Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…
Buy
61
AOR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$67.35
Seasonality move
:
1.22%
Day range:
$67.18 - $67.43
52-week range:
$52.97 - $67.71
Dividend yield:
2.46%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
536.1K
Avg. volume:
393.2K
1-year change:
15.32%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AOR
iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
AOA
iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PICK
iShares MSCI Global Mtls&Mng Prdcrs ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
URTH
iShares MSCI World ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AOR
iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF
|
$67.36 | -- | -- | -- | $0.67 | 2.46% | -- |
|
AOA
iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF
|
$93.38 | -- | -- | -- | $0.86 | 2.09% | -- |
|
PICK
iShares MSCI Global Mtls&Mng Prdcrs ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
URTH
iShares MSCI World ETF
|
$190.84 | -- | -- | -- | $1.50 | 1.44% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AOR
iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF
|
-- | 0.464 | -- | -- |
|
AOA
iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF
|
-- | 0.600 | -- | -- |
|
PICK
iShares MSCI Global Mtls&Mng Prdcrs ETF
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
URTH
iShares MSCI World ETF
|
-- | 0.857 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AOR
iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
AOA
iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PICK
iShares MSCI Global Mtls&Mng Prdcrs ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
URTH
iShares MSCI World ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns AOR or AOA?
iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF's net margin of --. iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AORiShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF-- -- -- AOAiShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About AOR or AOA?
iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF has higher upside potential than iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF, analysts believe iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF is more attractive than iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AORiShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF0 0 0 AOAiShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF0 0 0 -
Is AOR or AOA More Risky?
iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.646, which suggesting that the stock is 35.415% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.775, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.473%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AOR or AOA?
iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.67 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.46%. iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF offers a yield of 2.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.86 per share. iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AOR or AOA?
iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF is -- versus -- for iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AORiShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF-- -- -- -- AOAiShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns AOR or PICK?
iShares MSCI Global Mtls&Mng Prdcrs ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF's net margin of --. iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares MSCI Global Mtls&Mng Prdcrs ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AORiShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF-- -- -- PICKiShares MSCI Global Mtls&Mng Prdcrs ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About AOR or PICK?
iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares MSCI Global Mtls&Mng Prdcrs ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF has higher upside potential than iShares MSCI Global Mtls&Mng Prdcrs ETF, analysts believe iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF is more attractive than iShares MSCI Global Mtls&Mng Prdcrs ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AORiShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF0 0 0 PICKiShares MSCI Global Mtls&Mng Prdcrs ETF0 0 0 -
Is AOR or PICK More Risky?
iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.646, which suggesting that the stock is 35.415% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares MSCI Global Mtls&Mng Prdcrs ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AOR or PICK?
iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.67 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.46%. iShares MSCI Global Mtls&Mng Prdcrs ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares MSCI Global Mtls&Mng Prdcrs ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AOR or PICK?
iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares MSCI Global Mtls&Mng Prdcrs ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares MSCI Global Mtls&Mng Prdcrs ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares MSCI Global Mtls&Mng Prdcrs ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF is -- versus -- for iShares MSCI Global Mtls&Mng Prdcrs ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AORiShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF-- -- -- -- PICKiShares MSCI Global Mtls&Mng Prdcrs ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns AOR or URTH?
iShares MSCI World ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF's net margin of --. iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares MSCI World ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AORiShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF-- -- -- URTHiShares MSCI World ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About AOR or URTH?
iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares MSCI World ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF has higher upside potential than iShares MSCI World ETF, analysts believe iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF is more attractive than iShares MSCI World ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AORiShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF0 0 0 URTHiShares MSCI World ETF0 0 0 -
Is AOR or URTH More Risky?
iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.646, which suggesting that the stock is 35.415% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares MSCI World ETF has a beta of 0.902, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.813%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AOR or URTH?
iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.67 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.46%. iShares MSCI World ETF offers a yield of 1.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.50 per share. iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares MSCI World ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AOR or URTH?
iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares MSCI World ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares MSCI World ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares MSCI World ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF is -- versus -- for iShares MSCI World ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AORiShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF-- -- -- -- URTHiShares MSCI World ETF-- -- -- --
Related Companies
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…
Stock Ideas
Sell
47
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.3T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Sell
48
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Sell
40
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 29x
Alerts
Buy
54
AAOI alert for Feb 28
Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. [AAOI] is up 56.96% over the past day.
Buy
90
BNAI alert for Feb 28
Brand Engagement Network, Inc. [BNAI] is up 36.02% over the past day.
Sell
36
WLDN alert for Feb 28
Willdan Group, Inc. [WLDN] is down 25.56% over the past day.
