How Big Will the SpaceX IPO Be?
Operated up to now as a private business, SpaceX will…
Sell
49
MUST Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$20.85
Seasonality move
:
-0.99%
Day range:
$20.80 - $20.91
52-week range:
$19.01 - $22.10
Dividend yield:
3.24%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
119K
Avg. volume:
132.3K
1-year change:
2.35%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MUST
Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FMB
First Trust Managed Municipal ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GMUN
Goldman Sachs Access Municipal Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HMOP
Hartford Municipal Opportunities ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ITM
VanEck Intermediate Muni ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MINO
PIMCO Municipal Income Opportunities Active ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MUST
Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF
|
$20.91 | -- | -- | -- | $0.06 | 3.24% | -- |
|
FMB
First Trust Managed Municipal ETF
|
$51.42 | -- | -- | -- | $0.15 | 3.37% | -- |
|
GMUN
Goldman Sachs Access Municipal Bond ETF
|
$51.11 | -- | -- | -- | $0.13 | 2.92% | -- |
|
HMOP
Hartford Municipal Opportunities ETF
|
$39.41 | -- | -- | -- | $0.11 | 3.41% | -- |
|
ITM
VanEck Intermediate Muni ETF
|
$47.44 | -- | -- | -- | $0.12 | 2.84% | -- |
|
MINO
PIMCO Municipal Income Opportunities Active ETF
|
$45.64 | -- | -- | -- | $0.15 | 3.68% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MUST
Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF
|
-- | 1.052 | -- | -- |
|
FMB
First Trust Managed Municipal ETF
|
-- | 1.018 | -- | -- |
|
GMUN
Goldman Sachs Access Municipal Bond ETF
|
-- | 0.702 | -- | -- |
|
HMOP
Hartford Municipal Opportunities ETF
|
-- | 0.818 | -- | -- |
|
ITM
VanEck Intermediate Muni ETF
|
-- | 1.038 | -- | -- |
|
MINO
PIMCO Municipal Income Opportunities Active ETF
|
-- | 1.202 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MUST
Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FMB
First Trust Managed Municipal ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GMUN
Goldman Sachs Access Municipal Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HMOP
Hartford Municipal Opportunities ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ITM
VanEck Intermediate Muni ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MINO
PIMCO Municipal Income Opportunities Active ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns MUST or FMB?
First Trust Managed Municipal ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF's net margin of --. Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF's return on equity of -- beat First Trust Managed Municipal ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MUSTColumbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF-- -- -- FMBFirst Trust Managed Municipal ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MUST or FMB?
Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand First Trust Managed Municipal ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF has higher upside potential than First Trust Managed Municipal ETF, analysts believe Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF is more attractive than First Trust Managed Municipal ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MUSTColumbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF0 0 0 FMBFirst Trust Managed Municipal ETF0 0 0 -
Is MUST or FMB More Risky?
Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF has a beta of 1.031, which suggesting that the stock is 3.114% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First Trust Managed Municipal ETF has a beta of 0.909, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.125%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MUST or FMB?
Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.24%. First Trust Managed Municipal ETF offers a yield of 3.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. First Trust Managed Municipal ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MUST or FMB?
Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than First Trust Managed Municipal ETF quarterly revenues of --. Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF's net income of -- is lower than First Trust Managed Municipal ETF's net income of --. Notably, Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while First Trust Managed Municipal ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF is -- versus -- for First Trust Managed Municipal ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MUSTColumbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF-- -- -- -- FMBFirst Trust Managed Municipal ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns MUST or GMUN?
Goldman Sachs Access Municipal Bond ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF's net margin of --. Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF's return on equity of -- beat Goldman Sachs Access Municipal Bond ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MUSTColumbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF-- -- -- GMUNGoldman Sachs Access Municipal Bond ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MUST or GMUN?
Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Goldman Sachs Access Municipal Bond ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF has higher upside potential than Goldman Sachs Access Municipal Bond ETF, analysts believe Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF is more attractive than Goldman Sachs Access Municipal Bond ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MUSTColumbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF0 0 0 GMUNGoldman Sachs Access Municipal Bond ETF0 0 0 -
Is MUST or GMUN More Risky?
Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF has a beta of 1.031, which suggesting that the stock is 3.114% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Goldman Sachs Access Municipal Bond ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MUST or GMUN?
Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.24%. Goldman Sachs Access Municipal Bond ETF offers a yield of 2.92% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Goldman Sachs Access Municipal Bond ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MUST or GMUN?
Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Goldman Sachs Access Municipal Bond ETF quarterly revenues of --. Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF's net income of -- is lower than Goldman Sachs Access Municipal Bond ETF's net income of --. Notably, Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Goldman Sachs Access Municipal Bond ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF is -- versus -- for Goldman Sachs Access Municipal Bond ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MUSTColumbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF-- -- -- -- GMUNGoldman Sachs Access Municipal Bond ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns MUST or HMOP?
Hartford Municipal Opportunities ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF's net margin of --. Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF's return on equity of -- beat Hartford Municipal Opportunities ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MUSTColumbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF-- -- -- HMOPHartford Municipal Opportunities ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MUST or HMOP?
Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Hartford Municipal Opportunities ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF has higher upside potential than Hartford Municipal Opportunities ETF, analysts believe Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF is more attractive than Hartford Municipal Opportunities ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MUSTColumbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF0 0 0 HMOPHartford Municipal Opportunities ETF0 0 0 -
Is MUST or HMOP More Risky?
Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF has a beta of 1.031, which suggesting that the stock is 3.114% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hartford Municipal Opportunities ETF has a beta of 0.884, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.62%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MUST or HMOP?
Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.24%. Hartford Municipal Opportunities ETF offers a yield of 3.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hartford Municipal Opportunities ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MUST or HMOP?
Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Hartford Municipal Opportunities ETF quarterly revenues of --. Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF's net income of -- is lower than Hartford Municipal Opportunities ETF's net income of --. Notably, Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Hartford Municipal Opportunities ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF is -- versus -- for Hartford Municipal Opportunities ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MUSTColumbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF-- -- -- -- HMOPHartford Municipal Opportunities ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns MUST or ITM?
VanEck Intermediate Muni ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF's net margin of --. Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF's return on equity of -- beat VanEck Intermediate Muni ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MUSTColumbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF-- -- -- ITMVanEck Intermediate Muni ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MUST or ITM?
Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand VanEck Intermediate Muni ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF has higher upside potential than VanEck Intermediate Muni ETF, analysts believe Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF is more attractive than VanEck Intermediate Muni ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MUSTColumbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF0 0 0 ITMVanEck Intermediate Muni ETF0 0 0 -
Is MUST or ITM More Risky?
Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF has a beta of 1.031, which suggesting that the stock is 3.114% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VanEck Intermediate Muni ETF has a beta of 1.046, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.609%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MUST or ITM?
Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.24%. VanEck Intermediate Muni ETF offers a yield of 2.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. VanEck Intermediate Muni ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MUST or ITM?
Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than VanEck Intermediate Muni ETF quarterly revenues of --. Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF's net income of -- is lower than VanEck Intermediate Muni ETF's net income of --. Notably, Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while VanEck Intermediate Muni ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF is -- versus -- for VanEck Intermediate Muni ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MUSTColumbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF-- -- -- -- ITMVanEck Intermediate Muni ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns MUST or MINO?
PIMCO Municipal Income Opportunities Active ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF's net margin of --. Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF's return on equity of -- beat PIMCO Municipal Income Opportunities Active ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MUSTColumbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF-- -- -- MINOPIMCO Municipal Income Opportunities Active ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MUST or MINO?
Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand PIMCO Municipal Income Opportunities Active ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF has higher upside potential than PIMCO Municipal Income Opportunities Active ETF, analysts believe Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF is more attractive than PIMCO Municipal Income Opportunities Active ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MUSTColumbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF0 0 0 MINOPIMCO Municipal Income Opportunities Active ETF0 0 0 -
Is MUST or MINO More Risky?
Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF has a beta of 1.031, which suggesting that the stock is 3.114% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PIMCO Municipal Income Opportunities Active ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MUST or MINO?
Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.24%. PIMCO Municipal Income Opportunities Active ETF offers a yield of 3.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PIMCO Municipal Income Opportunities Active ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MUST or MINO?
Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than PIMCO Municipal Income Opportunities Active ETF quarterly revenues of --. Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF's net income of -- is lower than PIMCO Municipal Income Opportunities Active ETF's net income of --. Notably, Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while PIMCO Municipal Income Opportunities Active ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF is -- versus -- for PIMCO Municipal Income Opportunities Active ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MUSTColumbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF-- -- -- -- MINOPIMCO Municipal Income Opportunities Active ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Where Will ISRG Stock Be in 5 Years?
Intuitive Surgical (NASDAQ:ISRG) is the innovative medical tech business behind…
Is Kratos Stock a Good Investment?
UAV and hypersonic system defense contractor Kratos (NASDAQ:KTOS) has swung…
Stock Ideas
Buy
59
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 65x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Sell
50
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Alerts
Sell
40
GDXU alert for Jan 31
MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETN [GDXU] is down 38.85% over the past day.
Sell
34
PFSI alert for Jan 31
PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. [PFSI] is down 33.21% over the past day.
Sell
40
SHNY alert for Jan 31
MicroSectors Gold 3X Leveraged ETN [SHNY] is down 31.56% over the past day.
