Is Bloom Energy The Best Stock to Buy Now?
Shares of energy startup Bloom Energy (NYSE:BE) have advanced by…
Sell
32
AERG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$1.8700
Seasonality move
:
-1.5%
Day range:
$1.9100 - $1.9900
52-week range:
$0.5800 - $2.9900
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
359.75x
P/B ratio:
204.85x
Volume:
120.2K
Avg. volume:
117.3K
1-year change:
180.88%
Market cap:
$426.8M
Revenue:
$2.4M
EPS (TTM):
-$0.06
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AERG
Applied Energetics, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ACFN
Acorn Energy, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
AIMD
Ainos, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
LGL
LGL Group, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TRMB
Trimble, Inc.
|
$870.3M | $0.72 | -3.57% | 164.32% | $98.50 |
|
USBC
US Biotec
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AERG
Applied Energetics, Inc.
|
$1.9100 | -- | $426.8M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 359.75x |
|
ACFN
Acorn Energy, Inc.
|
$15.36 | -- | $38.4M | 5.79x | $0.00 | 0% | 3.07x |
|
AIMD
Ainos, Inc.
|
$1.97 | -- | $8.3M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 174.04x |
|
LGL
LGL Group, Inc.
|
$5.95 | -- | $32.9M | 36.37x | $0.00 | 0% | 14.03x |
|
TRMB
Trimble, Inc.
|
$78.89 | $98.50 | $18.8B | 53.65x | $0.00 | 0% | 5.34x |
|
USBC
US Biotec
|
$0.0001 | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AERG
Applied Energetics, Inc.
|
290.01% | 9.557 | 0.27% | 1.56x |
|
ACFN
Acorn Energy, Inc.
|
12.73% | 1.689 | 1.46% | 1.34x |
|
AIMD
Ainos, Inc.
|
52.27% | 2.390 | 75.73% | 1.94x |
|
LGL
LGL Group, Inc.
|
-- | 0.379 | -- | 38.96x |
|
TRMB
Trimble, Inc.
|
19.38% | 1.684 | 7.16% | 0.62x |
|
USBC
US Biotec
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AERG
Applied Energetics, Inc.
|
-$59K | -$4M | -485.56% | -895.17% | -3643.3% | -$2.5M |
|
ACFN
Acorn Energy, Inc.
|
$1.9M | $159K | 117.45% | 128.24% | 6.42% | $891K |
|
AIMD
Ainos, Inc.
|
-$1.2M | -$2.8M | -59.16% | -109.74% | -126554.55% | -$1.2M |
|
LGL
LGL Group, Inc.
|
$349K | -$327K | 2.39% | 2.4% | -49.47% | $275K |
|
TRMB
Trimble, Inc.
|
$593.9M | $166M | 4.93% | 6.27% | 18.42% | $116.6M |
|
USBC
US Biotec
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Applied Energetics, Inc. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns AERG or ACFN?
Acorn Energy, Inc. has a net margin of -3643.3% compared to Applied Energetics, Inc.'s net margin of 10.41%. Applied Energetics, Inc.'s return on equity of -895.17% beat Acorn Energy, Inc.'s return on equity of 128.24%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AERGApplied Energetics, Inc.-54.13% -$0.02 $384.3K ACFNAcorn Energy, Inc.78.49% $0.10 $8.3M -
What do Analysts Say About AERG or ACFN?
Applied Energetics, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Acorn Energy, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Applied Energetics, Inc. has higher upside potential than Acorn Energy, Inc., analysts believe Applied Energetics, Inc. is more attractive than Acorn Energy, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AERGApplied Energetics, Inc.0 0 0 ACFNAcorn Energy, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is AERG or ACFN More Risky?
Applied Energetics, Inc. has a beta of 0.977, which suggesting that the stock is 2.297% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Acorn Energy, Inc. has a beta of 0.124, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 87.594%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AERG or ACFN?
Applied Energetics, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Acorn Energy, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Applied Energetics, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Acorn Energy, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AERG or ACFN?
Applied Energetics, Inc. quarterly revenues are $109K, which are smaller than Acorn Energy, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.5M. Applied Energetics, Inc.'s net income of -$4M is lower than Acorn Energy, Inc.'s net income of $258K. Notably, Applied Energetics, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Acorn Energy, Inc.'s PE ratio is 5.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Applied Energetics, Inc. is 359.75x versus 3.07x for Acorn Energy, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AERGApplied Energetics, Inc.359.75x -- $109K -$4M ACFNAcorn Energy, Inc.3.07x 5.79x $2.5M $258K
-
Which has Higher Returns AERG or AIMD?
Ainos, Inc. has a net margin of -3643.3% compared to Applied Energetics, Inc.'s net margin of -133259.09%. Applied Energetics, Inc.'s return on equity of -895.17% beat Ainos, Inc.'s return on equity of -109.74%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AERGApplied Energetics, Inc.-54.13% -$0.02 $384.3K AIMDAinos, Inc.-54772.73% -$0.64 $21M -
What do Analysts Say About AERG or AIMD?
Applied Energetics, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Ainos, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Applied Energetics, Inc. has higher upside potential than Ainos, Inc., analysts believe Applied Energetics, Inc. is more attractive than Ainos, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AERGApplied Energetics, Inc.0 0 0 AIMDAinos, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is AERG or AIMD More Risky?
Applied Energetics, Inc. has a beta of 0.977, which suggesting that the stock is 2.297% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ainos, Inc. has a beta of 2.387, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 138.689%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AERG or AIMD?
Applied Energetics, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ainos, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Applied Energetics, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ainos, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AERG or AIMD?
Applied Energetics, Inc. quarterly revenues are $109K, which are larger than Ainos, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.2K. Applied Energetics, Inc.'s net income of -$4M is lower than Ainos, Inc.'s net income of -$2.9M. Notably, Applied Energetics, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ainos, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Applied Energetics, Inc. is 359.75x versus 174.04x for Ainos, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AERGApplied Energetics, Inc.359.75x -- $109K -$4M AIMDAinos, Inc.174.04x -- $2.2K -$2.9M
-
Which has Higher Returns AERG or LGL?
LGL Group, Inc. has a net margin of -3643.3% compared to Applied Energetics, Inc.'s net margin of -9.17%. Applied Energetics, Inc.'s return on equity of -895.17% beat LGL Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 2.4%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AERGApplied Energetics, Inc.-54.13% -$0.02 $384.3K LGLLGL Group, Inc.52.8% $0.14 $41.9M -
What do Analysts Say About AERG or LGL?
Applied Energetics, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand LGL Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 34.45%. Given that LGL Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Applied Energetics, Inc., analysts believe LGL Group, Inc. is more attractive than Applied Energetics, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AERGApplied Energetics, Inc.0 0 0 LGLLGL Group, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is AERG or LGL More Risky?
Applied Energetics, Inc. has a beta of 0.977, which suggesting that the stock is 2.297% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LGL Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.417, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.348%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AERG or LGL?
Applied Energetics, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. LGL Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Applied Energetics, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. LGL Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AERG or LGL?
Applied Energetics, Inc. quarterly revenues are $109K, which are smaller than LGL Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $661K. Applied Energetics, Inc.'s net income of -$4M is lower than LGL Group, Inc.'s net income of $794K. Notably, Applied Energetics, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while LGL Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 36.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Applied Energetics, Inc. is 359.75x versus 14.03x for LGL Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AERGApplied Energetics, Inc.359.75x -- $109K -$4M LGLLGL Group, Inc.14.03x 36.37x $661K $794K
-
Which has Higher Returns AERG or TRMB?
Trimble, Inc. has a net margin of -3643.3% compared to Applied Energetics, Inc.'s net margin of 12.37%. Applied Energetics, Inc.'s return on equity of -895.17% beat Trimble, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.27%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AERGApplied Energetics, Inc.-54.13% -$0.02 $384.3K TRMBTrimble, Inc.65.9% $0.46 $7.2B -
What do Analysts Say About AERG or TRMB?
Applied Energetics, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Trimble, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $98.50 which suggests that it could grow by 24.86%. Given that Trimble, Inc. has higher upside potential than Applied Energetics, Inc., analysts believe Trimble, Inc. is more attractive than Applied Energetics, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AERGApplied Energetics, Inc.0 0 0 TRMBTrimble, Inc.9 0 0 -
Is AERG or TRMB More Risky?
Applied Energetics, Inc. has a beta of 0.977, which suggesting that the stock is 2.297% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Trimble, Inc. has a beta of 1.598, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.819%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AERG or TRMB?
Applied Energetics, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Trimble, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Applied Energetics, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Trimble, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AERG or TRMB?
Applied Energetics, Inc. quarterly revenues are $109K, which are smaller than Trimble, Inc. quarterly revenues of $901.2M. Applied Energetics, Inc.'s net income of -$4M is lower than Trimble, Inc.'s net income of $111.5M. Notably, Applied Energetics, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Trimble, Inc.'s PE ratio is 53.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Applied Energetics, Inc. is 359.75x versus 5.34x for Trimble, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AERGApplied Energetics, Inc.359.75x -- $109K -$4M TRMBTrimble, Inc.5.34x 53.65x $901.2M $111.5M
-
Which has Higher Returns AERG or USBC?
US Biotec has a net margin of -3643.3% compared to Applied Energetics, Inc.'s net margin of --. Applied Energetics, Inc.'s return on equity of -895.17% beat US Biotec's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AERGApplied Energetics, Inc.-54.13% -$0.02 $384.3K USBCUS Biotec-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About AERG or USBC?
Applied Energetics, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand US Biotec has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Applied Energetics, Inc. has higher upside potential than US Biotec, analysts believe Applied Energetics, Inc. is more attractive than US Biotec.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AERGApplied Energetics, Inc.0 0 0 USBCUS Biotec0 0 0 -
Is AERG or USBC More Risky?
Applied Energetics, Inc. has a beta of 0.977, which suggesting that the stock is 2.297% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison US Biotec has a beta of 1,683.577, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 168257.737%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AERG or USBC?
Applied Energetics, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. US Biotec offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Applied Energetics, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. US Biotec pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AERG or USBC?
Applied Energetics, Inc. quarterly revenues are $109K, which are larger than US Biotec quarterly revenues of --. Applied Energetics, Inc.'s net income of -$4M is higher than US Biotec's net income of --. Notably, Applied Energetics, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while US Biotec's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Applied Energetics, Inc. is 359.75x versus -- for US Biotec. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AERGApplied Energetics, Inc.359.75x -- $109K -$4M USBCUS Biotec-- -- -- --
Related Companies
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Berkshire Hathaway Stock Undervalued?
Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE:BRK.A,BRK.B) has undershot the market this year, returning…
Is Oracle Stock Undervalued?
Shares of Oracle (NYSE:ORCL) rocketed higher earlier this year when…
Stock Ideas
Sell
46
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.2T
P/E Ratio: 58x
Buy
53
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Buy
67
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.6T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Alerts
Sell
46
BE alert for Dec 18
Bloom Energy Corp. [BE] is up 4.27% over the past day.
Sell
44
STRL alert for Dec 18
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. [STRL] is up 6.62% over the past day.
Sell
39
SOXL alert for Dec 18
Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X Shares [SOXL] is up 7.28% over the past day.
