Is Lucid Group Stock a Millionaire Maker?
Lucid Group (LCID) is an EV manufacturer with a focus…
Buy
73
AOR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$58.88
Seasonality move
:
1.61%
Day range:
$58.59 - $58.93
52-week range:
$52.97 - $59.77
Dividend yield:
2.63%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
570.4K
Avg. volume:
334.4K
1-year change:
6.44%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AOR
iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
AOA
iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
AOM
iShares Core 40/60 Moderate Allocation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GAL
SPDR SSGA Global Allocation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PCEF
Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AOR
iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF
|
$58.85 | -- | -- | -- | $0.25 | 2.63% | -- |
|
AOA
iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF
|
$79.19 | -- | -- | -- | $0.22 | 2.24% | -- |
|
AOM
iShares Core 40/60 Moderate Allocation ETF
|
$44.33 | -- | -- | -- | $0.25 | 3.1% | -- |
|
GAL
SPDR SSGA Global Allocation ETF
|
$45.61 | -- | -- | -- | $0.18 | 2.97% | -- |
|
PCEF
Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF
|
$18.95 | -- | -- | -- | $0.13 | 8.72% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AOR
iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF
|
-- | 0.520 | -- | -- |
|
AOA
iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF
|
-- | 0.624 | -- | -- |
|
AOM
iShares Core 40/60 Moderate Allocation ETF
|
-- | 0.396 | -- | -- |
|
GAL
SPDR SSGA Global Allocation ETF
|
-- | 0.397 | -- | -- |
|
PCEF
Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF
|
-- | 0.683 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AOR
iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
AOA
iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
AOM
iShares Core 40/60 Moderate Allocation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GAL
SPDR SSGA Global Allocation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PCEF
Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns AOR or AOA?
iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF's net margin of --. iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AORiShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF-- -- -- AOAiShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About AOR or AOA?
iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF has higher upside potential than iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF, analysts believe iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF is more attractive than iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AORiShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF0 0 0 AOAiShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF0 0 0 -
Is AOR or AOA More Risky?
iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.646, which suggesting that the stock is 35.431% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.782, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.805%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AOR or AOA?
iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.63%. iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF offers a yield of 2.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AOR or AOA?
iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF is -- versus -- for iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AORiShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF-- -- -- -- AOAiShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns AOR or AOM?
iShares Core 40/60 Moderate Allocation ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF's net margin of --. iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares Core 40/60 Moderate Allocation ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AORiShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF-- -- -- AOMiShares Core 40/60 Moderate Allocation ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About AOR or AOM?
iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares Core 40/60 Moderate Allocation ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF has higher upside potential than iShares Core 40/60 Moderate Allocation ETF, analysts believe iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF is more attractive than iShares Core 40/60 Moderate Allocation ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AORiShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF0 0 0 AOMiShares Core 40/60 Moderate Allocation ETF0 0 0 -
Is AOR or AOM More Risky?
iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.646, which suggesting that the stock is 35.431% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares Core 40/60 Moderate Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.512, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.831%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AOR or AOM?
iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.63%. iShares Core 40/60 Moderate Allocation ETF offers a yield of 3.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares Core 40/60 Moderate Allocation ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AOR or AOM?
iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares Core 40/60 Moderate Allocation ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares Core 40/60 Moderate Allocation ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares Core 40/60 Moderate Allocation ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF is -- versus -- for iShares Core 40/60 Moderate Allocation ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AORiShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF-- -- -- -- AOMiShares Core 40/60 Moderate Allocation ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns AOR or GAL?
SPDR SSGA Global Allocation ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF's net margin of --. iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF's return on equity of -- beat SPDR SSGA Global Allocation ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AORiShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF-- -- -- GALSPDR SSGA Global Allocation ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About AOR or GAL?
iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SPDR SSGA Global Allocation ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF has higher upside potential than SPDR SSGA Global Allocation ETF, analysts believe iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF is more attractive than SPDR SSGA Global Allocation ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AORiShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF0 0 0 GALSPDR SSGA Global Allocation ETF0 0 0 -
Is AOR or GAL More Risky?
iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.646, which suggesting that the stock is 35.431% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SPDR SSGA Global Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.634, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.64%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AOR or GAL?
iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.63%. SPDR SSGA Global Allocation ETF offers a yield of 2.97% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SPDR SSGA Global Allocation ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AOR or GAL?
iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than SPDR SSGA Global Allocation ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF's net income of -- is lower than SPDR SSGA Global Allocation ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SPDR SSGA Global Allocation ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF is -- versus -- for SPDR SSGA Global Allocation ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AORiShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF-- -- -- -- GALSPDR SSGA Global Allocation ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns AOR or PCEF?
Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF's net margin of --. iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AORiShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF-- -- -- PCEFInvesco CEF Income Composite ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About AOR or PCEF?
iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF, analysts believe iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF is more attractive than Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AORiShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF0 0 0 PCEFInvesco CEF Income Composite ETF0 0 0 -
Is AOR or PCEF More Risky?
iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.646, which suggesting that the stock is 35.431% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF has a beta of 0.781, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.897%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AOR or PCEF?
iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.63%. Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF offers a yield of 8.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AOR or PCEF?
iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AORiShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF-- -- -- -- PCEFInvesco CEF Income Composite ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Enovix an Underrated Small Cap?
Enovix (NASDAQ:ENVX) is one of several small, innovative companies hoping…
Are We Heading Toward a Recession?
Fears of a recession in 2025 grew at the end…
Stock Ideas
Buy
68
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Sell
48
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.1T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Buy
70
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.8T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Buy
64
RGC alert for May 13
Regencell Bioscience Holdings [RGC] is up 28.41% over the past day.
Buy
82
NRG alert for May 13
NRG Energy [NRG] is up 26.29% over the past day.
Sell
44
GDXU alert for May 13
MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETN [GDXU] is down 22.92% over the past day.
