WTM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Markel Group, Inc. has a net margin of 18.54% compared to White Mountains Insurance Group Ltd.'s net margin of 17.49%. White Mountains Insurance Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 4.93% beat Markel Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.93%.

White Mountains Insurance Group Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Markel Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $2,051.40 which suggests that it could fall by -6.03%. Given that Markel Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than White Mountains Insurance Group Ltd., analysts believe Markel Group, Inc. is more attractive than White Mountains Insurance Group Ltd..

White Mountains Insurance Group Ltd. has a beta of 0.359, which suggesting that the stock is 64.053% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Markel Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.808, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.207%.

White Mountains Insurance Group Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.05%. Markel Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. White Mountains Insurance Group Ltd. pays 1.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Markel Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. White Mountains Insurance Group Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

White Mountains Insurance Group Ltd. quarterly revenues are $864.2M, which are smaller than Markel Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $4.4B. White Mountains Insurance Group Ltd.'s net income of $160.2M is lower than Markel Group, Inc.'s net income of $763.8M. Notably, White Mountains Insurance Group Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 37.98x while Markel Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 13.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for White Mountains Insurance Group Ltd. is 2.14x versus 1.72x for Markel Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Safety Insurance Group, Inc. has a net margin of 18.54% compared to White Mountains Insurance Group Ltd.'s net margin of 8.72%. White Mountains Insurance Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 4.93% beat Safety Insurance Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.14%.

White Mountains Insurance Group Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Safety Insurance Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -11.54%. Given that Safety Insurance Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than White Mountains Insurance Group Ltd., analysts believe Safety Insurance Group, Inc. is more attractive than White Mountains Insurance Group Ltd..

White Mountains Insurance Group Ltd. has a beta of 0.359, which suggesting that the stock is 64.053% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Safety Insurance Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.251, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 74.921%.

White Mountains Insurance Group Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.05%. Safety Insurance Group, Inc. offers a yield of 4.6% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.92 per share. White Mountains Insurance Group Ltd. pays 1.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Safety Insurance Group, Inc. pays out 75.24% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

White Mountains Insurance Group Ltd. quarterly revenues are $864.2M, which are larger than Safety Insurance Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $324.7M. White Mountains Insurance Group Ltd.'s net income of $160.2M is higher than Safety Insurance Group, Inc.'s net income of $28.3M. Notably, White Mountains Insurance Group Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 37.98x while Safety Insurance Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 13.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for White Mountains Insurance Group Ltd. is 2.14x versus 0.95x for Safety Insurance Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Selective Insurance Group, Inc. has a net margin of 18.54% compared to White Mountains Insurance Group Ltd.'s net margin of 8.49%. White Mountains Insurance Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 4.93% beat Selective Insurance Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 12.4%.

White Mountains Insurance Group Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Selective Insurance Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $83.86 which suggests that it could fall by -0.84%. Given that Selective Insurance Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than White Mountains Insurance Group Ltd., analysts believe Selective Insurance Group, Inc. is more attractive than White Mountains Insurance Group Ltd..

White Mountains Insurance Group Ltd. has a beta of 0.359, which suggesting that the stock is 64.053% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Selective Insurance Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.263, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.695%.

White Mountains Insurance Group Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.05%. Selective Insurance Group, Inc. offers a yield of 1.86% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share. White Mountains Insurance Group Ltd. pays 1.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Selective Insurance Group, Inc. pays out 44.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

White Mountains Insurance Group Ltd. quarterly revenues are $864.2M, which are smaller than Selective Insurance Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.4B. White Mountains Insurance Group Ltd.'s net income of $160.2M is higher than Selective Insurance Group, Inc.'s net income of $115.3M. Notably, White Mountains Insurance Group Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 37.98x while Selective Insurance Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 13.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for White Mountains Insurance Group Ltd. is 2.14x versus 0.99x for Selective Insurance Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

United Fire Group, Inc. has a net margin of 18.54% compared to White Mountains Insurance Group Ltd.'s net margin of 11.07%. White Mountains Insurance Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 4.93% beat United Fire Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.47%.

White Mountains Insurance Group Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand United Fire Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $37.50 which suggests that it could grow by 1.43%. Given that United Fire Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than White Mountains Insurance Group Ltd., analysts believe United Fire Group, Inc. is more attractive than White Mountains Insurance Group Ltd..

White Mountains Insurance Group Ltd. has a beta of 0.359, which suggesting that the stock is 64.053% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison United Fire Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.474, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.58%.

White Mountains Insurance Group Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.05%. United Fire Group, Inc. offers a yield of 1.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. White Mountains Insurance Group Ltd. pays 1.11% of its earnings as a dividend. United Fire Group, Inc. pays out 26.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

White Mountains Insurance Group Ltd. quarterly revenues are $864.2M, which are larger than United Fire Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $354M. White Mountains Insurance Group Ltd.'s net income of $160.2M is higher than United Fire Group, Inc.'s net income of $39.2M. Notably, White Mountains Insurance Group Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 37.98x while United Fire Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 8.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for White Mountains Insurance Group Ltd. is 2.14x versus 0.72x for United Fire Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.