NVIDIA vs Broadcom Stock: Which Is Best?
If you want to invest in an AI-leading tech company,…
Sell
39
CZA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$105.72
Seasonality move
:
0.57%
Day range:
$105.72 - $106.31
52-week range:
$90.68 - $113.72
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
3.2K
Avg. volume:
2.5K
1-year change:
15.29%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CZA
Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BFOR
Barron's 400 ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IQSM
NYLI Candriam US Mid Cap Equity ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
LSAF
LeaderShares AlphaFactor US Core ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TPLC
Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CZA
Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF
|
$105.72 | -- | -- | -- | $1.28 | 0% | -- |
|
BFOR
Barron's 400 ETF
|
$73.19 | -- | -- | -- | $0.50 | 0.69% | -- |
|
IQSM
NYLI Candriam US Mid Cap Equity ETF
|
$32.73 | -- | -- | -- | $0.13 | 1.21% | -- |
|
LSAF
LeaderShares AlphaFactor US Core ETF
|
$40.93 | -- | -- | -- | $0.29 | 0% | -- |
|
TPLC
Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core ETF
|
$43.14 | -- | -- | -- | $0.07 | 0.88% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CZA
Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF
|
-- | 0.922 | -- | -- |
|
BFOR
Barron's 400 ETF
|
-- | 1.213 | -- | -- |
|
IQSM
NYLI Candriam US Mid Cap Equity ETF
|
-- | 1.299 | -- | -- |
|
LSAF
LeaderShares AlphaFactor US Core ETF
|
-- | 1.199 | -- | -- |
|
TPLC
Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core ETF
|
-- | 1.127 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CZA
Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BFOR
Barron's 400 ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IQSM
NYLI Candriam US Mid Cap Equity ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
LSAF
LeaderShares AlphaFactor US Core ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TPLC
Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CZA or BFOR?
Barron's 400 ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF's net margin of --. Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF's return on equity of -- beat Barron's 400 ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CZAInvesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF-- -- -- BFORBarron's 400 ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CZA or BFOR?
Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Barron's 400 ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF has higher upside potential than Barron's 400 ETF, analysts believe Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF is more attractive than Barron's 400 ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CZAInvesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF0 0 0 BFORBarron's 400 ETF0 0 0 -
Is CZA or BFOR More Risky?
Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF has a beta of 0.979, which suggesting that the stock is 2.091% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Barron's 400 ETF has a beta of 1.092, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.2%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CZA or BFOR?
Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Barron's 400 ETF offers a yield of 0.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Barron's 400 ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CZA or BFOR?
Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Barron's 400 ETF quarterly revenues of --. Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF's net income of -- is lower than Barron's 400 ETF's net income of --. Notably, Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Barron's 400 ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF is -- versus -- for Barron's 400 ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CZAInvesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF-- -- -- -- BFORBarron's 400 ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CZA or IQSM?
NYLI Candriam US Mid Cap Equity ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF's net margin of --. Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF's return on equity of -- beat NYLI Candriam US Mid Cap Equity ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CZAInvesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF-- -- -- IQSMNYLI Candriam US Mid Cap Equity ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CZA or IQSM?
Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand NYLI Candriam US Mid Cap Equity ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF has higher upside potential than NYLI Candriam US Mid Cap Equity ETF, analysts believe Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF is more attractive than NYLI Candriam US Mid Cap Equity ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CZAInvesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF0 0 0 IQSMNYLI Candriam US Mid Cap Equity ETF0 0 0 -
Is CZA or IQSM More Risky?
Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF has a beta of 0.979, which suggesting that the stock is 2.091% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NYLI Candriam US Mid Cap Equity ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CZA or IQSM?
Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NYLI Candriam US Mid Cap Equity ETF offers a yield of 1.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NYLI Candriam US Mid Cap Equity ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CZA or IQSM?
Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than NYLI Candriam US Mid Cap Equity ETF quarterly revenues of --. Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF's net income of -- is lower than NYLI Candriam US Mid Cap Equity ETF's net income of --. Notably, Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NYLI Candriam US Mid Cap Equity ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF is -- versus -- for NYLI Candriam US Mid Cap Equity ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CZAInvesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF-- -- -- -- IQSMNYLI Candriam US Mid Cap Equity ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CZA or LSAF?
LeaderShares AlphaFactor US Core ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF's net margin of --. Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF's return on equity of -- beat LeaderShares AlphaFactor US Core ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CZAInvesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF-- -- -- LSAFLeaderShares AlphaFactor US Core ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CZA or LSAF?
Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand LeaderShares AlphaFactor US Core ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF has higher upside potential than LeaderShares AlphaFactor US Core ETF, analysts believe Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF is more attractive than LeaderShares AlphaFactor US Core ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CZAInvesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF0 0 0 LSAFLeaderShares AlphaFactor US Core ETF0 0 0 -
Is CZA or LSAF More Risky?
Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF has a beta of 0.979, which suggesting that the stock is 2.091% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LeaderShares AlphaFactor US Core ETF has a beta of 1.080, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.021%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CZA or LSAF?
Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. LeaderShares AlphaFactor US Core ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. LeaderShares AlphaFactor US Core ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CZA or LSAF?
Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than LeaderShares AlphaFactor US Core ETF quarterly revenues of --. Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF's net income of -- is lower than LeaderShares AlphaFactor US Core ETF's net income of --. Notably, Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while LeaderShares AlphaFactor US Core ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF is -- versus -- for LeaderShares AlphaFactor US Core ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CZAInvesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF-- -- -- -- LSAFLeaderShares AlphaFactor US Core ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CZA or TPLC?
Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF's net margin of --. Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF's return on equity of -- beat Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CZAInvesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF-- -- -- TPLCTimothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CZA or TPLC?
Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF has higher upside potential than Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core ETF, analysts believe Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF is more attractive than Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CZAInvesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF0 0 0 TPLCTimothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core ETF0 0 0 -
Is CZA or TPLC More Risky?
Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF has a beta of 0.979, which suggesting that the stock is 2.091% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core ETF has a beta of 1.016, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.588%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CZA or TPLC?
Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core ETF offers a yield of 0.88% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CZA or TPLC?
Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core ETF quarterly revenues of --. Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF's net income of -- is lower than Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core ETF's net income of --. Notably, Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF is -- versus -- for Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CZAInvesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF-- -- -- -- TPLCTimothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Why Caesars’ Digital Arm May Be the Gaming Giant’s Best-Kept Secret
It’s not often that a company with the scale and…
Will Tyson Foods Stock Bounce Back?
Tyson Foods, Inc. (NYSE:TSN) is one of the biggest food…
Stock Ideas
Buy
64
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 113x
Buy
55
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Alerts
Buy
61
QMCO alert for Dec 23
Quantum [QMCO] is up 3.25% over the past day.
Sell
46
NUKK alert for Dec 23
Nukkleus [NUKK] is up 8.13% over the past day.
Sell
1
IIPR alert for Dec 23
Innovative Industrial Properties [IIPR] is down 4% over the past day.
