VIK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Expedia Group has a net margin of 22.34% compared to Viking Holdings's net margin of 16.85%. Viking Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Expedia Group's return on equity of 42.54%.

Viking Holdings has a consensus price target of $51.00, signalling upside risk potential of 17.67%. On the other hand Expedia Group has an analysts' consensus of $189.50 which suggests that it could grow by 2.44%. Given that Viking Holdings has higher upside potential than Expedia Group, analysts believe Viking Holdings is more attractive than Expedia Group.

Viking Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Expedia Group has a beta of 1.831, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 83.12%.

Viking Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Expedia Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Viking Holdings pays -2.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Expedia Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Viking Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are smaller than Expedia Group quarterly revenues of $4.1B. Viking Holdings's net income of $375.1M is lower than Expedia Group's net income of $684M. Notably, Viking Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Expedia Group's PE ratio is 23.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Viking Holdings is 3.54x versus 1.91x for Expedia Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has a net margin of 22.34% compared to Viking Holdings's net margin of 10.93%. Viking Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's return on equity of --.

Viking Holdings has a consensus price target of $51.00, signalling upside risk potential of 17.67%. On the other hand Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $12.50 which suggests that it could grow by 29.93%. Given that Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has higher upside potential than Viking Holdings, analysts believe Lindblad Expeditions Holdings is more attractive than Viking Holdings.

Viking Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has a beta of 3.111, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 211.114%.

Viking Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lindblad Expeditions Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Viking Holdings pays -2.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Lindblad Expeditions Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Viking Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are larger than Lindblad Expeditions Holdings quarterly revenues of $206M. Viking Holdings's net income of $375.1M is higher than Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's net income of $22.5M. Notably, Viking Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Viking Holdings is 3.54x versus 1.07x for Lindblad Expeditions Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NextTrip has a net margin of 22.34% compared to Viking Holdings's net margin of -993.31%. Viking Holdings's return on equity of -- beat NextTrip's return on equity of -317.98%.

Viking Holdings has a consensus price target of $51.00, signalling upside risk potential of 17.67%. On the other hand NextTrip has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -66.98%. Given that Viking Holdings has higher upside potential than NextTrip, analysts believe Viking Holdings is more attractive than NextTrip.

Viking Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NextTrip has a beta of 1.674, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 67.443%.

Viking Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NextTrip offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Viking Holdings pays -2.67% of its earnings as a dividend. NextTrip pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Viking Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are larger than NextTrip quarterly revenues of $154.5K. Viking Holdings's net income of $375.1M is higher than NextTrip's net income of -$1.5M. Notably, Viking Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NextTrip's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Viking Holdings is 3.54x versus 12.15x for NextTrip. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tripadvisor has a net margin of 22.34% compared to Viking Holdings's net margin of 7.33%. Viking Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Tripadvisor's return on equity of 4.17%.

Viking Holdings has a consensus price target of $51.00, signalling upside risk potential of 17.67%. On the other hand Tripadvisor has an analysts' consensus of $17.15 which suggests that it could grow by 12.59%. Given that Viking Holdings has higher upside potential than Tripadvisor, analysts believe Viking Holdings is more attractive than Tripadvisor.

Viking Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tripadvisor has a beta of 1.334, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.373%.

Viking Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tripadvisor offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Viking Holdings pays -2.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Tripadvisor pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Viking Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are larger than Tripadvisor quarterly revenues of $532M. Viking Holdings's net income of $375.1M is higher than Tripadvisor's net income of $39M. Notably, Viking Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Tripadvisor's PE ratio is 63.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Viking Holdings is 3.54x versus 1.23x for Tripadvisor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.