Where Will Cisco Systems Stock Be in 10 Years?
Cisco Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ:CSCO) has enjoyed its position as a…
Buy
60
LOWV Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$70.58
Seasonality move
:
8.62%
Day range:
$70.33 - $71.20
52-week range:
$59.20 - $73.07
Dividend yield:
0.92%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
4.9K
Avg. volume:
3.7K
1-year change:
20.7%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LOWV
AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CLM
Cornerstone Strategic Value Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FLCC
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Core ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
INFO
IHS Markit
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
LCDS
JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Core ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SPXV
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Health Care ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LOWV
AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF
|
$70.64 | -- | -- | -- | $0.25 | 0.92% | -- |
|
CLM
Cornerstone Strategic Value Fund
|
$8.70 | -- | -- | -- | $0.11 | 0.81% | -- |
|
FLCC
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Core ETF
|
$28.37 | -- | -- | -- | $0.05 | 0.19% | -- |
|
INFO
IHS Markit
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
LCDS
JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Core ETF
|
$57.16 | -- | -- | -- | $0.19 | 0.47% | -- |
|
SPXV
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Health Care ETF
|
$63.90 | -- | -- | -- | $0.20 | 1.12% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LOWV
AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF
|
-- | 0.788 | -- | -- |
|
CLM
Cornerstone Strategic Value Fund
|
-- | 0.842 | -- | -- |
|
FLCC
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Core ETF
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
INFO
IHS Markit
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
LCDS
JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Core ETF
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
SPXV
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Health Care ETF
|
-- | 0.999 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LOWV
AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CLM
Cornerstone Strategic Value Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FLCC
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Core ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
INFO
IHS Markit
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
LCDS
JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Core ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SPXV
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Health Care ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns LOWV or CLM?
Cornerstone Strategic Value Fund has a net margin of -- compared to AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF's net margin of --. AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF's return on equity of -- beat Cornerstone Strategic Value Fund's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LOWVAB US Low Volatility Equity ETF-- -- -- CLMCornerstone Strategic Value Fund-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About LOWV or CLM?
AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Cornerstone Strategic Value Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF has higher upside potential than Cornerstone Strategic Value Fund, analysts believe AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF is more attractive than Cornerstone Strategic Value Fund.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LOWVAB US Low Volatility Equity ETF0 0 0 CLMCornerstone Strategic Value Fund0 0 0 -
Is LOWV or CLM More Risky?
AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cornerstone Strategic Value Fund has a beta of 1.155, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.502%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LOWV or CLM?
AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.92%. Cornerstone Strategic Value Fund offers a yield of 0.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cornerstone Strategic Value Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LOWV or CLM?
AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Cornerstone Strategic Value Fund quarterly revenues of --. AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF's net income of -- is lower than Cornerstone Strategic Value Fund's net income of --. Notably, AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Cornerstone Strategic Value Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF is -- versus -- for Cornerstone Strategic Value Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LOWVAB US Low Volatility Equity ETF-- -- -- -- CLMCornerstone Strategic Value Fund-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns LOWV or FLCC?
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Core ETF has a net margin of -- compared to AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF's net margin of --. AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF's return on equity of -- beat Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Core ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LOWVAB US Low Volatility Equity ETF-- -- -- FLCCFederated Hermes MDT Large Cap Core ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About LOWV or FLCC?
AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Core ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF has higher upside potential than Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Core ETF, analysts believe AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF is more attractive than Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Core ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LOWVAB US Low Volatility Equity ETF0 0 0 FLCCFederated Hermes MDT Large Cap Core ETF0 0 0 -
Is LOWV or FLCC More Risky?
AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Core ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LOWV or FLCC?
AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.92%. Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Core ETF offers a yield of 0.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Core ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LOWV or FLCC?
AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Core ETF quarterly revenues of --. AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF's net income of -- is lower than Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Core ETF's net income of --. Notably, AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Core ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF is -- versus -- for Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Core ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LOWVAB US Low Volatility Equity ETF-- -- -- -- FLCCFederated Hermes MDT Large Cap Core ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns LOWV or INFO?
IHS Markit has a net margin of -- compared to AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF's net margin of --. AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF's return on equity of -- beat IHS Markit's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LOWVAB US Low Volatility Equity ETF-- -- -- INFOIHS Markit-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About LOWV or INFO?
AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand IHS Markit has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF has higher upside potential than IHS Markit, analysts believe AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF is more attractive than IHS Markit.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LOWVAB US Low Volatility Equity ETF0 0 0 INFOIHS Markit0 0 0 -
Is LOWV or INFO More Risky?
AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison IHS Markit has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LOWV or INFO?
AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.92%. IHS Markit offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. IHS Markit pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LOWV or INFO?
AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than IHS Markit quarterly revenues of --. AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF's net income of -- is lower than IHS Markit's net income of --. Notably, AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while IHS Markit's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF is -- versus -- for IHS Markit. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LOWVAB US Low Volatility Equity ETF-- -- -- -- INFOIHS Markit-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns LOWV or LCDS?
JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Core ETF has a net margin of -- compared to AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF's net margin of --. AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF's return on equity of -- beat JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Core ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LOWVAB US Low Volatility Equity ETF-- -- -- LCDSJPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Core ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About LOWV or LCDS?
AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Core ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF has higher upside potential than JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Core ETF, analysts believe AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF is more attractive than JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Core ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LOWVAB US Low Volatility Equity ETF0 0 0 LCDSJPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Core ETF0 0 0 -
Is LOWV or LCDS More Risky?
AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Core ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LOWV or LCDS?
AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.92%. JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Core ETF offers a yield of 0.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Core ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LOWV or LCDS?
AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Core ETF quarterly revenues of --. AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF's net income of -- is lower than JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Core ETF's net income of --. Notably, AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Core ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF is -- versus -- for JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Core ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LOWVAB US Low Volatility Equity ETF-- -- -- -- LCDSJPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Core ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns LOWV or SPXV?
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Health Care ETF has a net margin of -- compared to AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF's net margin of --. AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF's return on equity of -- beat ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Health Care ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LOWVAB US Low Volatility Equity ETF-- -- -- SPXVProShares S&P 500 Ex-Health Care ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About LOWV or SPXV?
AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Health Care ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF has higher upside potential than ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Health Care ETF, analysts believe AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF is more attractive than ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Health Care ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LOWVAB US Low Volatility Equity ETF0 0 0 SPXVProShares S&P 500 Ex-Health Care ETF0 0 0 -
Is LOWV or SPXV More Risky?
AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Health Care ETF has a beta of 1.051, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.137%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LOWV or SPXV?
AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.92%. ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Health Care ETF offers a yield of 1.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Health Care ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LOWV or SPXV?
AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Health Care ETF quarterly revenues of --. AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF's net income of -- is lower than ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Health Care ETF's net income of --. Notably, AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Health Care ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF is -- versus -- for ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Health Care ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LOWVAB US Low Volatility Equity ETF-- -- -- -- SPXVProShares S&P 500 Ex-Health Care ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Disney vs Estée Lauder Stock, Which Is Best?
Inflation has eaten away at a lot of the money…
Is SCHD a Good ETF to Buy?
With around $65.7 billion in net assets, Schwab’s US Dividend…
Stock Ideas
Sell
40
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 117x
Sell
43
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.1T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Alerts
Buy
57
NARI alert for Jan 8
Inari Medical [NARI] is down 0.23% over the past day.
Buy
69
UNF alert for Jan 8
UniFirst [UNF] is up 4.97% over the past day.
Sell
31
APOG alert for Jan 8
Apogee Enterprises [APOG] is down 8.78% over the past day.
