Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Sell Broadcom Stock?
In Q3, legendary macro investor Stan Druckenmiller sold his entire…
Buy
52
URA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$42.72
Seasonality move
:
-1.02%
Day range:
$42.54 - $43.23
52-week range:
$19.50 - $60.51
Dividend yield:
4.88%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
3M
Avg. volume:
4M
1-year change:
59.56%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
URA
Global X Uranium ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CGW
Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NLR
VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PIO
Invesco Global Water ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
REMX
VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
URNM
Sprott Uranium Miners ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
URA
Global X Uranium ETF
|
$42.73 | -- | -- | -- | $2.08 | 4.88% | -- |
|
CGW
Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF
|
$63.01 | -- | -- | -- | $1.00 | 1.58% | -- |
|
NLR
VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF
|
$124.20 | -- | -- | -- | $3.17 | 2.55% | -- |
|
PIO
Invesco Global Water ETF
|
$44.15 | -- | -- | -- | $0.04 | 1.04% | -- |
|
REMX
VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF
|
$73.92 | -- | -- | -- | $1.30 | 1.76% | -- |
|
URNM
Sprott Uranium Miners ETF
|
$54.89 | -- | -- | -- | $1.74 | 3.18% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
URA
Global X Uranium ETF
|
-- | 4.036 | -- | -- |
|
CGW
Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF
|
-- | 0.250 | -- | -- |
|
NLR
VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF
|
-- | 3.529 | -- | -- |
|
PIO
Invesco Global Water ETF
|
-- | 0.593 | -- | -- |
|
REMX
VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF
|
-- | 0.705 | -- | -- |
|
URNM
Sprott Uranium Miners ETF
|
-- | 3.217 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
URA
Global X Uranium ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CGW
Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NLR
VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PIO
Invesco Global Water ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
REMX
VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
URNM
Sprott Uranium Miners ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Global X Uranium ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns URA or CGW?
Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Global X Uranium ETF's net margin of --. Global X Uranium ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital URAGlobal X Uranium ETF-- -- -- CGWInvesco S&P Global Water Index ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About URA or CGW?
Global X Uranium ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X Uranium ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF, analysts believe Global X Uranium ETF is more attractive than Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings URAGlobal X Uranium ETF0 0 0 CGWInvesco S&P Global Water Index ETF0 0 0 -
Is URA or CGW More Risky?
Global X Uranium ETF has a beta of 1.205, which suggesting that the stock is 20.546% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF has a beta of 1.122, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.162%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock URA or CGW?
Global X Uranium ETF has a quarterly dividend of $2.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.88%. Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF offers a yield of 1.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. Global X Uranium ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios URA or CGW?
Global X Uranium ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF quarterly revenues of --. Global X Uranium ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF's net income of --. Notably, Global X Uranium ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X Uranium ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income URAGlobal X Uranium ETF-- -- -- -- CGWInvesco S&P Global Water Index ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns URA or NLR?
VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Global X Uranium ETF's net margin of --. Global X Uranium ETF's return on equity of -- beat VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital URAGlobal X Uranium ETF-- -- -- NLRVanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About URA or NLR?
Global X Uranium ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X Uranium ETF has higher upside potential than VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF, analysts believe Global X Uranium ETF is more attractive than VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings URAGlobal X Uranium ETF0 0 0 NLRVanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF0 0 0 -
Is URA or NLR More Risky?
Global X Uranium ETF has a beta of 1.205, which suggesting that the stock is 20.546% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF has a beta of 0.865, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.472%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock URA or NLR?
Global X Uranium ETF has a quarterly dividend of $2.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.88%. VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF offers a yield of 2.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $3.17 per share. Global X Uranium ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios URA or NLR?
Global X Uranium ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF quarterly revenues of --. Global X Uranium ETF's net income of -- is lower than VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF's net income of --. Notably, Global X Uranium ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X Uranium ETF is -- versus -- for VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income URAGlobal X Uranium ETF-- -- -- -- NLRVanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns URA or PIO?
Invesco Global Water ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Global X Uranium ETF's net margin of --. Global X Uranium ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco Global Water ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital URAGlobal X Uranium ETF-- -- -- PIOInvesco Global Water ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About URA or PIO?
Global X Uranium ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco Global Water ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X Uranium ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco Global Water ETF, analysts believe Global X Uranium ETF is more attractive than Invesco Global Water ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings URAGlobal X Uranium ETF0 0 0 PIOInvesco Global Water ETF0 0 0 -
Is URA or PIO More Risky?
Global X Uranium ETF has a beta of 1.205, which suggesting that the stock is 20.546% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco Global Water ETF has a beta of 1.156, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.559%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock URA or PIO?
Global X Uranium ETF has a quarterly dividend of $2.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.88%. Invesco Global Water ETF offers a yield of 1.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Global X Uranium ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco Global Water ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios URA or PIO?
Global X Uranium ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco Global Water ETF quarterly revenues of --. Global X Uranium ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco Global Water ETF's net income of --. Notably, Global X Uranium ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco Global Water ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X Uranium ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco Global Water ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income URAGlobal X Uranium ETF-- -- -- -- PIOInvesco Global Water ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns URA or REMX?
VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Global X Uranium ETF's net margin of --. Global X Uranium ETF's return on equity of -- beat VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital URAGlobal X Uranium ETF-- -- -- REMXVanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About URA or REMX?
Global X Uranium ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X Uranium ETF has higher upside potential than VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF, analysts believe Global X Uranium ETF is more attractive than VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings URAGlobal X Uranium ETF0 0 0 REMXVanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF0 0 0 -
Is URA or REMX More Risky?
Global X Uranium ETF has a beta of 1.205, which suggesting that the stock is 20.546% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF has a beta of 1.330, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.993%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock URA or REMX?
Global X Uranium ETF has a quarterly dividend of $2.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.88%. VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF offers a yield of 1.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.30 per share. Global X Uranium ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios URA or REMX?
Global X Uranium ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF quarterly revenues of --. Global X Uranium ETF's net income of -- is lower than VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF's net income of --. Notably, Global X Uranium ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X Uranium ETF is -- versus -- for VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income URAGlobal X Uranium ETF-- -- -- -- REMXVanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns URA or URNM?
Sprott Uranium Miners ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Global X Uranium ETF's net margin of --. Global X Uranium ETF's return on equity of -- beat Sprott Uranium Miners ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital URAGlobal X Uranium ETF-- -- -- URNMSprott Uranium Miners ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About URA or URNM?
Global X Uranium ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sprott Uranium Miners ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X Uranium ETF has higher upside potential than Sprott Uranium Miners ETF, analysts believe Global X Uranium ETF is more attractive than Sprott Uranium Miners ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings URAGlobal X Uranium ETF0 0 0 URNMSprott Uranium Miners ETF0 0 0 -
Is URA or URNM More Risky?
Global X Uranium ETF has a beta of 1.205, which suggesting that the stock is 20.546% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sprott Uranium Miners ETF has a beta of 1.024, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.386%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock URA or URNM?
Global X Uranium ETF has a quarterly dividend of $2.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.88%. Sprott Uranium Miners ETF offers a yield of 3.18% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.74 per share. Global X Uranium ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sprott Uranium Miners ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios URA or URNM?
Global X Uranium ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Sprott Uranium Miners ETF quarterly revenues of --. Global X Uranium ETF's net income of -- is lower than Sprott Uranium Miners ETF's net income of --. Notably, Global X Uranium ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sprott Uranium Miners ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X Uranium ETF is -- versus -- for Sprott Uranium Miners ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income URAGlobal X Uranium ETF-- -- -- -- URNMSprott Uranium Miners ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Why Is CoreWeave Stock Down So Much?
AI cloud computing business CoreWeave (NASDAQ:CRWV) has been through a…
Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Buy MercadoLibre Stock?
In Q3, billionaire Stan Druckenmiller bought about 4,620 shares of…
Stock Ideas
Buy
55
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.5T
P/E Ratio: 63x
Buy
53
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Sell
30
CORT alert for Jan 1
Corcept Therapeutics, Inc. [CORT] is down 50.44% over the past day.
Buy
75
AXSM alert for Jan 1
Axsome Therapeutics, Inc. [AXSM] is up 22.82% over the past day.
Buy
81
ZIJMY alert for Jan 1
Zijin Mining Group Co., Ltd. [ZIJMY] is up 1.86% over the past day.
