Why Caesars’ Digital Arm May Be the Gaming Giant’s Best-Kept Secret
It’s not often that a company with the scale and…
Sell
40
AOA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$76.93
Seasonality move
:
0.82%
Day range:
$75.96 - $77.28
52-week range:
$67.05 - $80.20
Dividend yield:
2.29%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
211.8K
Avg. volume:
134.5K
1-year change:
12.02%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AOA
iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
AOM
iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
AOR
iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DRAI
Draco Evolution AI ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NDAA
Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PCEF
Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AOA
iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF
|
$76.79 | -- | -- | -- | $0.74 | 2.29% | -- |
|
AOM
iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF
|
$43.53 | -- | -- | -- | $0.53 | 3.09% | -- |
|
AOR
iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF
|
$57.49 | -- | -- | -- | $0.61 | 2.65% | -- |
|
DRAI
Draco Evolution AI ETF
|
$23.52 | -- | -- | -- | $0.04 | 0.16% | -- |
|
NDAA
Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF
|
$19.69 | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
PCEF
Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF
|
$19.23 | -- | -- | -- | $0.14 | 8.73% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AOA
iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF
|
-- | 0.783 | -- | -- |
|
AOM
iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF
|
-- | 0.560 | -- | -- |
|
AOR
iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF
|
-- | 0.678 | -- | -- |
|
DRAI
Draco Evolution AI ETF
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
NDAA
Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
PCEF
Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF
|
-- | 0.748 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AOA
iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
AOM
iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
AOR
iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DRAI
Draco Evolution AI ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NDAA
Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PCEF
Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns AOA or AOM?
iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF's net margin of --. iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AOAiShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF-- -- -- AOMiShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About AOA or AOM?
iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF has higher upside potential than iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF, analysts believe iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF is more attractive than iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AOAiShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF0 0 0 AOMiShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF0 0 0 -
Is AOA or AOM More Risky?
iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.800, which suggesting that the stock is 19.966% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.497, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.329%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AOA or AOM?
iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.74 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.29%. iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF offers a yield of 3.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.53 per share. iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AOA or AOM?
iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF is -- versus -- for iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AOAiShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF-- -- -- -- AOMiShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns AOA or AOR?
iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF's net margin of --. iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AOAiShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF-- -- -- AORiShares Core Growth Allocation ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About AOA or AOR?
iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF has higher upside potential than iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF, analysts believe iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF is more attractive than iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AOAiShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF0 0 0 AORiShares Core Growth Allocation ETF0 0 0 -
Is AOA or AOR More Risky?
iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.800, which suggesting that the stock is 19.966% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.648, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.214%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AOA or AOR?
iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.74 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.29%. iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF offers a yield of 2.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.61 per share. iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AOA or AOR?
iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF is -- versus -- for iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AOAiShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF-- -- -- -- AORiShares Core Growth Allocation ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns AOA or DRAI?
Draco Evolution AI ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF's net margin of --. iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF's return on equity of -- beat Draco Evolution AI ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AOAiShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF-- -- -- DRAIDraco Evolution AI ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About AOA or DRAI?
iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Draco Evolution AI ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF has higher upside potential than Draco Evolution AI ETF, analysts believe iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF is more attractive than Draco Evolution AI ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AOAiShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF0 0 0 DRAIDraco Evolution AI ETF0 0 0 -
Is AOA or DRAI More Risky?
iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.800, which suggesting that the stock is 19.966% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Draco Evolution AI ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AOA or DRAI?
iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.74 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.29%. Draco Evolution AI ETF offers a yield of 0.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Draco Evolution AI ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AOA or DRAI?
iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Draco Evolution AI ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF's net income of -- is lower than Draco Evolution AI ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Draco Evolution AI ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF is -- versus -- for Draco Evolution AI ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AOAiShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF-- -- -- -- DRAIDraco Evolution AI ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns AOA or NDAA?
Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF's net margin of --. iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF's return on equity of -- beat Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AOAiShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF-- -- -- NDAANed Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About AOA or NDAA?
iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF has higher upside potential than Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF, analysts believe iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF is more attractive than Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AOAiShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF0 0 0 NDAANed Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF0 0 0 -
Is AOA or NDAA More Risky?
iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.800, which suggesting that the stock is 19.966% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AOA or NDAA?
iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.74 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.29%. Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AOA or NDAA?
iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF's net income of -- is lower than Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF is -- versus -- for Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AOAiShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF-- -- -- -- NDAANed Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns AOA or PCEF?
Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF's net margin of --. iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AOAiShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF-- -- -- PCEFInvesco CEF Income Composite ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About AOA or PCEF?
iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF, analysts believe iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF is more attractive than Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AOAiShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF0 0 0 PCEFInvesco CEF Income Composite ETF0 0 0 -
Is AOA or PCEF More Risky?
iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.800, which suggesting that the stock is 19.966% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF has a beta of 0.851, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.93%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AOA or PCEF?
iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.74 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.29%. Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF offers a yield of 8.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AOA or PCEF?
iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AOAiShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF-- -- -- -- PCEFInvesco CEF Income Composite ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will Tyson Foods Stock Bounce Back?
Tyson Foods, Inc. (NYSE:TSN) is one of the biggest food…
Will Iovance Biotherapeutics Stock Bounce Back?
Iovance Biotherapeutics (NASDAQ:IOVA) is a fledgling pharmaceutical company that specializes…
Stock Ideas
Buy
64
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 113x
Buy
55
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Alerts
Buy
61
QMCO alert for Dec 23
Quantum [QMCO] is up 6.11% over the past day.
Sell
46
NUKK alert for Dec 23
Nukkleus [NUKK] is up 16.63% over the past day.
Sell
1
IIPR alert for Dec 23
Innovative Industrial Properties [IIPR] is down 1.74% over the past day.
