Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Sell Broadcom Stock?
In Q3, legendary macro investor Stan Druckenmiller sold his entire…
Buy
75
JHMU Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$26.29
Seasonality move
:
1.95%
Day range:
$26.25 - $26.29
52-week range:
$24.68 - $26.41
Dividend yield:
4.34%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
12.1K
Avg. volume:
8.5K
1-year change:
0.85%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
JHMU
John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FMB
First Trust Managed Municipal ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GMUN
Goldman Sachs Access Municipal Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MFSM
MFS Active Intermediate Muni Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MNBD
ALPS Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MUST
Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
JHMU
John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF
|
$26.29 | -- | -- | -- | $0.13 | 4.34% | -- |
|
FMB
First Trust Managed Municipal ETF
|
$51.38 | -- | -- | -- | $0.15 | 3.35% | -- |
|
GMUN
Goldman Sachs Access Municipal Bond ETF
|
$50.94 | -- | -- | -- | $0.13 | 2.93% | -- |
|
MFSM
MFS Active Intermediate Muni Bond ETF
|
$25.14 | -- | -- | -- | $0.07 | 3.51% | -- |
|
MNBD
ALPS Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF
|
$26.10 | -- | -- | -- | $0.09 | 3.31% | -- |
|
MUST
Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF
|
$20.75 | -- | -- | -- | $0.06 | 3.26% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
JHMU
John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF
|
-- | 0.959 | -- | -- |
|
FMB
First Trust Managed Municipal ETF
|
-- | 1.018 | -- | -- |
|
GMUN
Goldman Sachs Access Municipal Bond ETF
|
-- | 0.702 | -- | -- |
|
MFSM
MFS Active Intermediate Muni Bond ETF
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
MNBD
ALPS Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF
|
-- | 0.707 | -- | -- |
|
MUST
Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF
|
-- | 1.052 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
JHMU
John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FMB
First Trust Managed Municipal ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GMUN
Goldman Sachs Access Municipal Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MFSM
MFS Active Intermediate Muni Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MNBD
ALPS Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MUST
Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns JHMU or FMB?
First Trust Managed Municipal ETF has a net margin of -- compared to John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF's net margin of --. John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF's return on equity of -- beat First Trust Managed Municipal ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital JHMUJohn Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF-- -- -- FMBFirst Trust Managed Municipal ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About JHMU or FMB?
John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand First Trust Managed Municipal ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF has higher upside potential than First Trust Managed Municipal ETF, analysts believe John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF is more attractive than First Trust Managed Municipal ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings JHMUJohn Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF0 0 0 FMBFirst Trust Managed Municipal ETF0 0 0 -
Is JHMU or FMB More Risky?
John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First Trust Managed Municipal ETF has a beta of 0.909, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.125%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock JHMU or FMB?
John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.34%. First Trust Managed Municipal ETF offers a yield of 3.35% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. First Trust Managed Municipal ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios JHMU or FMB?
John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than First Trust Managed Municipal ETF quarterly revenues of --. John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF's net income of -- is lower than First Trust Managed Municipal ETF's net income of --. Notably, John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while First Trust Managed Municipal ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF is -- versus -- for First Trust Managed Municipal ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income JHMUJohn Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF-- -- -- -- FMBFirst Trust Managed Municipal ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns JHMU or GMUN?
Goldman Sachs Access Municipal Bond ETF has a net margin of -- compared to John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF's net margin of --. John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF's return on equity of -- beat Goldman Sachs Access Municipal Bond ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital JHMUJohn Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF-- -- -- GMUNGoldman Sachs Access Municipal Bond ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About JHMU or GMUN?
John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Goldman Sachs Access Municipal Bond ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF has higher upside potential than Goldman Sachs Access Municipal Bond ETF, analysts believe John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF is more attractive than Goldman Sachs Access Municipal Bond ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings JHMUJohn Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF0 0 0 GMUNGoldman Sachs Access Municipal Bond ETF0 0 0 -
Is JHMU or GMUN More Risky?
John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Goldman Sachs Access Municipal Bond ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock JHMU or GMUN?
John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.34%. Goldman Sachs Access Municipal Bond ETF offers a yield of 2.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Goldman Sachs Access Municipal Bond ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios JHMU or GMUN?
John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Goldman Sachs Access Municipal Bond ETF quarterly revenues of --. John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF's net income of -- is lower than Goldman Sachs Access Municipal Bond ETF's net income of --. Notably, John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Goldman Sachs Access Municipal Bond ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF is -- versus -- for Goldman Sachs Access Municipal Bond ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income JHMUJohn Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF-- -- -- -- GMUNGoldman Sachs Access Municipal Bond ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns JHMU or MFSM?
MFS Active Intermediate Muni Bond ETF has a net margin of -- compared to John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF's net margin of --. John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF's return on equity of -- beat MFS Active Intermediate Muni Bond ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital JHMUJohn Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF-- -- -- MFSMMFS Active Intermediate Muni Bond ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About JHMU or MFSM?
John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand MFS Active Intermediate Muni Bond ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF has higher upside potential than MFS Active Intermediate Muni Bond ETF, analysts believe John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF is more attractive than MFS Active Intermediate Muni Bond ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings JHMUJohn Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF0 0 0 MFSMMFS Active Intermediate Muni Bond ETF0 0 0 -
Is JHMU or MFSM More Risky?
John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MFS Active Intermediate Muni Bond ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock JHMU or MFSM?
John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.34%. MFS Active Intermediate Muni Bond ETF offers a yield of 3.51% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MFS Active Intermediate Muni Bond ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios JHMU or MFSM?
John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than MFS Active Intermediate Muni Bond ETF quarterly revenues of --. John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF's net income of -- is lower than MFS Active Intermediate Muni Bond ETF's net income of --. Notably, John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while MFS Active Intermediate Muni Bond ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF is -- versus -- for MFS Active Intermediate Muni Bond ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income JHMUJohn Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF-- -- -- -- MFSMMFS Active Intermediate Muni Bond ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns JHMU or MNBD?
ALPS Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF has a net margin of -- compared to John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF's net margin of --. John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF's return on equity of -- beat ALPS Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital JHMUJohn Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF-- -- -- MNBDALPS Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About JHMU or MNBD?
John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ALPS Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF has higher upside potential than ALPS Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF, analysts believe John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF is more attractive than ALPS Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings JHMUJohn Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF0 0 0 MNBDALPS Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF0 0 0 -
Is JHMU or MNBD More Risky?
John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ALPS Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock JHMU or MNBD?
John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.34%. ALPS Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF offers a yield of 3.31% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ALPS Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios JHMU or MNBD?
John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ALPS Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF quarterly revenues of --. John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF's net income of -- is lower than ALPS Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF's net income of --. Notably, John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ALPS Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF is -- versus -- for ALPS Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income JHMUJohn Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF-- -- -- -- MNBDALPS Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns JHMU or MUST?
Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF has a net margin of -- compared to John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF's net margin of --. John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF's return on equity of -- beat Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital JHMUJohn Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF-- -- -- MUSTColumbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About JHMU or MUST?
John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF has higher upside potential than Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF, analysts believe John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF is more attractive than Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings JHMUJohn Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF0 0 0 MUSTColumbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF0 0 0 -
Is JHMU or MUST More Risky?
John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF has a beta of 1.031, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.114%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock JHMU or MUST?
John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.34%. Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF offers a yield of 3.26% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios JHMU or MUST?
John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF quarterly revenues of --. John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF's net income of -- is lower than Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF's net income of --. Notably, John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF is -- versus -- for Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income JHMUJohn Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF-- -- -- -- MUSTColumbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Why Is CoreWeave Stock Down So Much?
AI cloud computing business CoreWeave (NASDAQ:CRWV) has been through a…
Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Buy MercadoLibre Stock?
In Q3, billionaire Stan Druckenmiller bought about 4,620 shares of…
Stock Ideas
Buy
59
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x
Buy
65
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Buy
51
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Buy
70
RGC alert for Jan 8
Regencell Bioscience Holdings Ltd. [RGC] is down 21.5% over the past day.
Buy
64
RVMD alert for Jan 8
Revolution Medicines, Inc. [RVMD] is up 4.61% over the past day.
Sell
38
CRNX alert for Jan 8
Crinetics Pharmaceuticals, Inc. [CRNX] is down 0.23% over the past day.
