WHG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. has a net margin of 6.72% compared to Westwood Holdings Group, Inc.'s net margin of 47.18%. Westwood Holdings Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 5.72% beat Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 20.05%.

Westwood Holdings Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $382.00 which suggests that it could grow by 48.56%. Given that Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Westwood Holdings Group, Inc., analysts believe Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. is more attractive than Westwood Holdings Group, Inc..

Westwood Holdings Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.762, which suggesting that the stock is 23.769% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.197, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.706%.

Westwood Holdings Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.6%. Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Westwood Holdings Group, Inc. pays 75.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. pays out 0.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Westwood Holdings Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $27.4M, which are smaller than Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $801.4M. Westwood Holdings Group, Inc.'s net income of $1.8M is lower than Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.'s net income of $378.1M. Notably, Westwood Holdings Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 21.10x while Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 11.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Westwood Holdings Group, Inc. is 1.50x versus 3.56x for Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CaliberCos, Inc. has a net margin of 6.72% compared to Westwood Holdings Group, Inc.'s net margin of -195.3%. Westwood Holdings Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 5.72% beat CaliberCos, Inc.'s return on equity of -344.7%.

Westwood Holdings Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CaliberCos, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $6.00 which suggests that it could grow by 619.87%. Given that CaliberCos, Inc. has higher upside potential than Westwood Holdings Group, Inc., analysts believe CaliberCos, Inc. is more attractive than Westwood Holdings Group, Inc..

Westwood Holdings Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.762, which suggesting that the stock is 23.769% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CaliberCos, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Westwood Holdings Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.6%. CaliberCos, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Westwood Holdings Group, Inc. pays 75.54% of its earnings as a dividend. CaliberCos, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Westwood Holdings Group, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Westwood Holdings Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $27.4M, which are larger than CaliberCos, Inc. quarterly revenues of $4.1M. Westwood Holdings Group, Inc.'s net income of $1.8M is higher than CaliberCos, Inc.'s net income of -$8.1M. Notably, Westwood Holdings Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 21.10x while CaliberCos, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Westwood Holdings Group, Inc. is 1.50x versus 0.14x for CaliberCos, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

GQG Partners has a net margin of 6.72% compared to Westwood Holdings Group, Inc.'s net margin of --. Westwood Holdings Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 5.72% beat GQG Partners's return on equity of --.

Westwood Holdings Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand GQG Partners has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Westwood Holdings Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than GQG Partners, analysts believe Westwood Holdings Group, Inc. is more attractive than GQG Partners.

Westwood Holdings Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.762, which suggesting that the stock is 23.769% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GQG Partners has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Westwood Holdings Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.6%. GQG Partners offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Westwood Holdings Group, Inc. pays 75.54% of its earnings as a dividend. GQG Partners pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Westwood Holdings Group, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Westwood Holdings Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $27.4M, which are larger than GQG Partners quarterly revenues of --. Westwood Holdings Group, Inc.'s net income of $1.8M is higher than GQG Partners's net income of --. Notably, Westwood Holdings Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 21.10x while GQG Partners's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Westwood Holdings Group, Inc. is 1.50x versus -- for GQG Partners. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.