Will UnitedHealth Stock Recover?
Shares of embattled health insurance giant UnitedHealth (NYSE:UNH) plummeted by…
Buy
73
AOR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$66.74
Seasonality move
:
1.38%
Day range:
$66.13 - $66.75
52-week range:
$52.97 - $66.89
Dividend yield:
2.48%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
540.1K
Avg. volume:
423.4K
1-year change:
13.16%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AOR
iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
AOA
iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CRBN
iShares Low Carbon Optimized MSCI ACWI ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
URTH
iShares MSCI World ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AOR
iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF
|
$66.73 | -- | -- | -- | $0.67 | 2.48% | -- |
|
AOA
iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF
|
$92.53 | -- | -- | -- | $0.86 | 2.11% | -- |
|
CRBN
iShares Low Carbon Optimized MSCI ACWI ETF
|
$237.16 | -- | -- | -- | $3.38 | 2.15% | -- |
|
URTH
iShares MSCI World ETF
|
$190.24 | -- | -- | -- | $1.50 | 1.45% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AOR
iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF
|
-- | 0.464 | -- | -- |
|
AOA
iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF
|
-- | 0.600 | -- | -- |
|
CRBN
iShares Low Carbon Optimized MSCI ACWI ETF
|
-- | 0.904 | -- | -- |
|
URTH
iShares MSCI World ETF
|
-- | 0.857 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AOR
iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
AOA
iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CRBN
iShares Low Carbon Optimized MSCI ACWI ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
URTH
iShares MSCI World ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns AOR or AOA?
iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF's net margin of --. iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AORiShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF-- -- -- AOAiShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About AOR or AOA?
iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF has higher upside potential than iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF, analysts believe iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF is more attractive than iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AORiShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF0 0 0 AOAiShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF0 0 0 -
Is AOR or AOA More Risky?
iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.646, which suggesting that the stock is 35.415% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.775, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.473%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AOR or AOA?
iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.67 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.48%. iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF offers a yield of 2.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.86 per share. iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AOR or AOA?
iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF is -- versus -- for iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AORiShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF-- -- -- -- AOAiShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns AOR or CRBN?
iShares Low Carbon Optimized MSCI ACWI ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF's net margin of --. iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares Low Carbon Optimized MSCI ACWI ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AORiShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF-- -- -- CRBNiShares Low Carbon Optimized MSCI ACWI ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About AOR or CRBN?
iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares Low Carbon Optimized MSCI ACWI ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF has higher upside potential than iShares Low Carbon Optimized MSCI ACWI ETF, analysts believe iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF is more attractive than iShares Low Carbon Optimized MSCI ACWI ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AORiShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF0 0 0 CRBNiShares Low Carbon Optimized MSCI ACWI ETF0 0 0 -
Is AOR or CRBN More Risky?
iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.646, which suggesting that the stock is 35.415% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares Low Carbon Optimized MSCI ACWI ETF has a beta of 0.908, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.188%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AOR or CRBN?
iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.67 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.48%. iShares Low Carbon Optimized MSCI ACWI ETF offers a yield of 2.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $3.38 per share. iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares Low Carbon Optimized MSCI ACWI ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AOR or CRBN?
iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares Low Carbon Optimized MSCI ACWI ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares Low Carbon Optimized MSCI ACWI ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares Low Carbon Optimized MSCI ACWI ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF is -- versus -- for iShares Low Carbon Optimized MSCI ACWI ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AORiShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF-- -- -- -- CRBNiShares Low Carbon Optimized MSCI ACWI ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns AOR or URTH?
iShares MSCI World ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF's net margin of --. iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares MSCI World ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AORiShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF-- -- -- URTHiShares MSCI World ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About AOR or URTH?
iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares MSCI World ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF has higher upside potential than iShares MSCI World ETF, analysts believe iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF is more attractive than iShares MSCI World ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AORiShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF0 0 0 URTHiShares MSCI World ETF0 0 0 -
Is AOR or URTH More Risky?
iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.646, which suggesting that the stock is 35.415% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares MSCI World ETF has a beta of 0.902, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.813%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AOR or URTH?
iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.67 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.48%. iShares MSCI World ETF offers a yield of 1.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.50 per share. iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares MSCI World ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AOR or URTH?
iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares MSCI World ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares MSCI World ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares MSCI World ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF is -- versus -- for iShares MSCI World ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AORiShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF-- -- -- -- URTHiShares MSCI World ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Lumentum The Best Laser Stock to Buy?
Though certainly less well-known than the huge tech businesses that…
Is Planet Fitness Stock Undervalued?
Planet Fitness (NYSE:PLNT) has had a difficult 12 months, retreating…
Stock Ideas
Buy
56
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.5T
P/E Ratio: 63x
Buy
61
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
53
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 30x
Alerts
Sell
40
BILL alert for Feb 7
Bill Holdings, Inc. [BILL] is up 37.11% over the past day.
Buy
75
PRLB alert for Feb 7
Proto Labs, Inc. [PRLB] is up 28.33% over the past day.
Sell
30
MSTR alert for Feb 7
Strategy, Inc. [MSTR] is up 26.08% over the past day.
