WOLF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Intel has a net margin of -144.94% compared to Wolfspeed's net margin of -125.26%. Wolfspeed's return on equity of -76.14% beat Intel's return on equity of -14.47%.

Wolfspeed has a consensus price target of $13.95, signalling upside risk potential of 79.96%. On the other hand Intel has an analysts' consensus of $24.33 which suggests that it could grow by 20.44%. Given that Wolfspeed has higher upside potential than Intel, analysts believe Wolfspeed is more attractive than Intel.

Wolfspeed has a beta of 1.379, which suggesting that the stock is 37.862% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intel has a beta of 1.052, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.181%.

Wolfspeed has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Intel offers a yield of 2.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Wolfspeed pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Intel pays out 182.83% of its earnings as a dividend.

Wolfspeed quarterly revenues are $194.7M, which are smaller than Intel quarterly revenues of $13.3B. Wolfspeed's net income of -$282.2M is higher than Intel's net income of -$16.6B. Notably, Wolfspeed's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Intel's PE ratio is 91.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Wolfspeed is 1.21x versus 1.59x for Intel. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Micron Technology has a net margin of -144.94% compared to Wolfspeed's net margin of 21.47%. Wolfspeed's return on equity of -76.14% beat Micron Technology's return on equity of 8.71%.

Wolfspeed has a consensus price target of $13.95, signalling upside risk potential of 79.96%. On the other hand Micron Technology has an analysts' consensus of $132.01 which suggests that it could grow by 47.13%. Given that Wolfspeed has higher upside potential than Micron Technology, analysts believe Wolfspeed is more attractive than Micron Technology.

Wolfspeed has a beta of 1.379, which suggesting that the stock is 37.862% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Micron Technology has a beta of 1.160, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.005%.

Wolfspeed has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Micron Technology offers a yield of 0.51% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Wolfspeed pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Micron Technology pays out 65.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Micron Technology's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Wolfspeed quarterly revenues are $194.7M, which are smaller than Micron Technology quarterly revenues of $8.7B. Wolfspeed's net income of -$282.2M is lower than Micron Technology's net income of $1.9B. Notably, Wolfspeed's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Micron Technology's PE ratio is 25.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Wolfspeed is 1.21x versus 3.48x for Micron Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NVIDIA has a net margin of -144.94% compared to Wolfspeed's net margin of 55.04%. Wolfspeed's return on equity of -76.14% beat NVIDIA's return on equity of 126.43%.

Wolfspeed has a consensus price target of $13.95, signalling upside risk potential of 79.96%. On the other hand NVIDIA has an analysts' consensus of $172.80 which suggests that it could grow by 23.72%. Given that Wolfspeed has higher upside potential than NVIDIA, analysts believe Wolfspeed is more attractive than NVIDIA.

Wolfspeed has a beta of 1.379, which suggesting that the stock is 37.862% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NVIDIA has a beta of 1.635, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.477%.

Wolfspeed has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NVIDIA offers a yield of 0.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Wolfspeed pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA pays out 1.33% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Wolfspeed quarterly revenues are $194.7M, which are smaller than NVIDIA quarterly revenues of $35.1B. Wolfspeed's net income of -$282.2M is lower than NVIDIA's net income of $19.3B. Notably, Wolfspeed's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NVIDIA's PE ratio is 54.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Wolfspeed is 1.21x versus 30.66x for NVIDIA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ON Semiconductor has a net margin of -144.94% compared to Wolfspeed's net margin of 22.8%. Wolfspeed's return on equity of -76.14% beat ON Semiconductor's return on equity of 21.72%.

Wolfspeed has a consensus price target of $13.95, signalling upside risk potential of 79.96%. On the other hand ON Semiconductor has an analysts' consensus of $85.87 which suggests that it could grow by 28.88%. Given that Wolfspeed has higher upside potential than ON Semiconductor, analysts believe Wolfspeed is more attractive than ON Semiconductor.

Wolfspeed has a beta of 1.379, which suggesting that the stock is 37.862% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ON Semiconductor has a beta of 1.628, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.845%.

Wolfspeed has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ON Semiconductor offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Wolfspeed pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ON Semiconductor pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Wolfspeed quarterly revenues are $194.7M, which are smaller than ON Semiconductor quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Wolfspeed's net income of -$282.2M is lower than ON Semiconductor's net income of $401.7M. Notably, Wolfspeed's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ON Semiconductor's PE ratio is 16.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Wolfspeed is 1.21x versus 3.93x for ON Semiconductor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.