NCLH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Carnival Corp. has a net margin of 14.27% compared to Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of 22.72%. Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 42.86% beat Carnival Corp.'s return on equity of 26.98%.

Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of $27.93, signalling upside risk potential of 48.34%. On the other hand Carnival Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $35.63 which suggests that it could grow by 36.83%. Given that Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Carnival Corp., analysts believe Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Carnival Corp..

Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 2.110, which suggesting that the stock is 110.983% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Carnival Corp. has a beta of 2.534, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 153.37%.

Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Carnival Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Carnival Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are smaller than Carnival Corp. quarterly revenues of $8.2B. Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd.'s net income of $419.3M is lower than Carnival Corp.'s net income of $1.9B. Notably, Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.34x while Carnival Corp.'s PE ratio is 13.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. is 0.92x versus 1.37x for Carnival Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Planet Fitness, Inc. has a net margin of 14.27% compared to Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of 17.92%. Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 42.86% beat Planet Fitness, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of $27.93, signalling upside risk potential of 48.34%. On the other hand Planet Fitness, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $128.94 which suggests that it could grow by 18.92%. Given that Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Planet Fitness, Inc., analysts believe Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Planet Fitness, Inc..

Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 2.110, which suggesting that the stock is 110.983% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Planet Fitness, Inc. has a beta of 1.276, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.609%.

Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Planet Fitness, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Planet Fitness, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are larger than Planet Fitness, Inc. quarterly revenues of $330.3M. Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd.'s net income of $419.3M is higher than Planet Fitness, Inc.'s net income of $59.2M. Notably, Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.34x while Planet Fitness, Inc.'s PE ratio is 44.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. is 0.92x versus 7.08x for Planet Fitness, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Royal Caribbean Group has a net margin of 14.27% compared to Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of 30.73%. Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 42.86% beat Royal Caribbean Group's return on equity of 47.81%.

Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of $27.93, signalling upside risk potential of 48.34%. On the other hand Royal Caribbean Group has an analysts' consensus of $335.42 which suggests that it could grow by 26.21%. Given that Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Royal Caribbean Group, analysts believe Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Royal Caribbean Group.

Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 2.110, which suggesting that the stock is 110.983% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Royal Caribbean Group has a beta of 1.911, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 91.101%.

Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Royal Caribbean Group offers a yield of 1.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Royal Caribbean Group pays out 8.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Royal Caribbean Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are smaller than Royal Caribbean Group quarterly revenues of $5.1B. Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd.'s net income of $419.3M is lower than Royal Caribbean Group's net income of $1.6B. Notably, Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.34x while Royal Caribbean Group's PE ratio is 17.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. is 0.92x versus 4.20x for Royal Caribbean Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.