Will NVIDIA Return to Its 52-Week High?
NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA) has been among the best-performing investments of the…
Sell
31
LFEQ Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$42.52
Seasonality move
:
4.94%
Day range:
$44.38 - $45.23
52-week range:
$41.58 - $51.75
Dividend yield:
0.8%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
1.8K
Avg. volume:
2.9K
1-year change:
3.22%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LFEQ
VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NACP
Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SPXE
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Energy ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SPXN
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SPXV
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Health Care ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LFEQ
VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF
|
$45.23 | -- | -- | -- | $0.36 | 0.8% | -- |
|
NACP
Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF
|
$37.77 | -- | -- | -- | $0.10 | 1.12% | -- |
|
SPXE
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Energy ETF
|
$57.68 | -- | -- | -- | $0.16 | 1.24% | -- |
|
SPXN
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF
|
$56.84 | -- | -- | -- | $0.16 | 1.27% | -- |
|
SPXV
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Health Care ETF
|
$57.54 | -- | -- | -- | $0.16 | 1.26% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LFEQ
VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF
|
-- | 1.016 | -- | -- |
|
NACP
Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF
|
-- | 1.022 | -- | -- |
|
SPXE
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Energy ETF
|
-- | 1.014 | -- | -- |
|
SPXN
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF
|
-- | 0.979 | -- | -- |
|
SPXV
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Health Care ETF
|
-- | 1.024 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LFEQ
VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NACP
Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SPXE
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Energy ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SPXN
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SPXV
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Health Care ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns LFEQ or NACP?
Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF has a net margin of -- compared to VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF's net margin of --. VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF's return on equity of -- beat Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LFEQVanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF-- -- -- NACPImpact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About LFEQ or NACP?
VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF has higher upside potential than Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF, analysts believe VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF is more attractive than Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LFEQVanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF0 0 0 NACPImpact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF0 0 0 -
Is LFEQ or NACP More Risky?
VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF has a beta of 0.795, which suggesting that the stock is 20.489% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF has a beta of 1.031, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.06%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LFEQ or NACP?
VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.8%. Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF offers a yield of 1.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LFEQ or NACP?
VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF quarterly revenues of --. VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF's net income of -- is lower than Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF's net income of --. Notably, VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF is -- versus -- for Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LFEQVanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF-- -- -- -- NACPImpact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns LFEQ or SPXE?
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Energy ETF has a net margin of -- compared to VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF's net margin of --. VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF's return on equity of -- beat ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Energy ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LFEQVanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF-- -- -- SPXEProShares S&P 500 Ex-Energy ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About LFEQ or SPXE?
VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Energy ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF has higher upside potential than ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Energy ETF, analysts believe VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF is more attractive than ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Energy ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LFEQVanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF0 0 0 SPXEProShares S&P 500 Ex-Energy ETF0 0 0 -
Is LFEQ or SPXE More Risky?
VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF has a beta of 0.795, which suggesting that the stock is 20.489% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Energy ETF has a beta of 1.005, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.46200000000001%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LFEQ or SPXE?
VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.8%. ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Energy ETF offers a yield of 1.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Energy ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LFEQ or SPXE?
VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Energy ETF quarterly revenues of --. VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF's net income of -- is lower than ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Energy ETF's net income of --. Notably, VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Energy ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF is -- versus -- for ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Energy ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LFEQVanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF-- -- -- -- SPXEProShares S&P 500 Ex-Energy ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns LFEQ or SPXN?
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF has a net margin of -- compared to VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF's net margin of --. VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF's return on equity of -- beat ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LFEQVanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF-- -- -- SPXNProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About LFEQ or SPXN?
VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF has higher upside potential than ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF, analysts believe VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF is more attractive than ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LFEQVanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF0 0 0 SPXNProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF0 0 0 -
Is LFEQ or SPXN More Risky?
VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF has a beta of 0.795, which suggesting that the stock is 20.489% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF has a beta of 1.006, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.644%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LFEQ or SPXN?
VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.8%. ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF offers a yield of 1.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LFEQ or SPXN?
VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF quarterly revenues of --. VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF's net income of -- is lower than ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF's net income of --. Notably, VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF is -- versus -- for ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LFEQVanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF-- -- -- -- SPXNProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns LFEQ or SPXV?
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Health Care ETF has a net margin of -- compared to VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF's net margin of --. VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF's return on equity of -- beat ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Health Care ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LFEQVanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF-- -- -- SPXVProShares S&P 500 Ex-Health Care ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About LFEQ or SPXV?
VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Health Care ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF has higher upside potential than ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Health Care ETF, analysts believe VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF is more attractive than ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Health Care ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LFEQVanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF0 0 0 SPXVProShares S&P 500 Ex-Health Care ETF0 0 0 -
Is LFEQ or SPXV More Risky?
VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF has a beta of 0.795, which suggesting that the stock is 20.489% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Health Care ETF has a beta of 1.048, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.801%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LFEQ or SPXV?
VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.8%. ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Health Care ETF offers a yield of 1.26% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Health Care ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LFEQ or SPXV?
VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Health Care ETF quarterly revenues of --. VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF's net income of -- is lower than ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Health Care ETF's net income of --. Notably, VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Health Care ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF is -- versus -- for ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Health Care ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LFEQVanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF-- -- -- -- SPXVProShares S&P 500 Ex-Health Care ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will JP Morgan’s AI Advisor Be a Winner?
JPMorgan Chase is rolling out “JPM WealthAI for high-net-worth clients.…
Is Revolve Group Stock a Buy, Sell or Hold?
Recently, Revolve Group (NYSE:RVLV) management delivered some fairly positive business…
Stock Ideas
Sell
45
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3T
P/E Ratio: 33x
Buy
53
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.9T
P/E Ratio: 33x
Sell
50
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.7T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Alerts
Buy
52
RGC alert for Apr 12
Regencell Bioscience Holdings [RGC] is up 29.14% over the past day.
Buy
52
SLP alert for Apr 12
Simulations Plus [SLP] is up 26.73% over the past day.
Buy
89
GDXU alert for Apr 12
MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETN [GDXU] is up 15.9% over the past day.
