AABB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Ivanhoe Electric has a net margin of -- compared to Asia Broadband's net margin of -6443.52%. Asia Broadband's return on equity of -- beat Ivanhoe Electric's return on equity of -57.41%.

Asia Broadband has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Ivanhoe Electric has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 112.77%. Given that Ivanhoe Electric has higher upside potential than Asia Broadband, analysts believe Ivanhoe Electric is more attractive than Asia Broadband.

Asia Broadband has a beta of 3.557, which suggesting that the stock is 255.68% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ivanhoe Electric has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Asia Broadband has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ivanhoe Electric offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Asia Broadband pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ivanhoe Electric pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Asia Broadband quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Ivanhoe Electric quarterly revenues of $671K. Asia Broadband's net income of -- is lower than Ivanhoe Electric's net income of -$43.2M. Notably, Asia Broadband's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ivanhoe Electric's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Asia Broadband is -- versus 295.85x for Ivanhoe Electric. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Premium Exploration has a net margin of -- compared to Asia Broadband's net margin of --. Asia Broadband's return on equity of -- beat Premium Exploration's return on equity of --.

Asia Broadband has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Premium Exploration has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Asia Broadband has higher upside potential than Premium Exploration, analysts believe Asia Broadband is more attractive than Premium Exploration.

Asia Broadband has a beta of 3.557, which suggesting that the stock is 255.68% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Premium Exploration has a beta of -4.443, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 544.326%.

Asia Broadband has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Premium Exploration offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Asia Broadband pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Premium Exploration pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Asia Broadband quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Premium Exploration quarterly revenues of --. Asia Broadband's net income of -- is lower than Premium Exploration's net income of --. Notably, Asia Broadband's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Premium Exploration's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Asia Broadband is -- versus -- for Premium Exploration. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rare Element Resources has a net margin of -- compared to Asia Broadband's net margin of --. Asia Broadband's return on equity of -- beat Rare Element Resources's return on equity of --.

Asia Broadband has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Rare Element Resources has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 612.74%. Given that Rare Element Resources has higher upside potential than Asia Broadband, analysts believe Rare Element Resources is more attractive than Asia Broadband.

Asia Broadband has a beta of 3.557, which suggesting that the stock is 255.68% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rare Element Resources has a beta of 1.471, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.104%.

Asia Broadband has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rare Element Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Asia Broadband pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rare Element Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Asia Broadband quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Rare Element Resources quarterly revenues of --. Asia Broadband's net income of -- is lower than Rare Element Resources's net income of --. Notably, Asia Broadband's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Rare Element Resources's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Asia Broadband is -- versus -- for Rare Element Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tamerlane Ventures has a net margin of -- compared to Asia Broadband's net margin of --. Asia Broadband's return on equity of -- beat Tamerlane Ventures's return on equity of --.

Asia Broadband has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Tamerlane Ventures has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Asia Broadband has higher upside potential than Tamerlane Ventures, analysts believe Asia Broadband is more attractive than Tamerlane Ventures.

Asia Broadband has a beta of 3.557, which suggesting that the stock is 255.68% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tamerlane Ventures has a beta of -117.052, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11805.169%.

Asia Broadband has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tamerlane Ventures offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Asia Broadband pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tamerlane Ventures pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Asia Broadband quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Tamerlane Ventures quarterly revenues of --. Asia Broadband's net income of -- is lower than Tamerlane Ventures's net income of --. Notably, Asia Broadband's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Tamerlane Ventures's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Asia Broadband is -- versus -- for Tamerlane Ventures. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.