Is Enovix an Underrated Small Cap?
Enovix (NASDAQ:ENVX) is one of several small, innovative companies hoping…
Buy
69
RING Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$39.40
Seasonality move
:
-0.92%
Day range:
$41.21 - $42.44
52-week range:
$26.33 - $44.40
Dividend yield:
0.95%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
140.1K
Avg. volume:
548.8K
1-year change:
49.47%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
RING
iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GDX
VanEck Gold Miners ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GDXJ
VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SGDM
Sprott Gold Miners ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SIL
Global X Silver Miners ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SLVP
iShares MSCI Global Silver Miners ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
RING
iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF
|
$42.33 | -- | -- | -- | $0.22 | 0.95% | -- |
|
GDX
VanEck Gold Miners ETF
|
$50.37 | -- | -- | -- | $0.40 | 0.8% | -- |
|
GDXJ
VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF
|
$64.33 | -- | -- | -- | $1.11 | 1.73% | -- |
|
SGDM
Sprott Gold Miners ETF
|
$42.96 | -- | -- | -- | $0.29 | 0.68% | -- |
|
SIL
Global X Silver Miners ETF
|
$42.57 | -- | -- | -- | $0.76 | 1.79% | -- |
|
SLVP
iShares MSCI Global Silver Miners ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
RING
iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF
|
-- | -0.097 | -- | -- |
|
GDX
VanEck Gold Miners ETF
|
-- | -0.160 | -- | -- |
|
GDXJ
VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF
|
-- | -0.379 | -- | -- |
|
SGDM
Sprott Gold Miners ETF
|
-- | -0.385 | -- | -- |
|
SIL
Global X Silver Miners ETF
|
-- | -0.276 | -- | -- |
|
SLVP
iShares MSCI Global Silver Miners ETF
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
RING
iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GDX
VanEck Gold Miners ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GDXJ
VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SGDM
Sprott Gold Miners ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SIL
Global X Silver Miners ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SLVP
iShares MSCI Global Silver Miners ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns RING or GDX?
VanEck Gold Miners ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF's net margin of --. iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF's return on equity of -- beat VanEck Gold Miners ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital RINGiShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF-- -- -- GDXVanEck Gold Miners ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About RING or GDX?
iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand VanEck Gold Miners ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF has higher upside potential than VanEck Gold Miners ETF, analysts believe iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF is more attractive than VanEck Gold Miners ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings RINGiShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF0 0 0 GDXVanEck Gold Miners ETF0 0 0 -
Is RING or GDX More Risky?
iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF has a beta of 0.623, which suggesting that the stock is 37.689% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VanEck Gold Miners ETF has a beta of 0.678, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.194%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock RING or GDX?
iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.95%. VanEck Gold Miners ETF offers a yield of 0.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. VanEck Gold Miners ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios RING or GDX?
iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than VanEck Gold Miners ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF's net income of -- is lower than VanEck Gold Miners ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while VanEck Gold Miners ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF is -- versus -- for VanEck Gold Miners ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income RINGiShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF-- -- -- -- GDXVanEck Gold Miners ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns RING or GDXJ?
VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF's net margin of --. iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF's return on equity of -- beat VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital RINGiShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF-- -- -- GDXJVanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About RING or GDXJ?
iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF has higher upside potential than VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF, analysts believe iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF is more attractive than VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings RINGiShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF0 0 0 GDXJVanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF0 0 0 -
Is RING or GDXJ More Risky?
iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF has a beta of 0.623, which suggesting that the stock is 37.689% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF has a beta of 0.892, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.812%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock RING or GDXJ?
iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.95%. VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF offers a yield of 1.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.11 per share. iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios RING or GDXJ?
iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF's net income of -- is lower than VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF is -- versus -- for VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income RINGiShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF-- -- -- -- GDXJVanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns RING or SGDM?
Sprott Gold Miners ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF's net margin of --. iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF's return on equity of -- beat Sprott Gold Miners ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital RINGiShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF-- -- -- SGDMSprott Gold Miners ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About RING or SGDM?
iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sprott Gold Miners ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF has higher upside potential than Sprott Gold Miners ETF, analysts believe iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF is more attractive than Sprott Gold Miners ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings RINGiShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF0 0 0 SGDMSprott Gold Miners ETF0 0 0 -
Is RING or SGDM More Risky?
iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF has a beta of 0.623, which suggesting that the stock is 37.689% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sprott Gold Miners ETF has a beta of 0.565, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.497%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock RING or SGDM?
iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.95%. Sprott Gold Miners ETF offers a yield of 0.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sprott Gold Miners ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios RING or SGDM?
iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Sprott Gold Miners ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF's net income of -- is lower than Sprott Gold Miners ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sprott Gold Miners ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF is -- versus -- for Sprott Gold Miners ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income RINGiShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF-- -- -- -- SGDMSprott Gold Miners ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns RING or SIL?
Global X Silver Miners ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF's net margin of --. iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF's return on equity of -- beat Global X Silver Miners ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital RINGiShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF-- -- -- SILGlobal X Silver Miners ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About RING or SIL?
iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Global X Silver Miners ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF has higher upside potential than Global X Silver Miners ETF, analysts believe iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF is more attractive than Global X Silver Miners ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings RINGiShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF0 0 0 SILGlobal X Silver Miners ETF0 0 0 -
Is RING or SIL More Risky?
iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF has a beta of 0.623, which suggesting that the stock is 37.689% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global X Silver Miners ETF has a beta of 0.890, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.017%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock RING or SIL?
iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.95%. Global X Silver Miners ETF offers a yield of 1.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share. iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global X Silver Miners ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios RING or SIL?
iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Global X Silver Miners ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF's net income of -- is lower than Global X Silver Miners ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global X Silver Miners ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF is -- versus -- for Global X Silver Miners ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income RINGiShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF-- -- -- -- SILGlobal X Silver Miners ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns RING or SLVP?
iShares MSCI Global Silver Miners ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF's net margin of --. iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares MSCI Global Silver Miners ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital RINGiShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF-- -- -- SLVPiShares MSCI Global Silver Miners ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About RING or SLVP?
iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares MSCI Global Silver Miners ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF has higher upside potential than iShares MSCI Global Silver Miners ETF, analysts believe iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF is more attractive than iShares MSCI Global Silver Miners ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings RINGiShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF0 0 0 SLVPiShares MSCI Global Silver Miners ETF0 0 0 -
Is RING or SLVP More Risky?
iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF has a beta of 0.623, which suggesting that the stock is 37.689% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares MSCI Global Silver Miners ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock RING or SLVP?
iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.95%. iShares MSCI Global Silver Miners ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares MSCI Global Silver Miners ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios RING or SLVP?
iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares MSCI Global Silver Miners ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares MSCI Global Silver Miners ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares MSCI Global Silver Miners ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF is -- versus -- for iShares MSCI Global Silver Miners ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income RINGiShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF-- -- -- -- SLVPiShares MSCI Global Silver Miners ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Are We Heading Toward a Recession?
Fears of a recession in 2025 grew at the end…
3 Recession-Proof ETFs to Invest in Now
The U.S. gross domestic product (GDP) contracted 0.3% during the…
Stock Ideas
Buy
68
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Sell
39
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3T
P/E Ratio: 33x
Buy
61
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.8T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Buy
60
RGC alert for May 12
Regencell Bioscience Holdings [RGC] is up 13.03% over the past day.
Buy
97
NGVC alert for May 12
Natural Grocers by Vitamin Cottage [NGVC] is down 6.78% over the past day.
Sell
38
ONTO alert for May 12
Onto Innovation [ONTO] is up 5.31% over the past day.
