Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?
Digital signature software business DocuSign (NASDAQ:DOCU) has been struggling over…
Sell
49
SHLD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$66.00
Seasonality move
:
22.42%
Day range:
$65.84 - $66.50
52-week range:
$36.61 - $71.54
Dividend yield:
0.39%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
395.3K
Avg. volume:
796.9K
1-year change:
72.52%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SHLD
Global X Defense Tech ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
COPX
Global X Copper Miners ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EVX
VanEck Environmental Services ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GDX
VanEck Gold Miners ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
RING
iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SHLD
Global X Defense Tech ETF
|
$65.99 | -- | -- | -- | $0.12 | 0.39% | -- |
|
COPX
Global X Copper Miners ETF
|
$75.71 | -- | -- | -- | $0.25 | 1.03% | -- |
|
EVX
VanEck Environmental Services ETF
|
$38.85 | -- | -- | -- | $0.07 | 0.18% | -- |
|
GDX
VanEck Gold Miners ETF
|
$91.29 | -- | -- | -- | $0.63 | 0.69% | -- |
|
RING
iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF
|
$78.62 | -- | -- | -- | $0.38 | 0.78% | -- |
|
SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
|
$365.86 | -- | -- | -- | $1.10 | 0.3% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SHLD
Global X Defense Tech ETF
|
-- | 0.511 | -- | -- |
|
COPX
Global X Copper Miners ETF
|
-- | 1.575 | -- | -- |
|
EVX
VanEck Environmental Services ETF
|
-- | 0.824 | -- | -- |
|
GDX
VanEck Gold Miners ETF
|
-- | 0.414 | -- | -- |
|
RING
iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF
|
-- | 0.399 | -- | -- |
|
SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
|
-- | 2.169 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SHLD
Global X Defense Tech ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
COPX
Global X Copper Miners ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EVX
VanEck Environmental Services ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GDX
VanEck Gold Miners ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
RING
iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Global X Defense Tech ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns SHLD or COPX?
Global X Copper Miners ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Global X Defense Tech ETF's net margin of --. Global X Defense Tech ETF's return on equity of -- beat Global X Copper Miners ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SHLDGlobal X Defense Tech ETF-- -- -- COPXGlobal X Copper Miners ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About SHLD or COPX?
Global X Defense Tech ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Global X Copper Miners ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X Defense Tech ETF has higher upside potential than Global X Copper Miners ETF, analysts believe Global X Defense Tech ETF is more attractive than Global X Copper Miners ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SHLDGlobal X Defense Tech ETF0 0 0 COPXGlobal X Copper Miners ETF0 0 0 -
Is SHLD or COPX More Risky?
Global X Defense Tech ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global X Copper Miners ETF has a beta of 1.293, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.342%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SHLD or COPX?
Global X Defense Tech ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.39%. Global X Copper Miners ETF offers a yield of 1.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Global X Defense Tech ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global X Copper Miners ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SHLD or COPX?
Global X Defense Tech ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Global X Copper Miners ETF quarterly revenues of --. Global X Defense Tech ETF's net income of -- is lower than Global X Copper Miners ETF's net income of --. Notably, Global X Defense Tech ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global X Copper Miners ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X Defense Tech ETF is -- versus -- for Global X Copper Miners ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SHLDGlobal X Defense Tech ETF-- -- -- -- COPXGlobal X Copper Miners ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SHLD or EVX?
VanEck Environmental Services ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Global X Defense Tech ETF's net margin of --. Global X Defense Tech ETF's return on equity of -- beat VanEck Environmental Services ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SHLDGlobal X Defense Tech ETF-- -- -- EVXVanEck Environmental Services ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About SHLD or EVX?
Global X Defense Tech ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand VanEck Environmental Services ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X Defense Tech ETF has higher upside potential than VanEck Environmental Services ETF, analysts believe Global X Defense Tech ETF is more attractive than VanEck Environmental Services ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SHLDGlobal X Defense Tech ETF0 0 0 EVXVanEck Environmental Services ETF0 0 0 -
Is SHLD or EVX More Risky?
Global X Defense Tech ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VanEck Environmental Services ETF has a beta of 1.035, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.543%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SHLD or EVX?
Global X Defense Tech ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.39%. VanEck Environmental Services ETF offers a yield of 0.18% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. Global X Defense Tech ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. VanEck Environmental Services ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SHLD or EVX?
Global X Defense Tech ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than VanEck Environmental Services ETF quarterly revenues of --. Global X Defense Tech ETF's net income of -- is lower than VanEck Environmental Services ETF's net income of --. Notably, Global X Defense Tech ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while VanEck Environmental Services ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X Defense Tech ETF is -- versus -- for VanEck Environmental Services ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SHLDGlobal X Defense Tech ETF-- -- -- -- EVXVanEck Environmental Services ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SHLD or GDX?
VanEck Gold Miners ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Global X Defense Tech ETF's net margin of --. Global X Defense Tech ETF's return on equity of -- beat VanEck Gold Miners ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SHLDGlobal X Defense Tech ETF-- -- -- GDXVanEck Gold Miners ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About SHLD or GDX?
Global X Defense Tech ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand VanEck Gold Miners ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X Defense Tech ETF has higher upside potential than VanEck Gold Miners ETF, analysts believe Global X Defense Tech ETF is more attractive than VanEck Gold Miners ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SHLDGlobal X Defense Tech ETF0 0 0 GDXVanEck Gold Miners ETF0 0 0 -
Is SHLD or GDX More Risky?
Global X Defense Tech ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VanEck Gold Miners ETF has a beta of 0.844, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.595%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SHLD or GDX?
Global X Defense Tech ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.39%. VanEck Gold Miners ETF offers a yield of 0.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.63 per share. Global X Defense Tech ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. VanEck Gold Miners ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SHLD or GDX?
Global X Defense Tech ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than VanEck Gold Miners ETF quarterly revenues of --. Global X Defense Tech ETF's net income of -- is lower than VanEck Gold Miners ETF's net income of --. Notably, Global X Defense Tech ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while VanEck Gold Miners ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X Defense Tech ETF is -- versus -- for VanEck Gold Miners ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SHLDGlobal X Defense Tech ETF-- -- -- -- GDXVanEck Gold Miners ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SHLD or RING?
iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Global X Defense Tech ETF's net margin of --. Global X Defense Tech ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SHLDGlobal X Defense Tech ETF-- -- -- RINGiShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About SHLD or RING?
Global X Defense Tech ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X Defense Tech ETF has higher upside potential than iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF, analysts believe Global X Defense Tech ETF is more attractive than iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SHLDGlobal X Defense Tech ETF0 0 0 RINGiShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF0 0 0 -
Is SHLD or RING More Risky?
Global X Defense Tech ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF has a beta of 0.805, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.517%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SHLD or RING?
Global X Defense Tech ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.39%. iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF offers a yield of 0.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. Global X Defense Tech ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SHLD or RING?
Global X Defense Tech ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF quarterly revenues of --. Global X Defense Tech ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF's net income of --. Notably, Global X Defense Tech ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X Defense Tech ETF is -- versus -- for iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SHLDGlobal X Defense Tech ETF-- -- -- -- RINGiShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SHLD or SMH?
VanEck Semiconductor ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Global X Defense Tech ETF's net margin of --. Global X Defense Tech ETF's return on equity of -- beat VanEck Semiconductor ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SHLDGlobal X Defense Tech ETF-- -- -- SMHVanEck Semiconductor ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About SHLD or SMH?
Global X Defense Tech ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand VanEck Semiconductor ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X Defense Tech ETF has higher upside potential than VanEck Semiconductor ETF, analysts believe Global X Defense Tech ETF is more attractive than VanEck Semiconductor ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SHLDGlobal X Defense Tech ETF0 0 0 SMHVanEck Semiconductor ETF0 0 0 -
Is SHLD or SMH More Risky?
Global X Defense Tech ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VanEck Semiconductor ETF has a beta of 1.572, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.183%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SHLD or SMH?
Global X Defense Tech ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.39%. VanEck Semiconductor ETF offers a yield of 0.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.10 per share. Global X Defense Tech ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. VanEck Semiconductor ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SHLD or SMH?
Global X Defense Tech ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than VanEck Semiconductor ETF quarterly revenues of --. Global X Defense Tech ETF's net income of -- is lower than VanEck Semiconductor ETF's net income of --. Notably, Global X Defense Tech ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while VanEck Semiconductor ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X Defense Tech ETF is -- versus -- for VanEck Semiconductor ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SHLDGlobal X Defense Tech ETF-- -- -- -- SMHVanEck Semiconductor ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?
Cybersecurity major SentinelOne (NYSE:S) has struggled over several years, delivering…
Is Broadcom Stock on Sale?
Chip and software maker Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) has been among the…
Stock Ideas
Buy
59
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 65x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
72
GLTO alert for Dec 27
Galecto, Inc. [GLTO] is up 16.92% over the past day.
Sell
20
SMX alert for Dec 27
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 15.76% over the past day.
Sell
11
CDNAF alert for Dec 27
Canadian Tire Corp. Ltd. [CDNAF] is down 10% over the past day.
