Is The Santa Claus Rally The Gift That Keeps Giving?
Remember the horror of 2008 when the Great Recession hit…
Sell
26
BINC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$51.99
Seasonality move
:
0.64%
Day range:
$51.92 - $51.99
52-week range:
$51.53 - $53.57
Dividend yield:
6.14%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
565K
Avg. volume:
938K
1-year change:
-0.15%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BINC
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CGMS
Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EVV
Eaton Vance Ltd Duration Income Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GOF
Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
JPIE
JPMorgan Income ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PYLD
PIMCO Multisector Bond Active ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BINC
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF
|
$51.98 | -- | -- | -- | $0.58 | 6.14% | -- |
|
CGMS
Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF
|
$27.18 | -- | -- | -- | $0.17 | 5.93% | -- |
|
EVV
Eaton Vance Ltd Duration Income Fund
|
$9.97 | -- | -- | -- | $0.08 | 6.74% | -- |
|
GOF
Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund
|
$15.24 | -- | -- | -- | $0.18 | 5.03% | -- |
|
JPIE
JPMorgan Income ETF
|
$45.75 | -- | -- | -- | $0.22 | 6.17% | -- |
|
PYLD
PIMCO Multisector Bond Active ETF
|
$25.98 | -- | -- | -- | $0.15 | 5.9% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BINC
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF
|
-- | 0.565 | -- | -- |
|
CGMS
Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF
|
-- | 0.713 | -- | -- |
|
EVV
Eaton Vance Ltd Duration Income Fund
|
-- | 1.006 | -- | -- |
|
GOF
Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund
|
-- | -0.576 | -- | -- |
|
JPIE
JPMorgan Income ETF
|
-- | 0.471 | -- | -- |
|
PYLD
PIMCO Multisector Bond Active ETF
|
-- | 0.763 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BINC
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CGMS
Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EVV
Eaton Vance Ltd Duration Income Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GOF
Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
JPIE
JPMorgan Income ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PYLD
PIMCO Multisector Bond Active ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns BINC or CGMS?
Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares Flexible Income Active ETF's net margin of --. iShares Flexible Income Active ETF's return on equity of -- beat Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BINCiShares Flexible Income Active ETF-- -- -- CGMSCapital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About BINC or CGMS?
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares Flexible Income Active ETF has higher upside potential than Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF, analysts believe iShares Flexible Income Active ETF is more attractive than Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BINCiShares Flexible Income Active ETF0 0 0 CGMSCapital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF0 0 0 -
Is BINC or CGMS More Risky?
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BINC or CGMS?
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.14%. Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF offers a yield of 5.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. iShares Flexible Income Active ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BINC or CGMS?
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares Flexible Income Active ETF's net income of -- is lower than Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares Flexible Income Active ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares Flexible Income Active ETF is -- versus -- for Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BINCiShares Flexible Income Active ETF-- -- -- -- CGMSCapital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns BINC or EVV?
Eaton Vance Ltd Duration Income Fund has a net margin of -- compared to iShares Flexible Income Active ETF's net margin of --. iShares Flexible Income Active ETF's return on equity of -- beat Eaton Vance Ltd Duration Income Fund's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BINCiShares Flexible Income Active ETF-- -- -- EVVEaton Vance Ltd Duration Income Fund-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About BINC or EVV?
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Eaton Vance Ltd Duration Income Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares Flexible Income Active ETF has higher upside potential than Eaton Vance Ltd Duration Income Fund, analysts believe iShares Flexible Income Active ETF is more attractive than Eaton Vance Ltd Duration Income Fund.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BINCiShares Flexible Income Active ETF0 0 0 EVVEaton Vance Ltd Duration Income Fund0 0 0 -
Is BINC or EVV More Risky?
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Eaton Vance Ltd Duration Income Fund has a beta of 1.460, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.964%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BINC or EVV?
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.14%. Eaton Vance Ltd Duration Income Fund offers a yield of 6.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. iShares Flexible Income Active ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Eaton Vance Ltd Duration Income Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BINC or EVV?
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Eaton Vance Ltd Duration Income Fund quarterly revenues of --. iShares Flexible Income Active ETF's net income of -- is lower than Eaton Vance Ltd Duration Income Fund's net income of --. Notably, iShares Flexible Income Active ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Eaton Vance Ltd Duration Income Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares Flexible Income Active ETF is -- versus -- for Eaton Vance Ltd Duration Income Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BINCiShares Flexible Income Active ETF-- -- -- -- EVVEaton Vance Ltd Duration Income Fund-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns BINC or GOF?
Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund has a net margin of -- compared to iShares Flexible Income Active ETF's net margin of --. iShares Flexible Income Active ETF's return on equity of -- beat Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BINCiShares Flexible Income Active ETF-- -- -- GOFGuggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About BINC or GOF?
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares Flexible Income Active ETF has higher upside potential than Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund, analysts believe iShares Flexible Income Active ETF is more attractive than Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BINCiShares Flexible Income Active ETF0 0 0 GOFGuggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund0 0 0 -
Is BINC or GOF More Risky?
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund has a beta of 0.941, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.871%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BINC or GOF?
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.14%. Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund offers a yield of 5.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. iShares Flexible Income Active ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BINC or GOF?
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund quarterly revenues of --. iShares Flexible Income Active ETF's net income of -- is lower than Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund's net income of --. Notably, iShares Flexible Income Active ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares Flexible Income Active ETF is -- versus -- for Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BINCiShares Flexible Income Active ETF-- -- -- -- GOFGuggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns BINC or JPIE?
JPMorgan Income ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares Flexible Income Active ETF's net margin of --. iShares Flexible Income Active ETF's return on equity of -- beat JPMorgan Income ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BINCiShares Flexible Income Active ETF-- -- -- JPIEJPMorgan Income ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About BINC or JPIE?
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand JPMorgan Income ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares Flexible Income Active ETF has higher upside potential than JPMorgan Income ETF, analysts believe iShares Flexible Income Active ETF is more attractive than JPMorgan Income ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BINCiShares Flexible Income Active ETF0 0 0 JPIEJPMorgan Income ETF0 0 0 -
Is BINC or JPIE More Risky?
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison JPMorgan Income ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BINC or JPIE?
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.14%. JPMorgan Income ETF offers a yield of 6.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. iShares Flexible Income Active ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. JPMorgan Income ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BINC or JPIE?
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than JPMorgan Income ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares Flexible Income Active ETF's net income of -- is lower than JPMorgan Income ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares Flexible Income Active ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while JPMorgan Income ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares Flexible Income Active ETF is -- versus -- for JPMorgan Income ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BINCiShares Flexible Income Active ETF-- -- -- -- JPIEJPMorgan Income ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns BINC or PYLD?
PIMCO Multisector Bond Active ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares Flexible Income Active ETF's net margin of --. iShares Flexible Income Active ETF's return on equity of -- beat PIMCO Multisector Bond Active ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BINCiShares Flexible Income Active ETF-- -- -- PYLDPIMCO Multisector Bond Active ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About BINC or PYLD?
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand PIMCO Multisector Bond Active ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares Flexible Income Active ETF has higher upside potential than PIMCO Multisector Bond Active ETF, analysts believe iShares Flexible Income Active ETF is more attractive than PIMCO Multisector Bond Active ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BINCiShares Flexible Income Active ETF0 0 0 PYLDPIMCO Multisector Bond Active ETF0 0 0 -
Is BINC or PYLD More Risky?
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PIMCO Multisector Bond Active ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BINC or PYLD?
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.14%. PIMCO Multisector Bond Active ETF offers a yield of 5.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. iShares Flexible Income Active ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PIMCO Multisector Bond Active ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BINC or PYLD?
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than PIMCO Multisector Bond Active ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares Flexible Income Active ETF's net income of -- is lower than PIMCO Multisector Bond Active ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares Flexible Income Active ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while PIMCO Multisector Bond Active ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares Flexible Income Active ETF is -- versus -- for PIMCO Multisector Bond Active ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BINCiShares Flexible Income Active ETF-- -- -- -- PYLDPIMCO Multisector Bond Active ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Alphabet an Undervalued Growth Stock to Buy?
Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) is easily one of the most successful companies…
Is Tesla Going to Buy Uber?
Tesla has always been in the habit of making large,…
Stock Ideas
Buy
65
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 118x
Buy
58
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Alerts
Buy
87
PSIX alert for Dec 25
Power Solutions International [PSIX] is up 27.42% over the past day.
Buy
65
TSLL alert for Dec 25
Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X Shares [TSLL] is up 19.46% over the past day.
Buy
75
SMLR alert for Dec 25
Semler Scientific [SMLR] is up 15.37% over the past day.
