Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…
Sell
33
TINY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$60.00
Seasonality move
:
1.57%
Day range:
$58.00 - $61.00
52-week range:
$31.16 - $70.71
Dividend yield:
0.25%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
1.2K
Avg. volume:
2.3K
1-year change:
46.56%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TINY
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BULD
Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DAT
ProShares Big Data Refiners ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ODDS
Pacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
OND
ProShares On-Demand ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TINT
ProShares Smart Materials ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TINY
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF
|
$61.70 | -- | -- | -- | $0.06 | 0.25% | -- |
|
BULD
Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF
|
$28.58 | -- | -- | -- | $0.30 | 0.4% | -- |
|
DAT
ProShares Big Data Refiners ETF
|
$37.43 | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
ODDS
Pacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF
|
$24.41 | -- | -- | -- | $0.01 | 2.9% | -- |
|
OND
ProShares On-Demand ETF
|
$34.97 | -- | -- | -- | $0.19 | 0% | -- |
|
TINT
ProShares Smart Materials ETF
|
$34.73 | -- | -- | -- | $0.04 | 1.22% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TINY
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF
|
-- | 2.196 | -- | -- |
|
BULD
Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF
|
-- | 1.878 | -- | -- |
|
DAT
ProShares Big Data Refiners ETF
|
-- | 1.645 | -- | -- |
|
ODDS
Pacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF
|
-- | 1.628 | -- | -- |
|
OND
ProShares On-Demand ETF
|
-- | 1.889 | -- | -- |
|
TINT
ProShares Smart Materials ETF
|
-- | 1.020 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TINY
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BULD
Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DAT
ProShares Big Data Refiners ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ODDS
Pacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
OND
ProShares On-Demand ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TINT
ProShares Smart Materials ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns TINY or BULD?
Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF has a net margin of -- compared to ProShares Nanotechnology ETF's net margin of --. ProShares Nanotechnology ETF's return on equity of -- beat Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TINYProShares Nanotechnology ETF-- -- -- BULDPacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About TINY or BULD?
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ProShares Nanotechnology ETF has higher upside potential than Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF, analysts believe ProShares Nanotechnology ETF is more attractive than Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TINYProShares Nanotechnology ETF0 0 0 BULDPacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF0 0 0 -
Is TINY or BULD More Risky?
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TINY or BULD?
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.25%. Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF offers a yield of 0.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. ProShares Nanotechnology ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TINY or BULD?
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF quarterly revenues of --. ProShares Nanotechnology ETF's net income of -- is lower than Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF's net income of --. Notably, ProShares Nanotechnology ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProShares Nanotechnology ETF is -- versus -- for Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TINYProShares Nanotechnology ETF-- -- -- -- BULDPacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns TINY or DAT?
ProShares Big Data Refiners ETF has a net margin of -- compared to ProShares Nanotechnology ETF's net margin of --. ProShares Nanotechnology ETF's return on equity of -- beat ProShares Big Data Refiners ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TINYProShares Nanotechnology ETF-- -- -- DATProShares Big Data Refiners ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About TINY or DAT?
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ProShares Big Data Refiners ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ProShares Nanotechnology ETF has higher upside potential than ProShares Big Data Refiners ETF, analysts believe ProShares Nanotechnology ETF is more attractive than ProShares Big Data Refiners ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TINYProShares Nanotechnology ETF0 0 0 DATProShares Big Data Refiners ETF0 0 0 -
Is TINY or DAT More Risky?
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ProShares Big Data Refiners ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TINY or DAT?
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.25%. ProShares Big Data Refiners ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ProShares Nanotechnology ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ProShares Big Data Refiners ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TINY or DAT?
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ProShares Big Data Refiners ETF quarterly revenues of --. ProShares Nanotechnology ETF's net income of -- is lower than ProShares Big Data Refiners ETF's net income of --. Notably, ProShares Nanotechnology ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ProShares Big Data Refiners ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProShares Nanotechnology ETF is -- versus -- for ProShares Big Data Refiners ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TINYProShares Nanotechnology ETF-- -- -- -- DATProShares Big Data Refiners ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns TINY or ODDS?
Pacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF has a net margin of -- compared to ProShares Nanotechnology ETF's net margin of --. ProShares Nanotechnology ETF's return on equity of -- beat Pacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TINYProShares Nanotechnology ETF-- -- -- ODDSPacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About TINY or ODDS?
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Pacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ProShares Nanotechnology ETF has higher upside potential than Pacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF, analysts believe ProShares Nanotechnology ETF is more attractive than Pacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TINYProShares Nanotechnology ETF0 0 0 ODDSPacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF0 0 0 -
Is TINY or ODDS More Risky?
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TINY or ODDS?
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.25%. Pacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF offers a yield of 2.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. ProShares Nanotechnology ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TINY or ODDS?
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Pacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF quarterly revenues of --. ProShares Nanotechnology ETF's net income of -- is lower than Pacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF's net income of --. Notably, ProShares Nanotechnology ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Pacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProShares Nanotechnology ETF is -- versus -- for Pacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TINYProShares Nanotechnology ETF-- -- -- -- ODDSPacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns TINY or OND?
ProShares On-Demand ETF has a net margin of -- compared to ProShares Nanotechnology ETF's net margin of --. ProShares Nanotechnology ETF's return on equity of -- beat ProShares On-Demand ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TINYProShares Nanotechnology ETF-- -- -- ONDProShares On-Demand ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About TINY or OND?
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ProShares On-Demand ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ProShares Nanotechnology ETF has higher upside potential than ProShares On-Demand ETF, analysts believe ProShares Nanotechnology ETF is more attractive than ProShares On-Demand ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TINYProShares Nanotechnology ETF0 0 0 ONDProShares On-Demand ETF0 0 0 -
Is TINY or OND More Risky?
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ProShares On-Demand ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TINY or OND?
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.25%. ProShares On-Demand ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. ProShares Nanotechnology ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ProShares On-Demand ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TINY or OND?
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ProShares On-Demand ETF quarterly revenues of --. ProShares Nanotechnology ETF's net income of -- is lower than ProShares On-Demand ETF's net income of --. Notably, ProShares Nanotechnology ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ProShares On-Demand ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProShares Nanotechnology ETF is -- versus -- for ProShares On-Demand ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TINYProShares Nanotechnology ETF-- -- -- -- ONDProShares On-Demand ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns TINY or TINT?
ProShares Smart Materials ETF has a net margin of -- compared to ProShares Nanotechnology ETF's net margin of --. ProShares Nanotechnology ETF's return on equity of -- beat ProShares Smart Materials ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TINYProShares Nanotechnology ETF-- -- -- TINTProShares Smart Materials ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About TINY or TINT?
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ProShares Smart Materials ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ProShares Nanotechnology ETF has higher upside potential than ProShares Smart Materials ETF, analysts believe ProShares Nanotechnology ETF is more attractive than ProShares Smart Materials ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TINYProShares Nanotechnology ETF0 0 0 TINTProShares Smart Materials ETF0 0 0 -
Is TINY or TINT More Risky?
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ProShares Smart Materials ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TINY or TINT?
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.25%. ProShares Smart Materials ETF offers a yield of 1.22% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. ProShares Nanotechnology ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ProShares Smart Materials ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TINY or TINT?
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ProShares Smart Materials ETF quarterly revenues of --. ProShares Nanotechnology ETF's net income of -- is lower than ProShares Smart Materials ETF's net income of --. Notably, ProShares Nanotechnology ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ProShares Smart Materials ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProShares Nanotechnology ETF is -- versus -- for ProShares Smart Materials ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TINYProShares Nanotechnology ETF-- -- -- -- TINTProShares Smart Materials ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…
Stock Ideas
Sell
49
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Sell
45
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Sell
37
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 28x
Alerts
Sell
47
GSIW alert for Mar 10
Garden Stage Ltd. [GSIW] is up 278.41% over the past day.
Sell
44
TECX alert for Mar 10
Tectonic Therapeutic, Inc. [TECX] is down 5.02% over the past day.
Buy
67
BNAI alert for Mar 10
Brand Engagement Network, Inc. [BNAI] is down 25.47% over the past day.
