Is Amazon an AI Stock?
With the market starting to look skittish on pure-play AI…
Sell
46
QQH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$79.04
Seasonality move
:
1.52%
Day range:
$78.31 - $79.29
52-week range:
$53.37 - $82.54
Dividend yield:
0.2%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
59.3K
Avg. volume:
23.8K
1-year change:
16.92%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
QQH
HCM Defender 100 Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FDMO
Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GFLW
VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ONEQ
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PTNQ
Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
QQQ
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
QQH
HCM Defender 100 Index ETF
|
$79.18 | -- | -- | -- | $0.16 | 0.2% | -- |
|
FDMO
Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF
|
$84.38 | -- | -- | -- | $0.15 | 0.8% | -- |
|
GFLW
VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF
|
$28.44 | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0.03% | -- |
|
ONEQ
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
|
$92.32 | -- | -- | -- | $0.14 | 0.56% | -- |
|
PTNQ
Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF
|
$80.48 | -- | -- | -- | $1.45 | 1.8% | -- |
|
QQQ
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
|
$623.52 | -- | -- | -- | $0.69 | 0.46% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
QQH
HCM Defender 100 Index ETF
|
-- | 1.539 | -- | -- |
|
FDMO
Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF
|
-- | 1.276 | -- | -- |
|
GFLW
VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
ONEQ
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
|
-- | 1.342 | -- | -- |
|
PTNQ
Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF
|
-- | 0.692 | -- | -- |
|
QQQ
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
|
-- | 1.240 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
QQH
HCM Defender 100 Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FDMO
Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GFLW
VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ONEQ
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PTNQ
Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
QQQ
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
HCM Defender 100 Index ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns QQH or FDMO?
Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF has a net margin of -- compared to HCM Defender 100 Index ETF's net margin of --. HCM Defender 100 Index ETF's return on equity of -- beat Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital QQHHCM Defender 100 Index ETF-- -- -- FDMOFidelity Momentum Factor ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About QQH or FDMO?
HCM Defender 100 Index ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that HCM Defender 100 Index ETF has higher upside potential than Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF, analysts believe HCM Defender 100 Index ETF is more attractive than Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings QQHHCM Defender 100 Index ETF0 0 0 FDMOFidelity Momentum Factor ETF0 0 0 -
Is QQH or FDMO More Risky?
HCM Defender 100 Index ETF has a beta of 1.108, which suggesting that the stock is 10.789% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF has a beta of 1.020, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.037%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock QQH or FDMO?
HCM Defender 100 Index ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.2%. Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF offers a yield of 0.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. HCM Defender 100 Index ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios QQH or FDMO?
HCM Defender 100 Index ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF quarterly revenues of --. HCM Defender 100 Index ETF's net income of -- is lower than Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF's net income of --. Notably, HCM Defender 100 Index ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HCM Defender 100 Index ETF is -- versus -- for Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income QQHHCM Defender 100 Index ETF-- -- -- -- FDMOFidelity Momentum Factor ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns QQH or GFLW?
VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF has a net margin of -- compared to HCM Defender 100 Index ETF's net margin of --. HCM Defender 100 Index ETF's return on equity of -- beat VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital QQHHCM Defender 100 Index ETF-- -- -- GFLWVictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About QQH or GFLW?
HCM Defender 100 Index ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that HCM Defender 100 Index ETF has higher upside potential than VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF, analysts believe HCM Defender 100 Index ETF is more attractive than VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings QQHHCM Defender 100 Index ETF0 0 0 GFLWVictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF0 0 0 -
Is QQH or GFLW More Risky?
HCM Defender 100 Index ETF has a beta of 1.108, which suggesting that the stock is 10.789% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock QQH or GFLW?
HCM Defender 100 Index ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.2%. VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF offers a yield of 0.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. HCM Defender 100 Index ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios QQH or GFLW?
HCM Defender 100 Index ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF quarterly revenues of --. HCM Defender 100 Index ETF's net income of -- is lower than VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF's net income of --. Notably, HCM Defender 100 Index ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HCM Defender 100 Index ETF is -- versus -- for VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income QQHHCM Defender 100 Index ETF-- -- -- -- GFLWVictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns QQH or ONEQ?
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF has a net margin of -- compared to HCM Defender 100 Index ETF's net margin of --. HCM Defender 100 Index ETF's return on equity of -- beat Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital QQHHCM Defender 100 Index ETF-- -- -- ONEQFidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About QQH or ONEQ?
HCM Defender 100 Index ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that HCM Defender 100 Index ETF has higher upside potential than Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF, analysts believe HCM Defender 100 Index ETF is more attractive than Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings QQHHCM Defender 100 Index ETF0 0 0 ONEQFidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF0 0 0 -
Is QQH or ONEQ More Risky?
HCM Defender 100 Index ETF has a beta of 1.108, which suggesting that the stock is 10.789% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF has a beta of 1.168, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.828%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock QQH or ONEQ?
HCM Defender 100 Index ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.2%. Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF offers a yield of 0.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. HCM Defender 100 Index ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios QQH or ONEQ?
HCM Defender 100 Index ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF quarterly revenues of --. HCM Defender 100 Index ETF's net income of -- is lower than Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF's net income of --. Notably, HCM Defender 100 Index ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HCM Defender 100 Index ETF is -- versus -- for Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income QQHHCM Defender 100 Index ETF-- -- -- -- ONEQFidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns QQH or PTNQ?
Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF has a net margin of -- compared to HCM Defender 100 Index ETF's net margin of --. HCM Defender 100 Index ETF's return on equity of -- beat Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital QQHHCM Defender 100 Index ETF-- -- -- PTNQPacer Trendpilot 100 ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About QQH or PTNQ?
HCM Defender 100 Index ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that HCM Defender 100 Index ETF has higher upside potential than Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF, analysts believe HCM Defender 100 Index ETF is more attractive than Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings QQHHCM Defender 100 Index ETF0 0 0 PTNQPacer Trendpilot 100 ETF0 0 0 -
Is QQH or PTNQ More Risky?
HCM Defender 100 Index ETF has a beta of 1.108, which suggesting that the stock is 10.789% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF has a beta of 0.563, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.746%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock QQH or PTNQ?
HCM Defender 100 Index ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.2%. Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF offers a yield of 1.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.45 per share. HCM Defender 100 Index ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios QQH or PTNQ?
HCM Defender 100 Index ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF quarterly revenues of --. HCM Defender 100 Index ETF's net income of -- is lower than Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF's net income of --. Notably, HCM Defender 100 Index ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HCM Defender 100 Index ETF is -- versus -- for Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income QQHHCM Defender 100 Index ETF-- -- -- -- PTNQPacer Trendpilot 100 ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns QQH or QQQ?
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 has a net margin of -- compared to HCM Defender 100 Index ETF's net margin of --. HCM Defender 100 Index ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital QQHHCM Defender 100 Index ETF-- -- -- QQQInvesco QQQ Trust, Series 1-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About QQH or QQQ?
HCM Defender 100 Index ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that HCM Defender 100 Index ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1, analysts believe HCM Defender 100 Index ETF is more attractive than Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings QQHHCM Defender 100 Index ETF0 0 0 QQQInvesco QQQ Trust, Series 10 0 0 -
Is QQH or QQQ More Risky?
HCM Defender 100 Index ETF has a beta of 1.108, which suggesting that the stock is 10.789% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 has a beta of 1.173, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.333%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock QQH or QQQ?
HCM Defender 100 Index ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.2%. Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 offers a yield of 0.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.69 per share. HCM Defender 100 Index ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios QQH or QQQ?
HCM Defender 100 Index ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 quarterly revenues of --. HCM Defender 100 Index ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1's net income of --. Notably, HCM Defender 100 Index ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HCM Defender 100 Index ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income QQHHCM Defender 100 Index ETF-- -- -- -- QQQInvesco QQQ Trust, Series 1-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Google Vs NVIDIA Stock: Which Is Best?
Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) and NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVIDIA) are two of the market’s…
How High Could NVIDIA Stock Go?
NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA) has been one of the best stocks to…
Stock Ideas
Buy
51
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 61x
Buy
65
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.2T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Buy
69
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Sell
47
PSTG alert for Dec 4
Pure Storage, Inc. [PSTG] is up 5.05% over the past day.
Sell
41
SMX alert for Dec 4
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is up 154.74% over the past day.
Sell
43
HY alert for Dec 4
Hyster-Yale, Inc. [HY] is up 1.92% over the past day.
