Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?
Digital signature software business DocuSign (NASDAQ:DOCU) has been struggling over…
Buy
66
URA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$46.57
Seasonality move
:
-1.02%
Day range:
$45.93 - $46.68
52-week range:
$19.50 - $60.51
Dividend yield:
1.65%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
1.4M
Avg. volume:
4.3M
1-year change:
65.81%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
URA
Global X Uranium ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
LITP
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NLR
VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
REMX
VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SETM
Sprott Critical Materials ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
URNM
Sprott Uranium Miners ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
URA
Global X Uranium ETF
|
$46.56 | -- | -- | -- | $0.74 | 1.65% | -- |
|
LITP
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF
|
$12.75 | -- | -- | -- | $0.89 | 7% | -- |
|
NLR
VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF
|
$128.64 | -- | -- | -- | $3.17 | 2.46% | -- |
|
REMX
VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF
|
$76.13 | -- | -- | -- | $1.30 | 1.71% | -- |
|
SETM
Sprott Critical Materials ETF
|
$29.69 | -- | -- | -- | $0.45 | 1.53% | -- |
|
URNM
Sprott Uranium Miners ETF
|
$56.58 | -- | -- | -- | $1.74 | 3.08% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
URA
Global X Uranium ETF
|
-- | 4.146 | -- | -- |
|
LITP
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF
|
-- | 1.525 | -- | -- |
|
NLR
VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF
|
-- | 3.656 | -- | -- |
|
REMX
VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF
|
-- | 1.346 | -- | -- |
|
SETM
Sprott Critical Materials ETF
|
-- | 2.219 | -- | -- |
|
URNM
Sprott Uranium Miners ETF
|
-- | 3.367 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
URA
Global X Uranium ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
LITP
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NLR
VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
REMX
VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SETM
Sprott Critical Materials ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
URNM
Sprott Uranium Miners ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Global X Uranium ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns URA or LITP?
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Global X Uranium ETF's net margin of --. Global X Uranium ETF's return on equity of -- beat Sprott Lithium Miners ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital URAGlobal X Uranium ETF-- -- -- LITPSprott Lithium Miners ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About URA or LITP?
Global X Uranium ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sprott Lithium Miners ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X Uranium ETF has higher upside potential than Sprott Lithium Miners ETF, analysts believe Global X Uranium ETF is more attractive than Sprott Lithium Miners ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings URAGlobal X Uranium ETF0 0 0 LITPSprott Lithium Miners ETF0 0 0 -
Is URA or LITP More Risky?
Global X Uranium ETF has a beta of 1.278, which suggesting that the stock is 27.789% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sprott Lithium Miners ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock URA or LITP?
Global X Uranium ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.74 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.65%. Sprott Lithium Miners ETF offers a yield of 7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.89 per share. Global X Uranium ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sprott Lithium Miners ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios URA or LITP?
Global X Uranium ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Sprott Lithium Miners ETF quarterly revenues of --. Global X Uranium ETF's net income of -- is lower than Sprott Lithium Miners ETF's net income of --. Notably, Global X Uranium ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sprott Lithium Miners ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X Uranium ETF is -- versus -- for Sprott Lithium Miners ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income URAGlobal X Uranium ETF-- -- -- -- LITPSprott Lithium Miners ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns URA or NLR?
VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Global X Uranium ETF's net margin of --. Global X Uranium ETF's return on equity of -- beat VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital URAGlobal X Uranium ETF-- -- -- NLRVanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About URA or NLR?
Global X Uranium ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X Uranium ETF has higher upside potential than VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF, analysts believe Global X Uranium ETF is more attractive than VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings URAGlobal X Uranium ETF0 0 0 NLRVanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF0 0 0 -
Is URA or NLR More Risky?
Global X Uranium ETF has a beta of 1.278, which suggesting that the stock is 27.789% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF has a beta of 0.862, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.77%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock URA or NLR?
Global X Uranium ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.74 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.65%. VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF offers a yield of 2.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $3.17 per share. Global X Uranium ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios URA or NLR?
Global X Uranium ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF quarterly revenues of --. Global X Uranium ETF's net income of -- is lower than VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF's net income of --. Notably, Global X Uranium ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X Uranium ETF is -- versus -- for VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income URAGlobal X Uranium ETF-- -- -- -- NLRVanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns URA or REMX?
VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Global X Uranium ETF's net margin of --. Global X Uranium ETF's return on equity of -- beat VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital URAGlobal X Uranium ETF-- -- -- REMXVanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About URA or REMX?
Global X Uranium ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X Uranium ETF has higher upside potential than VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF, analysts believe Global X Uranium ETF is more attractive than VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings URAGlobal X Uranium ETF0 0 0 REMXVanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF0 0 0 -
Is URA or REMX More Risky?
Global X Uranium ETF has a beta of 1.278, which suggesting that the stock is 27.789% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF has a beta of 1.376, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.631%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock URA or REMX?
Global X Uranium ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.74 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.65%. VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF offers a yield of 1.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.30 per share. Global X Uranium ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios URA or REMX?
Global X Uranium ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF quarterly revenues of --. Global X Uranium ETF's net income of -- is lower than VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF's net income of --. Notably, Global X Uranium ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X Uranium ETF is -- versus -- for VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income URAGlobal X Uranium ETF-- -- -- -- REMXVanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns URA or SETM?
Sprott Critical Materials ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Global X Uranium ETF's net margin of --. Global X Uranium ETF's return on equity of -- beat Sprott Critical Materials ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital URAGlobal X Uranium ETF-- -- -- SETMSprott Critical Materials ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About URA or SETM?
Global X Uranium ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sprott Critical Materials ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X Uranium ETF has higher upside potential than Sprott Critical Materials ETF, analysts believe Global X Uranium ETF is more attractive than Sprott Critical Materials ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings URAGlobal X Uranium ETF0 0 0 SETMSprott Critical Materials ETF0 0 0 -
Is URA or SETM More Risky?
Global X Uranium ETF has a beta of 1.278, which suggesting that the stock is 27.789% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sprott Critical Materials ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock URA or SETM?
Global X Uranium ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.74 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.65%. Sprott Critical Materials ETF offers a yield of 1.53% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Global X Uranium ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sprott Critical Materials ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios URA or SETM?
Global X Uranium ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Sprott Critical Materials ETF quarterly revenues of --. Global X Uranium ETF's net income of -- is lower than Sprott Critical Materials ETF's net income of --. Notably, Global X Uranium ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sprott Critical Materials ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X Uranium ETF is -- versus -- for Sprott Critical Materials ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income URAGlobal X Uranium ETF-- -- -- -- SETMSprott Critical Materials ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns URA or URNM?
Sprott Uranium Miners ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Global X Uranium ETF's net margin of --. Global X Uranium ETF's return on equity of -- beat Sprott Uranium Miners ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital URAGlobal X Uranium ETF-- -- -- URNMSprott Uranium Miners ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About URA or URNM?
Global X Uranium ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sprott Uranium Miners ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X Uranium ETF has higher upside potential than Sprott Uranium Miners ETF, analysts believe Global X Uranium ETF is more attractive than Sprott Uranium Miners ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings URAGlobal X Uranium ETF0 0 0 URNMSprott Uranium Miners ETF0 0 0 -
Is URA or URNM More Risky?
Global X Uranium ETF has a beta of 1.278, which suggesting that the stock is 27.789% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sprott Uranium Miners ETF has a beta of 1.152, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.22%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock URA or URNM?
Global X Uranium ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.74 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.65%. Sprott Uranium Miners ETF offers a yield of 3.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.74 per share. Global X Uranium ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sprott Uranium Miners ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios URA or URNM?
Global X Uranium ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Sprott Uranium Miners ETF quarterly revenues of --. Global X Uranium ETF's net income of -- is lower than Sprott Uranium Miners ETF's net income of --. Notably, Global X Uranium ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sprott Uranium Miners ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X Uranium ETF is -- versus -- for Sprott Uranium Miners ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income URAGlobal X Uranium ETF-- -- -- -- URNMSprott Uranium Miners ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?
Cybersecurity major SentinelOne (NYSE:S) has struggled over several years, delivering…
Is Broadcom Stock on Sale?
Chip and software maker Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) has been among the…
Stock Ideas
Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
80
TVTX alert for Dec 25
Travere Therapeutics, Inc. [TVTX] is up 14.03% over the past day.
Buy
68
KOD alert for Dec 25
Kodiak Sciences, Inc. [KOD] is up 13.41% over the past day.
Buy
64
ZCSH alert for Dec 25
Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) [ZCSH] is up 5.33% over the past day.
