Will UnitedHealth Stock Recover?
Shares of embattled health insurance giant UnitedHealth (NYSE:UNH) plummeted by…
Buy
66
SPXN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$74.34
Seasonality move
:
1.37%
Day range:
$74.29 - $74.65
52-week range:
$51.42 - $76.08
Dividend yield:
0.97%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
1K
Avg. volume:
2.3K
1-year change:
13.89%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SPXN
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
LFEQ
VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SCHX
Schwab US Large-Cap ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SPXE
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Energy ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SPXV
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Health Care ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SPXN
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF
|
$74.32 | -- | -- | -- | $0.19 | 0.97% | -- |
|
LFEQ
VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF
|
$54.07 | -- | -- | -- | $0.49 | 0.91% | -- |
|
SCHX
Schwab US Large-Cap ETF
|
$26.85 | -- | -- | -- | $0.08 | 1.09% | -- |
|
SPXE
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Energy ETF
|
$73.30 | -- | -- | -- | $0.21 | 1% | -- |
|
SPXV
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Health Care ETF
|
$74.32 | -- | -- | -- | $0.20 | 0.97% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SPXN
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF
|
-- | 1.097 | -- | -- |
|
LFEQ
VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF
|
-- | 0.914 | -- | -- |
|
SCHX
Schwab US Large-Cap ETF
|
-- | 1.015 | -- | -- |
|
SPXE
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Energy ETF
|
-- | 1.022 | -- | -- |
|
SPXV
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Health Care ETF
|
-- | 1.111 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SPXN
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
LFEQ
VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SCHX
Schwab US Large-Cap ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SPXE
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Energy ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SPXV
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Health Care ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns SPXN or LFEQ?
VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF has a net margin of -- compared to ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF's net margin of --. ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF's return on equity of -- beat VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SPXNProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF-- -- -- LFEQVanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About SPXN or LFEQ?
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF has higher upside potential than VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF, analysts believe ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF is more attractive than VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SPXNProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF0 0 0 LFEQVanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF0 0 0 -
Is SPXN or LFEQ More Risky?
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF has a beta of 1.003, which suggesting that the stock is 0.31699999999999% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF has a beta of 0.726, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.44%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SPXN or LFEQ?
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.97%. VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF offers a yield of 0.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share. ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SPXN or LFEQ?
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF quarterly revenues of --. ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF's net income of -- is lower than VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF's net income of --. Notably, ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF is -- versus -- for VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SPXNProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF-- -- -- -- LFEQVanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SPXN or SCHX?
Schwab US Large-Cap ETF has a net margin of -- compared to ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF's net margin of --. ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF's return on equity of -- beat Schwab US Large-Cap ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SPXNProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF-- -- -- SCHXSchwab US Large-Cap ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About SPXN or SCHX?
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Schwab US Large-Cap ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF has higher upside potential than Schwab US Large-Cap ETF, analysts believe ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF is more attractive than Schwab US Large-Cap ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SPXNProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF0 0 0 SCHXSchwab US Large-Cap ETF0 0 0 -
Is SPXN or SCHX More Risky?
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF has a beta of 1.003, which suggesting that the stock is 0.31699999999999% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Schwab US Large-Cap ETF has a beta of 1.007, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.71000000000001%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SPXN or SCHX?
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.97%. Schwab US Large-Cap ETF offers a yield of 1.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Schwab US Large-Cap ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SPXN or SCHX?
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Schwab US Large-Cap ETF quarterly revenues of --. ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF's net income of -- is lower than Schwab US Large-Cap ETF's net income of --. Notably, ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Schwab US Large-Cap ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF is -- versus -- for Schwab US Large-Cap ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SPXNProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF-- -- -- -- SCHXSchwab US Large-Cap ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SPXN or SPXE?
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Energy ETF has a net margin of -- compared to ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF's net margin of --. ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF's return on equity of -- beat ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Energy ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SPXNProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF-- -- -- SPXEProShares S&P 500 Ex-Energy ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About SPXN or SPXE?
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Energy ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF has higher upside potential than ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Energy ETF, analysts believe ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF is more attractive than ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Energy ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SPXNProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF0 0 0 SPXEProShares S&P 500 Ex-Energy ETF0 0 0 -
Is SPXN or SPXE More Risky?
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF has a beta of 1.003, which suggesting that the stock is 0.31699999999999% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Energy ETF has a beta of 1.009, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.875%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SPXN or SPXE?
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.97%. ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Energy ETF offers a yield of 1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Energy ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SPXN or SPXE?
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Energy ETF quarterly revenues of --. ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF's net income of -- is lower than ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Energy ETF's net income of --. Notably, ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Energy ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF is -- versus -- for ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Energy ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SPXNProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF-- -- -- -- SPXEProShares S&P 500 Ex-Energy ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SPXN or SPXV?
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Health Care ETF has a net margin of -- compared to ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF's net margin of --. ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF's return on equity of -- beat ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Health Care ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SPXNProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF-- -- -- SPXVProShares S&P 500 Ex-Health Care ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About SPXN or SPXV?
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Health Care ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF has higher upside potential than ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Health Care ETF, analysts believe ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF is more attractive than ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Health Care ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SPXNProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF0 0 0 SPXVProShares S&P 500 Ex-Health Care ETF0 0 0 -
Is SPXN or SPXV More Risky?
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF has a beta of 1.003, which suggesting that the stock is 0.31699999999999% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Health Care ETF has a beta of 1.054, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.389%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SPXN or SPXV?
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.97%. ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Health Care ETF offers a yield of 0.97% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Health Care ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SPXN or SPXV?
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Health Care ETF quarterly revenues of --. ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF's net income of -- is lower than ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Health Care ETF's net income of --. Notably, ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Health Care ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF is -- versus -- for ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Health Care ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SPXNProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF-- -- -- -- SPXVProShares S&P 500 Ex-Health Care ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Lumentum The Best Laser Stock to Buy?
Though certainly less well-known than the huge tech businesses that…
Is Planet Fitness Stock Undervalued?
Planet Fitness (NYSE:PLNT) has had a difficult 12 months, retreating…
Stock Ideas
Buy
55
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.5T
P/E Ratio: 64x
Sell
43
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 34x
Sell
44
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 28x
Alerts
Buy
77
CPS alert for Feb 14
Cooper-Standard Holdings, Inc. [CPS] is up 32.06% over the past day.
Buy
91
SPHR alert for Feb 14
Sphere Entertainment Co. [SPHR] is down 0.2% over the past day.
Sell
39
IRON alert for Feb 14
Disc Medicine, Inc. [IRON] is down 21.88% over the past day.
