WTM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

The Allstate Corp. has a net margin of 18.54% compared to White Mountains Insurance Group Ltd.'s net margin of 22.06%. White Mountains Insurance Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 21.54% beat The Allstate Corp.'s return on equity of 40.9%.

White Mountains Insurance Group Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand The Allstate Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $239.95 which suggests that it could grow by 12.78%. Given that The Allstate Corp. has higher upside potential than White Mountains Insurance Group Ltd., analysts believe The Allstate Corp. is more attractive than White Mountains Insurance Group Ltd..

White Mountains Insurance Group Ltd. has a beta of 0.320, which suggesting that the stock is 67.963% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Allstate Corp. has a beta of 0.227, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 77.335%.

White Mountains Insurance Group Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.05%. The Allstate Corp. offers a yield of 1.92% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.08 per share. White Mountains Insurance Group Ltd. pays 0.23% of its earnings as a dividend. The Allstate Corp. pays out 10.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

White Mountains Insurance Group Ltd. quarterly revenues are $754.5M, which are smaller than The Allstate Corp. quarterly revenues of $17.3B. White Mountains Insurance Group Ltd.'s net income of $803.5M is lower than The Allstate Corp.'s net income of $3.8B. Notably, White Mountains Insurance Group Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 5.19x while The Allstate Corp.'s PE ratio is 5.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for White Mountains Insurance Group Ltd. is 1.97x versus 0.84x for The Allstate Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cincinnati Financial Corp. has a net margin of 18.54% compared to White Mountains Insurance Group Ltd.'s net margin of 21.87%. White Mountains Insurance Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 21.54% beat Cincinnati Financial Corp.'s return on equity of 16.33%.

White Mountains Insurance Group Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Cincinnati Financial Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $173.67 which suggests that it could grow by 2.17%. Given that Cincinnati Financial Corp. has higher upside potential than White Mountains Insurance Group Ltd., analysts believe Cincinnati Financial Corp. is more attractive than White Mountains Insurance Group Ltd..

White Mountains Insurance Group Ltd. has a beta of 0.320, which suggesting that the stock is 67.963% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cincinnati Financial Corp. has a beta of 0.634, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.568%.

White Mountains Insurance Group Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.05%. Cincinnati Financial Corp. offers a yield of 2.05% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.87 per share. White Mountains Insurance Group Ltd. pays 0.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Cincinnati Financial Corp. pays out 22.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

White Mountains Insurance Group Ltd. quarterly revenues are $754.5M, which are smaller than Cincinnati Financial Corp. quarterly revenues of $3.1B. White Mountains Insurance Group Ltd.'s net income of $803.5M is higher than Cincinnati Financial Corp.'s net income of $676M. Notably, White Mountains Insurance Group Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 5.19x while Cincinnati Financial Corp.'s PE ratio is 11.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for White Mountains Insurance Group Ltd. is 1.97x versus 2.12x for Cincinnati Financial Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CNA Financial Corp. has a net margin of 18.54% compared to White Mountains Insurance Group Ltd.'s net margin of 7.89%. White Mountains Insurance Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 21.54% beat CNA Financial Corp.'s return on equity of 11.75%.

White Mountains Insurance Group Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CNA Financial Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $43.00 which suggests that it could fall by -13.27%. Given that CNA Financial Corp. has higher upside potential than White Mountains Insurance Group Ltd., analysts believe CNA Financial Corp. is more attractive than White Mountains Insurance Group Ltd..

White Mountains Insurance Group Ltd. has a beta of 0.320, which suggesting that the stock is 67.963% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CNA Financial Corp. has a beta of 0.345, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.455%.

White Mountains Insurance Group Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.05%. CNA Financial Corp. offers a yield of 3.75% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.48 per share. White Mountains Insurance Group Ltd. pays 0.23% of its earnings as a dividend. CNA Financial Corp. pays out 39.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

White Mountains Insurance Group Ltd. quarterly revenues are $754.5M, which are smaller than CNA Financial Corp. quarterly revenues of $3.8B. White Mountains Insurance Group Ltd.'s net income of $803.5M is higher than CNA Financial Corp.'s net income of $302M. Notably, White Mountains Insurance Group Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 5.19x while CNA Financial Corp.'s PE ratio is 10.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for White Mountains Insurance Group Ltd. is 1.97x versus 0.90x for CNA Financial Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Horace Mann Educators Corp. has a net margin of 18.54% compared to White Mountains Insurance Group Ltd.'s net margin of 8.33%. White Mountains Insurance Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 21.54% beat Horace Mann Educators Corp.'s return on equity of 11.72%.

White Mountains Insurance Group Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Horace Mann Educators Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $49.33 which suggests that it could grow by 11.06%. Given that Horace Mann Educators Corp. has higher upside potential than White Mountains Insurance Group Ltd., analysts believe Horace Mann Educators Corp. is more attractive than White Mountains Insurance Group Ltd..

White Mountains Insurance Group Ltd. has a beta of 0.320, which suggesting that the stock is 67.963% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Horace Mann Educators Corp. has a beta of 0.064, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 93.585%.

White Mountains Insurance Group Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.05%. Horace Mann Educators Corp. offers a yield of 3.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. White Mountains Insurance Group Ltd. pays 0.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Horace Mann Educators Corp. pays out 35.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

White Mountains Insurance Group Ltd. quarterly revenues are $754.5M, which are larger than Horace Mann Educators Corp. quarterly revenues of $434.8M. White Mountains Insurance Group Ltd.'s net income of $803.5M is higher than Horace Mann Educators Corp.'s net income of $36.2M. Notably, White Mountains Insurance Group Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 5.19x while Horace Mann Educators Corp.'s PE ratio is 11.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for White Mountains Insurance Group Ltd. is 1.97x versus 1.09x for Horace Mann Educators Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.