Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?
Digital signature software business DocuSign (NASDAQ:DOCU) has been struggling over…
Buy
61
AOR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$65.40
Seasonality move
:
0.12%
Day range:
$65.24 - $65.42
52-week range:
$52.97 - $65.78
Dividend yield:
2.53%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
370K
Avg. volume:
416.1K
1-year change:
12.89%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AOR
iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
AOA
iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EFAV
iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
URTH
iShares MSCI World ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AOR
iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF
|
$65.40 | -- | -- | -- | $0.67 | 2.53% | -- |
|
AOA
iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF
|
$90.22 | -- | -- | -- | $0.86 | 2.16% | -- |
|
EFAV
iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF
|
$86.54 | -- | -- | -- | $1.17 | 3.19% | -- |
|
URTH
iShares MSCI World ETF
|
$187.72 | -- | -- | -- | $1.50 | 1.47% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AOR
iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF
|
-- | 0.511 | -- | -- |
|
AOA
iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF
|
-- | 0.652 | -- | -- |
|
EFAV
iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF
|
-- | 0.692 | -- | -- |
|
URTH
iShares MSCI World ETF
|
-- | 1.135 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AOR
iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
AOA
iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EFAV
iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
URTH
iShares MSCI World ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns AOR or AOA?
iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF's net margin of --. iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AORiShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF-- -- -- AOAiShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About AOR or AOA?
iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF has higher upside potential than iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF, analysts believe iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF is more attractive than iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AORiShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF0 0 0 AOAiShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF0 0 0 -
Is AOR or AOA More Risky?
iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.646, which suggesting that the stock is 35.369% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.777, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.306%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AOR or AOA?
iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.67 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.53%. iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF offers a yield of 2.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.86 per share. iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AOR or AOA?
iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF is -- versus -- for iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AORiShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF-- -- -- -- AOAiShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns AOR or EFAV?
iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF's net margin of --. iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AORiShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF-- -- -- EFAViShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About AOR or EFAV?
iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF has higher upside potential than iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF, analysts believe iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF is more attractive than iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AORiShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF0 0 0 EFAViShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF0 0 0 -
Is AOR or EFAV More Risky?
iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.646, which suggesting that the stock is 35.369% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF has a beta of 0.762, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.816%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AOR or EFAV?
iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.67 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.53%. iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF offers a yield of 3.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.17 per share. iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AOR or EFAV?
iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF is -- versus -- for iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AORiShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF-- -- -- -- EFAViShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns AOR or URTH?
iShares MSCI World ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF's net margin of --. iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares MSCI World ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AORiShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF-- -- -- URTHiShares MSCI World ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About AOR or URTH?
iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares MSCI World ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF has higher upside potential than iShares MSCI World ETF, analysts believe iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF is more attractive than iShares MSCI World ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AORiShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF0 0 0 URTHiShares MSCI World ETF0 0 0 -
Is AOR or URTH More Risky?
iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.646, which suggesting that the stock is 35.369% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares MSCI World ETF has a beta of 0.922, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.81%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AOR or URTH?
iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.67 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.53%. iShares MSCI World ETF offers a yield of 1.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.50 per share. iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares MSCI World ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AOR or URTH?
iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares MSCI World ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares MSCI World ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares MSCI World ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF is -- versus -- for iShares MSCI World ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AORiShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF-- -- -- -- URTHiShares MSCI World ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?
Cybersecurity major SentinelOne (NYSE:S) has struggled over several years, delivering…
Is Broadcom Stock on Sale?
Chip and software maker Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) has been among the…
Stock Ideas
Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
80
TVTX alert for Dec 25
Travere Therapeutics, Inc. [TVTX] is up 14.03% over the past day.
Buy
68
KOD alert for Dec 25
Kodiak Sciences, Inc. [KOD] is up 13.41% over the past day.
Buy
64
ZCSH alert for Dec 25
Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) [ZCSH] is up 5.33% over the past day.
