Is Amazon an AI Stock?
With the market starting to look skittish on pure-play AI…
Sell
37
BMVP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$49.09
Seasonality move
:
3.37%
Day range:
$49.10 - $49.17
52-week range:
$42.01 - $50.22
Dividend yield:
1.65%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
718
Avg. volume:
1.9K
1-year change:
-2.3%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BMVP
Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-Factor ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BUL
Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CDL
VictoryShares US LgCp High Div Vol Wtd ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CFO
VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
LSAF
LeaderShares AlphaFactor US Core Equity ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SPHB
Invesco S&P 500 High Beta ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BMVP
Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-Factor ETF
|
$49.10 | -- | -- | -- | $0.21 | 1.65% | -- |
|
BUL
Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF
|
$54.42 | -- | -- | -- | $0.03 | 0.19% | -- |
|
CDL
VictoryShares US LgCp High Div Vol Wtd ETF
|
$69.29 | -- | -- | -- | $0.11 | 3.27% | -- |
|
CFO
VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF
|
$73.79 | -- | -- | -- | $0.04 | 1.3% | -- |
|
LSAF
LeaderShares AlphaFactor US Core Equity ETF
|
$45.08 | -- | -- | -- | $0.17 | 0.38% | -- |
|
SPHB
Invesco S&P 500 High Beta ETF
|
$116.59 | -- | -- | -- | $0.20 | 0.54% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BMVP
Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-Factor ETF
|
-- | 0.545 | -- | -- |
|
BUL
Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF
|
-- | 1.085 | -- | -- |
|
CDL
VictoryShares US LgCp High Div Vol Wtd ETF
|
-- | 0.391 | -- | -- |
|
CFO
VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF
|
-- | 0.754 | -- | -- |
|
LSAF
LeaderShares AlphaFactor US Core Equity ETF
|
-- | 1.004 | -- | -- |
|
SPHB
Invesco S&P 500 High Beta ETF
|
-- | 1.818 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BMVP
Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-Factor ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BUL
Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CDL
VictoryShares US LgCp High Div Vol Wtd ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CFO
VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
LSAF
LeaderShares AlphaFactor US Core Equity ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SPHB
Invesco S&P 500 High Beta ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-Factor ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns BMVP or BUL?
Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-Factor ETF's net margin of --. Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-Factor ETF's return on equity of -- beat Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BMVPInvesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-Factor ETF-- -- -- BULPacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About BMVP or BUL?
Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-Factor ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-Factor ETF has higher upside potential than Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF, analysts believe Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-Factor ETF is more attractive than Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BMVPInvesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-Factor ETF0 0 0 BULPacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF0 0 0 -
Is BMVP or BUL More Risky?
Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-Factor ETF has a beta of 0.949, which suggesting that the stock is 5.089% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF has a beta of 1.046, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.556%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BMVP or BUL?
Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-Factor ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.65%. Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF offers a yield of 0.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-Factor ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BMVP or BUL?
Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-Factor ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF quarterly revenues of --. Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-Factor ETF's net income of -- is lower than Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF's net income of --. Notably, Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-Factor ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-Factor ETF is -- versus -- for Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BMVPInvesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-Factor ETF-- -- -- -- BULPacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns BMVP or CDL?
VictoryShares US LgCp High Div Vol Wtd ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-Factor ETF's net margin of --. Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-Factor ETF's return on equity of -- beat VictoryShares US LgCp High Div Vol Wtd ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BMVPInvesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-Factor ETF-- -- -- CDLVictoryShares US LgCp High Div Vol Wtd ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About BMVP or CDL?
Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-Factor ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand VictoryShares US LgCp High Div Vol Wtd ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-Factor ETF has higher upside potential than VictoryShares US LgCp High Div Vol Wtd ETF, analysts believe Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-Factor ETF is more attractive than VictoryShares US LgCp High Div Vol Wtd ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BMVPInvesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-Factor ETF0 0 0 CDLVictoryShares US LgCp High Div Vol Wtd ETF0 0 0 -
Is BMVP or CDL More Risky?
Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-Factor ETF has a beta of 0.949, which suggesting that the stock is 5.089% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VictoryShares US LgCp High Div Vol Wtd ETF has a beta of 0.702, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.796%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BMVP or CDL?
Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-Factor ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.65%. VictoryShares US LgCp High Div Vol Wtd ETF offers a yield of 3.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-Factor ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. VictoryShares US LgCp High Div Vol Wtd ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BMVP or CDL?
Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-Factor ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than VictoryShares US LgCp High Div Vol Wtd ETF quarterly revenues of --. Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-Factor ETF's net income of -- is lower than VictoryShares US LgCp High Div Vol Wtd ETF's net income of --. Notably, Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-Factor ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while VictoryShares US LgCp High Div Vol Wtd ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-Factor ETF is -- versus -- for VictoryShares US LgCp High Div Vol Wtd ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BMVPInvesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-Factor ETF-- -- -- -- CDLVictoryShares US LgCp High Div Vol Wtd ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns BMVP or CFO?
VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-Factor ETF's net margin of --. Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-Factor ETF's return on equity of -- beat VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BMVPInvesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-Factor ETF-- -- -- CFOVictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About BMVP or CFO?
Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-Factor ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-Factor ETF has higher upside potential than VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF, analysts believe Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-Factor ETF is more attractive than VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BMVPInvesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-Factor ETF0 0 0 CFOVictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF0 0 0 -
Is BMVP or CFO More Risky?
Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-Factor ETF has a beta of 0.949, which suggesting that the stock is 5.089% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF has a beta of 0.690, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.027%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BMVP or CFO?
Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-Factor ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.65%. VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF offers a yield of 1.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-Factor ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BMVP or CFO?
Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-Factor ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF quarterly revenues of --. Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-Factor ETF's net income of -- is lower than VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF's net income of --. Notably, Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-Factor ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-Factor ETF is -- versus -- for VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BMVPInvesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-Factor ETF-- -- -- -- CFOVictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns BMVP or LSAF?
LeaderShares AlphaFactor US Core Equity ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-Factor ETF's net margin of --. Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-Factor ETF's return on equity of -- beat LeaderShares AlphaFactor US Core Equity ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BMVPInvesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-Factor ETF-- -- -- LSAFLeaderShares AlphaFactor US Core Equity ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About BMVP or LSAF?
Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-Factor ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand LeaderShares AlphaFactor US Core Equity ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-Factor ETF has higher upside potential than LeaderShares AlphaFactor US Core Equity ETF, analysts believe Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-Factor ETF is more attractive than LeaderShares AlphaFactor US Core Equity ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BMVPInvesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-Factor ETF0 0 0 LSAFLeaderShares AlphaFactor US Core Equity ETF0 0 0 -
Is BMVP or LSAF More Risky?
Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-Factor ETF has a beta of 0.949, which suggesting that the stock is 5.089% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LeaderShares AlphaFactor US Core Equity ETF has a beta of 0.997, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.29400000000001%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BMVP or LSAF?
Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-Factor ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.65%. LeaderShares AlphaFactor US Core Equity ETF offers a yield of 0.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-Factor ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. LeaderShares AlphaFactor US Core Equity ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BMVP or LSAF?
Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-Factor ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than LeaderShares AlphaFactor US Core Equity ETF quarterly revenues of --. Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-Factor ETF's net income of -- is lower than LeaderShares AlphaFactor US Core Equity ETF's net income of --. Notably, Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-Factor ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while LeaderShares AlphaFactor US Core Equity ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-Factor ETF is -- versus -- for LeaderShares AlphaFactor US Core Equity ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BMVPInvesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-Factor ETF-- -- -- -- LSAFLeaderShares AlphaFactor US Core Equity ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns BMVP or SPHB?
Invesco S&P 500 High Beta ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-Factor ETF's net margin of --. Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-Factor ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco S&P 500 High Beta ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BMVPInvesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-Factor ETF-- -- -- SPHBInvesco S&P 500 High Beta ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About BMVP or SPHB?
Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-Factor ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco S&P 500 High Beta ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-Factor ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco S&P 500 High Beta ETF, analysts believe Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-Factor ETF is more attractive than Invesco S&P 500 High Beta ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BMVPInvesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-Factor ETF0 0 0 SPHBInvesco S&P 500 High Beta ETF0 0 0 -
Is BMVP or SPHB More Risky?
Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-Factor ETF has a beta of 0.949, which suggesting that the stock is 5.089% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco S&P 500 High Beta ETF has a beta of 1.405, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.509%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BMVP or SPHB?
Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-Factor ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.65%. Invesco S&P 500 High Beta ETF offers a yield of 0.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-Factor ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco S&P 500 High Beta ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BMVP or SPHB?
Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-Factor ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco S&P 500 High Beta ETF quarterly revenues of --. Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-Factor ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco S&P 500 High Beta ETF's net income of --. Notably, Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-Factor ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco S&P 500 High Beta ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-Factor ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco S&P 500 High Beta ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BMVPInvesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-Factor ETF-- -- -- -- SPHBInvesco S&P 500 High Beta ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Google Vs NVIDIA Stock: Which Is Best?
Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) and NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVIDIA) are two of the market’s…
How High Could NVIDIA Stock Go?
NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA) has been one of the best stocks to…
Stock Ideas
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.5T
P/E Ratio: 62x
Buy
61
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Buy
63
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Buy
54
SMX alert for Dec 5
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is up 65.26% over the past day.
Sell
15
HOV alert for Dec 5
Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. [HOV] is up 0.12% over the past day.
Buy
67
NUTX alert for Dec 5
Nutex Health, Inc. [NUTX] is down 0.53% over the past day.
