Why Caesars’ Digital Arm May Be the Gaming Giant’s Best-Kept Secret
It’s not often that a company with the scale and…
Sell
47
KWEB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$29.98
Seasonality move
:
3.08%
Day range:
$29.48 - $30.11
52-week range:
$22.68 - $39.17
Dividend yield:
3.42%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
13.2M
Avg. volume:
18M
1-year change:
14.97%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
KWEB
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ASHR
Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CWEB
Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KLIP
KraneShares Chn Intrnt & Cvrd Cll Strtgy ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KTEC
KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MCHI
iShares MSCI China ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
KWEB
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF
|
$29.96 | -- | -- | -- | $1.02 | 3.42% | -- |
|
ASHR
Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF
|
$26.75 | -- | -- | -- | $0.30 | 1.12% | -- |
|
CWEB
Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs
|
$34.69 | -- | -- | -- | $0.09 | 2.45% | -- |
|
KLIP
KraneShares Chn Intrnt & Cvrd Cll Strtgy ETF
|
$11.15 | -- | -- | -- | $0.56 | 56.17% | -- |
|
KTEC
KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF
|
$13.61 | -- | -- | -- | $0.04 | 0.27% | -- |
|
MCHI
iShares MSCI China ETF
|
$47.10 | -- | -- | -- | $0.89 | 2.3% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
KWEB
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF
|
-- | 0.077 | -- | -- |
|
ASHR
Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF
|
-- | 0.896 | -- | -- |
|
CWEB
Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs
|
-- | -0.177 | -- | -- |
|
KLIP
KraneShares Chn Intrnt & Cvrd Cll Strtgy ETF
|
-- | 0.067 | -- | -- |
|
KTEC
KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF
|
-- | 0.274 | -- | -- |
|
MCHI
iShares MSCI China ETF
|
-- | 0.993 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
KWEB
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ASHR
Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CWEB
Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KLIP
KraneShares Chn Intrnt & Cvrd Cll Strtgy ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KTEC
KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MCHI
iShares MSCI China ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns KWEB or ASHR?
Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF has a net margin of -- compared to KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF's net margin of --. KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF's return on equity of -- beat Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital KWEBKraneShares CSI China Internet ETF-- -- -- ASHRXtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About KWEB or ASHR?
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF has higher upside potential than Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF, analysts believe KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF is more attractive than Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings KWEBKraneShares CSI China Internet ETF0 0 0 ASHRXtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF0 0 0 -
Is KWEB or ASHR More Risky?
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF has a beta of 0.478, which suggesting that the stock is 52.161% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF has a beta of 0.686, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.442%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock KWEB or ASHR?
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.42%. Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF offers a yield of 1.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios KWEB or ASHR?
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF quarterly revenues of --. KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF's net income of -- is lower than Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF's net income of --. Notably, KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF is -- versus -- for Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income KWEBKraneShares CSI China Internet ETF-- -- -- -- ASHRXtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns KWEB or CWEB?
Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs has a net margin of -- compared to KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF's net margin of --. KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF's return on equity of -- beat Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital KWEBKraneShares CSI China Internet ETF-- -- -- CWEBDirexion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About KWEB or CWEB?
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF has higher upside potential than Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs, analysts believe KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF is more attractive than Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings KWEBKraneShares CSI China Internet ETF0 0 0 CWEBDirexion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs0 0 0 -
Is KWEB or CWEB More Risky?
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF has a beta of 0.478, which suggesting that the stock is 52.161% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs has a beta of 0.779, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.066%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock KWEB or CWEB?
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.42%. Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs offers a yield of 2.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios KWEB or CWEB?
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs quarterly revenues of --. KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF's net income of -- is lower than Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs's net income of --. Notably, KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF is -- versus -- for Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income KWEBKraneShares CSI China Internet ETF-- -- -- -- CWEBDirexion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns KWEB or KLIP?
KraneShares Chn Intrnt & Cvrd Cll Strtgy ETF has a net margin of -- compared to KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF's net margin of --. KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF's return on equity of -- beat KraneShares Chn Intrnt & Cvrd Cll Strtgy ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital KWEBKraneShares CSI China Internet ETF-- -- -- KLIPKraneShares Chn Intrnt & Cvrd Cll Strtgy ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About KWEB or KLIP?
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand KraneShares Chn Intrnt & Cvrd Cll Strtgy ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF has higher upside potential than KraneShares Chn Intrnt & Cvrd Cll Strtgy ETF, analysts believe KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF is more attractive than KraneShares Chn Intrnt & Cvrd Cll Strtgy ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings KWEBKraneShares CSI China Internet ETF0 0 0 KLIPKraneShares Chn Intrnt & Cvrd Cll Strtgy ETF0 0 0 -
Is KWEB or KLIP More Risky?
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF has a beta of 0.478, which suggesting that the stock is 52.161% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KraneShares Chn Intrnt & Cvrd Cll Strtgy ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock KWEB or KLIP?
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.42%. KraneShares Chn Intrnt & Cvrd Cll Strtgy ETF offers a yield of 56.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.56 per share. KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. KraneShares Chn Intrnt & Cvrd Cll Strtgy ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios KWEB or KLIP?
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than KraneShares Chn Intrnt & Cvrd Cll Strtgy ETF quarterly revenues of --. KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF's net income of -- is lower than KraneShares Chn Intrnt & Cvrd Cll Strtgy ETF's net income of --. Notably, KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while KraneShares Chn Intrnt & Cvrd Cll Strtgy ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF is -- versus -- for KraneShares Chn Intrnt & Cvrd Cll Strtgy ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income KWEBKraneShares CSI China Internet ETF-- -- -- -- KLIPKraneShares Chn Intrnt & Cvrd Cll Strtgy ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns KWEB or KTEC?
KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF has a net margin of -- compared to KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF's net margin of --. KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF's return on equity of -- beat KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital KWEBKraneShares CSI China Internet ETF-- -- -- KTECKraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About KWEB or KTEC?
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF has higher upside potential than KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF, analysts believe KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF is more attractive than KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings KWEBKraneShares CSI China Internet ETF0 0 0 KTECKraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF0 0 0 -
Is KWEB or KTEC More Risky?
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF has a beta of 0.478, which suggesting that the stock is 52.161% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock KWEB or KTEC?
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.42%. KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF offers a yield of 0.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios KWEB or KTEC?
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF quarterly revenues of --. KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF's net income of -- is lower than KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF's net income of --. Notably, KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF is -- versus -- for KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income KWEBKraneShares CSI China Internet ETF-- -- -- -- KTECKraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns KWEB or MCHI?
iShares MSCI China ETF has a net margin of -- compared to KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF's net margin of --. KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares MSCI China ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital KWEBKraneShares CSI China Internet ETF-- -- -- MCHIiShares MSCI China ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About KWEB or MCHI?
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares MSCI China ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF has higher upside potential than iShares MSCI China ETF, analysts believe KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF is more attractive than iShares MSCI China ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings KWEBKraneShares CSI China Internet ETF0 0 0 MCHIiShares MSCI China ETF0 0 0 -
Is KWEB or MCHI More Risky?
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF has a beta of 0.478, which suggesting that the stock is 52.161% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares MSCI China ETF has a beta of 0.820, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.019%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock KWEB or MCHI?
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.42%. iShares MSCI China ETF offers a yield of 2.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.89 per share. KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares MSCI China ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios KWEB or MCHI?
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares MSCI China ETF quarterly revenues of --. KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares MSCI China ETF's net income of --. Notably, KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares MSCI China ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF is -- versus -- for iShares MSCI China ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income KWEBKraneShares CSI China Internet ETF-- -- -- -- MCHIiShares MSCI China ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will Tyson Foods Stock Bounce Back?
Tyson Foods, Inc. (NYSE:TSN) is one of the biggest food…
Will Iovance Biotherapeutics Stock Bounce Back?
Iovance Biotherapeutics (NASDAQ:IOVA) is a fledgling pharmaceutical company that specializes…
Stock Ideas
Buy
64
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 113x
Buy
55
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Alerts
Buy
61
QMCO alert for Dec 21
Quantum [QMCO] is up 26.28% over the past day.
Sell
46
NUKK alert for Dec 21
Nukkleus [NUKK] is down 22.94% over the past day.
Sell
1
IIPR alert for Dec 21
Innovative Industrial Properties [IIPR] is down 22.7% over the past day.
