Financhill
Sell
30

LIT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$42.21
Seasonality move :
-1.83%
Day range:
$41.53 - $42.68
52-week range:
$34.65 - $52.23
Dividend yield:
1.44%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
356.4K
Avg. volume:
345.4K
1-year change:
-12.95%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
LIT
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
-- -- -- -- --
BATT
Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF
-- -- -- -- --
ICOP
iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF
-- -- -- -- --
VAW
Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF
-- -- -- -- --
XLB
Materials Select Sector SPDR Fund
-- -- -- -- --
XME
SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF
-- -- -- -- --
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
LIT
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
$42.16 -- -- -- $0.25 1.44% --
BATT
Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF
$9.11 -- -- -- $0.34 3.74% --
ICOP
iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF
$25.98 -- -- -- $0.42 1.83% --
VAW
Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF
$189.83 -- -- -- $0.86 1.68% --
XLB
Materials Select Sector SPDR Fund
$85.58 -- -- -- $0.42 2.06% --
XME
SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF
$56.82 -- -- -- $0.11 0.71% --
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
LIT
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
-- 1.053 -- --
BATT
Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF
-- 1.110 -- --
ICOP
iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF
-- 0.518 -- --
VAW
Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF
-- 1.220 -- --
XLB
Materials Select Sector SPDR Fund
-- 1.131 -- --
XME
SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF
-- 1.039 -- --
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
LIT
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
-- -- -- -- -- --
BATT
Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF
-- -- -- -- -- --
ICOP
iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF
-- -- -- -- -- --
VAW
Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF
-- -- -- -- -- --
XLB
Materials Select Sector SPDR Fund
-- -- -- -- -- --
XME
SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF
-- -- -- -- -- --

Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns LIT or BATT?

    Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF's net margin of --. Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF's return on equity of -- beat Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    LIT
    Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
    -- -- --
    BATT
    Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About LIT or BATT?

    Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF has higher upside potential than Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF, analysts believe Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF is more attractive than Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    LIT
    Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
    0 0 0
    BATT
    Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF
    0 0 0
  • Is LIT or BATT More Risky?

    Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF has a beta of 1.175, which suggesting that the stock is 17.542% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF has a beta of 1.375, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.472%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock LIT or BATT?

    Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.44%. Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF offers a yield of 3.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios LIT or BATT?

    Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF quarterly revenues of --. Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF's net income of -- is lower than Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF's net income of --. Notably, Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF is -- versus -- for Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    LIT
    Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
    -- -- -- --
    BATT
    Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF
    -- -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns LIT or ICOP?

    iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF's net margin of --. Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    LIT
    Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
    -- -- --
    ICOP
    iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About LIT or ICOP?

    Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF has higher upside potential than iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF, analysts believe Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF is more attractive than iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    LIT
    Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
    0 0 0
    ICOP
    iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF
    0 0 0
  • Is LIT or ICOP More Risky?

    Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF has a beta of 1.175, which suggesting that the stock is 17.542% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock LIT or ICOP?

    Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.44%. iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF offers a yield of 1.83% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share. Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios LIT or ICOP?

    Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF quarterly revenues of --. Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF's net income of --. Notably, Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF is -- versus -- for iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    LIT
    Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
    -- -- -- --
    ICOP
    iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF
    -- -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns LIT or VAW?

    Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF's net margin of --. Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF's return on equity of -- beat Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    LIT
    Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
    -- -- --
    VAW
    Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About LIT or VAW?

    Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF has higher upside potential than Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF, analysts believe Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF is more attractive than Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    LIT
    Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
    0 0 0
    VAW
    Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF
    0 0 0
  • Is LIT or VAW More Risky?

    Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF has a beta of 1.175, which suggesting that the stock is 17.542% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF has a beta of 1.142, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.239%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock LIT or VAW?

    Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.44%. Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF offers a yield of 1.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.86 per share. Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios LIT or VAW?

    Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF quarterly revenues of --. Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF's net income of -- is lower than Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF's net income of --. Notably, Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF is -- versus -- for Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    LIT
    Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
    -- -- -- --
    VAW
    Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF
    -- -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns LIT or XLB?

    Materials Select Sector SPDR Fund has a net margin of -- compared to Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF's net margin of --. Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF's return on equity of -- beat Materials Select Sector SPDR Fund's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    LIT
    Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
    -- -- --
    XLB
    Materials Select Sector SPDR Fund
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About LIT or XLB?

    Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Materials Select Sector SPDR Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF has higher upside potential than Materials Select Sector SPDR Fund, analysts believe Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF is more attractive than Materials Select Sector SPDR Fund.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    LIT
    Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
    0 0 0
    XLB
    Materials Select Sector SPDR Fund
    0 0 0
  • Is LIT or XLB More Risky?

    Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF has a beta of 1.175, which suggesting that the stock is 17.542% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Materials Select Sector SPDR Fund has a beta of 1.098, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.849%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock LIT or XLB?

    Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.44%. Materials Select Sector SPDR Fund offers a yield of 2.06% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share. Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Materials Select Sector SPDR Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios LIT or XLB?

    Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Materials Select Sector SPDR Fund quarterly revenues of --. Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF's net income of -- is lower than Materials Select Sector SPDR Fund's net income of --. Notably, Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Materials Select Sector SPDR Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF is -- versus -- for Materials Select Sector SPDR Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    LIT
    Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
    -- -- -- --
    XLB
    Materials Select Sector SPDR Fund
    -- -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns LIT or XME?

    SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF's net margin of --. Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF's return on equity of -- beat SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    LIT
    Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
    -- -- --
    XME
    SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About LIT or XME?

    Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF has higher upside potential than SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF, analysts believe Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF is more attractive than SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    LIT
    Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
    0 0 0
    XME
    SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF
    0 0 0
  • Is LIT or XME More Risky?

    Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF has a beta of 1.175, which suggesting that the stock is 17.542% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF has a beta of 1.473, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.299%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock LIT or XME?

    Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.44%. SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF offers a yield of 0.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios LIT or XME?

    Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF quarterly revenues of --. Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF's net income of -- is lower than SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF's net income of --. Notably, Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF is -- versus -- for SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    LIT
    Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
    -- -- -- --
    XME
    SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF
    -- -- -- --

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Why Caesars’ Digital Arm May Be the Gaming Giant’s Best-Kept Secret
Why Caesars’ Digital Arm May Be the Gaming Giant’s Best-Kept Secret

It’s not often that a company with the scale and…

Will Tyson Foods Stock Bounce Back?
Will Tyson Foods Stock Bounce Back?

Tyson Foods, Inc. (NYSE:TSN) is one of the biggest food…

Will Iovance Biotherapeutics Stock Bounce Back?
Will Iovance Biotherapeutics Stock Bounce Back?

Iovance Biotherapeutics (NASDAQ:IOVA) is a fledgling pharmaceutical company that specializes…

Stock Ideas

Buy
64
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 42x

Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 113x

Buy
55
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 37x

Alerts

Buy
61
QMCO alert for Dec 21

Quantum [QMCO] is up 26.28% over the past day.

Sell
46
NUKK alert for Dec 21

Nukkleus [NUKK] is down 22.94% over the past day.

Sell
1
IIPR alert for Dec 21

Innovative Industrial Properties [IIPR] is down 22.7% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock