Is Enovix an Underrated Small Cap?
Enovix (NASDAQ:ENVX) is one of several small, innovative companies hoping…
Buy
52
URA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$27.23
Seasonality move
:
-6.94%
Day range:
$26.46 - $27.22
52-week range:
$19.50 - $33.99
Dividend yield:
2.82%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
2.5M
Avg. volume:
2.9M
1-year change:
-14.64%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
URA
Global X Uranium ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
COPP
Sprott Copper Miners ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ILIT
iShares Lithium Miners and Producers ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
LITP
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PHO
Invesco Water Resources ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SETM
Sprott Critical Materials ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
URA
Global X Uranium ETF
|
$27.16 | -- | -- | -- | $0.74 | 2.82% | -- |
|
COPP
Sprott Copper Miners ETF
|
$20.12 | -- | -- | -- | $0.53 | 2.63% | -- |
|
ILIT
iShares Lithium Miners and Producers ETF
|
$7.70 | -- | -- | -- | $0.50 | 7.45% | -- |
|
LITP
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF
|
$5.69 | -- | -- | -- | $0.44 | 7.73% | -- |
|
PHO
Invesco Water Resources ETF
|
$66.70 | -- | -- | -- | $0.10 | 0.5% | -- |
|
SETM
Sprott Critical Materials ETF
|
$14.56 | -- | -- | -- | $0.31 | 2.13% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
URA
Global X Uranium ETF
|
-- | 1.661 | -- | -- |
|
COPP
Sprott Copper Miners ETF
|
-- | 0.660 | -- | -- |
|
ILIT
iShares Lithium Miners and Producers ETF
|
-- | 0.801 | -- | -- |
|
LITP
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF
|
-- | 0.510 | -- | -- |
|
PHO
Invesco Water Resources ETF
|
-- | 1.184 | -- | -- |
|
SETM
Sprott Critical Materials ETF
|
-- | 1.001 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
URA
Global X Uranium ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
COPP
Sprott Copper Miners ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ILIT
iShares Lithium Miners and Producers ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
LITP
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PHO
Invesco Water Resources ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SETM
Sprott Critical Materials ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Global X Uranium ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns URA or COPP?
Sprott Copper Miners ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Global X Uranium ETF's net margin of --. Global X Uranium ETF's return on equity of -- beat Sprott Copper Miners ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital URAGlobal X Uranium ETF-- -- -- COPPSprott Copper Miners ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About URA or COPP?
Global X Uranium ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sprott Copper Miners ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X Uranium ETF has higher upside potential than Sprott Copper Miners ETF, analysts believe Global X Uranium ETF is more attractive than Sprott Copper Miners ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings URAGlobal X Uranium ETF0 0 0 COPPSprott Copper Miners ETF0 0 0 -
Is URA or COPP More Risky?
Global X Uranium ETF has a beta of 1.048, which suggesting that the stock is 4.845% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sprott Copper Miners ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock URA or COPP?
Global X Uranium ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.74 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.82%. Sprott Copper Miners ETF offers a yield of 2.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.53 per share. Global X Uranium ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sprott Copper Miners ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios URA or COPP?
Global X Uranium ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Sprott Copper Miners ETF quarterly revenues of --. Global X Uranium ETF's net income of -- is lower than Sprott Copper Miners ETF's net income of --. Notably, Global X Uranium ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sprott Copper Miners ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X Uranium ETF is -- versus -- for Sprott Copper Miners ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income URAGlobal X Uranium ETF-- -- -- -- COPPSprott Copper Miners ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns URA or ILIT?
iShares Lithium Miners and Producers ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Global X Uranium ETF's net margin of --. Global X Uranium ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares Lithium Miners and Producers ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital URAGlobal X Uranium ETF-- -- -- ILITiShares Lithium Miners and Producers ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About URA or ILIT?
Global X Uranium ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares Lithium Miners and Producers ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X Uranium ETF has higher upside potential than iShares Lithium Miners and Producers ETF, analysts believe Global X Uranium ETF is more attractive than iShares Lithium Miners and Producers ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings URAGlobal X Uranium ETF0 0 0 ILITiShares Lithium Miners and Producers ETF0 0 0 -
Is URA or ILIT More Risky?
Global X Uranium ETF has a beta of 1.048, which suggesting that the stock is 4.845% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares Lithium Miners and Producers ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock URA or ILIT?
Global X Uranium ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.74 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.82%. iShares Lithium Miners and Producers ETF offers a yield of 7.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Global X Uranium ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares Lithium Miners and Producers ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios URA or ILIT?
Global X Uranium ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares Lithium Miners and Producers ETF quarterly revenues of --. Global X Uranium ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares Lithium Miners and Producers ETF's net income of --. Notably, Global X Uranium ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares Lithium Miners and Producers ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X Uranium ETF is -- versus -- for iShares Lithium Miners and Producers ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income URAGlobal X Uranium ETF-- -- -- -- ILITiShares Lithium Miners and Producers ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns URA or LITP?
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Global X Uranium ETF's net margin of --. Global X Uranium ETF's return on equity of -- beat Sprott Lithium Miners ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital URAGlobal X Uranium ETF-- -- -- LITPSprott Lithium Miners ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About URA or LITP?
Global X Uranium ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sprott Lithium Miners ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X Uranium ETF has higher upside potential than Sprott Lithium Miners ETF, analysts believe Global X Uranium ETF is more attractive than Sprott Lithium Miners ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings URAGlobal X Uranium ETF0 0 0 LITPSprott Lithium Miners ETF0 0 0 -
Is URA or LITP More Risky?
Global X Uranium ETF has a beta of 1.048, which suggesting that the stock is 4.845% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sprott Lithium Miners ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock URA or LITP?
Global X Uranium ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.74 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.82%. Sprott Lithium Miners ETF offers a yield of 7.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share. Global X Uranium ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sprott Lithium Miners ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios URA or LITP?
Global X Uranium ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Sprott Lithium Miners ETF quarterly revenues of --. Global X Uranium ETF's net income of -- is lower than Sprott Lithium Miners ETF's net income of --. Notably, Global X Uranium ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sprott Lithium Miners ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X Uranium ETF is -- versus -- for Sprott Lithium Miners ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income URAGlobal X Uranium ETF-- -- -- -- LITPSprott Lithium Miners ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns URA or PHO?
Invesco Water Resources ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Global X Uranium ETF's net margin of --. Global X Uranium ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco Water Resources ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital URAGlobal X Uranium ETF-- -- -- PHOInvesco Water Resources ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About URA or PHO?
Global X Uranium ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco Water Resources ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X Uranium ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco Water Resources ETF, analysts believe Global X Uranium ETF is more attractive than Invesco Water Resources ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings URAGlobal X Uranium ETF0 0 0 PHOInvesco Water Resources ETF0 0 0 -
Is URA or PHO More Risky?
Global X Uranium ETF has a beta of 1.048, which suggesting that the stock is 4.845% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco Water Resources ETF has a beta of 1.036, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.638%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock URA or PHO?
Global X Uranium ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.74 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.82%. Invesco Water Resources ETF offers a yield of 0.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Global X Uranium ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco Water Resources ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios URA or PHO?
Global X Uranium ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco Water Resources ETF quarterly revenues of --. Global X Uranium ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco Water Resources ETF's net income of --. Notably, Global X Uranium ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco Water Resources ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X Uranium ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco Water Resources ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income URAGlobal X Uranium ETF-- -- -- -- PHOInvesco Water Resources ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns URA or SETM?
Sprott Critical Materials ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Global X Uranium ETF's net margin of --. Global X Uranium ETF's return on equity of -- beat Sprott Critical Materials ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital URAGlobal X Uranium ETF-- -- -- SETMSprott Critical Materials ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About URA or SETM?
Global X Uranium ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sprott Critical Materials ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X Uranium ETF has higher upside potential than Sprott Critical Materials ETF, analysts believe Global X Uranium ETF is more attractive than Sprott Critical Materials ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings URAGlobal X Uranium ETF0 0 0 SETMSprott Critical Materials ETF0 0 0 -
Is URA or SETM More Risky?
Global X Uranium ETF has a beta of 1.048, which suggesting that the stock is 4.845% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sprott Critical Materials ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock URA or SETM?
Global X Uranium ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.74 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.82%. Sprott Critical Materials ETF offers a yield of 2.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share. Global X Uranium ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sprott Critical Materials ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios URA or SETM?
Global X Uranium ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Sprott Critical Materials ETF quarterly revenues of --. Global X Uranium ETF's net income of -- is lower than Sprott Critical Materials ETF's net income of --. Notably, Global X Uranium ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sprott Critical Materials ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X Uranium ETF is -- versus -- for Sprott Critical Materials ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income URAGlobal X Uranium ETF-- -- -- -- SETMSprott Critical Materials ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Are We Heading Toward a Recession?
Fears of a recession in 2025 grew at the end…
3 Recession-Proof ETFs to Invest in Now
The U.S. gross domestic product (GDP) contracted 0.3% during the…
Stock Ideas
Buy
68
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Sell
39
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3T
P/E Ratio: 33x
Buy
61
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.8T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Buy
60
RGC alert for May 12
Regencell Bioscience Holdings [RGC] is up 25.68% over the past day.
Buy
97
NGVC alert for May 12
Natural Grocers by Vitamin Cottage [NGVC] is down 7.5% over the past day.
Sell
38
ONTO alert for May 12
Onto Innovation [ONTO] is up 5.2% over the past day.
