Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…
Sell
25
MUST Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$20.83
Seasonality move
:
-1.32%
Day range:
$20.82 - $20.91
52-week range:
$19.01 - $22.10
Dividend yield:
3.24%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
109.4K
Avg. volume:
170.5K
1-year change:
1.71%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MUST
Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GMUN
Goldman Sachs Access Municipal Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HMOP
Hartford Municipal Opportunities ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ITM
VanEck Intermediate Muni ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
JHMU
John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MINO
PIMCO Municipal Income Opportunities Active ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MUST
Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF
|
$20.82 | -- | -- | -- | $0.05 | 3.24% | -- |
|
GMUN
Goldman Sachs Access Municipal Bond ETF
|
$50.99 | -- | -- | -- | $0.12 | 2.99% | -- |
|
HMOP
Hartford Municipal Opportunities ETF
|
$39.52 | -- | -- | -- | $0.11 | 3.41% | -- |
|
ITM
VanEck Intermediate Muni ETF
|
$47.47 | -- | -- | -- | $0.10 | 2.87% | -- |
|
JHMU
John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF
|
$26.47 | -- | -- | -- | $0.05 | 4.04% | -- |
|
MINO
PIMCO Municipal Income Opportunities Active ETF
|
$45.72 | -- | -- | -- | $0.15 | 3.76% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MUST
Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF
|
-- | 1.025 | -- | -- |
|
GMUN
Goldman Sachs Access Municipal Bond ETF
|
-- | 0.692 | -- | -- |
|
HMOP
Hartford Municipal Opportunities ETF
|
-- | 0.824 | -- | -- |
|
ITM
VanEck Intermediate Muni ETF
|
-- | 0.999 | -- | -- |
|
JHMU
John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF
|
-- | 0.925 | -- | -- |
|
MINO
PIMCO Municipal Income Opportunities Active ETF
|
-- | 1.184 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MUST
Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GMUN
Goldman Sachs Access Municipal Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HMOP
Hartford Municipal Opportunities ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ITM
VanEck Intermediate Muni ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
JHMU
John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MINO
PIMCO Municipal Income Opportunities Active ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns MUST or GMUN?
Goldman Sachs Access Municipal Bond ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF's net margin of --. Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF's return on equity of -- beat Goldman Sachs Access Municipal Bond ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MUSTColumbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF-- -- -- GMUNGoldman Sachs Access Municipal Bond ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MUST or GMUN?
Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Goldman Sachs Access Municipal Bond ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF has higher upside potential than Goldman Sachs Access Municipal Bond ETF, analysts believe Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF is more attractive than Goldman Sachs Access Municipal Bond ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MUSTColumbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF0 0 0 GMUNGoldman Sachs Access Municipal Bond ETF0 0 0 -
Is MUST or GMUN More Risky?
Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF has a beta of 1.034, which suggesting that the stock is 3.432% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Goldman Sachs Access Municipal Bond ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MUST or GMUN?
Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.24%. Goldman Sachs Access Municipal Bond ETF offers a yield of 2.99% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Goldman Sachs Access Municipal Bond ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MUST or GMUN?
Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Goldman Sachs Access Municipal Bond ETF quarterly revenues of --. Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF's net income of -- is lower than Goldman Sachs Access Municipal Bond ETF's net income of --. Notably, Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Goldman Sachs Access Municipal Bond ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF is -- versus -- for Goldman Sachs Access Municipal Bond ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MUSTColumbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF-- -- -- -- GMUNGoldman Sachs Access Municipal Bond ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns MUST or HMOP?
Hartford Municipal Opportunities ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF's net margin of --. Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF's return on equity of -- beat Hartford Municipal Opportunities ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MUSTColumbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF-- -- -- HMOPHartford Municipal Opportunities ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MUST or HMOP?
Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Hartford Municipal Opportunities ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF has higher upside potential than Hartford Municipal Opportunities ETF, analysts believe Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF is more attractive than Hartford Municipal Opportunities ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MUSTColumbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF0 0 0 HMOPHartford Municipal Opportunities ETF0 0 0 -
Is MUST or HMOP More Risky?
Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF has a beta of 1.034, which suggesting that the stock is 3.432% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hartford Municipal Opportunities ETF has a beta of 0.885, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.527%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MUST or HMOP?
Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.24%. Hartford Municipal Opportunities ETF offers a yield of 3.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hartford Municipal Opportunities ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MUST or HMOP?
Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Hartford Municipal Opportunities ETF quarterly revenues of --. Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF's net income of -- is lower than Hartford Municipal Opportunities ETF's net income of --. Notably, Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Hartford Municipal Opportunities ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF is -- versus -- for Hartford Municipal Opportunities ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MUSTColumbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF-- -- -- -- HMOPHartford Municipal Opportunities ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns MUST or ITM?
VanEck Intermediate Muni ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF's net margin of --. Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF's return on equity of -- beat VanEck Intermediate Muni ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MUSTColumbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF-- -- -- ITMVanEck Intermediate Muni ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MUST or ITM?
Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand VanEck Intermediate Muni ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF has higher upside potential than VanEck Intermediate Muni ETF, analysts believe Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF is more attractive than VanEck Intermediate Muni ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MUSTColumbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF0 0 0 ITMVanEck Intermediate Muni ETF0 0 0 -
Is MUST or ITM More Risky?
Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF has a beta of 1.034, which suggesting that the stock is 3.432% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VanEck Intermediate Muni ETF has a beta of 1.043, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.328%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MUST or ITM?
Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.24%. VanEck Intermediate Muni ETF offers a yield of 2.87% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. VanEck Intermediate Muni ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MUST or ITM?
Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than VanEck Intermediate Muni ETF quarterly revenues of --. Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF's net income of -- is lower than VanEck Intermediate Muni ETF's net income of --. Notably, Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while VanEck Intermediate Muni ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF is -- versus -- for VanEck Intermediate Muni ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MUSTColumbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF-- -- -- -- ITMVanEck Intermediate Muni ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns MUST or JHMU?
John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF's net margin of --. Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF's return on equity of -- beat John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MUSTColumbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF-- -- -- JHMUJohn Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MUST or JHMU?
Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF has higher upside potential than John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF, analysts believe Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF is more attractive than John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MUSTColumbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF0 0 0 JHMUJohn Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF0 0 0 -
Is MUST or JHMU More Risky?
Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF has a beta of 1.034, which suggesting that the stock is 3.432% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MUST or JHMU?
Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.24%. John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF offers a yield of 4.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MUST or JHMU?
Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF quarterly revenues of --. Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF's net income of -- is lower than John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF's net income of --. Notably, Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF is -- versus -- for John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MUSTColumbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF-- -- -- -- JHMUJohn Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns MUST or MINO?
PIMCO Municipal Income Opportunities Active ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF's net margin of --. Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF's return on equity of -- beat PIMCO Municipal Income Opportunities Active ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MUSTColumbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF-- -- -- MINOPIMCO Municipal Income Opportunities Active ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MUST or MINO?
Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand PIMCO Municipal Income Opportunities Active ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF has higher upside potential than PIMCO Municipal Income Opportunities Active ETF, analysts believe Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF is more attractive than PIMCO Municipal Income Opportunities Active ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MUSTColumbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF0 0 0 MINOPIMCO Municipal Income Opportunities Active ETF0 0 0 -
Is MUST or MINO More Risky?
Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF has a beta of 1.034, which suggesting that the stock is 3.432% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PIMCO Municipal Income Opportunities Active ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MUST or MINO?
Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.24%. PIMCO Municipal Income Opportunities Active ETF offers a yield of 3.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PIMCO Municipal Income Opportunities Active ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MUST or MINO?
Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than PIMCO Municipal Income Opportunities Active ETF quarterly revenues of --. Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF's net income of -- is lower than PIMCO Municipal Income Opportunities Active ETF's net income of --. Notably, Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while PIMCO Municipal Income Opportunities Active ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF is -- versus -- for PIMCO Municipal Income Opportunities Active ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MUSTColumbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF-- -- -- -- MINOPIMCO Municipal Income Opportunities Active ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…
Stock Ideas
Sell
47
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Sell
46
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Sell
34
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 28x
Alerts
Sell
46
ZD alert for Mar 4
Ziff Davis, Inc. [ZD] is up 3.64% over the past day.
Sell
40
PSIX alert for Mar 5
Power Solutions International, Inc. [PSIX] is down 1.4% over the past day.
Sell
49
TREE alert for Mar 4
LendingTree, Inc. [TREE] is up 1.11% over the past day.
