YMM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Global Mofy AI has a net margin of 17.59% compared to Full Truck Alliance's net margin of --. Full Truck Alliance's return on equity of 8.41% beat Global Mofy AI's return on equity of 65.29%.

Full Truck Alliance has a consensus price target of $15.46, signalling upside risk potential of 32.78%. On the other hand Global Mofy AI has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Full Truck Alliance has higher upside potential than Global Mofy AI, analysts believe Full Truck Alliance is more attractive than Global Mofy AI.

Full Truck Alliance has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global Mofy AI has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Full Truck Alliance has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.82%. Global Mofy AI offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Full Truck Alliance pays 34.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Global Mofy AI pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Full Truck Alliance's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Full Truck Alliance quarterly revenues are $441.2M, which are larger than Global Mofy AI quarterly revenues of --. Full Truck Alliance's net income of $77.6M is higher than Global Mofy AI's net income of --. Notably, Full Truck Alliance's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.93x while Global Mofy AI's PE ratio is 0.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Full Truck Alliance is 7.80x versus 0.11x for Global Mofy AI. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

9F has a net margin of 17.59% compared to Full Truck Alliance's net margin of --. Full Truck Alliance's return on equity of 8.41% beat 9F's return on equity of 0.22%.

Full Truck Alliance has a consensus price target of $15.46, signalling upside risk potential of 32.78%. On the other hand 9F has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 12197.86%. Given that 9F has higher upside potential than Full Truck Alliance, analysts believe 9F is more attractive than Full Truck Alliance.

Full Truck Alliance has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison 9F has a beta of 0.882, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.768%.

Full Truck Alliance has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.82%. 9F offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Full Truck Alliance pays 34.67% of its earnings as a dividend. 9F pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Full Truck Alliance's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Full Truck Alliance quarterly revenues are $441.2M, which are larger than 9F quarterly revenues of --. Full Truck Alliance's net income of $77.6M is higher than 9F's net income of --. Notably, Full Truck Alliance's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.93x while 9F's PE ratio is 9.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Full Truck Alliance is 7.80x versus 0.02x for 9F. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Jianzhi Education Technology Group has a net margin of 17.59% compared to Full Truck Alliance's net margin of --. Full Truck Alliance's return on equity of 8.41% beat Jianzhi Education Technology Group's return on equity of -252.25%.

Full Truck Alliance has a consensus price target of $15.46, signalling upside risk potential of 32.78%. On the other hand Jianzhi Education Technology Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Full Truck Alliance has higher upside potential than Jianzhi Education Technology Group, analysts believe Full Truck Alliance is more attractive than Jianzhi Education Technology Group.

Full Truck Alliance has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Jianzhi Education Technology Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Full Truck Alliance has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.82%. Jianzhi Education Technology Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Full Truck Alliance pays 34.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Jianzhi Education Technology Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Full Truck Alliance's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Full Truck Alliance quarterly revenues are $441.2M, which are larger than Jianzhi Education Technology Group quarterly revenues of --. Full Truck Alliance's net income of $77.6M is higher than Jianzhi Education Technology Group's net income of --. Notably, Full Truck Alliance's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.93x while Jianzhi Education Technology Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Full Truck Alliance is 7.80x versus 0.31x for Jianzhi Education Technology Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

VNET Group has a net margin of 17.59% compared to Full Truck Alliance's net margin of -0.49%. Full Truck Alliance's return on equity of 8.41% beat VNET Group's return on equity of 2.74%.

Full Truck Alliance has a consensus price target of $15.46, signalling upside risk potential of 32.78%. On the other hand VNET Group has an analysts' consensus of $14.61 which suggests that it could grow by 143.55%. Given that VNET Group has higher upside potential than Full Truck Alliance, analysts believe VNET Group is more attractive than Full Truck Alliance.

Full Truck Alliance has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VNET Group has a beta of 0.141, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.943%.

Full Truck Alliance has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.82%. VNET Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Full Truck Alliance pays 34.67% of its earnings as a dividend. VNET Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Full Truck Alliance's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Full Truck Alliance quarterly revenues are $441.2M, which are larger than VNET Group quarterly revenues of $312.2M. Full Truck Alliance's net income of $77.6M is higher than VNET Group's net income of -$1.5M. Notably, Full Truck Alliance's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.93x while VNET Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Full Truck Alliance is 7.80x versus 1.46x for VNET Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.