NCLH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Carnival Corp. has a net margin of 14.27% compared to Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of 6.67%. Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 42.86% beat Carnival Corp.'s return on equity of 26.22%.

Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of $27.25, signalling upside risk potential of 12.09%. On the other hand Carnival Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $38.00 which suggests that it could grow by 18.8%. Given that Carnival Corp. has higher upside potential than Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd., analysts believe Carnival Corp. is more attractive than Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd..

Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 2.060, which suggesting that the stock is 105.954% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Carnival Corp. has a beta of 2.492, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 149.171%.

Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Carnival Corp. offers a yield of 0.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Carnival Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are smaller than Carnival Corp. quarterly revenues of $6.3B. Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd.'s net income of $419.3M is lower than Carnival Corp.'s net income of $422M. Notably, Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 18.52x while Carnival Corp.'s PE ratio is 15.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. is 1.19x versus 1.66x for Carnival Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Genuine Parts Co. has a net margin of 14.27% compared to Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of -10.14%. Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 42.86% beat Genuine Parts Co.'s return on equity of 1.45%.

Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of $27.25, signalling upside risk potential of 12.09%. On the other hand Genuine Parts Co. has an analysts' consensus of $143.33 which suggests that it could grow by 21.41%. Given that Genuine Parts Co. has higher upside potential than Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd., analysts believe Genuine Parts Co. is more attractive than Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd..

Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 2.060, which suggesting that the stock is 105.954% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Genuine Parts Co. has a beta of 0.740, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.025%.

Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Genuine Parts Co. offers a yield of 3.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.03 per share. Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Genuine Parts Co. pays out 869.93% of its earnings as a dividend.

Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are smaller than Genuine Parts Co. quarterly revenues of $6B. Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd.'s net income of $419.3M is higher than Genuine Parts Co.'s net income of -$609.5M. Notably, Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 18.52x while Genuine Parts Co.'s PE ratio is 255.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. is 1.19x versus 0.68x for Genuine Parts Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Royal Caribbean Group has a net margin of 14.27% compared to Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of 17.89%. Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 42.86% beat Royal Caribbean Group's return on equity of 46.88%.

Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of $27.25, signalling upside risk potential of 12.09%. On the other hand Royal Caribbean Group has an analysts' consensus of $363.08 which suggests that it could grow by 15.36%. Given that Royal Caribbean Group has higher upside potential than Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd., analysts believe Royal Caribbean Group is more attractive than Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd..

Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 2.060, which suggesting that the stock is 105.954% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Royal Caribbean Group has a beta of 1.915, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 91.533%.

Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Royal Caribbean Group offers a yield of 1.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Royal Caribbean Group pays out 22.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Royal Caribbean Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are smaller than Royal Caribbean Group quarterly revenues of $4.3B. Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd.'s net income of $419.3M is lower than Royal Caribbean Group's net income of $762M. Notably, Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 18.52x while Royal Caribbean Group's PE ratio is 20.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. is 1.19x versus 4.82x for Royal Caribbean Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Travel + Leisure Co. has a net margin of 14.27% compared to Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of -5.95%. Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 42.86% beat Travel + Leisure Co.'s return on equity of --.

Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of $27.25, signalling upside risk potential of 12.09%. On the other hand Travel + Leisure Co. has an analysts' consensus of $85.58 which suggests that it could grow by 10.48%. Given that Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Travel + Leisure Co., analysts believe Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Travel + Leisure Co..

Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 2.060, which suggesting that the stock is 105.954% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Travel + Leisure Co. has a beta of 1.387, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.713%.

Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Travel + Leisure Co. offers a yield of 2.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.56 per share. Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Travel + Leisure Co. pays out 65.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Travel + Leisure Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are larger than Travel + Leisure Co. quarterly revenues of $1B. Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd.'s net income of $419.3M is higher than Travel + Leisure Co.'s net income of -$61M. Notably, Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 18.52x while Travel + Leisure Co.'s PE ratio is 22.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. is 1.19x versus 1.25x for Travel + Leisure Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.