Financhill
Buy
72

AOA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$89.75
Seasonality move :
1.91%
Day range:
$89.65 - $89.92
52-week range:
$68.45 - $90.35
Dividend yield:
2.04%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
76.1K
Avg. volume:
98K
1-year change:
12.45%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
AOA
iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF
-- -- -- -- --
AOR
iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF
-- -- -- -- --
PPH
VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF
-- -- -- -- --
URTH
iShares MSCI World ETF
-- -- -- -- --
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
AOA
iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF
$89.80 -- -- -- $0.25 2.04% --
AOR
iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF
$65.38 -- -- -- $0.27 2.44% --
PPH
VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF
$99.85 -- -- -- $0.39 1.94% --
URTH
iShares MSCI World ETF
$186.25 -- -- -- $1.26 1.27% --
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
AOA
iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF
-- 0.652 -- --
AOR
iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF
-- 0.511 -- --
PPH
VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF
-- 0.233 -- --
URTH
iShares MSCI World ETF
-- 1.135 -- --
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
AOA
iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF
-- -- -- -- -- --
AOR
iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF
-- -- -- -- -- --
PPH
VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF
-- -- -- -- -- --
URTH
iShares MSCI World ETF
-- -- -- -- -- --

iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns AOA or AOR?

    iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF's net margin of --. iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    AOA
    iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF
    -- -- --
    AOR
    iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About AOA or AOR?

    iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF has higher upside potential than iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF, analysts believe iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF is more attractive than iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    AOA
    iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF
    0 0 0
    AOR
    iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF
    0 0 0
  • Is AOA or AOR More Risky?

    iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.777, which suggesting that the stock is 22.306% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.646, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.369%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock AOA or AOR?

    iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.04%. iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF offers a yield of 2.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios AOA or AOR?

    iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF is -- versus -- for iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    AOA
    iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF
    -- -- -- --
    AOR
    iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF
    -- -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns AOA or PPH?

    VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF's net margin of --. iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF's return on equity of -- beat VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    AOA
    iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF
    -- -- --
    PPH
    VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About AOA or PPH?

    iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF has higher upside potential than VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF, analysts believe iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF is more attractive than VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    AOA
    iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF
    0 0 0
    PPH
    VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF
    0 0 0
  • Is AOA or PPH More Risky?

    iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.777, which suggesting that the stock is 22.306% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF has a beta of 0.549, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.102%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock AOA or PPH?

    iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.04%. VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF offers a yield of 1.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share. iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios AOA or PPH?

    iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF's net income of -- is lower than VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF is -- versus -- for VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    AOA
    iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF
    -- -- -- --
    PPH
    VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF
    -- -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns AOA or URTH?

    iShares MSCI World ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF's net margin of --. iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares MSCI World ETF's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    AOA
    iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF
    -- -- --
    URTH
    iShares MSCI World ETF
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About AOA or URTH?

    iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares MSCI World ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF has higher upside potential than iShares MSCI World ETF, analysts believe iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF is more attractive than iShares MSCI World ETF.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    AOA
    iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF
    0 0 0
    URTH
    iShares MSCI World ETF
    0 0 0
  • Is AOA or URTH More Risky?

    iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.777, which suggesting that the stock is 22.306% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares MSCI World ETF has a beta of 0.922, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.81%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock AOA or URTH?

    iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.04%. iShares MSCI World ETF offers a yield of 1.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.26 per share. iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares MSCI World ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios AOA or URTH?

    iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares MSCI World ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares MSCI World ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares MSCI World ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF is -- versus -- for iShares MSCI World ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    AOA
    iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF
    -- -- -- --
    URTH
    iShares MSCI World ETF
    -- -- -- --

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Is Amazon an AI Stock?
Is Amazon an AI Stock?

With the market starting to look skittish on pure-play AI…

Google Vs NVIDIA Stock: Which Is Best?
Google Vs NVIDIA Stock: Which Is Best?

Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) and NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVIDIA) are two of the market’s…

How High Could NVIDIA Stock Go?
How High Could NVIDIA Stock Go?

NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA) has been one of the best stocks to…

Stock Ideas

Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.5T
P/E Ratio: 62x

Buy
61
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 38x

Buy
63
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 40x

Alerts

Buy
54
SMX alert for Dec 5

SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is up 154.74% over the past day.

Sell
15
HOV alert for Dec 5

Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. [HOV] is down 22.58% over the past day.

Buy
67
NUTX alert for Dec 5

Nutex Health, Inc. [NUTX] is up 18.9% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock