TNL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. has a net margin of -5.95% compared to Travel + Leisure Co.'s net margin of 14.27%. Travel + Leisure Co.'s return on equity of -- beat Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 42.86%.

Travel + Leisure Co. has a consensus price target of $85.58, signalling upside risk potential of 10.48%. On the other hand Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $27.25 which suggests that it could grow by 12.09%. Given that Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Travel + Leisure Co., analysts believe Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Travel + Leisure Co..

Travel + Leisure Co. has a beta of 1.387, which suggesting that the stock is 38.713% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 2.060, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 105.954%.

Travel + Leisure Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.56 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.94%. Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Travel + Leisure Co. pays 65.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Travel + Leisure Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Travel + Leisure Co. quarterly revenues are $1B, which are smaller than Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues of $2.9B. Travel + Leisure Co.'s net income of -$61M is lower than Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd.'s net income of $419.3M. Notably, Travel + Leisure Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 22.26x while Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd.'s PE ratio is 18.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Travel + Leisure Co. is 1.25x versus 1.19x for Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ranpak Holdings Corp. has a net margin of -5.95% compared to Travel + Leisure Co.'s net margin of -10.44%. Travel + Leisure Co.'s return on equity of -- beat Ranpak Holdings Corp.'s return on equity of -6.73%.

Travel + Leisure Co. has a consensus price target of $85.58, signalling upside risk potential of 10.48%. On the other hand Ranpak Holdings Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $7.17 which suggests that it could grow by 41.17%. Given that Ranpak Holdings Corp. has higher upside potential than Travel + Leisure Co., analysts believe Ranpak Holdings Corp. is more attractive than Travel + Leisure Co..

Travel + Leisure Co. has a beta of 1.387, which suggesting that the stock is 38.713% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ranpak Holdings Corp. has a beta of 2.830, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 182.973%.

Travel + Leisure Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.56 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.94%. Ranpak Holdings Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Travel + Leisure Co. pays 65.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Ranpak Holdings Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Travel + Leisure Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Travel + Leisure Co. quarterly revenues are $1B, which are larger than Ranpak Holdings Corp. quarterly revenues of $99.6M. Travel + Leisure Co.'s net income of -$61M is lower than Ranpak Holdings Corp.'s net income of -$10.4M. Notably, Travel + Leisure Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 22.26x while Ranpak Holdings Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Travel + Leisure Co. is 1.25x versus 1.19x for Ranpak Holdings Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pursuit Attractions & Hospitality, Inc. has a net margin of -5.95% compared to Travel + Leisure Co.'s net margin of 36.5%. Travel + Leisure Co.'s return on equity of -- beat Pursuit Attractions & Hospitality, Inc.'s return on equity of -13.88%.

Travel + Leisure Co. has a consensus price target of $85.58, signalling upside risk potential of 10.48%. On the other hand Pursuit Attractions & Hospitality, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $45.75 which suggests that it could grow by 23.02%. Given that Pursuit Attractions & Hospitality, Inc. has higher upside potential than Travel + Leisure Co., analysts believe Pursuit Attractions & Hospitality, Inc. is more attractive than Travel + Leisure Co..

Travel + Leisure Co. has a beta of 1.387, which suggesting that the stock is 38.713% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pursuit Attractions & Hospitality, Inc. has a beta of 1.460, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.007%.

Travel + Leisure Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.56 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.94%. Pursuit Attractions & Hospitality, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Travel + Leisure Co. pays 65.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Pursuit Attractions & Hospitality, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Travel + Leisure Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Travel + Leisure Co. quarterly revenues are $1B, which are larger than Pursuit Attractions & Hospitality, Inc. quarterly revenues of $241M. Travel + Leisure Co.'s net income of -$61M is lower than Pursuit Attractions & Hospitality, Inc.'s net income of $88M. Notably, Travel + Leisure Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 22.26x while Pursuit Attractions & Hospitality, Inc.'s PE ratio is 2.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Travel + Leisure Co. is 1.25x versus 2.26x for Pursuit Attractions & Hospitality, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Royal Caribbean Group has a net margin of -5.95% compared to Travel + Leisure Co.'s net margin of 17.89%. Travel + Leisure Co.'s return on equity of -- beat Royal Caribbean Group's return on equity of 46.88%.

Travel + Leisure Co. has a consensus price target of $85.58, signalling upside risk potential of 10.48%. On the other hand Royal Caribbean Group has an analysts' consensus of $363.08 which suggests that it could grow by 15.36%. Given that Royal Caribbean Group has higher upside potential than Travel + Leisure Co., analysts believe Royal Caribbean Group is more attractive than Travel + Leisure Co..

Travel + Leisure Co. has a beta of 1.387, which suggesting that the stock is 38.713% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Royal Caribbean Group has a beta of 1.915, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 91.533%.

Travel + Leisure Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.56 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.94%. Royal Caribbean Group offers a yield of 1.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. Travel + Leisure Co. pays 65.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Royal Caribbean Group pays out 22.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Travel + Leisure Co. quarterly revenues are $1B, which are smaller than Royal Caribbean Group quarterly revenues of $4.3B. Travel + Leisure Co.'s net income of -$61M is lower than Royal Caribbean Group's net income of $762M. Notably, Travel + Leisure Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 22.26x while Royal Caribbean Group's PE ratio is 20.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Travel + Leisure Co. is 1.25x versus 4.82x for Royal Caribbean Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.