Is Amazon an AI Stock?
With the market starting to look skittish on pure-play AI…
Buy
62
BUL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$54.27
Seasonality move
:
4.95%
Day range:
$54.13 - $54.52
52-week range:
$37.67 - $54.52
Dividend yield:
0.19%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
14K
Avg. volume:
10.6K
1-year change:
7.71%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BUL
Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BMVP
Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-Factor ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SPHB
Invesco S&P 500 High Beta ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SRHQ
SRH US Quality GARP ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TPLC
Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BUL
Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF
|
$54.42 | -- | -- | -- | $0.03 | 0.19% | -- |
|
BMVP
Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-Factor ETF
|
$49.10 | -- | -- | -- | $0.21 | 1.65% | -- |
|
SPHB
Invesco S&P 500 High Beta ETF
|
$116.59 | -- | -- | -- | $0.20 | 0.54% | -- |
|
SRHQ
SRH US Quality GARP ETF
|
$39.30 | -- | -- | -- | $0.08 | 0.69% | -- |
|
TPLC
Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core ETF
|
$46.12 | -- | -- | -- | $0.01 | 0.87% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BUL
Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF
|
-- | 1.085 | -- | -- |
|
BMVP
Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-Factor ETF
|
-- | 0.545 | -- | -- |
|
SPHB
Invesco S&P 500 High Beta ETF
|
-- | 1.818 | -- | -- |
|
SRHQ
SRH US Quality GARP ETF
|
-- | 0.775 | -- | -- |
|
TPLC
Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core ETF
|
-- | 0.807 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BUL
Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BMVP
Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-Factor ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SPHB
Invesco S&P 500 High Beta ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SRHQ
SRH US Quality GARP ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TPLC
Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns BUL or BMVP?
Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-Factor ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF's net margin of --. Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-Factor ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BULPacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF-- -- -- BMVPInvesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-Factor ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About BUL or BMVP?
Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-Factor ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-Factor ETF, analysts believe Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF is more attractive than Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-Factor ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BULPacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF0 0 0 BMVPInvesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-Factor ETF0 0 0 -
Is BUL or BMVP More Risky?
Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF has a beta of 1.046, which suggesting that the stock is 4.556% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-Factor ETF has a beta of 0.949, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.089%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BUL or BMVP?
Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.19%. Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-Factor ETF offers a yield of 1.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-Factor ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BUL or BMVP?
Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-Factor ETF quarterly revenues of --. Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-Factor ETF's net income of --. Notably, Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-Factor ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-Factor ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BULPacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF-- -- -- -- BMVPInvesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-Factor ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns BUL or SPHB?
Invesco S&P 500 High Beta ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF's net margin of --. Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco S&P 500 High Beta ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BULPacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF-- -- -- SPHBInvesco S&P 500 High Beta ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About BUL or SPHB?
Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco S&P 500 High Beta ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco S&P 500 High Beta ETF, analysts believe Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF is more attractive than Invesco S&P 500 High Beta ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BULPacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF0 0 0 SPHBInvesco S&P 500 High Beta ETF0 0 0 -
Is BUL or SPHB More Risky?
Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF has a beta of 1.046, which suggesting that the stock is 4.556% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco S&P 500 High Beta ETF has a beta of 1.405, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.509%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BUL or SPHB?
Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.19%. Invesco S&P 500 High Beta ETF offers a yield of 0.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco S&P 500 High Beta ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BUL or SPHB?
Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco S&P 500 High Beta ETF quarterly revenues of --. Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco S&P 500 High Beta ETF's net income of --. Notably, Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco S&P 500 High Beta ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco S&P 500 High Beta ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BULPacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF-- -- -- -- SPHBInvesco S&P 500 High Beta ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns BUL or SRHQ?
SRH US Quality GARP ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF's net margin of --. Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF's return on equity of -- beat SRH US Quality GARP ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BULPacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF-- -- -- SRHQSRH US Quality GARP ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About BUL or SRHQ?
Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SRH US Quality GARP ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF has higher upside potential than SRH US Quality GARP ETF, analysts believe Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF is more attractive than SRH US Quality GARP ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BULPacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF0 0 0 SRHQSRH US Quality GARP ETF0 0 0 -
Is BUL or SRHQ More Risky?
Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF has a beta of 1.046, which suggesting that the stock is 4.556% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SRH US Quality GARP ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BUL or SRHQ?
Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.19%. SRH US Quality GARP ETF offers a yield of 0.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SRH US Quality GARP ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BUL or SRHQ?
Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than SRH US Quality GARP ETF quarterly revenues of --. Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF's net income of -- is lower than SRH US Quality GARP ETF's net income of --. Notably, Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SRH US Quality GARP ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF is -- versus -- for SRH US Quality GARP ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BULPacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF-- -- -- -- SRHQSRH US Quality GARP ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns BUL or TPLC?
Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF's net margin of --. Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF's return on equity of -- beat Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BULPacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF-- -- -- TPLCTimothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About BUL or TPLC?
Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF has higher upside potential than Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core ETF, analysts believe Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF is more attractive than Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BULPacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF0 0 0 TPLCTimothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core ETF0 0 0 -
Is BUL or TPLC More Risky?
Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF has a beta of 1.046, which suggesting that the stock is 4.556% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core ETF has a beta of 0.986, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.45%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BUL or TPLC?
Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.19%. Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core ETF offers a yield of 0.87% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BUL or TPLC?
Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core ETF quarterly revenues of --. Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF's net income of -- is lower than Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core ETF's net income of --. Notably, Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF is -- versus -- for Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BULPacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF-- -- -- -- TPLCTimothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Google Vs NVIDIA Stock: Which Is Best?
Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) and NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVIDIA) are two of the market’s…
How High Could NVIDIA Stock Go?
NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA) has been one of the best stocks to…
Stock Ideas
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.5T
P/E Ratio: 62x
Buy
61
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Buy
63
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Buy
54
SMX alert for Dec 5
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is up 154.74% over the past day.
Sell
15
HOV alert for Dec 5
Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. [HOV] is down 22.58% over the past day.
Buy
67
NUTX alert for Dec 5
Nutex Health, Inc. [NUTX] is up 18.9% over the past day.
