JGRW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Core ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Jensen Quality Growth ETF's net margin of --. Jensen Quality Growth ETF's return on equity of -- beat JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Core ETF's return on equity of --.

Jensen Quality Growth ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Core ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Jensen Quality Growth ETF has higher upside potential than JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Core ETF, analysts believe Jensen Quality Growth ETF is more attractive than JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Core ETF.

Jensen Quality Growth ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Core ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Jensen Quality Growth ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.24%. JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Core ETF offers a yield of 0.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. Jensen Quality Growth ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Core ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Jensen Quality Growth ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Core ETF quarterly revenues of --. Jensen Quality Growth ETF's net income of -- is lower than JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Core ETF's net income of --. Notably, Jensen Quality Growth ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Core ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Jensen Quality Growth ETF is -- versus -- for JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Core ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Jensen Quality Growth ETF's net margin of --. Jensen Quality Growth ETF's return on equity of -- beat AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF's return on equity of --.

Jensen Quality Growth ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Jensen Quality Growth ETF has higher upside potential than AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF, analysts believe Jensen Quality Growth ETF is more attractive than AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF.

Jensen Quality Growth ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Jensen Quality Growth ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.24%. AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF offers a yield of 0.92% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Jensen Quality Growth ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Jensen Quality Growth ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF quarterly revenues of --. Jensen Quality Growth ETF's net income of -- is lower than AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF's net income of --. Notably, Jensen Quality Growth ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Jensen Quality Growth ETF is -- versus -- for AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

American Century Low Volatility ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Jensen Quality Growth ETF's net margin of --. Jensen Quality Growth ETF's return on equity of -- beat American Century Low Volatility ETF's return on equity of --.

Jensen Quality Growth ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand American Century Low Volatility ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Jensen Quality Growth ETF has higher upside potential than American Century Low Volatility ETF, analysts believe Jensen Quality Growth ETF is more attractive than American Century Low Volatility ETF.

Jensen Quality Growth ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison American Century Low Volatility ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Jensen Quality Growth ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.24%. American Century Low Volatility ETF offers a yield of 1.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. Jensen Quality Growth ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. American Century Low Volatility ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Jensen Quality Growth ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than American Century Low Volatility ETF quarterly revenues of --. Jensen Quality Growth ETF's net income of -- is lower than American Century Low Volatility ETF's net income of --. Notably, Jensen Quality Growth ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while American Century Low Volatility ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Jensen Quality Growth ETF is -- versus -- for American Century Low Volatility ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Strive 1000 Dividend Growth ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Jensen Quality Growth ETF's net margin of --. Jensen Quality Growth ETF's return on equity of -- beat Strive 1000 Dividend Growth ETF's return on equity of --.

Jensen Quality Growth ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Strive 1000 Dividend Growth ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Jensen Quality Growth ETF has higher upside potential than Strive 1000 Dividend Growth ETF, analysts believe Jensen Quality Growth ETF is more attractive than Strive 1000 Dividend Growth ETF.

Jensen Quality Growth ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Strive 1000 Dividend Growth ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Jensen Quality Growth ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.24%. Strive 1000 Dividend Growth ETF offers a yield of 1.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. Jensen Quality Growth ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Strive 1000 Dividend Growth ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Jensen Quality Growth ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Strive 1000 Dividend Growth ETF quarterly revenues of --. Jensen Quality Growth ETF's net income of -- is lower than Strive 1000 Dividend Growth ETF's net income of --. Notably, Jensen Quality Growth ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Strive 1000 Dividend Growth ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Jensen Quality Growth ETF is -- versus -- for Strive 1000 Dividend Growth ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.