JHMM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

iShares Russell Mid-Cap ETF has a net margin of -- compared to John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF's net margin of --. John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares Russell Mid-Cap ETF's return on equity of --.

John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares Russell Mid-Cap ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF has higher upside potential than iShares Russell Mid-Cap ETF, analysts believe John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF is more attractive than iShares Russell Mid-Cap ETF.

John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF has a beta of 1.086, which suggesting that the stock is 8.57% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares Russell Mid-Cap ETF has a beta of 1.102, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.185%.

John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 1%. iShares Russell Mid-Cap ETF offers a yield of 1.25% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share. John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares Russell Mid-Cap ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares Russell Mid-Cap ETF quarterly revenues of --. John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares Russell Mid-Cap ETF's net income of --. Notably, John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares Russell Mid-Cap ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF is -- versus -- for iShares Russell Mid-Cap ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF has a net margin of -- compared to John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF's net margin of --. John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF's return on equity of -- beat Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF's return on equity of --.

John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF has higher upside potential than Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF, analysts believe John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF is more attractive than Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF.

John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF has a beta of 1.086, which suggesting that the stock is 8.57% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF has a beta of 1.131, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.061%.

John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 1%. Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF offers a yield of 1.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF quarterly revenues of --. John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF's net income of -- is lower than Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF's net income of --. Notably, John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF is -- versus -- for Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vanguard Mid-Cap Index Fund ETF has a net margin of -- compared to John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF's net margin of --. John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF's return on equity of -- beat Vanguard Mid-Cap Index Fund ETF's return on equity of --.

John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Vanguard Mid-Cap Index Fund ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF has higher upside potential than Vanguard Mid-Cap Index Fund ETF, analysts believe John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF is more attractive than Vanguard Mid-Cap Index Fund ETF.

John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF has a beta of 1.086, which suggesting that the stock is 8.57% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vanguard Mid-Cap Index Fund ETF has a beta of 1.085, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.458%.

John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 1%. Vanguard Mid-Cap Index Fund ETF offers a yield of 1.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.09 per share. John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Vanguard Mid-Cap Index Fund ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Vanguard Mid-Cap Index Fund ETF quarterly revenues of --. John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF's net income of -- is lower than Vanguard Mid-Cap Index Fund ETF's net income of --. Notably, John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Vanguard Mid-Cap Index Fund ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF is -- versus -- for Vanguard Mid-Cap Index Fund ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.