Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?
Digital signature software business DocuSign (NASDAQ:DOCU) has been struggling over…
Sell
47
CGMS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$27.65
Seasonality move
:
-0.07%
Day range:
$27.63 - $27.66
52-week range:
$26.08 - $28.08
Dividend yield:
5.99%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
951.5K
Avg. volume:
869.9K
1-year change:
1.47%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CGMS
Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
AINP
Allspring Income Plus ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BINC
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DYFI
IDX Dynamic Fixed Income ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FLXR
TCW Flexible Income ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CGMS
Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF
|
$27.65 | -- | -- | -- | $0.17 | 5.99% | -- |
|
AINP
Allspring Income Plus ETF
|
$25.26 | -- | -- | -- | $0.15 | 5.03% | -- |
|
BINC
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF
|
$52.76 | -- | -- | -- | $0.43 | 5.6% | -- |
|
DYFI
IDX Dynamic Fixed Income ETF
|
$23.06 | -- | -- | -- | $0.20 | 4.64% | -- |
|
FLXR
TCW Flexible Income ETF
|
$39.56 | -- | -- | -- | $0.20 | 5.66% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CGMS
Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF
|
-- | 0.499 | -- | -- |
|
AINP
Allspring Income Plus ETF
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
BINC
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF
|
-- | 0.350 | -- | -- |
|
DYFI
IDX Dynamic Fixed Income ETF
|
-- | 0.407 | -- | -- |
|
FLXR
TCW Flexible Income ETF
|
-- | 0.367 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CGMS
Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
AINP
Allspring Income Plus ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BINC
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DYFI
IDX Dynamic Fixed Income ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FLXR
TCW Flexible Income ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CGMS or AINP?
Allspring Income Plus ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF's net margin of --. Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF's return on equity of -- beat Allspring Income Plus ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CGMSCapital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF-- -- -- AINPAllspring Income Plus ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CGMS or AINP?
Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Allspring Income Plus ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF has higher upside potential than Allspring Income Plus ETF, analysts believe Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF is more attractive than Allspring Income Plus ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CGMSCapital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF0 0 0 AINPAllspring Income Plus ETF0 0 0 -
Is CGMS or AINP More Risky?
Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Allspring Income Plus ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CGMS or AINP?
Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.99%. Allspring Income Plus ETF offers a yield of 5.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Allspring Income Plus ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CGMS or AINP?
Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Allspring Income Plus ETF quarterly revenues of --. Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF's net income of -- is lower than Allspring Income Plus ETF's net income of --. Notably, Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Allspring Income Plus ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF is -- versus -- for Allspring Income Plus ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CGMSCapital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF-- -- -- -- AINPAllspring Income Plus ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CGMS or BINC?
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF's net margin of --. Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares Flexible Income Active ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CGMSCapital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF-- -- -- BINCiShares Flexible Income Active ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CGMS or BINC?
Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares Flexible Income Active ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF has higher upside potential than iShares Flexible Income Active ETF, analysts believe Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF is more attractive than iShares Flexible Income Active ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CGMSCapital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF0 0 0 BINCiShares Flexible Income Active ETF0 0 0 -
Is CGMS or BINC More Risky?
Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares Flexible Income Active ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CGMS or BINC?
Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.99%. iShares Flexible Income Active ETF offers a yield of 5.6% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share. Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares Flexible Income Active ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CGMS or BINC?
Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares Flexible Income Active ETF quarterly revenues of --. Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares Flexible Income Active ETF's net income of --. Notably, Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares Flexible Income Active ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF is -- versus -- for iShares Flexible Income Active ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CGMSCapital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF-- -- -- -- BINCiShares Flexible Income Active ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CGMS or DYFI?
IDX Dynamic Fixed Income ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF's net margin of --. Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF's return on equity of -- beat IDX Dynamic Fixed Income ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CGMSCapital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF-- -- -- DYFIIDX Dynamic Fixed Income ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CGMS or DYFI?
Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand IDX Dynamic Fixed Income ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF has higher upside potential than IDX Dynamic Fixed Income ETF, analysts believe Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF is more attractive than IDX Dynamic Fixed Income ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CGMSCapital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF0 0 0 DYFIIDX Dynamic Fixed Income ETF0 0 0 -
Is CGMS or DYFI More Risky?
Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison IDX Dynamic Fixed Income ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CGMS or DYFI?
Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.99%. IDX Dynamic Fixed Income ETF offers a yield of 4.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. IDX Dynamic Fixed Income ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CGMS or DYFI?
Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than IDX Dynamic Fixed Income ETF quarterly revenues of --. Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF's net income of -- is lower than IDX Dynamic Fixed Income ETF's net income of --. Notably, Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while IDX Dynamic Fixed Income ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF is -- versus -- for IDX Dynamic Fixed Income ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CGMSCapital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF-- -- -- -- DYFIIDX Dynamic Fixed Income ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CGMS or FLXR?
TCW Flexible Income ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF's net margin of --. Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF's return on equity of -- beat TCW Flexible Income ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CGMSCapital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF-- -- -- FLXRTCW Flexible Income ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CGMS or FLXR?
Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand TCW Flexible Income ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF has higher upside potential than TCW Flexible Income ETF, analysts believe Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF is more attractive than TCW Flexible Income ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CGMSCapital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF0 0 0 FLXRTCW Flexible Income ETF0 0 0 -
Is CGMS or FLXR More Risky?
Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TCW Flexible Income ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CGMS or FLXR?
Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.99%. TCW Flexible Income ETF offers a yield of 5.66% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. TCW Flexible Income ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CGMS or FLXR?
Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than TCW Flexible Income ETF quarterly revenues of --. Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF's net income of -- is lower than TCW Flexible Income ETF's net income of --. Notably, Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while TCW Flexible Income ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF is -- versus -- for TCW Flexible Income ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CGMSCapital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF-- -- -- -- FLXRTCW Flexible Income ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?
Cybersecurity major SentinelOne (NYSE:S) has struggled over several years, delivering…
Is Broadcom Stock on Sale?
Chip and software maker Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) has been among the…
Stock Ideas
Buy
59
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 65x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
72
GLTO alert for Dec 27
Galecto, Inc. [GLTO] is up 16.92% over the past day.
Sell
20
SMX alert for Dec 27
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 15.76% over the past day.
Sell
11
CDNAF alert for Dec 27
Canadian Tire Corp. Ltd. [CDNAF] is down 10% over the past day.
