Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?
Digital signature software business DocuSign (NASDAQ:DOCU) has been struggling over…
Buy
68
CQQQ Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$52.26
Seasonality move
:
3.91%
Day range:
$51.76 - $52.27
52-week range:
$35.62 - $61.20
Dividend yield:
2.16%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
1.2M
Avg. volume:
1.1M
1-year change:
27.55%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CQQQ
Invesco China Technology ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CXSE
WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EWT
iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IXN
iShares Global Tech ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KSTR
KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KWEB
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CQQQ
Invesco China Technology ETF
|
$52.23 | -- | -- | -- | $1.13 | 2.16% | -- |
|
CXSE
WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund
|
$41.10 | -- | -- | -- | $0.33 | 1.91% | -- |
|
EWT
iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF
|
$63.02 | -- | -- | -- | $2.82 | 1.61% | -- |
|
IXN
iShares Global Tech ETF
|
$106.40 | -- | -- | -- | $0.93 | 0.32% | -- |
|
KSTR
KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF
|
$18.69 | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
KWEB
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF
|
$34.83 | -- | -- | -- | $2.10 | 6.02% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CQQQ
Invesco China Technology ETF
|
-- | 0.696 | -- | -- |
|
CXSE
WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund
|
-- | 0.627 | -- | -- |
|
EWT
iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF
|
-- | 1.387 | -- | -- |
|
IXN
iShares Global Tech ETF
|
-- | 1.457 | -- | -- |
|
KSTR
KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF
|
-- | 0.671 | -- | -- |
|
KWEB
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF
|
-- | 0.493 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CQQQ
Invesco China Technology ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CXSE
WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EWT
iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IXN
iShares Global Tech ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KSTR
KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KWEB
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Invesco China Technology ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CQQQ or CXSE?
WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund has a net margin of -- compared to Invesco China Technology ETF's net margin of --. Invesco China Technology ETF's return on equity of -- beat WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CQQQInvesco China Technology ETF-- -- -- CXSEWisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CQQQ or CXSE?
Invesco China Technology ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Invesco China Technology ETF has higher upside potential than WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund, analysts believe Invesco China Technology ETF is more attractive than WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CQQQInvesco China Technology ETF0 0 0 CXSEWisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund0 0 0 -
Is CQQQ or CXSE More Risky?
Invesco China Technology ETF has a beta of 0.611, which suggesting that the stock is 38.946% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund has a beta of 1.083, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.328%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CQQQ or CXSE?
Invesco China Technology ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.16%. WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund offers a yield of 1.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share. Invesco China Technology ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CQQQ or CXSE?
Invesco China Technology ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund quarterly revenues of --. Invesco China Technology ETF's net income of -- is lower than WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund's net income of --. Notably, Invesco China Technology ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Invesco China Technology ETF is -- versus -- for WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CQQQInvesco China Technology ETF-- -- -- -- CXSEWisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CQQQ or EWT?
iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Invesco China Technology ETF's net margin of --. Invesco China Technology ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CQQQInvesco China Technology ETF-- -- -- EWTiShares MSCI Taiwan ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CQQQ or EWT?
Invesco China Technology ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Invesco China Technology ETF has higher upside potential than iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF, analysts believe Invesco China Technology ETF is more attractive than iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CQQQInvesco China Technology ETF0 0 0 EWTiShares MSCI Taiwan ETF0 0 0 -
Is CQQQ or EWT More Risky?
Invesco China Technology ETF has a beta of 0.611, which suggesting that the stock is 38.946% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF has a beta of 1.150, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.988%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CQQQ or EWT?
Invesco China Technology ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.16%. iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF offers a yield of 1.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.82 per share. Invesco China Technology ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CQQQ or EWT?
Invesco China Technology ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF quarterly revenues of --. Invesco China Technology ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF's net income of --. Notably, Invesco China Technology ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Invesco China Technology ETF is -- versus -- for iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CQQQInvesco China Technology ETF-- -- -- -- EWTiShares MSCI Taiwan ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CQQQ or IXN?
iShares Global Tech ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Invesco China Technology ETF's net margin of --. Invesco China Technology ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares Global Tech ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CQQQInvesco China Technology ETF-- -- -- IXNiShares Global Tech ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CQQQ or IXN?
Invesco China Technology ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares Global Tech ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Invesco China Technology ETF has higher upside potential than iShares Global Tech ETF, analysts believe Invesco China Technology ETF is more attractive than iShares Global Tech ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CQQQInvesco China Technology ETF0 0 0 IXNiShares Global Tech ETF0 0 0 -
Is CQQQ or IXN More Risky?
Invesco China Technology ETF has a beta of 0.611, which suggesting that the stock is 38.946% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares Global Tech ETF has a beta of 1.267, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.702%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CQQQ or IXN?
Invesco China Technology ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.16%. iShares Global Tech ETF offers a yield of 0.32% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.93 per share. Invesco China Technology ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares Global Tech ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CQQQ or IXN?
Invesco China Technology ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares Global Tech ETF quarterly revenues of --. Invesco China Technology ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares Global Tech ETF's net income of --. Notably, Invesco China Technology ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares Global Tech ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Invesco China Technology ETF is -- versus -- for iShares Global Tech ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CQQQInvesco China Technology ETF-- -- -- -- IXNiShares Global Tech ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CQQQ or KSTR?
KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Invesco China Technology ETF's net margin of --. Invesco China Technology ETF's return on equity of -- beat KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CQQQInvesco China Technology ETF-- -- -- KSTRKraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CQQQ or KSTR?
Invesco China Technology ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Invesco China Technology ETF has higher upside potential than KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF, analysts believe Invesco China Technology ETF is more attractive than KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CQQQInvesco China Technology ETF0 0 0 KSTRKraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF0 0 0 -
Is CQQQ or KSTR More Risky?
Invesco China Technology ETF has a beta of 0.611, which suggesting that the stock is 38.946% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CQQQ or KSTR?
Invesco China Technology ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.16%. KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Invesco China Technology ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CQQQ or KSTR?
Invesco China Technology ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF quarterly revenues of --. Invesco China Technology ETF's net income of -- is lower than KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF's net income of --. Notably, Invesco China Technology ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Invesco China Technology ETF is -- versus -- for KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CQQQInvesco China Technology ETF-- -- -- -- KSTRKraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CQQQ or KWEB?
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Invesco China Technology ETF's net margin of --. Invesco China Technology ETF's return on equity of -- beat KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CQQQInvesco China Technology ETF-- -- -- KWEBKraneShares CSI China Internet ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CQQQ or KWEB?
Invesco China Technology ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Invesco China Technology ETF has higher upside potential than KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF, analysts believe Invesco China Technology ETF is more attractive than KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CQQQInvesco China Technology ETF0 0 0 KWEBKraneShares CSI China Internet ETF0 0 0 -
Is CQQQ or KWEB More Risky?
Invesco China Technology ETF has a beta of 0.611, which suggesting that the stock is 38.946% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF has a beta of 0.455, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.521%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CQQQ or KWEB?
Invesco China Technology ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.16%. KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF offers a yield of 6.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.10 per share. Invesco China Technology ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CQQQ or KWEB?
Invesco China Technology ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF quarterly revenues of --. Invesco China Technology ETF's net income of -- is lower than KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF's net income of --. Notably, Invesco China Technology ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Invesco China Technology ETF is -- versus -- for KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CQQQInvesco China Technology ETF-- -- -- -- KWEBKraneShares CSI China Internet ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?
Cybersecurity major SentinelOne (NYSE:S) has struggled over several years, delivering…
Is Broadcom Stock on Sale?
Chip and software maker Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) has been among the…
Stock Ideas
Buy
59
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 65x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
72
GLTO alert for Dec 27
Galecto, Inc. [GLTO] is up 16.92% over the past day.
Sell
20
SMX alert for Dec 27
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 15.76% over the past day.
Sell
11
CDNAF alert for Dec 27
Canadian Tire Corp. Ltd. [CDNAF] is down 10% over the past day.
