Why Did SoFi Stock Drop?
Fintech platform SoFi (NASDAQ:SOFI) has stumbled in recent days, selling…
Buy
53
MLPD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$25.53
Seasonality move
:
-1.89%
Day range:
$25.45 - $25.56
52-week range:
$21.30 - $26.11
Dividend yield:
11.27%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
9.5K
Avg. volume:
7.3K
1-year change:
-2.18%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MLPD
Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HCOW
Amplify COWS Covered Call ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
QRMI
Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
XRMI
Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
XYLG
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MLPD
Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF
|
$25.52 | -- | -- | -- | $0.22 | 11.27% | -- |
|
HCOW
Amplify COWS Covered Call ETF
|
$24.67 | -- | -- | -- | $0.24 | 10.37% | -- |
|
QRMI
Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF
|
$16.00 | -- | -- | -- | $0.16 | 11.38% | -- |
|
XRMI
Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF
|
$17.85 | -- | -- | -- | $0.18 | 12.41% | -- |
|
XYLG
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF
|
$29.59 | -- | -- | -- | $0.21 | 23.06% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MLPD
Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF
|
-- | 0.178 | -- | -- |
|
HCOW
Amplify COWS Covered Call ETF
|
-- | 0.740 | -- | -- |
|
QRMI
Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF
|
-- | 0.155 | -- | -- |
|
XRMI
Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF
|
-- | 0.271 | -- | -- |
|
XYLG
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF
|
-- | 0.710 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MLPD
Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HCOW
Amplify COWS Covered Call ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
QRMI
Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
XRMI
Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
XYLG
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns MLPD or HCOW?
Amplify COWS Covered Call ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF's net margin of --. Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF's return on equity of -- beat Amplify COWS Covered Call ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MLPDGlobal X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF-- -- -- HCOWAmplify COWS Covered Call ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MLPD or HCOW?
Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Amplify COWS Covered Call ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF has higher upside potential than Amplify COWS Covered Call ETF, analysts believe Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF is more attractive than Amplify COWS Covered Call ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MLPDGlobal X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF0 0 0 HCOWAmplify COWS Covered Call ETF0 0 0 -
Is MLPD or HCOW More Risky?
Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Amplify COWS Covered Call ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MLPD or HCOW?
Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.27%. Amplify COWS Covered Call ETF offers a yield of 10.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Amplify COWS Covered Call ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MLPD or HCOW?
Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Amplify COWS Covered Call ETF quarterly revenues of --. Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF's net income of -- is lower than Amplify COWS Covered Call ETF's net income of --. Notably, Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Amplify COWS Covered Call ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF is -- versus -- for Amplify COWS Covered Call ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MLPDGlobal X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF-- -- -- -- HCOWAmplify COWS Covered Call ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns MLPD or QRMI?
Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF's net margin of --. Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF's return on equity of -- beat Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MLPDGlobal X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF-- -- -- QRMIGlobal X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MLPD or QRMI?
Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF has higher upside potential than Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF, analysts believe Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF is more attractive than Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MLPDGlobal X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF0 0 0 QRMIGlobal X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF0 0 0 -
Is MLPD or QRMI More Risky?
Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MLPD or QRMI?
Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.27%. Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF offers a yield of 11.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MLPD or QRMI?
Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF quarterly revenues of --. Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF's net income of -- is lower than Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF's net income of --. Notably, Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF is -- versus -- for Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MLPDGlobal X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF-- -- -- -- QRMIGlobal X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns MLPD or XRMI?
Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF's net margin of --. Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF's return on equity of -- beat Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MLPDGlobal X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF-- -- -- XRMIGlobal X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MLPD or XRMI?
Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF has higher upside potential than Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF, analysts believe Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF is more attractive than Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MLPDGlobal X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF0 0 0 XRMIGlobal X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF0 0 0 -
Is MLPD or XRMI More Risky?
Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MLPD or XRMI?
Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.27%. Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF offers a yield of 12.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MLPD or XRMI?
Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF quarterly revenues of --. Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF's net income of -- is lower than Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF's net income of --. Notably, Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF is -- versus -- for Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MLPDGlobal X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF-- -- -- -- XRMIGlobal X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns MLPD or XYLG?
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF's net margin of --. Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF's return on equity of -- beat Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MLPDGlobal X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF-- -- -- XYLGGlobal X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MLPD or XYLG?
Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF has higher upside potential than Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF, analysts believe Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF is more attractive than Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MLPDGlobal X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF0 0 0 XYLGGlobal X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF0 0 0 -
Is MLPD or XYLG More Risky?
Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF has a beta of 0.759, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.085%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MLPD or XYLG?
Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.27%. Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF offers a yield of 23.06% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MLPD or XYLG?
Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF quarterly revenues of --. Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF's net income of -- is lower than Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF's net income of --. Notably, Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF is -- versus -- for Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MLPDGlobal X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF-- -- -- -- XYLGGlobal X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will Robinhood Win AI Investing?
Recently, online brokerage Robinhood (NASDAQ:HOOD) has been focused on introducing…
Is Amazon an AI Stock?
With the market starting to look skittish on pure-play AI…
Stock Ideas
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 62x
Buy
56
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
81
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Buy
56
SMX alert for Dec 6
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is up 134.09% over the past day.
Buy
62
PRAX alert for Dec 6
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. [PRAX] is up 30.47% over the past day.
Sell
13
PSN alert for Dec 6
Parsons Corp. [PSN] is down 21.1% over the past day.
