Why Did SoFi Stock Drop?
Fintech platform SoFi (NASDAQ:SOFI) has stumbled in recent days, selling…
Buy
54
CQQQ Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$52.95
Seasonality move
:
5.05%
Day range:
$52.80 - $53.10
52-week range:
$35.62 - $61.20
Dividend yield:
0.21%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
1.3M
Avg. volume:
1.5M
1-year change:
30.8%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CQQQ
Invesco China Technology ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CXSE
WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IXN
iShares Global Tech ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KSTR
KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KWEB
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
XT
iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CQQQ
Invesco China Technology ETF
|
$52.92 | -- | -- | -- | $0.11 | 0.21% | -- |
|
CXSE
WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund
|
$41.25 | -- | -- | -- | $0.14 | 1.32% | -- |
|
IXN
iShares Global Tech ETF
|
$106.51 | -- | -- | -- | $0.16 | 0.34% | -- |
|
KSTR
KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF
|
$18.08 | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
KWEB
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF
|
$37.59 | -- | -- | -- | $1.03 | 2.73% | -- |
|
XT
iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF
|
$75.32 | -- | -- | -- | $0.21 | 0.59% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CQQQ
Invesco China Technology ETF
|
-- | 0.696 | -- | -- |
|
CXSE
WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund
|
-- | 0.627 | -- | -- |
|
IXN
iShares Global Tech ETF
|
-- | 1.457 | -- | -- |
|
KSTR
KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF
|
-- | 0.671 | -- | -- |
|
KWEB
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF
|
-- | 0.493 | -- | -- |
|
XT
iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF
|
-- | 1.285 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CQQQ
Invesco China Technology ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CXSE
WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IXN
iShares Global Tech ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KSTR
KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KWEB
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
XT
iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Invesco China Technology ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CQQQ or CXSE?
WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund has a net margin of -- compared to Invesco China Technology ETF's net margin of --. Invesco China Technology ETF's return on equity of -- beat WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CQQQInvesco China Technology ETF-- -- -- CXSEWisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CQQQ or CXSE?
Invesco China Technology ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Invesco China Technology ETF has higher upside potential than WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund, analysts believe Invesco China Technology ETF is more attractive than WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CQQQInvesco China Technology ETF0 0 0 CXSEWisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund0 0 0 -
Is CQQQ or CXSE More Risky?
Invesco China Technology ETF has a beta of 0.611, which suggesting that the stock is 38.946% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund has a beta of 1.083, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.328%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CQQQ or CXSE?
Invesco China Technology ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.21%. WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund offers a yield of 1.32% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. Invesco China Technology ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CQQQ or CXSE?
Invesco China Technology ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund quarterly revenues of --. Invesco China Technology ETF's net income of -- is lower than WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund's net income of --. Notably, Invesco China Technology ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Invesco China Technology ETF is -- versus -- for WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CQQQInvesco China Technology ETF-- -- -- -- CXSEWisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CQQQ or IXN?
iShares Global Tech ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Invesco China Technology ETF's net margin of --. Invesco China Technology ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares Global Tech ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CQQQInvesco China Technology ETF-- -- -- IXNiShares Global Tech ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CQQQ or IXN?
Invesco China Technology ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares Global Tech ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Invesco China Technology ETF has higher upside potential than iShares Global Tech ETF, analysts believe Invesco China Technology ETF is more attractive than iShares Global Tech ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CQQQInvesco China Technology ETF0 0 0 IXNiShares Global Tech ETF0 0 0 -
Is CQQQ or IXN More Risky?
Invesco China Technology ETF has a beta of 0.611, which suggesting that the stock is 38.946% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares Global Tech ETF has a beta of 1.267, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.702%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CQQQ or IXN?
Invesco China Technology ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.21%. iShares Global Tech ETF offers a yield of 0.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. Invesco China Technology ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares Global Tech ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CQQQ or IXN?
Invesco China Technology ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares Global Tech ETF quarterly revenues of --. Invesco China Technology ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares Global Tech ETF's net income of --. Notably, Invesco China Technology ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares Global Tech ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Invesco China Technology ETF is -- versus -- for iShares Global Tech ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CQQQInvesco China Technology ETF-- -- -- -- IXNiShares Global Tech ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CQQQ or KSTR?
KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Invesco China Technology ETF's net margin of --. Invesco China Technology ETF's return on equity of -- beat KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CQQQInvesco China Technology ETF-- -- -- KSTRKraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CQQQ or KSTR?
Invesco China Technology ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Invesco China Technology ETF has higher upside potential than KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF, analysts believe Invesco China Technology ETF is more attractive than KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CQQQInvesco China Technology ETF0 0 0 KSTRKraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF0 0 0 -
Is CQQQ or KSTR More Risky?
Invesco China Technology ETF has a beta of 0.611, which suggesting that the stock is 38.946% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CQQQ or KSTR?
Invesco China Technology ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.21%. KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Invesco China Technology ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CQQQ or KSTR?
Invesco China Technology ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF quarterly revenues of --. Invesco China Technology ETF's net income of -- is lower than KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF's net income of --. Notably, Invesco China Technology ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Invesco China Technology ETF is -- versus -- for KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CQQQInvesco China Technology ETF-- -- -- -- KSTRKraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CQQQ or KWEB?
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Invesco China Technology ETF's net margin of --. Invesco China Technology ETF's return on equity of -- beat KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CQQQInvesco China Technology ETF-- -- -- KWEBKraneShares CSI China Internet ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CQQQ or KWEB?
Invesco China Technology ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Invesco China Technology ETF has higher upside potential than KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF, analysts believe Invesco China Technology ETF is more attractive than KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CQQQInvesco China Technology ETF0 0 0 KWEBKraneShares CSI China Internet ETF0 0 0 -
Is CQQQ or KWEB More Risky?
Invesco China Technology ETF has a beta of 0.611, which suggesting that the stock is 38.946% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF has a beta of 0.455, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.521%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CQQQ or KWEB?
Invesco China Technology ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.21%. KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF offers a yield of 2.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.03 per share. Invesco China Technology ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CQQQ or KWEB?
Invesco China Technology ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF quarterly revenues of --. Invesco China Technology ETF's net income of -- is lower than KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF's net income of --. Notably, Invesco China Technology ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Invesco China Technology ETF is -- versus -- for KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CQQQInvesco China Technology ETF-- -- -- -- KWEBKraneShares CSI China Internet ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CQQQ or XT?
iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Invesco China Technology ETF's net margin of --. Invesco China Technology ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CQQQInvesco China Technology ETF-- -- -- XTiShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CQQQ or XT?
Invesco China Technology ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Invesco China Technology ETF has higher upside potential than iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF, analysts believe Invesco China Technology ETF is more attractive than iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CQQQInvesco China Technology ETF0 0 0 XTiShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF0 0 0 -
Is CQQQ or XT More Risky?
Invesco China Technology ETF has a beta of 0.611, which suggesting that the stock is 38.946% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF has a beta of 1.166, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.647%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CQQQ or XT?
Invesco China Technology ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.21%. iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF offers a yield of 0.59% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. Invesco China Technology ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CQQQ or XT?
Invesco China Technology ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF quarterly revenues of --. Invesco China Technology ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF's net income of --. Notably, Invesco China Technology ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Invesco China Technology ETF is -- versus -- for iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CQQQInvesco China Technology ETF-- -- -- -- XTiShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will Robinhood Win AI Investing?
Recently, online brokerage Robinhood (NASDAQ:HOOD) has been focused on introducing…
Is Amazon an AI Stock?
With the market starting to look skittish on pure-play AI…
Stock Ideas
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 62x
Buy
56
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
81
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Sell
50
TGL alert for Dec 8
Treasure Global, Inc. [TGL] is up 28.81% over the past day.
Buy
56
SMX alert for Dec 8
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 43.66% over the past day.
Buy
62
PRAX alert for Dec 8
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. [PRAX] is up 8.97% over the past day.
