WOLF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Intel has a net margin of -206.21% compared to Wolfspeed's net margin of -6.48%. Wolfspeed's return on equity of -120.58% beat Intel's return on equity of -17.53%.

Wolfspeed has a consensus price target of $4.78, signalling upside risk potential of 45.66%. On the other hand Intel has an analysts' consensus of $21.34 which suggests that it could fall by -0.36%. Given that Wolfspeed has higher upside potential than Intel, analysts believe Wolfspeed is more attractive than Intel.

Wolfspeed has a beta of 1.616, which suggesting that the stock is 61.613% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intel has a beta of 1.154, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.441%.

Wolfspeed has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Intel offers a yield of 2.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Wolfspeed pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Intel pays out -8.53% of its earnings as a dividend.

Wolfspeed quarterly revenues are $180.5M, which are smaller than Intel quarterly revenues of $12.7B. Wolfspeed's net income of -$372.2M is higher than Intel's net income of -$821M. Notably, Wolfspeed's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Intel's PE ratio is 95.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Wolfspeed is 0.54x versus 1.74x for Intel. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NVIDIA has a net margin of -206.21% compared to Wolfspeed's net margin of 56.17%. Wolfspeed's return on equity of -120.58% beat NVIDIA's return on equity of 123.32%.

Wolfspeed has a consensus price target of $4.78, signalling upside risk potential of 45.66%. On the other hand NVIDIA has an analysts' consensus of $163.12 which suggests that it could grow by 39.84%. Given that Wolfspeed has higher upside potential than NVIDIA, analysts believe Wolfspeed is more attractive than NVIDIA.

Wolfspeed has a beta of 1.616, which suggesting that the stock is 61.613% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NVIDIA has a beta of 2.113, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 111.31%.

Wolfspeed has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NVIDIA offers a yield of 0.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Wolfspeed pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA pays out 1.14% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Wolfspeed quarterly revenues are $180.5M, which are smaller than NVIDIA quarterly revenues of $39.3B. Wolfspeed's net income of -$372.2M is lower than NVIDIA's net income of $22.1B. Notably, Wolfspeed's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NVIDIA's PE ratio is 39.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Wolfspeed is 0.54x versus 22.17x for NVIDIA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Onto Innovation has a net margin of -206.21% compared to Wolfspeed's net margin of 24.04%. Wolfspeed's return on equity of -120.58% beat Onto Innovation's return on equity of 11.69%.

Wolfspeed has a consensus price target of $4.78, signalling upside risk potential of 45.66%. On the other hand Onto Innovation has an analysts' consensus of $150.80 which suggests that it could grow by 70.4%. Given that Onto Innovation has higher upside potential than Wolfspeed, analysts believe Onto Innovation is more attractive than Wolfspeed.

Wolfspeed has a beta of 1.616, which suggesting that the stock is 61.613% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Onto Innovation has a beta of 1.553, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.292%.

Wolfspeed has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Onto Innovation offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Wolfspeed pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Onto Innovation pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Wolfspeed quarterly revenues are $180.5M, which are smaller than Onto Innovation quarterly revenues of $266.6M. Wolfspeed's net income of -$372.2M is lower than Onto Innovation's net income of $64.1M. Notably, Wolfspeed's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Onto Innovation's PE ratio is 20.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Wolfspeed is 0.54x versus 4.28x for Onto Innovation. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Texas Instruments has a net margin of -206.21% compared to Wolfspeed's net margin of 28.98%. Wolfspeed's return on equity of -120.58% beat Texas Instruments's return on equity of 28.74%.

Wolfspeed has a consensus price target of $4.78, signalling upside risk potential of 45.66%. On the other hand Texas Instruments has an analysts' consensus of $177.42 which suggests that it could grow by 2.99%. Given that Wolfspeed has higher upside potential than Texas Instruments, analysts believe Wolfspeed is more attractive than Texas Instruments.

Wolfspeed has a beta of 1.616, which suggesting that the stock is 61.613% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Texas Instruments has a beta of 0.968, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.158%.

Wolfspeed has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Texas Instruments offers a yield of 3.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.36 per share. Wolfspeed pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Texas Instruments pays out 99.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Texas Instruments's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Wolfspeed quarterly revenues are $180.5M, which are smaller than Texas Instruments quarterly revenues of $4.1B. Wolfspeed's net income of -$372.2M is lower than Texas Instruments's net income of $1.2B. Notably, Wolfspeed's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Texas Instruments's PE ratio is 32.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Wolfspeed is 0.54x versus 9.86x for Texas Instruments. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.