Will Tesla Stock Go Up In 2026?
EV giant Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) has, somewhat surprisingly, undershot the broader…
Sell
42
QNXT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$27.92
Seasonality move
:
--
Day range:
$27.89 - $28.02
52-week range:
$20.51 - $28.65
Dividend yield:
0.6%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
4.6K
Avg. volume:
1.4K
1-year change:
8.78%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
QNXT
iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ANEW
ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GMET
VanEck Green Metals ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HQGO
Hartford US Quality Growth ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
QNXT
iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF
|
$27.89 | -- | -- | -- | $0.04 | 0.6% | -- |
|
ANEW
ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF
|
$50.20 | -- | -- | -- | $0.04 | 0.98% | -- |
|
GMET
VanEck Green Metals ETF
|
$35.31 | -- | -- | -- | $0.39 | 1.12% | -- |
|
HQGO
Hartford US Quality Growth ETF
|
$60.12 | -- | -- | -- | $0.06 | 0.42% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
QNXT
iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF
|
-- | 1.824 | -- | -- |
|
ANEW
ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF
|
-- | 1.353 | -- | -- |
|
GMET
VanEck Green Metals ETF
|
-- | 2.184 | -- | -- |
|
HQGO
Hartford US Quality Growth ETF
|
-- | 1.081 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
QNXT
iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ANEW
ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GMET
VanEck Green Metals ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HQGO
Hartford US Quality Growth ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns QNXT or ANEW?
ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF's net margin of --. iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF's return on equity of -- beat ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital QNXTiShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF-- -- -- ANEWProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About QNXT or ANEW?
iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF has higher upside potential than ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF, analysts believe iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF is more attractive than ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings QNXTiShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF0 0 0 ANEWProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF0 0 0 -
Is QNXT or ANEW More Risky?
iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF has a beta of 1.013, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.276%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock QNXT or ANEW?
iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.6%. ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF offers a yield of 0.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios QNXT or ANEW?
iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF's net income of -- is lower than ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF is -- versus -- for ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income QNXTiShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF-- -- -- -- ANEWProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns QNXT or GMET?
VanEck Green Metals ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF's net margin of --. iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF's return on equity of -- beat VanEck Green Metals ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital QNXTiShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF-- -- -- GMETVanEck Green Metals ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About QNXT or GMET?
iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand VanEck Green Metals ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF has higher upside potential than VanEck Green Metals ETF, analysts believe iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF is more attractive than VanEck Green Metals ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings QNXTiShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF0 0 0 GMETVanEck Green Metals ETF0 0 0 -
Is QNXT or GMET More Risky?
iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VanEck Green Metals ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock QNXT or GMET?
iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.6%. VanEck Green Metals ETF offers a yield of 1.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share. iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. VanEck Green Metals ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios QNXT or GMET?
iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than VanEck Green Metals ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF's net income of -- is lower than VanEck Green Metals ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while VanEck Green Metals ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF is -- versus -- for VanEck Green Metals ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income QNXTiShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF-- -- -- -- GMETVanEck Green Metals ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns QNXT or HQGO?
Hartford US Quality Growth ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF's net margin of --. iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF's return on equity of -- beat Hartford US Quality Growth ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital QNXTiShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF-- -- -- HQGOHartford US Quality Growth ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About QNXT or HQGO?
iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Hartford US Quality Growth ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF has higher upside potential than Hartford US Quality Growth ETF, analysts believe iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF is more attractive than Hartford US Quality Growth ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings QNXTiShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF0 0 0 HQGOHartford US Quality Growth ETF0 0 0 -
Is QNXT or HQGO More Risky?
iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hartford US Quality Growth ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock QNXT or HQGO?
iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.6%. Hartford US Quality Growth ETF offers a yield of 0.42% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hartford US Quality Growth ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios QNXT or HQGO?
iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Hartford US Quality Growth ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF's net income of -- is lower than Hartford US Quality Growth ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Hartford US Quality Growth ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF is -- versus -- for Hartford US Quality Growth ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income QNXTiShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF-- -- -- -- HQGOHartford US Quality Growth ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
What Are the Best AI Power Stocks?
As the construction of AI infrastructure accelerates, the gap between…
Is IONQ The Best Quantum Stock to Buy?
Riding a wave of investor enthusiasm for the technology, quantum…
Stock Ideas
Sell
49
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.3T
P/E Ratio: 60x
Buy
53
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
71
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Alerts
Sell
39
SMX alert for Dec 16
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 18.2% over the past day.
Sell
33
ZBIO alert for Dec 16
Zenas BioPharma, Inc. [ZBIO] is up 13.35% over the past day.
Sell
38
HUT alert for Dec 16
Hut 8 Corp. [HUT] is up 3.92% over the past day.
