BHE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Plexus has a net margin of 2.81% compared to Benchmark Electronics's net margin of 3.82%. Benchmark Electronics's return on equity of 5.78% beat Plexus's return on equity of 9.31%.

Benchmark Electronics has a consensus price target of $47.67, signalling upside risk potential of 29.67%. On the other hand Plexus has an analysts' consensus of $159.80 which suggests that it could grow by 28.76%. Given that Benchmark Electronics has higher upside potential than Plexus, analysts believe Benchmark Electronics is more attractive than Plexus.

Benchmark Electronics has a beta of 0.829, which suggesting that the stock is 17.074% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Plexus has a beta of 0.828, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.232%.

Benchmark Electronics has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.84%. Plexus offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Benchmark Electronics pays 37.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Plexus pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Benchmark Electronics's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Benchmark Electronics quarterly revenues are $656.9M, which are smaller than Plexus quarterly revenues of $976.1M. Benchmark Electronics's net income of $18.4M is lower than Plexus's net income of $37.3M. Notably, Benchmark Electronics's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.25x while Plexus's PE ratio is 28.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Benchmark Electronics is 0.51x versus 0.87x for Plexus. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sanmina has a net margin of 2.81% compared to Benchmark Electronics's net margin of 3.24%. Benchmark Electronics's return on equity of 5.78% beat Sanmina's return on equity of 9.83%.

Benchmark Electronics has a consensus price target of $47.67, signalling upside risk potential of 29.67%. On the other hand Sanmina has an analysts' consensus of $91.00 which suggests that it could grow by 22.15%. Given that Benchmark Electronics has higher upside potential than Sanmina, analysts believe Benchmark Electronics is more attractive than Sanmina.

Benchmark Electronics has a beta of 0.829, which suggesting that the stock is 17.074% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sanmina has a beta of 0.999, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.109%.

Benchmark Electronics has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.84%. Sanmina offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Benchmark Electronics pays 37.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Sanmina pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Benchmark Electronics's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Benchmark Electronics quarterly revenues are $656.9M, which are smaller than Sanmina quarterly revenues of $2B. Benchmark Electronics's net income of $18.4M is lower than Sanmina's net income of $65M. Notably, Benchmark Electronics's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.25x while Sanmina's PE ratio is 18.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Benchmark Electronics is 0.51x versus 0.55x for Sanmina. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sigmatron International has a net margin of 2.81% compared to Benchmark Electronics's net margin of 5.47%. Benchmark Electronics's return on equity of 5.78% beat Sigmatron International's return on equity of -19.8%.

Benchmark Electronics has a consensus price target of $47.67, signalling upside risk potential of 29.67%. On the other hand Sigmatron International has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Benchmark Electronics has higher upside potential than Sigmatron International, analysts believe Benchmark Electronics is more attractive than Sigmatron International.

Benchmark Electronics has a beta of 0.829, which suggesting that the stock is 17.074% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sigmatron International has a beta of 0.930, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.955%.

Benchmark Electronics has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.84%. Sigmatron International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Benchmark Electronics pays 37.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Sigmatron International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Benchmark Electronics's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Benchmark Electronics quarterly revenues are $656.9M, which are larger than Sigmatron International quarterly revenues of $71.1M. Benchmark Electronics's net income of $18.4M is higher than Sigmatron International's net income of $3.9M. Notably, Benchmark Electronics's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.25x while Sigmatron International's PE ratio is 24.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Benchmark Electronics is 0.51x versus 0.02x for Sigmatron International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TTM Technologies has a net margin of 2.81% compared to Benchmark Electronics's net margin of 0.79%. Benchmark Electronics's return on equity of 5.78% beat TTM Technologies's return on equity of 3.67%.

Benchmark Electronics has a consensus price target of $47.67, signalling upside risk potential of 29.67%. On the other hand TTM Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $34.75 which suggests that it could grow by 87.74%. Given that TTM Technologies has higher upside potential than Benchmark Electronics, analysts believe TTM Technologies is more attractive than Benchmark Electronics.

Benchmark Electronics has a beta of 0.829, which suggesting that the stock is 17.074% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TTM Technologies has a beta of 1.173, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.325%.

Benchmark Electronics has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.84%. TTM Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Benchmark Electronics pays 37.76% of its earnings as a dividend. TTM Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Benchmark Electronics's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Benchmark Electronics quarterly revenues are $656.9M, which are larger than TTM Technologies quarterly revenues of $651M. Benchmark Electronics's net income of $18.4M is higher than TTM Technologies's net income of $5.2M. Notably, Benchmark Electronics's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.25x while TTM Technologies's PE ratio is 34.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Benchmark Electronics is 0.51x versus 0.79x for TTM Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.