resources's net income of $241M is higher than Sunshine Oilsands's net income of -$370.1K. Notably, ARC Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.32x while Sunshine Oilsands's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ARC Resources is 2.76x versus 0.49x for Sunshine Oilsands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    AETUF
    ARC Resources
    2.76x 12.32x $980.3M $241M
    SUNYF
    Sunshine Oilsands
    0.49x -- $3.8M -$370.1K
  • Which has Higher Returns AETUF or VELXQ?

    Canadian Overseas Petroleum has a net margin of 24.59% compared to ARC Resources's net margin of --. ARC Resources's return on equity of 16.71% beat Canadian Overseas Petroleum's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    AETUF
    ARC Resources
    45.06% $0.40 $6.8B
    VELXQ
    Canadian Overseas Petroleum
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About AETUF or VELXQ?

    ARC Resources has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 31.52%. On the other hand Canadian Overseas Petroleum has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ARC Resources has higher upside potential than Canadian Overseas Petroleum, analysts believe ARC Resources is more attractive than Canadian Overseas Petroleum.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    AETUF
    ARC Resources
    11 0 0
    VELXQ
    Canadian Overseas Petroleum
    0 0 0
  • Is AETUF or VELXQ More Risky?

    ARC Resources has a beta of 1.104, which suggesting that the stock is 10.383% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Canadian Overseas Petroleum has a beta of -0.299, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 129.861%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock AETUF or VELXQ?

    ARC Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.67%. Canadian Overseas Petroleum offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ARC Resources pays 24.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Canadian Overseas Petroleum pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. ARC Resources's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios AETUF or VELXQ?

    ARC Resources quarterly revenues are $980.3M, which are larger than Canadian Overseas Petroleum quarterly revenues of --. ARC Resources's net income of $241M is higher than Canadian Overseas Petroleum's net income of --. Notably, ARC Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.32x while Canadian Overseas Petroleum's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ARC Resources is 2.76x versus 0.01x for Canadian Overseas Petroleum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    AETUF
    ARC Resources
    2.76x 12.32x $980.3M $241M
    VELXQ
    Canadian Overseas Petroleum
    0.01x -- -- --

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

3 High Dividend Dow Jones Stocks
3 High Dividend Dow Jones Stocks

Thanks to surging stock prices over the past two years,…

Will American Tower Stock Recover?
Will American Tower Stock Recover?

The performance of the real estate investment trust, or REIT,…

Will Booking Holdings Stock Split?
Will Booking Holdings Stock Split?

Booking Holdings, the travel and technology company that owns brands…

Stock Ideas

Sell
42
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 40x

Buy
59
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 125x

Sell
46
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 36x

Alerts

Sell
50
NARI alert for Jan 7

Inari Medical [NARI] is up 22.11% over the past day.

Buy
70
PDEX alert for Jan 7

Pro-Dex [PDEX] is down 7.03% over the past day.

Buy
52
ALCO alert for Jan 7

Alico [ALCO] is down 0.7% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock