HCOW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Amplify COWS Covered Call ETF's net margin of --. Amplify COWS Covered Call ETF's return on equity of -- beat Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF's return on equity of --.

Amplify COWS Covered Call ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Amplify COWS Covered Call ETF has higher upside potential than Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF, analysts believe Amplify COWS Covered Call ETF is more attractive than Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF.

Amplify COWS Covered Call ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Amplify COWS Covered Call ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.37%. Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF offers a yield of 11.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. Amplify COWS Covered Call ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Amplify COWS Covered Call ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF quarterly revenues of --. Amplify COWS Covered Call ETF's net income of -- is lower than Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF's net income of --. Notably, Amplify COWS Covered Call ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amplify COWS Covered Call ETF is -- versus -- for Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Parametric Equity Premium Income ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Amplify COWS Covered Call ETF's net margin of --. Amplify COWS Covered Call ETF's return on equity of -- beat Parametric Equity Premium Income ETF's return on equity of --.

Amplify COWS Covered Call ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Parametric Equity Premium Income ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Amplify COWS Covered Call ETF has higher upside potential than Parametric Equity Premium Income ETF, analysts believe Amplify COWS Covered Call ETF is more attractive than Parametric Equity Premium Income ETF.

Amplify COWS Covered Call ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Parametric Equity Premium Income ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Amplify COWS Covered Call ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.37%. Parametric Equity Premium Income ETF offers a yield of 7.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Amplify COWS Covered Call ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Parametric Equity Premium Income ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Amplify COWS Covered Call ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Parametric Equity Premium Income ETF quarterly revenues of --. Amplify COWS Covered Call ETF's net income of -- is lower than Parametric Equity Premium Income ETF's net income of --. Notably, Amplify COWS Covered Call ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Parametric Equity Premium Income ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amplify COWS Covered Call ETF is -- versus -- for Parametric Equity Premium Income ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Amplify COWS Covered Call ETF's net margin of --. Amplify COWS Covered Call ETF's return on equity of -- beat Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF's return on equity of --.

Amplify COWS Covered Call ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Amplify COWS Covered Call ETF has higher upside potential than Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF, analysts believe Amplify COWS Covered Call ETF is more attractive than Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF.

Amplify COWS Covered Call ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Amplify COWS Covered Call ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.37%. Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF offers a yield of 11.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. Amplify COWS Covered Call ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Amplify COWS Covered Call ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF quarterly revenues of --. Amplify COWS Covered Call ETF's net income of -- is lower than Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF's net income of --. Notably, Amplify COWS Covered Call ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amplify COWS Covered Call ETF is -- versus -- for Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

YieldMax Target 12 Semiconductor OptionETF has a net margin of -- compared to Amplify COWS Covered Call ETF's net margin of --. Amplify COWS Covered Call ETF's return on equity of -- beat YieldMax Target 12 Semiconductor OptionETF's return on equity of --.

Amplify COWS Covered Call ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand YieldMax Target 12 Semiconductor OptionETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Amplify COWS Covered Call ETF has higher upside potential than YieldMax Target 12 Semiconductor OptionETF, analysts believe Amplify COWS Covered Call ETF is more attractive than YieldMax Target 12 Semiconductor OptionETF.

Amplify COWS Covered Call ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison YieldMax Target 12 Semiconductor OptionETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Amplify COWS Covered Call ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.37%. YieldMax Target 12 Semiconductor OptionETF offers a yield of 10.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share. Amplify COWS Covered Call ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. YieldMax Target 12 Semiconductor OptionETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Amplify COWS Covered Call ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than YieldMax Target 12 Semiconductor OptionETF quarterly revenues of --. Amplify COWS Covered Call ETF's net income of -- is lower than YieldMax Target 12 Semiconductor OptionETF's net income of --. Notably, Amplify COWS Covered Call ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while YieldMax Target 12 Semiconductor OptionETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amplify COWS Covered Call ETF is -- versus -- for YieldMax Target 12 Semiconductor OptionETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.