Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…
Buy
70
REMX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$88.85
Seasonality move
:
-3.9%
Day range:
$85.11 - $89.59
52-week range:
$32.36 - $103.68
Dividend yield:
1.46%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
694.4K
Avg. volume:
1.2M
1-year change:
128.12%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
REMX
VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
COPX
Global X Copper Miners ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
LIT
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NLR
VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PICK
iShares MSCI Global Mtls&Mng Prdcrs ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
URA
Global X Uranium ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
REMX
VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF
|
$88.90 | -- | -- | -- | $1.30 | 1.46% | -- |
|
COPX
Global X Copper Miners ETF
|
$76.86 | -- | -- | -- | $1.67 | 2.54% | -- |
|
LIT
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
|
$74.17 | -- | -- | -- | $0.18 | 0.42% | -- |
|
NLR
VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF
|
$133.67 | -- | -- | -- | $3.17 | 2.38% | -- |
|
PICK
iShares MSCI Global Mtls&Mng Prdcrs ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
URA
Global X Uranium ETF
|
$48.90 | -- | -- | -- | $2.08 | 4.3% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
REMX
VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF
|
-- | 1.455 | -- | -- |
|
COPX
Global X Copper Miners ETF
|
-- | 2.790 | -- | -- |
|
LIT
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
|
-- | 0.804 | -- | -- |
|
NLR
VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF
|
-- | 2.973 | -- | -- |
|
PICK
iShares MSCI Global Mtls&Mng Prdcrs ETF
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
URA
Global X Uranium ETF
|
-- | 3.592 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
REMX
VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
COPX
Global X Copper Miners ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
LIT
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NLR
VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PICK
iShares MSCI Global Mtls&Mng Prdcrs ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
URA
Global X Uranium ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns REMX or COPX?
Global X Copper Miners ETF has a net margin of -- compared to VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF's net margin of --. VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF's return on equity of -- beat Global X Copper Miners ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital REMXVanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF-- -- -- COPXGlobal X Copper Miners ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About REMX or COPX?
VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Global X Copper Miners ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF has higher upside potential than Global X Copper Miners ETF, analysts believe VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF is more attractive than Global X Copper Miners ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings REMXVanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF0 0 0 COPXGlobal X Copper Miners ETF0 0 0 -
Is REMX or COPX More Risky?
VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF has a beta of 1.408, which suggesting that the stock is 40.793% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global X Copper Miners ETF has a beta of 1.356, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.603%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock REMX or COPX?
VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.46%. Global X Copper Miners ETF offers a yield of 2.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.67 per share. VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global X Copper Miners ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios REMX or COPX?
VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Global X Copper Miners ETF quarterly revenues of --. VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF's net income of -- is lower than Global X Copper Miners ETF's net income of --. Notably, VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global X Copper Miners ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF is -- versus -- for Global X Copper Miners ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income REMXVanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF-- -- -- -- COPXGlobal X Copper Miners ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns REMX or LIT?
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF has a net margin of -- compared to VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF's net margin of --. VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF's return on equity of -- beat Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital REMXVanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF-- -- -- LITGlobal X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About REMX or LIT?
VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF has higher upside potential than Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF, analysts believe VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF is more attractive than Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings REMXVanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF0 0 0 LITGlobal X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF0 0 0 -
Is REMX or LIT More Risky?
VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF has a beta of 1.408, which suggesting that the stock is 40.793% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF has a beta of 1.030, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.043%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock REMX or LIT?
VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.46%. Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF offers a yield of 0.42% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios REMX or LIT?
VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF quarterly revenues of --. VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF's net income of -- is lower than Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF's net income of --. Notably, VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF is -- versus -- for Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income REMXVanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF-- -- -- -- LITGlobal X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns REMX or NLR?
VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF has a net margin of -- compared to VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF's net margin of --. VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF's return on equity of -- beat VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital REMXVanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF-- -- -- NLRVanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About REMX or NLR?
VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF has higher upside potential than VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF, analysts believe VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF is more attractive than VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings REMXVanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF0 0 0 NLRVanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF0 0 0 -
Is REMX or NLR More Risky?
VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF has a beta of 1.408, which suggesting that the stock is 40.793% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF has a beta of 0.917, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.309%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock REMX or NLR?
VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.46%. VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF offers a yield of 2.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $3.17 per share. VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios REMX or NLR?
VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF quarterly revenues of --. VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF's net income of -- is lower than VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF's net income of --. Notably, VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF is -- versus -- for VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income REMXVanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF-- -- -- -- NLRVanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns REMX or PICK?
iShares MSCI Global Mtls&Mng Prdcrs ETF has a net margin of -- compared to VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF's net margin of --. VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares MSCI Global Mtls&Mng Prdcrs ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital REMXVanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF-- -- -- PICKiShares MSCI Global Mtls&Mng Prdcrs ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About REMX or PICK?
VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares MSCI Global Mtls&Mng Prdcrs ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF has higher upside potential than iShares MSCI Global Mtls&Mng Prdcrs ETF, analysts believe VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF is more attractive than iShares MSCI Global Mtls&Mng Prdcrs ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings REMXVanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF0 0 0 PICKiShares MSCI Global Mtls&Mng Prdcrs ETF0 0 0 -
Is REMX or PICK More Risky?
VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF has a beta of 1.408, which suggesting that the stock is 40.793% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares MSCI Global Mtls&Mng Prdcrs ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock REMX or PICK?
VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.46%. iShares MSCI Global Mtls&Mng Prdcrs ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares MSCI Global Mtls&Mng Prdcrs ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios REMX or PICK?
VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares MSCI Global Mtls&Mng Prdcrs ETF quarterly revenues of --. VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares MSCI Global Mtls&Mng Prdcrs ETF's net income of --. Notably, VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares MSCI Global Mtls&Mng Prdcrs ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF is -- versus -- for iShares MSCI Global Mtls&Mng Prdcrs ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income REMXVanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF-- -- -- -- PICKiShares MSCI Global Mtls&Mng Prdcrs ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns REMX or URA?
Global X Uranium ETF has a net margin of -- compared to VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF's net margin of --. VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF's return on equity of -- beat Global X Uranium ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital REMXVanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF-- -- -- URAGlobal X Uranium ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About REMX or URA?
VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Global X Uranium ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF has higher upside potential than Global X Uranium ETF, analysts believe VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF is more attractive than Global X Uranium ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings REMXVanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF0 0 0 URAGlobal X Uranium ETF0 0 0 -
Is REMX or URA More Risky?
VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF has a beta of 1.408, which suggesting that the stock is 40.793% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global X Uranium ETF has a beta of 1.228, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.792%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock REMX or URA?
VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.46%. Global X Uranium ETF offers a yield of 4.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.08 per share. VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global X Uranium ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios REMX or URA?
VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Global X Uranium ETF quarterly revenues of --. VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF's net income of -- is lower than Global X Uranium ETF's net income of --. Notably, VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global X Uranium ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF is -- versus -- for Global X Uranium ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income REMXVanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF-- -- -- -- URAGlobal X Uranium ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…
Stock Ideas
Sell
46
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.3T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Sell
50
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 34x
Sell
40
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.6T
P/E Ratio: 27x
Alerts
Buy
51
AAOI alert for Apr 3
Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. [AAOI] is up 20.3% over the past day.
Buy
59
SBAC alert for Apr 3
SBA Communications Corp. [SBAC] is up 18.96% over the past day.
Buy
55
VSAT alert for Apr 3
ViaSat, Inc. [VSAT] is up 18.73% over the past day.
